fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r212-tall-174901993600082
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVs-PT-010A

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 3600000.00 0.00 0.00 T??????????????? normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600082.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-010A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600082
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749042023978

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-010A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Transformed 143 places.
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Transformed 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 143 places and 193 transitions and 920 arcs in 158 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 115 out of 143 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 228 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 388 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:00:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 96 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 92 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 147/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 12/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 691 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60154ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60165ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60581 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Support contains 115 out of 143 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
Support contains 112 out of 143 places (down from 115) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 88 to 82
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (273 resets) in 1539 ms. (25 steps per ms) remains 3/82 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (51 resets) in 304 ms. (131 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (41 resets) in 237 ms. (168 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (42 resets) in 149 ms. (266 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 22/29 variables, 7/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 22/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/143 variables, 34/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 114/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/336 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 330 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 285 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 7/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 22/29 variables, 7/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 22/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/143 variables, 34/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 114/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/336 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 240 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 533ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 75 ms.
Support contains 7 out of 143 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 192
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 22 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 22 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 142 transition count 192
Applied a total of 24 rules in 42 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 192/193 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 142/143 places, 192/193 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 35649 steps (268 resets) in 297 ms. (119 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 141 transition count 191
Applied a total of 2 rules in 17 ms. Remains 141 /143 variables (removed 2) and now considering 191/193 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 141 cols
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 170 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 261 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 54 ms returned [59]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 189 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 141 cols
[2025-06-04 13:01:28] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 12/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 7/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 190/331 variables, 141/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 13/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 7/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 5/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 11/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 20/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 5/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 3/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 3/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 2/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 0/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 331/331 variables, and 488 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 141/141 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 165/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 16/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 91 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 4/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 19/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 9/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 18/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 190/331 variables, 141/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 189/803 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 331/331 variables, and 803 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 141/141 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps: 291/291 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60074ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60075ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/143 places, 190/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 141 /141 variables (removed 0) and now considering 190/190 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60423 ms. Remains : 141/143 places, 190/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:02:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 190 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:02:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7537091978748888884.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1232867738924980031.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7537091978748888884.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1232867738924980031.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,10.7734,270120,2,10811,5,570316,6,0,757,2.29471e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4804451709314833717.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4804451709314833717.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4804451709314833717.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4804451709314833717.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4804451709314833717.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 205 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 82 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 188 labels/synchronizations in 24 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17257367280208551436.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10338371147001684940.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17257367280208551436.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10338371147001684940.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,11.4844,181648,986,29,184660,67,149,1.24715e+06,33,267,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((i2.u9.p32==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(i2.u9.p32==0))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-04 13:03:28] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 149 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:03:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 298 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:03:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:03:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60367 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:04:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:04:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18290609130297282920.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16702978687732643454.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18290609130297282920.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16702978687732643454.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,8.94152,214672,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((p94==1) * !(EF(EG(((p136==1)&&(p140==1)))))) U ((AG(!(((((p31==1)&&(p46==1))&&((p58==1)&&(p26==1)))&&(((p30==1)&&(p37==1))&&(p108==...244
