About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVs-PT-010A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ?FF??TT?TF?????? | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600081.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-010A, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600081
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 512K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 137K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:33 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-11
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749040788876
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-010A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Transformed 143 places.
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Transformed 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 143 places and 193 transitions and 920 arcs in 162 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 71 out of 143 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 292 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 488 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 88 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30115ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30126ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30643 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Support contains 71 out of 143 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 43 ms
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
Support contains 60 out of 143 places (down from 71) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
RANDOM walk for 7279 steps (46 resets) in 223 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 0/40 properties
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 141 transition count 191
Applied a total of 2 rules in 29 ms. Remains 141 /143 variables (removed 2) and now considering 191/193 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 141 cols
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 94 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 176 ms returned [59]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 189 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 190 rows 141 cols
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 12/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 7/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 190/331 variables, 141/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 13/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 11/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 7/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 5/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 11/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 20/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 5/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 3/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 3/485 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 2/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 0/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 331/331 variables, and 488 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 141/141 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 165/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 124 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 97 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 16/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 4/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 19/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 9/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 18/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 20/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 190/331 variables, 141/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/331 variables, 189/803 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 331/331 variables, and 803 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 141/141 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 141/141 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps: 291/291 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 189 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60073ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/143 places, 190/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 141 /141 variables (removed 0) and now considering 190/190 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60537 ms. Remains : 141/143 places, 190/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:41:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 190 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:41:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8323690737171100410.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6457225016518904809.ctl : 16 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8323690737171100410.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6457225016518904809.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,10.4393,270316,2,10811,5,570316,6,0,757,2.29471e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EG(AG(!(((p70==1)||(p11==1)))))) U (p140==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((p70==1)||(p11==1))))))))) * (p140==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...957
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11378650547853983930.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11378650547853983930.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11378650547853983930.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11378650547853983930.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11378650547853983930.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 205 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 102 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 188 labels/synchronizations in 22 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13136025999593631974.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15980899028876060698.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13136025999593631974.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15980899028876060698.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,12.5432,182420,986,29,186152,67,149,1.25158e+06,33,267,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EG(AG(!(((i4.u20.p70==1)||(i0.u3.p11==1)))))) U (i9.u40.p140==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((i4.u20.p70==1)||(i0.u3.p11==1))))))))) * (i9.u40.p140==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t61, t65, t70, t73, t78, t83, t86, t89, t98, t104, t106, t111, t115, t121, t123, t126, t133, ...1072
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-04 12:42:22] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:42:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 135 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 232 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:42:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 timeout
0.0)
(s1 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60075ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60076ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60317 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:43:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:43:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4001831249433772741.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2957373724500155492.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4001831249433772741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2957373724500155492.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,7.75871,215732,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX((E(AX(((p8==0)||(p112==1))) U (p110==0)) + EG(((p113==0)&&(p92==1)))))) * (AX(AF(((p2==0)&&(p8==1)))) + EG(EX(AF(AX((p10==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((E(!(EX(!(((p8==0)||(p112==1))))) U (p110==0)) + EG(((p113==0)&&(p92==1)))))))))] = FALSE *...247
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17661073061825302874.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17661073061825302874.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17661073061825302874.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17661073061825302874.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17661073061825302874.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16259715188014263421.gal : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5589865479068383714.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16259715188014263421.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5589865479068383714.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,13.8575,197264,948,29,207136,402,161,1.34147e+06,31,2445,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AX((E(AX(((i0.u2.p8==0)||(i7.u32.p112==1))) U (i7.u31.p110==0)) + EG(((i7.u32.p113==0)&&(i6.u26.p92==1)))))) * (AX(AF(((i0.u0.p2==0)&...207
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((E(!(EX(!(((i0.u2.p8==0)||(i7.u32.p112==1))))) U (i7.u31.p110==0)) + EG(((i7.u32.p113==0)&&...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 81 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 147/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 12/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 691 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60132ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60132ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60433 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:45:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:45:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14472299091935832509.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17367762618589488293.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14472299091935832509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17367762618589488293.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,7.61169,215224,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(FALSE)
