Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600074.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-005B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600074
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 484K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749039555811

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-005B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Transformed 203 places.
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Transformed 228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 203 places and 228 transitions and 720 arcs in 157 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 98 out of 203 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 203/203 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 190 transition count 215
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 190 transition count 215
Applied a total of 26 rules in 27 ms. Remains 190 /203 variables (removed 13) and now considering 215/228 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 190 cols
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 209 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 391 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 214 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:19:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 75 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 69 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 71 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 74 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 13/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 71 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 12/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 8/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 20/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 6/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 215/405 variables, 190/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 405/405 variables, and 426 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 214/214 constraints, Known Traps: 215/215 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/189 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/190 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 215/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 10/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 9/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 10/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 52 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 9/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 12/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 5/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 3/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 2/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 215/405 variables, 190/489 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 214/703 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 20/723 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 405/405 variables, and 723 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 214/214 constraints, Known Traps: 298/298 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60123ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 214 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60136ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 190/203 places, 215/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60571 ms. Remains : 190/203 places, 215/228 transitions.
Support contains 98 out of 190 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 12:20:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 215 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (172 resets) in 1060 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 3/75 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (21 resets) in 174 ms. (228 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (23 resets) in 46 ms. (851 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (20 resets) in 174 ms. (228 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-06-04 12:20:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 23/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 165/190 variables, 19/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 215/405 variables, 190/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/405 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 405/405 variables, and 211 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 147 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 23/25 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 165/190 variables, 19/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 191 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 12/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/190 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 215/405 variables, 190/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 2/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/405 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/405 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/405 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 405/405 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 1469 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 190/190 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1632ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 39 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 190 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 190 transition count 195
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 170 transition count 195
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 170 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 144 transition count 169
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 113 place count 123 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 123 transition count 148
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 123 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 112 transition count 137
Performed 37 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 75 transition count 100
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 12 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 12 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 75 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 243 place count 74 transition count 99
Applied a total of 243 rules in 59 ms. Remains 74 /190 variables (removed 116) and now considering 99/215 (removed 116) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 59 ms. Remains : 74/190 places, 99/215 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (502 resets) in 257 ms. (155 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (104 resets) in 74 ms. (533 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2616721 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=871 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2616721 steps, saw 436048 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=870 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 99 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-04 12:20:23] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/20 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 36/56 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 44/100 variables, 18/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 5/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 37/137 variables, 16/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 2/139 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 28/167 variables, 12/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 3/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 2/169 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 4/173 variables, 4/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 173/173 variables, and 95 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 83 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/11 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 9/20 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 36/56 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 44/100 variables, 18/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 5/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 37/137 variables, 16/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 2/139 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 2/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 28/167 variables, 12/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 3/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 2/169 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 4/173 variables, 4/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 173/173 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 280 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 371ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 5 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 74 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 74/74 places, 99/99 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 74/74 places, 99/99 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 74/74 places, 99/99 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 99/99 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:20:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 19 ms returned []
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 4/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 5/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 99/173 variables, 74/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 4/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 4/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 4/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 3/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 4/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 4/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 3/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/173 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 173/173 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 9768 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 55/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 4/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 6/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 2/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 5/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 99/173 variables, 74/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 98/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 6/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 6/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 8/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 173/173 variables, and 289 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 39805ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39806ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 39957 ms. Remains : 74/74 places, 99/99 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 215 transitions.