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(((((p31==1)&&(p46==1))&&((p58==1)&&(p26==1)))&&(((p30==1)&&(p37==1))&&(p...1283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11207671699337699926.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11207671699337699926.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11207671699337699926.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11207671699337699926.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11207671699337699926.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8535730049369001930.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 13:04:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15899337067616038624.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8535730049369001930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15899337067616038624.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,13.2306,195768,948,29,204711,416,161,1.33851e+06,31,2464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(((i6.u27.p94==1) * !(EF(EG(((i9.u39.p136==1)&&(i9.u40.p140==1)))))) U ((AG(!(((((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1))&&((i3.u16.p58==1)&&(...348
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(((((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1))&&((i3.u16.p58==1)&&(i1.u7.p26==1)))&...1761
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:05:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:05:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60292 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:06:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:06:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8512978281727255509.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12287221971628317058.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8512978281727255509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12287221971628317058.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,9.10817,215924,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX((((p24==0)||(p30==0))||(p37==0))) * EG((((p66==0)||(p70==0))||(p79==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX((((p24==0)||(p30==0))||(p37==0))) * EG((((p66==0)||(p70==0))||(p79==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1114040330616290077.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1114040330616290077.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1114040330616290077.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1114040330616290077.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1114040330616290077.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16411539941463204132.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:06:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8710319651949065950.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16411539941463204132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8710319651949065950.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,16.3439,225308,1305,29,231146,471,168,1.64771e+06,31,2727,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX((((i1.u7.p24==0)||(i1.u8.p30==0))||(i2.u11.p37==0))) * EG((((i4.u19.p66==0)||(i4.u20.p70==0))||(i5.u23.p79==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX((((i1.u7.p24==0)||(i1.u8.p30==0))||(i2.u11.p37==0))) * EG((((i4.u19.p66==0)||(i4.u20.p70==0))||...184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:07:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:07:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 191 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:07:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60249 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8840820698908186200.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:08:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14074348021584723850.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8840820698908186200.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14074348021584723850.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,9.33362,215848,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AX((((p76==1)&&(p77==1))&&(p82==1))) + ((p22==1)&&(p27==1))) + ((((p33==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p39==1)) + ((((p112==1)||(((p6==1)&&(p7==1))...424
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EX(!((((p76==1)&&(p77==1))&&(p82==1))))) + ((p22==1)&&(p27==1))) + ((((p33==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p39...475
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8781229770873876709.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8781229770873876709.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8781229770873876709.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8781229770873876709.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8781229770873876709.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12036582185084998811.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability706349277169581001.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12036582185084998811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability706349277169581001.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,14.895,201472,1049,29,215227,448,168,1.37864e+06,31,2547,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AX((((i5.u21.p76==1)&&(i5.u22.p77==1))&&(i5.u23.p82==1))) + ((i1.u6.p22==1)&&(i1.u8.p27==1))) + ((((i2.u9.p33==1)&&(i2.u10.p35==1))&...637
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EX(!((((i5.u21.p76==1)&&(i5.u22.p77==1))&&(i5.u23.p82==1))))) + ((i1.u6.p22==1)&&(i1.u8.p27==1)...688
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:09:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 79 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:09:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:09:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60061ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60061ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60298 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5290505463835932715.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:10:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2679259145978329535.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5290505463835932715.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2679259145978329535.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,8.22679,215452,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(((p66==1) + EG(E((((p38==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p51==1)) U (p19==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(((p66==1) + EG(E((((p38==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p51==1)) U (p19==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11795561526996474952.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11795561526996474952.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11795561526996474952.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11795561526996474952.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11795561526996474952.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1086285172617162520.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5072711563201270216.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1086285172617162520.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5072711563201270216.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,13.4864,198204,1229,29,205430,423,168,1.38414e+06,31,2591,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(((i4.u19.p66==1) + EG(E((((i2.u11.p38==1)&&(i2.u12.p42==1))&&(i3.u15.p51==1)) U (i1.u5.p19==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(((i4.u19.p66==1) + EG(E((((i2.u11.p38==1)&&(i2.u12.p42==1))&&(i3.u15.p51==1)) U (i1.u5.p19==1)))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:11:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:11:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 214 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:11:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60269 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:12:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:12:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1283897002157636703.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:12:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability758139005229178579.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1283897002157636703.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability758139005229178579.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,9.66142,215980,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((((p8==0)||(p13==0)) * !(E((((p17==1)&&(p34==1))&&(p43==1)) U ((p136==1)&&(p140==1))))) * ((EG((((p52==0)||(p58==0))||(p65==0))) + E...475
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(((((p8==0)||(p13==0)) * !(E((((p17==1)&&(p34==1))&&(p43==1)) U ((p136==1)&&(p140==1))))) * ((EG((...658
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15908063805006320631.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15908063805006320631.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15908063805006320631.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15908063805006320631.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15908063805006320631.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3575453767159173112.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12970579409092095210.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3575453767159173112.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12970579409092095210.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,14.8161,213196,1189,29,226934,443,168,1.48596e+06,31,2685,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((((i0.u2.p8==0)||(i0.u4.p13==0)) * !(E((((i1.u5.p17==1)&&(i2.u9.p34==1))&&(i2.u12.p43==1)) U ((i9.u39.p136==1)&&(i9.u40.p140==1)))))...699