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(FALSE))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,7.61782,215224,1,0,6,524598,7,1,1108,1.64355e+06,1
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 263 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:45:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60057ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60324 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:46:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:46:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7257433919490696287.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6495668490835120602.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7257433919490696287.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6495668490835120602.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,8.60609,215832,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(AX((AF(AG((p46==0))) * (p4==1)))) + EF(((EG((p54==1)) * EX(((p114==0)&&(p9==1)))) * EG((p123==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((EG((p54==1)) * EX(((p114==0)&&(p9==1)))) * EG((p123==0)))))),TRUE)),!(!(E(TR...309
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8607256035831514290.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8607256035831514290.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8607256035831514290.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8607256035831514290.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8607256035831514290.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5799977483560846902.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2716347551074491431.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5799977483560846902.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2716347551074491431.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,12.4855,197780,948,29,207281,423,161,1.35065e+06,31,2547,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(AX((AF(AG((i3.u13.p46==0))) * (i0.u1.p4==1)))) + EF(((EG((i3.u15.p54==1)) * EX(((i7.u32.p114==0)&&(i0.u3.p9==1)))) * EG((i8.u35.p123=...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((EG((i3.u15.p54==1)) * EX(((i7.u32.p114==0)&&(i0.u3.p9==1)))) * EG((i8.u35.p1...376
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:47:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:47:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 133 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 211 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:47:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60266 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:48:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:48:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8185200473639940097.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:48:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10690064386342542066.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8185200473639940097.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10690064386342542066.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,7.91971,215796,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((A(AX(EF(((p78==0)||(p137==1)))) U AF(!(AF((p32==0))))) * (p38==0)) * AG(((p45==0)&&(p95==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!((E(!(!(EG(!(!(!(EG(!((p32==0))))))))) U (!(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((p78==0)||(p137==1))))))) * !(!(EG(...290
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7473130866180599978.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7473130866180599978.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7473130866180599978.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7473130866180599978.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7473130866180599978.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 21 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6302237377445259588.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10607220324232203618.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6302237377445259588.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10607220324232203618.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,12.8428,197448,948,29,205941,414,161,1.35421e+06,31,2585,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((A(AX(EF(((i5.u22.p78==0)||(i9.u39.p137==1)))) U AF(!(AF((i2.u9.p32==0))))) * (i2.u11.p38==0)) * AG(((i3.u13.p45==0)&&(i6.u27.p95==1)...159
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!((E(!(!(EG(!(!(!(EG(!((i2.u9.p32==0))))))))) U (!(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U ((i5.u22.p78==0)||(i9.u39.p137...343
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:49:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:49:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 236 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:49:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:49:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 1.0)
(s3 1.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 1.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 1.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 1.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 1.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 1.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 1.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 1.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 1.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 1.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 1.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 1.0)
(s68 timeout
0.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60056ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60056ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60301 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13023181753472178757.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:50:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2333885306016900252.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13023181753472178757.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2333885306016900252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,8.82816,214916,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((p115==1) + AF(((p122==0)&&(p25==1)))) + ((p121==0) + EX(((p16==0)||(p15==1))))) + ((p94==0)&&(p111==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((p115==1) + !(EG(!(((p122==0)&&(p25==1)))))) + ((p121==0) + EX(((p16==0)||(p15==1))))) + ((p94==0)...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4160766279874850172.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4160766279874850172.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4160766279874850172.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4160766279874850172.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4160766279874850172.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4290582393769812807.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4872611297889126377.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4290582393769812807.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4872611297889126377.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,14.7634,197848,948,29,207737,446,161,1.35355e+06,31,2618,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((i8.u33.p115==1) + AF(((i8.u35.p122==0)&&(i1.u7.p25==1)))) + ((i8.u35.p121==0) + EX(((i0.u4.p16==0)||(i0.u4.p15==1))))) + ((i6.u27....183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((i8.u33.p115==1) + !(EG(!(((i8.u35.p122==0)&&(i1.u7.p25==1)))))) + ((i8.u35.p121==0) + EX(((i0.u4....232
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:51:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:51:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:51:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:51:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60276 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:52:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:52:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18304344645909455834.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:52:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality161539450547791815.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18304344645909455834.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality161539450547791815.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,8.34426,216056,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E((p13==1) U AF((((((p89==1)&&(p100==1))||(p40==0))||((p23==1)||(p125==1))) * AG((p88==1)))))) + AF(AX((EF(((p70==0)&&(p130==1))) * !(...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(E((p13==1) U !(EG(!((((((p89==1)&&(p100==1))||(p40==0))||((p23==1)||(p125==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !...305
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8310248868185826181.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8310248868185826181.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8310248868185826181.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8310248868185826181.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8310248868185826181.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10761173390734182785.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8999756609429710364.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10761173390734182785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8999756609429710364.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,13.3564,196632,948,29,204874,437,161,1.34195e+06,31,2596,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E((i0.u4.p13==1) U AF((((((i6.u25.p89==1)&&(i6.u28.p100==1))||(i2.u11.p40==0))||((i1.u7.p23==1)||(i8.u36.p125==1))) * AG((i6.u25.p88==...256
