Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600073.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-005B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600073
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 484K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.2K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 80K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 48K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.8K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 29K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 96K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 64K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 61K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749039443972

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-005B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Transformed 203 places.
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Transformed 228 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 203 places and 228 transitions and 720 arcs in 164 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 91 out of 203 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 203/203 places, 228/228 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 193 transition count 218
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 193 transition count 218
Applied a total of 20 rules in 27 ms. Remains 193 /203 variables (removed 10) and now considering 218/228 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 193 cols
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 15 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 251 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 438 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 217 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:17:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 90 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 74 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 71 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 19/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 69 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 56 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 11/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 10/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 13/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 10/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 62 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 64 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 63 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 72 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 58 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 70 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 18/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 63 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 75 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 80 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
(s147 0.0timeout
^^^^^^^^^^
(error "Invalid token: 0.0timeout")
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 1.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 1.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 1.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 1.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 1.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 1.0)
(s96 0.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 1.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 1.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 1.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 1.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 1.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 193/411 variables, and 262 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 0/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 217/217 constraints, Known Traps: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/192 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/193 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 241/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 18/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 70 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 13/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 11/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 9/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 5/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 3/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 3/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 19/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 20/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 4/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 12/399 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 6/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/407 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/409 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 9/418 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 6/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/193 variables, 2/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 193/411 variables, and 426 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 0/193 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/217 constraints, Known Traps: 405/405 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60096ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 217 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60117ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 193/203 places, 218/228 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60601 ms. Remains : 193/203 places, 218/228 transitions.
Support contains 91 out of 193 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
Support contains 78 out of 193 places (down from 91) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (170 resets) in 857 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 1/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 1427 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (203 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
Computed a total of 52 stabilizing places and 52 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 168 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 168 transition count 193
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 167 transition count 192
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 167 transition count 192
Applied a total of 52 rules in 19 ms. Remains 167 /193 variables (removed 26) and now considering 192/218 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 192 rows 167 cols
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 137 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 212 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 191 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:18:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/167 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 15/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 3/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 4/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 192/359 variables, 167/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/359 variables, 4/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 3/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 6/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 4/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 5/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 9/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 359/359 variables, and 327 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 167/167 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 139/139 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/166 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/167 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 139/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 6/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 3/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 12/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 2/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 192/359 variables, 167/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 191/542 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 18/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/359 variables, 20/580 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 359/359 variables, and 584 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 167/167 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 191/191 constraints, Known Traps: 205/205 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60084ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 191 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60086ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 167/193 places, 192/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60319 ms. Remains : 167/193 places, 192/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:19:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 192 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9009235955943609473.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5794276434809213708.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9009235955943609473.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5794276434809213708.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.31978e+15,7.5778,221652,2,26568,5,528242,6,0,862,1.61413e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((AF((((p83==0)&&(p7==1))&&(p125==0))) * AF((p84==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((!(EG(!((((p83==0)&&(p7==1))&&(p125==0))))) * !(EG(!((p84==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...463
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14244756529971976120.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14244756529971976120.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14244756529971976120.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14244756529971976120.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14244756529971976120.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4551251928640775559.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8486178657414368413.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4551251928640775559.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8486178657414368413.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.31978e+15,6.33821,163352,3412,43,233005,1538,433,1.06439e+06,42,11766,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((AF((((i0.u26.p83==0)&&(i1.i2.u2.p7==1))&&(i8.i1.u39.p125==0))) * AF((i0.u26.p84==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((!(EG(!((((i0.u26.p83==0)&&(i1.i2.u2.p7==1))&&(i8.i1.u39.p125==0))))) * !(EG(!((i0.u26.p84==1)))...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u24.t96, i0.u25.t15, i0.u25.t16, i0.u25.t17, i1.i1.u5.t122, i1.i2.u2.t125, i1.i2.u6.t0, i1...1027
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 172 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 172 transition count 197
Applied a total of 42 rules in 5 ms. Remains 172 /193 variables (removed 21) and now considering 197/218 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 172 cols