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(((((i0.u2.p8==0)||(i0.u4.p13==0)) * !(E((((i1.u5.p17==1)&&(i2.u9.p34==1))&&(i2.u12.p43==1)) U ((i...924
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:13:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:13:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:13:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:13:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 147/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 12/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 691 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60055ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60293 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:14:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:14:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1727473752221741776.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:14:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2538116822717060881.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1727473752221741776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2538116822717060881.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,8.17449,215208,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!((((EG(((p78==1)&&(p83==1))) + AF((((p80==1)&&(p86==1))&&(p93==1)))) + ((((p101==1)&&(p118==1))&&(p128==1))||(((p122==1)&&(p126==1)...818
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!((((EG(((p78==1)&&(p83==1))) + !(EG(!((((p80==1)&&(p86==1))&&(p93==1)))))) + (((...2946
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14672958807253531877.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14672958807253531877.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14672958807253531877.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14672958807253531877.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14672958807253531877.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12984318868229785385.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11624860098374377176.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12984318868229785385.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11624860098374377176.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,12.8259,196688,948,29,206012,417,161,1.34022e+06,31,2591,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF(!((((EG(((i5.u22.p78==1)&&(i5.u24.p83==1))) + AF((((i5.u23.p80==1)&&(i5.u24.p86==1))&&(i6.u27.p93==1)))) + ((((i7.u29.p101==1)&&(i8....1218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(!((((EG(((i5.u22.p78==1)&&(i5.u24.p83==1))) + !(EG(!((((i5.u23.p80==1)&&(i5.u24.p...4230
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:15:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:15:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 134 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:15:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60263 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:16:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:16:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15270420865958477124.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13108485793629830364.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15270420865958477124.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13108485793629830364.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,8.02356,215456,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(!(A((p103!=1) U A((((p75==1)&&(p77==1))&&(p82==1)) U (((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&(p30==1)))))) * EF(((((((p45==0)||(p60==0))||(p72==0))&&(...549
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU((Init * (EX(!(!((E(!(!((E(!((((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&(p30==1))) U (!((((p75==1)&&(p77==1))&&(p82==1))) *...2082
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6928797464306428659.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6928797464306428659.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6928797464306428659.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6928797464306428659.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6928797464306428659.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3946383688921337740.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15551483578695564913.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3946383688921337740.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15551483578695564913.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,12.4991,197740,948,29,206502,447,161,1.36141e+06,31,2706,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EX(!(A((i7.u29.p103!=1) U A((((i5.u21.p75==1)&&(i5.u22.p77==1))&&(i5.u23.p82==1)) U (((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p18==1))&&(i1.u8.p30==1))))...826
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((((FwdU((Init * (EX(!(!((E(!(!((E(!((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p18==1))&&(i1.u8.p30==1))) U (!((((i5.u21.p75==1)...3000
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 192
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 192/193 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:17:32] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:17:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 205 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 43 ms returned [60]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 190 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:17:32] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 7/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 4/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 9/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/333 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30032 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 149/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 6/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 190/679 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/680 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 680 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60067ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60067ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 142 /142 variables (removed 0) and now considering 191/191 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60356 ms. Remains : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6117584826911696681.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability28741812502564321.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6117584826911696681.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability28741812502564321.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...281
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,8.23204,214204,2,10404,5,523629,6,0,761,1.64366e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((AG((((p89==1)&&(p91==1))&&(p96==1))) + (p42==1)) + ((p68==0)||(p70==0))) + (((p79==0) + EG((((p76==1)&&(p77==1))&&((p82==1)&&(p52==...224
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((!(E(TRUE U !((((p89==1)&&(p91==1))&&(p96==1))))) + (p42==1)) + ((p68==0)||(p70==0))) + (((p79==0) ...279
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...958
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1133473531554390531.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1133473531554390531.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1133473531554390531.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1133473531554390531.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1133473531554390531.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:19:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:19:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:19:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 205 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:19:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 188 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:19:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6587853238927505883.gal : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2041180034366038507.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6587853238927505883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2041180034366038507.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,13.0795,195836,1033,29,205753,409,176,1.33119e+06,33,2336,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((AG((((i6.u25.p89==1)&&(i6.u26.p91==1))&&(i6.u27.p96==1))) + (i2.u12.p42==1)) + ((i4.u19.p68==0)||(i4.u20.p70==0))) + (((i5.u23.p79=...335
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((!(E(TRUE U !((((i6.u25.p89==1)&&(i6.u26.p91==1))&&(i6.u27.p96==1))))) + (i2.u12.p42==1)) + ((i4.u1...390
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t63, t67, t72, t75, t79, t84, t86, t93, t100, t103, t107, t114, t115, t121, t126, t127, t132,...1073
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 192