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(E((i0.u4.p13==1) U !(EG(!((((((i6.u25.p89==1)&&(i6.u28.p100==1))||(i2.u11.p40==0))||((i1.u7.p2...391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:53:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:53:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:53:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:53:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60054ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60054ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60280 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16074925437669667187.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4579104037713835239.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16074925437669667187.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4579104037713835239.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,9.21594,215436,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A(A((p37==0) U (p125==1)) U !(((p51==0)||(p76==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(!(((p51==0)||(p76==1)))) U (!(!((E(!((p125==1)) U (!((p37==0)) * !((p125==1)))) + EG(!((p12...243
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17107949177461266712.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17107949177461266712.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17107949177461266712.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17107949177461266712.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17107949177461266712.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9171565457196890775.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13272358438719812707.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9171565457196890775.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13272358438719812707.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,15.1924,225512,1313,29,234451,455,168,1.62875e+06,31,2760,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A(A((i2.u11.p37==0) U (i8.u36.p125==1)) U !(((i3.u15.p51==0)||(i5.u21.p76==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(!(((i3.u15.p51==0)||(i5.u21.p76==1)))) U (!(!((E(!((i8.u36.p125==1)) U (!((i2.u11.p37==0)) ...313
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:55:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:55:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 153 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 275 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:55:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:55:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 148/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 74 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 16/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 83 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 6/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/726 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 726 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 207/207 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60043ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60320 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality238853109763154228.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:56:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2926528754410664532.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality238853109763154228.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2926528754410664532.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,9.77877,215932,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((p56==1)) * (!(E((p124!=1) U ((p95==0)||(p64==0)))) + AX(AX(AF(((p120==0)||(p85==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG((p56==1))) * !(E((p124!=1) U ((p95==0)||(p64==0)))))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6835083353561587578.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6835083353561587578.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6835083353561587578.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6835083353561587578.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6835083353561587578.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9604821903188474540.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality162962910006792275.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9604821903188474540.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality162962910006792275.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,14.6791,210940,1290,29,216293,446,168,1.5117e+06,31,2556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((i3.u16.p56==1)) * (!(E((i8.u35.p124!=1) U ((i6.u27.p95==0)||(i4.u18.p64==0)))) + AX(AX(AF(((i8.u34.p120==0)||(i5.u24.p85==1))))))...157
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * EG((i3.u16.p56==1))) * !(E((i8.u35.p124!=1) U ((i6.u27.p95==0)||(i4.u18.p64==0)))))] != FA...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 192
Applied a total of 2 rules in 13 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 192/193 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 12:57:34] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 153 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:57:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 123 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 292 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:35] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 59 ms returned [60]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 190 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 12:57:35] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 22 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 77 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 79 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 7/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 4/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 9/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/333 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 149/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 6/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 190/679 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/680 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 680 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60059ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 142 /142 variables (removed 0) and now considering 191/191 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60468 ms. Remains : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:58:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:58:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2881400335261041595.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:58:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1618389867279734409.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2881400335261041595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1618389867279734409.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,8.17955,214252,2,10404,5,523629,6,0,761,1.64366e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(((p119!=0)&&(p10!=1))) * (EF((((p114!=0)||(p38!=1))&&((p79!=0)||((p70!=0)&&(p26!=1))))) + ((p66!=0)&&(p64!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p119!=0)&&(p10!=1)))))),TRUE) * (((p114!=0)||(p38!=1))&&((p79!=0)||((p...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...958
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9563722048230928443.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9563722048230928443.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9563722048230928443.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9563722048230928443.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9563722048230928443.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 205 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 188 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1966998881469629321.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7558691239786014689.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1966998881469629321.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7558691239786014689.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,12.0723,189600,1033,29,200152,395,176,1.31336e+06,33,2387,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(((i8.u34.p119!=0)&&(i0.u3.p10!=1))) * (EF((((i7.u32.p114!=0)||(i2.u11.p38!=1))&&((i5.u23.p79!=0)||((i4.u20.p70!=0)&&(i1.u7.p26!=1)...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i8.u34.p119!=0)&&(i0.u3.p10!=1)))))),TRUE) * (((i7.u32.p114!=0)||(i2.u...356
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t63, t67, t72, t75, t79, t84, t86, t93, t100, t103, t107, t114, t115, t121, t126, t127, t132,...1073