Computed a total of 54 stabilizing places and 54 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 169 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 169 transition count 194
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 168 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 168 transition count 193
Applied a total of 44 rules in 8 ms. Remains 168 /190 variables (removed 22) and now considering 193/215 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 168 cols
[2025-06-04 12:21:04] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 75 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:21:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 175 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 252 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:21:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 7/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 9/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 8/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 5/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 193/361 variables, 168/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 7/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 3/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 3/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 308 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 168/168 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 118/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 5/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 193/361 variables, 168/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 192/504 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 10/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 20/534 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 7/541 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 9/550 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60051ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 168/190 places, 193/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60321 ms. Remains : 168/190 places, 193/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17361144871387741197.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12759329382814250399.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17361144871387741197.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12759329382814250399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.53641e+15,7.53987,222800,2,26619,5,529471,6,0,867,1.61994e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((A(!((((p14==1)&&(p58==1))&&(p82==1))) U EX((p187==1))) + EX((((p97==0)||(p102==0))||(p110==0)))) + EF((((p96==1)&&(p102==1))&&(p1...166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((!((E(!(EX((p187==1))) U (!(!((((p14==1)&&(p58==1))&&(p82==1)))) * !(EX((p187==1))))) + EG(!(EX(...270
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...468
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8966416241306960046.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8966416241306960046.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8966416241306960046.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8966416241306960046.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8966416241306960046.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13956701955232033312.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11432504019104318255.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13956701955232033312.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11432504019104318255.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.53641e+15,6.00453,128792,2679,52,164366,3923,456,687897,45,27089,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((A(!((((i1.i3.u6.p14==1)&&(i2.i0.u19.p58==1))&&(i3.u25.p82==1))) U EX((i8.i1.u57.p187==1))) + EX((((i4.i0.u31.p97==0)||(i4.i0.u32....262
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((!((E(!(EX((i8.i1.u57.p187==1))) U (!(!((((i1.i3.u6.p14==1)&&(i2.i0.u19.p58==1))&&(i3.u25.p82==1...386
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i1.u5.t123, i1.i2.u9.t118, i1.i3.u2.t126, i1.i3.u6.t0, i1.i3.u6.t1, i1.i3.u6.t2, i1.i3.u10...1042
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 168 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 168 transition count 193
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 167 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 167 transition count 192
Applied a total of 46 rules in 8 ms. Remains 167 /190 variables (removed 23) and now considering 192/215 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 167 cols
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 263 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 191 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/167 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 15/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 3/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 4/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 192/359 variables, 167/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/359 variables, 4/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 3/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 6/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 4/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 5/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 9/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 359/359 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 167/167 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/167 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 139/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 6/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 3/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 12/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 2/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 192/359 variables, 167/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 191/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 18/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 20/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 359/359 variables, and 584 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 167/167 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 205/205 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60059ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60060ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 167/190 places, 192/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60331 ms. Remains : 167/190 places, 192/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 192 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2057730138938434055.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17764397914212344476.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2057730138938434055.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17764397914212344476.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.31978e+15,7.76987,220704,2,26568,5,528242,6,0,862,1.61413e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((p133==0)) * EF((((p147==1)&&(p158==1))&&(p184==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !((p133==0)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (((p147==1)&&(p158==1))&&(p184==1)))))] = FALSE)
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...463
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4519023670285814196.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4519023670285814196.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4519023670285814196.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4519023670285814196.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4519023670285814196.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9878556359252323107.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14511158132836747590.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9878556359252323107.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14511158132836747590.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.31978e+15,5.91845,128824,2758,43,167967,1597,450,718085,42,11858,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX((i6.i0.u42.p133==0)) * EF((((i6.i1.u46.p147==1)&&(i7.u49.p158==1))&&(i8.i1.u57.p184==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !((i6.i0.u42.p133==0)))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U (((i6.i1.u46.p147==1)&&(i7.u49.p158==1))&&(...187
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u5.t122, i0.i2.u2.t125, i0.i2.u6.t0, i0.i2.u6.t1, i0.i2.u6.t2, i0.i2.u10.t3, i0.i2.u10....1027
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 189 transition count 193
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 168 transition count 193
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 168 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 143 transition count 168
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 121 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 121 transition count 146
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 121 transition count 135
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 110 transition count 135
Performed 35 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 75 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 73 transition count 98