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 192/193 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:19:33] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:19:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 226 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 39 ms returned [60]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 190 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:19:33] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 7/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 4/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 9/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/333 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 149/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 6/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 190/679 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/680 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 680 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 142 /142 variables (removed 0) and now considering 191/191 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60333 ms. Remains : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:20:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:20:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11217517149541325593.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:20:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1755483562672875075.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11217517149541325593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1755483562672875075.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,7.95088,214304,2,10404,5,523629,6,0,761,1.64366e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13844662511011859137.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13844662511011859137.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13844662511011859137.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13844662511011859137.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13844662511011859137.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 205 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 188 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15505026230673947904.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9182014621660422702.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15505026230673947904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9182014621660422702.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,13.8019,195048,1033,29,205875,399,176,1.323e+06,33,2322,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((((i5.u21.p75==0)||(i5.u22.p77==0))||(i5.u23.p82==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((((i5.u21.p75==0)||(i5.u22.p77==0))||(i5.u23.p82==0))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-04 13:21:33] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:21:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 127 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:21:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 147/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 12/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 691 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60300 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:22:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:22:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2324503798878972275.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:22:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16468696926901890342.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2324503798878972275.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16468696926901890342.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,7.96181,215680,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((((p94==0)||(p100==0)) + ((p107==0) + ((p0==0) * EG(AG((((p17==0)||(p32==0))||(p44==0)))))))) * !(E(!(((((p101==1)&&(p118==1))&&((p12...320
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((EY(Init) * !(((p94==0)||(p100==0)))) * !((p107==0))) * !((p0==0)))] = FALSE * [(((EY(Init) * !(((p94==0)||...580
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 157/0/36
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11925874099138262496.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11925874099138262496.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11925874099138262496.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11925874099138262496.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11925874099138262496.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1428799071171813894.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17620524261373931486.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1428799071171813894.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17620524261373931486.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,13.6332,196940,948,29,207387,452,161,1.33738e+06,31,2712,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:23:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:23:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 262 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:23:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 150 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 101 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 146/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 82 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 158 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 19/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/779 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 779 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60057ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60321 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2872410716103511387.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:24:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15864684500703791399.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2872410716103511387.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15864684500703791399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,9.91412,214392,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(!(E(EG((((p124==1)&&(p126==1))&&(p135==1))) U AF((((p124==1)&&(p126==1))&&(p135==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(E(EG((((p124==1)&&(p126==1))&&(p135==1))) U !(EG(!((((p124==1)&&(p126==1))&&(p135==1))))))))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4030918625516246651.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4030918625516246651.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4030918625516246651.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4030918625516246651.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4030918625516246651.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17945957391495847300.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3973328036155847300.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17945957391495847300.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3973328036155847300.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,12.0789,187392,948,29,198773,418,161,1.29313e+06,31,2590,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(!(E(EG((((i8.u35.p124==1)&&(i8.u36.p126==1))&&(i9.u39.p135==1))) U AF((((i8.u35.p124==1)&&(i8.u36.p126==1))&&(i9.u39.p135==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(E(EG((((i8.u35.p124==1)&&(i8.u36.p126==1))&&(i9.u39.p135==1))) U !(EG(!((((i8.u35.p124==1)&&(i8...204
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 192
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 192/193 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:25:34] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:25:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 42 ms returned [60]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 190 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:25:35] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 7/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 4/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 9/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/333 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 149/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 6/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 190/679 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/680 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 680 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 142 /142 variables (removed 0) and now considering 191/191 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60363 ms. Remains : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 783 steps (4 resets) in 12 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14017082252966025765.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7999307431376451408.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14017082252966025765.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7999307431376451408.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:26:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 147/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 12/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 691 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60299 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:27:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:27:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5375408736617552559.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:27:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12405575996439956362.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5375408736617552559.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12405575996439956362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,8.03831,214756,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(EX(EX(AX((((p117==1)&&(p119==1))&&(p124==1)))))) U AX(A((A((((p34==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p40==1)) U (p0==1)) * !((((p115==1)&&(p132==1))&&...201