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 143 /143 variables (removed 0) and now considering 193/193 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-04 12:59:35] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:59:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:59:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 70 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 78 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 71 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 20/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 85 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 16/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 5/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/416 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 8/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 72 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 72 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 10/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 7/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 86 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:59:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 18/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 4/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 2/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 336/336 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 142/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/143 variables, 41/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 147/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 12/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 4/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 8/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/336 variables, 143/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 192/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/691 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 336/336 variables, and 691 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 143/143 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 143/143 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 172/172 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60321 ms. Remains : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6707528001825768889.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14311658797800332089.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6707528001825768889.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14311658797800332089.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,7.74158,215684,2,10480,5,524598,6,0,767,1.64355e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EX(((AG((p15==1)) + EF(((p126==0)||(p96==1)))) + (((p58==1)&&((p88==0)||(p106==1)))||((p138==0)&&((p31==0)||(p37==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(((!(E(TRUE U !((p15==1)))) + E(TRUE U ((p126==0)||(p96==1)))) + (((p58==1)&&((p88==0)||...215
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...969
(forward)formula 0,0,18.2682,420864,1,0,555,2.90767e+06,410,204,6539,2.91827e+06,408
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-010A-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 143/143 places, 193/193 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 192
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 192/193 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:00:54] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 166 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 13:00:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 149 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 315 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:54] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 92 ms returned [60]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 190 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 191 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-04 13:00:54] [INFO ] Computed 41 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 20/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 10/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 7/404 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 4/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/421 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 9/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 8/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 5/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 6/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 333/333 variables, and 474 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 149/149 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 141/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/142 variables, 41/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 149/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 6/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 99 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 4/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/142 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 191/333 variables, 142/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 190/679 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/333 variables, 1/680 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 333/333 variables, and 680 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 142/142 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 41/41 constraints, State Equation: 142/142 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps: 165/165 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 190 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 142 /142 variables (removed 0) and now considering 191/191 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 60484 ms. Remains : 142/143 places, 191/193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 191 transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15201269709694847618.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:01:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13557984002397001388.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15201269709694847618.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13557984002397001388.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,7.81199,214292,2,10404,5,523629,6,0,761,1.64366e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF(AG((p104==1))) U (p35==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!((p35==1))) * !((p35==1))),!(!(E(TRUE U !((p104==1))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,!((p35==1)))]...165
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 186/0/5
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...958
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2733579474311476579.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2733579474311476579.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2733579474311476579.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2733579474311476579.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2733579474311476579.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 205 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 188 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10090133049289209108.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17061709171304203724.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10090133049289209108.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17061709171304203724.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.03041e+19,12.938,209428,1358,29,214555,417,183,1.50657e+06,33,2270,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(AF(AG((i7.u29.p104==1))) U (i2.u10.p35==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!((i2.u10.p35==1))) * !((i2.u10.p35==1))),!(!(E(TRUE U !((i7.u29.p104==1))))))] != FALSE + [Fw...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t63, t67, t72, t75, t79, t84, t86, t93, t100, t103, t107, t114, t115, t121, t126, t127, t132,...1073
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9537189975111380699.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9537189975111380699.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9537189975111380699.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9537189975111380699.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9537189975111380699.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 192 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17519841672192296437.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 13:02:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2540944158864738540.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17519841672192296437.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2540944158864738540.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,16.4788,226360,1302,29,230776,460,168,1.66596e+06,31,2657,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EG(AG(!(((i4.u20.p70==1)||(i0.u3.p11==1)))))) U (i9.u40.p140==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((i4.u20.p70==1)||(i0.u3.p11==1))))))))) * (i9.u40.p140==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, t71, t76, t81, t85, t88, t93, t95, t103, t107, t111, t116, t119, t126, t130, t133, t137,...1076
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 207 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 30 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 120 labels/synchronizations in 8 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9966476966206267008.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 13:30:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7802058963751637668.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9966476966206267008.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7802058963751637668.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.12139e+20,4.15533,145360,2937,28,264695,193,275,587894,29,335,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EG(AG(!(((u21.p70==1)||(u4.p11==1)))))) U (u41.p140==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((u21.p70==1)||(u4.p11==1))))))))) * (u41.p140==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t64, t69, t71, t76, t78, t84, t86, t90, t96, t102, t103, t109, t114, t118, t120, t124, t130, ...859
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-010A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-010A, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600081"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-010A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-010A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;