Applied a total of 230 rules in 28 ms. Remains 73 /190 variables (removed 117) and now considering 98/215 (removed 117) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 138 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 22 ms returned []
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 11/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 12/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 14/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 4/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 3/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 3/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 208 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 18701 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 92/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 21/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 5/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 96/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 312 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 14404 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 33120ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 33120ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/190 places, 98/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 33324 ms. Remains : 73/190 places, 98/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12352329604053512855.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1134538254627657972.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12352329604053512855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1134538254627657972.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61687e+10,0.686687,28992,2,2748,5,76649,6,0,393,182203,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((((p147==1)&&(p161==1))&&(p184==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (((p147==1)&&(p161==1))&&(p184==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...520
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12732770129330864823.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12732770129330864823.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12732770129330864823.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12732770129330864823.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12732770129330864823.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 105 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18185705139487551166.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7412523608834048525.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18185705139487551166.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7412523608834048525.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.61687e+10,1.05466,40256,746,40,49722,92,156,274758,47,538,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((((i3.i0.u15.p147==1)&&(i3.i1.u17.p161==1))&&(i4.u20.p184==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (((i3.i0.u15.p147==1)&&(i3.i1.u17.p161==1))&&(i4.u20.p184==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t44, t52, t63, t80, t81, t82, t84, t89, t90, i0.t61, i0.t59, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t...634
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 189 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 169 transition count 194
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 169 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 144 transition count 169
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 123 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 123 transition count 148
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 123 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 112 transition count 137
Performed 37 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 75 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 73 transition count 98
Applied a total of 230 rules in 20 ms. Remains 73 /190 variables (removed 117) and now considering 98/215 (removed 117) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:26:38] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 96 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 30 ms returned [97]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 5/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 8/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 97/170 variables, 73/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 6/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 5/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 4/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 6/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 7/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 7/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 14227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 95/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 97/170 variables, 73/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 95/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 290 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 13809 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 99/99 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 28048ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 28049ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/190 places, 97/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 28275 ms. Remains : 73/190 places, 97/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6533590443251096457.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1584010962923024806.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6533590443251096457.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1584010962923024806.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.01767e+10,0.633924,28052,2,4258,5,73004,6,0,391,174684,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((p138==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p138==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 95/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,14.2984,449340,1,0,111,1.47726e+06,20,3,2337,3.78191e+06,111
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 189 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 169 transition count 194
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 169 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 144 transition count 169
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 111 place count 123 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 2 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 123 transition count 148
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 123 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 112 transition count 137
Performed 37 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 75 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 73 transition count 98
Applied a total of 230 rules in 22 ms. Remains 73 /190 variables (removed 117) and now considering 98/215 (removed 117) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 23 ms returned [97]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 8/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 97/170 variables, 73/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 7/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 9/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 5/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 5/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 7/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 4/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 34 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 6/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 6/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 19904 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 109/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 97/170 variables, 73/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 95/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 307 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 22622 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 42539ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42540ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/190 places, 97/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 42728 ms. Remains : 73/190 places, 97/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11656266348182882871.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17589562448671819154.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11656266348182882871.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17589562448671819154.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04279e+10,0.709098,28680,2,5838,5,75107,6,0,391,181343,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(AG(EF((p177==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p177==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...525