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U (p43==1)))) U (!((!((E(!((p0==1)) U (!((((p34==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p40==1)...926
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11638580660956772472.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11638580660956772472.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11638580660956772472.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11638580660956772472.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11638580660956772472.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2300310835036513543.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12144389312030120636.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2300310835036513543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12144389312030120636.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,15.6903,197084,948,29,207042,430,161,1.34842e+06,31,2601,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(EX(EX(AX((((i8.u33.p117==1)&&(i8.u34.p119==1))&&(i8.u35.p124==1)))))) U AX(A((A((((i2.u9.p34==1)&&(i2.u10.p35==1))&&(i2.u11.p40==1))...283
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U (i2.u12.p43==1)))) U (!((!((E(!((i0.u2.p0==1)) U (!((((i2.u9.p34==1)&&...1208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 192
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 192/193 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:28:35] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:28:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 53 ms returned [60]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 190 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:28:35] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 7/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 4/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 75 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 9/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 80 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/333 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 149/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 6/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 190/679 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/680 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 680 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60057ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60058ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 142 /142 variables (removed 0) and now considering 191/191 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60376 ms. Remains : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:29:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:29:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5428730437750507236.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:29:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1977247317091630362.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5428730437750507236.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1977247317091630362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,8.24357,214256,2,10404,5,523629,6,0,761,1.64366e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10510269009979362219.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10510269009979362219.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10510269009979362219.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10510269009979362219.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10510269009979362219.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 205 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 188 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10174896456463950897.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9678429512673942041.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10174896456463950897.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9678429512673942041.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,15.2446,218304,1321,29,231506,414,183,1.54516e+06,33,2357,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((i8.u34.p120==1)&&(i8.u36.p125==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((i8.u34.p120==1)&&(i8.u36.p125==1))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 168 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 258 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 83 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 81 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 146/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/411 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 19/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/779 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 779 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60053ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60312 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8782357533401871072.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 13:31:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8320910332516540558.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8782357533401871072.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8320910332516540558.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,7.99844,215368,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((AG((((p5==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p12==1))) + AG((EF((((p31==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p57==1))) + ((p47==1) * EF((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1))))))) ...541
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,((!(E(TRUE U !((((p5==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p12==1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (((p31==1)&&(p48==1))...815
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10911962828813864697.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10911962828813864697.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10911962828813864697.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10911962828813864697.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10911962828813864697.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14257785406862888056.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:32:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11722358519067584025.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14257785406862888056.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11722358519067584025.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,13.0417,197124,948,29,206269,410,161,1.34743e+06,31,2499,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((AG((((i0.u1.p5==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p12==1))) + AG((EF((((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p48==1))&&(i3.u16.p57==1))) + ((i3.u13.p47==1...786
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,((!(E(TRUE U !((((i0.u1.p5==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p12==1))))) + !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (((...1114
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12362067897684982208.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12362067897684982208.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12362067897684982208.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12362067897684982208.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12362067897684982208.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1510471860330209933.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:32:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3482170623842588130.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1510471860330209933.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3482170623842588130.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,12.0307,195940,1049,29,209997,439,168,1.36336e+06,31,2583,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((i2.u9.p32==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(i2.u9.p32==0))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 120 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16005874981520719950.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:37:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5554386898321067110.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16005874981520719950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5554386898321067110.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 15 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,4.73902,155344,2937,28,272569,193,275,655430,29,351,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((u10.p32==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(u10.p32==0))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-010A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-010A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600082"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-010A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-010A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;