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3915588105150015223.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3915588105150015223.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3915588105150015223.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3915588105150015223.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3915588105150015223.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4638202377402023656.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9840607865289778883.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4638202377402023656.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9840607865289778883.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04279e+10,1.03827,36740,1050,30,44758,64,123,242889,33,279,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(AG(EF((i4.u17.p177==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (i4.u17.p177==0))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t43, t61, t76, t77, t85, t86, t96, i0.t50, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...607
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 172 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 172 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 171 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 171 transition count 196
Applied a total of 38 rules in 4 ms. Remains 171 /190 variables (removed 19) and now considering 196/215 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 171 cols
[2025-06-04 12:29:04] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:29:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 171 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:29:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 18/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 8/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 4/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 8/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 8/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 4/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 8/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 9/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 2/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 367/367 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 162/162 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 162/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 8/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 195/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 11/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 20/588 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 9/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 13/610 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60034ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/190 places, 196/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60210 ms. Remains : 171/190 places, 196/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:30:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:30:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16761926430918959852.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14967725504355939970.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16761926430918959852.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14967725504355939970.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.8143e+15,9.46198,249792,2,35384,5,572281,6,0,882,1.85442e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12045260311350493782.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12045260311350493782.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12045260311350493782.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12045260311350493782.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12045260311350493782.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2202065499316522038.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6398997024847747867.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2202065499316522038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6398997024847747867.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.8143e+15,7.49946,149360,3447,60,189888,1899,517,863057,57,13824,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(EF(AX((((i0.i2.u5.p14==1)&&(i2.i0.u18.p58==1))&&(i3.u25.p83==1))))) + (EX((((i2.i1.u22.p73==0)||(i0.i3.u8.p35==0)) + (((i1.i0.u0.p4==...327
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((i0.i2.u5.p14==1)&&(i2.i0.u18.p58==1))&&(i3.u25.p83==1))))))))) * !(EX((((i2.i...529
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i1.u4.t126, i0.i2.u1.t129, i0.i2.u5.t0, i0.i2.u5.t1, i0.i2.u5.t2, i0.i2.u9.t3, i0.i2.u9.t4...1094
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 170 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 170 transition count 195
Applied a total of 40 rules in 6 ms. Remains 170 /190 variables (removed 20) and now considering 195/215 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 195 rows 170 cols
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 194 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/170 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 8/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 17/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 17/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 10/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 8/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 9/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 9/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 9/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 195/365 variables, 170/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 4/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 365/365 variables, and 377 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 170/170 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 186/186 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/170 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 186/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 14/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 4/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 3/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 195/365 variables, 170/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 194/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 20/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 3/620 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 365/365 variables, and 622 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 170/170 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 237/237 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60039ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/190 places, 195/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60208 ms. Remains : 170/190 places, 195/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2290407275554917879.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3447642027258200266.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2290407275554917879.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3447642027258200266.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.35032e+15,7.84423,225764,2,31498,5,533785,6,0,877,1.64262e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1895028001800459007.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1895028001800459007.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1895028001800459007.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1895028001800459007.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1895028001800459007.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7641174761454916923.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability680588317461085411.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7641174761454916923.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability680588317461085411.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.35032e+15,6.59881,133204,3339,45,165343,776,505,697610,44,3254,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(((i6.i1.u47.p144==0)||(i9.u60.p192==0))) + (((i2.i1.u20.p64==1)&&(i3.u25.p77==1)) * ((EG((i1.i1.u1.p4==1)) + (i6.i0.u40.p127==0)) ...197
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),((i6.i1.u47.p144==0)||(i9.u60.p192==0)))] != FALSE + ([FwdG(((EY(Init) * ((i2.i1.u20.p64==1)&&(i...369
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 189 transition count 194
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 169 transition count 194
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 169 transition count 169
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 144 transition count 169
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 122 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 122 transition count 147
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 122 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 111 transition count 136
Performed 33 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 78 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 224 place count 76 transition count 101
Applied a total of 224 rules in 17 ms. Remains 76 /190 variables (removed 114) and now considering 101/215 (removed 114) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 27 ms returned [100]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 13/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/76 variables, 5/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 15/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 4/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 8/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 100/176 variables, 76/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 7/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 176/176 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 9619 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 48/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/76 variables, 5/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 22/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 3/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 100/176 variables, 76/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 96/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 176/176 variables, and 277 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 39637ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39637ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/190 places, 100/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 100/100 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 39808 ms. Remains : 76/190 places, 100/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:33:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:33:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9713517169466045503.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4002923356246729677.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9713517169466045503.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4002923356246729677.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.06553e+10,0.812853,32372,2,3139,5,84834,6,0,406,209400,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(EF((((p111==1)&&(p122==1))&&((p145==1)&&(p50==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (((p111==1)&&(p122==1))&&((p145==1)&&(p50==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...526
(forward)formula 0,0,2.72874,80464,1,0,319,473648,221,122,3279,538572,253
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 174 transition count 199
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 174 transition count 199
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 173 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 173 transition count 198
Applied a total of 34 rules in 8 ms. Remains 173 /190 variables (removed 17) and now considering 198/215 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 198 rows 173 cols
[2025-06-04 12:33:48] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:33:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 160 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 197 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:33:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/173 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 8/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 7/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 7/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 3/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 16/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 6/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/173 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 198/371 variables, 173/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 8/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 7/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 11/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 2/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 3/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/371 variables, 2/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30034ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 197 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30035ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 173/190 places, 198/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30203 ms. Remains : 173/190 places, 198/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 198 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10807602759041096208.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11171079301580841645.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10807602759041096208.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11171079301580841645.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.50168e+15,9.78343,265992,2,29868,5,605626,6,0,892,1.97886e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18435877274404850083.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18435877274404850083.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18435877274404850083.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18435877274404850083.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18435877274404850083.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10406557593358030189.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13638733632490704742.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10406557593358030189.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13638733632490704742.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.50168e+15,20.8267,349564,3255,82,444163,4186,456,1.86288e+06,57,39369,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((E(!(E(((((i2.i1.u2.p7==1)&&(i2.i0.u6.p16==1))&&((i1.u14.p44==1)&&(i3.i1.u23.p72==1)))&&((i4.u26.p83==1)&&(i5.i1.u34.p106==1))) U ((i6...634
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(E(((((i2.i1.u2.p7==1)&&(i2.i0.u6.p16==1))&&((i1.u14.p44==1)&&(i3.i1.u23.p72==1)))&&((i4.u26...1980
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u12.t118, i2.i0.u5.t128, i2.i0.u6.t0, i2.i0.u6.t1, i2.i0.u6.t2, i2.i1.u2.t131, i2.i1.u13.t...1127
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 172 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 172 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 171 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 171 transition count 196
Applied a total of 38 rules in 2 ms. Remains 171 /190 variables (removed 19) and now considering 196/215 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 171 cols
[2025-06-04 12:35:18] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:35:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 165 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:35:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 16/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 15/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 12/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 15/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 49 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 16/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 7/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 2/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 10/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 4/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 6/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30055ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30055ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/190 places, 196/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30224 ms. Remains : 171/190 places, 196/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5848728683969257537.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6444052529711582890.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5848728683969257537.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6444052529711582890.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.54489e+15,7.91487,224176,2,27247,5,534116,6,0,882,1.64119e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((EX((p60==1)) + (!(AG((p153==1))) * (p115!=1))) U A(((A((p74==1) U (((p14==1)&&(p55==1))&&(p83==1))) * !(((p9==1)&&(p195==1)))) + (p1...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(EX((p60==1)) + (!(!(E(TRUE U !((p153==1))))) * (p115!=1)))) * !(EG(!(EG(E((((p92==1)&&(p133==1))&&...584
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...485
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15022816404823122232.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15022816404823122232.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15022816404823122232.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15022816404823122232.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15022816404823122232.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3738761543446681764.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14496613351488433913.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3738761543446681764.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14496613351488433913.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.54489e+15,7.18512,163944,3074,54,205758,3898,511,994902,49,35993,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E((EX((i2.i0.u17.p60==1)) + (!(AG((i7.u47.p153==1))) * (i5.u35.p115!=1))) U A(((A((i2.i1.u22.p74==1) U (((i1.i2.u6.p14==1)&&(i2.i0.u18....393
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,(EX((i2.i0.u17.p60==1)) + (!(!(E(TRUE U !((i7.u47.p153==1))))) * (i5.u35.p115!=1)))) * !(EG(!(EG(E(...896
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i1.u5.t126, i1.i2.u2.t129, i1.i2.u6.t0, i1.i2.u6.t1, i1.i2.u6.t2, i1.i2.u10.t3, i1.i2.u10....1078
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 173 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 173 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 172 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 172 transition count 197
Applied a total of 36 rules in 6 ms. Remains 172 /190 variables (removed 18) and now considering 197/215 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 172 cols
[2025-06-04 12:36:48] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:36:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:36:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 8/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 10/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 6/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 5/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 5/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 4/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 6/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 7/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 9/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 3/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 172/369 variables, and 184 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 0/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 163/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 7/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 9/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 8/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 7/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 6/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 197/369 variables, 172/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 196/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 12/604 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 14/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 369/369 variables, and 618 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 229/229 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60039ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 172/190 places, 197/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60207 ms. Remains : 172/190 places, 197/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:37:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:37:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13417486712683279185.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13068847974827874562.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13417486712683279185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13068847974827874562.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76443e+15,8.7913,231224,2,28260,5,545495,6,0,887,1.69034e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((E(EG(AF((((p14==1)&&(p58==1))&&(p82==1)))) U !(((EX((p13==1)) * ((p121==1)||(p149==1))) * ((p49==1)||(p115==1))))) * EF((p108==1))) ...465
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((E(EG(!(EG(!((((p14==1)&&(p58==1))&&(p82==1)))))) U !(((EX((p13==1)) * ((p121==1)||(p149==1))) * (...571
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...491
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5535808643654217499.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5535808643654217499.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5535808643654217499.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5535808643654217499.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5535808643654217499.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9604323231646504883.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9551968297127828580.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9604323231646504883.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9551968297127828580.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76443e+15,7.18391,199672,4048,61,277593,4434,525,1.35808e+06,45,42183,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((E(EG(AF((((i1.i2.u5.p14==1)&&(i2.i0.u19.p58==1))&&(i0.u24.p82==1)))) U !(((EX((i1.i1.u6.p13==1)) * ((i4.u38.p121==1)||(i5.i1.u46.p14...742
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(((E(EG(!(EG(!((((i1.i2.u5.p14==1)&&(i2.i0.u19.p58==1))&&(i0.u24.p82==1)))))) U !(((EX((i1.i1.u6.p13...848
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.t100, i0.u24.t16, i0.u24.t17, i0.u24.t18, i0.u25.t103, i1.i1.t127, i1.i1.u6.t129, i1.i2.u2...1087
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 189 transition count 193
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 168 transition count 193
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 168 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 143 transition count 168
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 121 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 121 transition count 146
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 121 transition count 134
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 109 transition count 134
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 73 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 71 transition count 96
Applied a total of 234 rules in 20 ms. Remains 71 /190 variables (removed 119) and now considering 96/215 (removed 119) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 25 ms returned [95]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/166 variables, 71/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 6/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 6/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 11/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 10/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 6/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 11/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 10289 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 92/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/166 variables, 71/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 94/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 8/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 6/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40315ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40316ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/190 places, 95/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 95/95 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 40497 ms. Remains : 71/190 places, 95/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6265553775967116619.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1581735292175296588.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6265553775967116619.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1581735292175296588.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,0.645956,27556,2,2666,5,71539,6,0,382,171446,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p55==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p55==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 90/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,17.2124,519032,1,0,111,1.68453e+06,20,4,2306,4.44562e+06,109
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 172 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 172 transition count 197
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 171 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 171 transition count 196
Applied a total of 38 rules in 3 ms. Remains 171 /190 variables (removed 19) and now considering 196/215 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 171 cols
[2025-06-04 12:39:47] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:39:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:39:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 13/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 14/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 11/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 9/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 15/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 11/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 55 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 15/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 3/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 13/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 3/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 367/367 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 171/171 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 171/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 10/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 4/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/377 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 195/572 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 7/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 20/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 367/367 variables, and 607 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 220/220 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60033ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60033ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/190 places, 196/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60220 ms. Remains : 171/190 places, 196/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:40:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:40:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9283482561284699127.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:40:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7003216438762844332.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9283482561284699127.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7003216438762844332.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.51509e+15,8.16925,229316,2,27503,5,540863,6,0,882,1.66696e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(E(EX(EF(((p64==1)&&(p77==1)))) U (EF((p149==1)) * A((p201==1) U (p195==1))))) * A((p199!=1) U ((((p25==1)&&(p38==1)) + AG((p1==1))) +...379
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(Init,EX(E(TRUE U ((p64==1)&&(p77==1))))) * E(TRUE U (p149==1))) * !(EG(!((p195==1))))) * !(E(!((p195=...1122
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...484
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4192453968684819547.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4192453968684819547.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4192453968684819547.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4192453968684819547.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4192453968684819547.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14915448721082132713.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability886167183444136041.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14915448721082132713.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability886167183444136041.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.51509e+15,7.57307,153120,3134,55,181864,2158,487,949764,51,16292,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(E(EX(EF(((i2.i1.u20.p64==1)&&(i3.u25.p77==1)))) U (EF((i6.i1.u45.p149==1)) * A((i8.i1.u58.p201==1) U (i8.i1.u59.p195==1))))) * A((i8....593
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(Init,EX(E(TRUE U ((i2.i1.u20.p64==1)&&(i3.u25.p77==1))))) * E(TRUE U (i6.i1.u45.p149==1))) * !(EG(!((...1604
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u5.t126, i0.i1.u2.t129, i0.i1.u6.t0, i0.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.u6.t2, i0.i1.u10.t3, i0.i1.u10....1074
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 18 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 18 transitions
Performed 18 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 18
Iterating post reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 189 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 171 transition count 195
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 170 transition count 195
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 170 transition count 170
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 145 transition count 170
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 124 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 124 transition count 149
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 124 transition count 139
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 114 transition count 139
Performed 35 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 35 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 70 rules applied. Total rules applied 220 place count 79 transition count 104
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 222 place count 77 transition count 102
Applied a total of 222 rules in 23 ms. Remains 77 /190 variables (removed 113) and now considering 102/215 (removed 113) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned [101]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 77 cols
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/77 variables, 8/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 20/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 17/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 6/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 101/178 variables, 77/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 5/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 10/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 5/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 7/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 3/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 15/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 4/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 5/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 7/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:41:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 3/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 4/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 4/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 3/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 42 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 4/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (OVERLAPS) 0/178 variables, 0/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 178/178 variables, and 250 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 25614 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 150/150 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 90/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/77 variables, 8/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 60/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 101/178 variables, 77/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 97/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/178 variables, 2/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 178/178 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 77/77 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 55633ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55633ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 77/190 places, 101/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 77 /77 variables (removed 0) and now considering 101/101 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 55810 ms. Remains : 77/190 places, 101/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 101 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3893797144829462643.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:42:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4530317596965667769.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3893797144829462643.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4530317596965667769.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.55114e+10,0.668986,28968,2,2874,5,75285,6,0,410,181735,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p59==1) * AG(E((p126==1) U AF((p26==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p59==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(E((p126==1) U !(EG(!((p26==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...532
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4609494558877421889.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4609494558877421889.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4609494558877421889.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4609494558877421889.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4609494558877421889.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 109 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13663969933349981089.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2177356532286809076.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13663969933349981089.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2177356532286809076.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.55114e+10,1.07508,41560,928,29,57329,96,167,263190,34,371,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((i1.u7.p59==1) * AG(E((i3.u15.p126==1) U AF((i0.u4.p26==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i1.u7.p59==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(E((i3.u15.p126==1) U !(EG(!((i0.u4.p26==1)))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t44, t61, t64, t66, t75, t79, t85, t90, t99, i0.t62, i0.t60, i0.t55, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1,...649
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 189 transition count 193
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 168 transition count 193
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 168 transition count 168
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 143 transition count 168
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 114 place count 121 transition count 146
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 121 transition count 146
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 121 transition count 134
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 109 transition count 134
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 232 place count 73 transition count 98
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 71 transition count 96
Applied a total of 234 rules in 10 ms. Remains 71 /190 variables (removed 119) and now considering 96/215 (removed 119) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 26 ms returned [95]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 94 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 95 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 12/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 95/166 variables, 71/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 6/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 3/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 6/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 11/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 10/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 6/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 11/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 166/166 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 10195 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 92/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 95/166 variables, 71/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 94/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 2/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 8/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/166 variables, 6/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 166/166 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40217ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 94 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40217ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/190 places, 95/215 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 71 /71 variables (removed 0) and now considering 95/95 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 40367 ms. Remains : 71/190 places, 95/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 95 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1393182728025081305.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10509034797215027134.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1393182728025081305.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10509034797215027134.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,0.625039,27444,2,2666,5,71539,6,0,382,171446,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((p57==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((p57==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...520
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5424813029806654426.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5424813029806654426.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5424813029806654426.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5424813029806654426.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5424813029806654426.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5589320843100086996.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:44:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5917245561575867159.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5589320843100086996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5917245561575867159.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,0.907072,33820,572,29,42400,56,111,216222,32,257,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((i1.u5.p57==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((i1.u5.p57==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t38, t41, t47, t67, t76, t77, t79, t93, i0.t50, i0.t37, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...599
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 190/190 places, 215/215 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 171 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 171 transition count 196
Applied a total of 38 rules in 6 ms. Remains 171 /190 variables (removed 19) and now considering 196/215 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 171 cols
[2025-06-04 12:45:23] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:45:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 155 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:45:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 15/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 9/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 17/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 9/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 5/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 6/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 5/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 7/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 12/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 367/367 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 132/132 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 132/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 16/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 7/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 4/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:45:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 9/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 195/557 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 20/577 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 4/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 19/600 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60040ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60041ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/190 places, 196/215 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60204 ms. Remains : 171/190 places, 196/215 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4688184392849970134.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5500428832848924438.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4688184392849970134.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5500428832848924438.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76384e+15,9.09534,243652,2,32840,5,570457,6,0,882,1.79632e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8397703800887315505.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8397703800887315505.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8397703800887315505.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8397703800887315505.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8397703800887315505.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13200379185254495084.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:46:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16397956028384069152.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13200379185254495084.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16397956028384069152.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76384e+15,3.63548,95848,3543,56,124384,251,461,595110,45,1555,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG(A(AX((i8.i0.u53.p168==1)) U ((!(((i6.i0.u42.p135==1)&&(i6.i0.u44.p141==1))&&(i6.i1.u46.p149==1)))||(((i0.i1.u11.p33==1)&&(i1.i1.u1...510
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG(!((E(!(((!(((i6.i0.u42.p135==1)&&(i6.i0.u44.p141==1))&&(i6.i1.u46.p149==1)))||(((i0.i1.u11.p33==1...1133
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u2.t128, i0.i0.u5.t125, i0.i0.u6.t0, i0.i0.u6.t1, i0.i0.u6.t2, i0.i0.u10.t3, i0.i0.u10....1085
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7843365796717808754.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7843365796717808754.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7843365796717808754.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7843365796717808754.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7843365796717808754.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8934896069845852331.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:47:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13454148319801092847.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8934896069845852331.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13454148319801092847.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.64954e+15,11.053,188092,4667,71,219085,1160,547,1.12858e+06,59,6077,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((A(!((((i1.i0.u6.p14==1)&&(i3.i0.u19.p58==1))&&(i4.u25.p82==1))) U EX((i10.u58.p187==1))) + EX((((i5.i0.u31.p97==0)||(i5.i1.u32.p1...260
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((!((E(!(EX((i10.u58.p187==1))) U (!(!((((i1.i0.u6.p14==1)&&(i3.i0.u19.p58==1))&&(i4.u25.p82==1))...380
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i0.t144, i1.i0.u6.t0, i1.i0.u6.t1, i1.i0.u6.t2, i1.i0.u7.t146, i1.i0.u11.t3, i1.i0.u11.t4,...1302
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 152 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16335402805287324586.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 13:16:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3840237497884116077.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16335402805287324586.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3840237497884116077.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.64954e+15,49.9436,1295736,11556,394,1.7771e+06,1351,242,1.13565e+07,102,27852,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((A(!((((i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u9.p14==1)&&(i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u16.p58==1))&&(i0.i0.i0.i1.u19.p82==1))) U EX((i1.i0.u39.p187==1))) + ...346
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((!((E(!(EX((i1.i0.u39.p187==1))) U (!(!((((i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u9.p14==1)&&(i0.i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u...470
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.i0.u5.t147, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t7, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t8, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t9, i0....1961

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600