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 128 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 207 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 67 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 70 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 49 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 64 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 15/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 20/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 5/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 13/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 4/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 5/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 4/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 4/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 197/369 variables, 172/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 13/381 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 2/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 369/369 variables, and 383 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/172 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 190/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 55 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 7/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 6/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 6/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 2/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/172 variables, 0/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 197/369 variables, 172/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 196/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 10/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 15/627 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 66 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/369 variables, 20/647 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 369/369 variables, and 647 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 172/172 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 172/193 places, 197/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60262 ms. Remains : 172/193 places, 197/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12002390304199255896.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14155705251780514948.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12002390304199255896.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14155705251780514948.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.56751e+15,8.09441,227112,2,36130,5,532339,6,0,887,1.66317e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9997926315476589366.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9997926315476589366.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9997926315476589366.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9997926315476589366.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9997926315476589366.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 39 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11921285023451943313.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality607779668813676584.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11921285023451943313.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality607779668813676584.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.56751e+15,7.98295,158968,3815,51,189266,804,518,955398,49,5962,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(EF((((i9.i0.u56.p179==0)&&(i0.i1.u6.p16==0)) + !(E(((i9.i0.u55.p175==0)||(i4.i1.u62.p202==1)) U (i0.i1.u10.p30==0)))))) + EG(AF((((i...229
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !((EG(E(TRUE U (((i9.i0.u56.p179==0)&&(i0.i1.u6.p16==0)) + !(E(((i9.i0.u55.p175==0)||(i4.i1.u62.p20...291
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u5.t126, i0.i1.u2.t129, i0.i1.u6.t0, i0.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.u6.t2, i0.i1.u10.t3, i0.i1.u10....1108
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 192 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 172 transition count 197
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 172 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 147 transition count 172
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 115 place count 122 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 122 transition count 147
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 122 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 111 transition count 136
Performed 36 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 36 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 36 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 234 place count 75 transition count 100
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 73 transition count 98
Applied a total of 236 rules in 50 ms. Remains 73 /193 variables (removed 120) and now considering 98/218 (removed 120) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 31 ms returned [97]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 19/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 11/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 8/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 97/170 variables, 73/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 5/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 5/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 4/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 6/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 4/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 2/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 170/170 variables, and 170 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 11626 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 67/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 9/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 97/170 variables, 73/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 96/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/170 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 170/170 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 11652 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 83/83 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23292ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23293ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/193 places, 97/218 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 97/97 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 23526 ms. Remains : 73/193 places, 97/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:22:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 97 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:22:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12386229594721275859.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4332320442402907977.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12386229594721275859.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4332320442402907977.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64182e+10,0.711447,28756,2,2744,5,75451,6,0,392,181105,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p53==1)||(p189==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p53==1)||(p189==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 85/12/12
(forward)formula 0,1,10.5414,336116,1,0,114,1.0468e+06,20,3,2383,2.8895e+06,114
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 169 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 169 transition count 194
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 168 transition count 193
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 168 transition count 193
Applied a total of 50 rules in 11 ms. Remains 168 /193 variables (removed 25) and now considering 193/218 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 193 rows 168 cols
[2025-06-04 12:23:02] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:23:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 107 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 182 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 192 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:23:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 70 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 80 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 12/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 193/361 variables, 168/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 5/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 4/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 3/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 8/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 4/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 9/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 49 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 46 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 67 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 54 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 57 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/361 variables, 19/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 361/361 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 168/168 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 136/136 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/167 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/168 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 136/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 20/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 5/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 12/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 10/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 193/361 variables, 168/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 192/565 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 20/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/361 variables, 5/590 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 361/361 variables, and 592 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 168/168 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 192/192 constraints, Known Traps: 211/211 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 192 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60039ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 168/193 places, 193/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60233 ms. Remains : 168/193 places, 193/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 193 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9424481707298239147.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4413175994627447820.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9424481707298239147.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4413175994627447820.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.52334e+15,7.81792,224412,2,27022,5,532182,6,0,867,1.62899e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((p69==0)&&(p0==1)) * (!(A(EX((p49==0)) U ((p121==0)||(p29==1)))) * (p104==0)))) * EG(EF(((EX((p10==1)) + EX(((p3==0)&&(p50==1)))) *...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((p69==0)&&(p0==1)) * (!(!((E(!(((p121==0)||(p29==1))) U (!(EX((p49==0))) * !(((p121==0)||(p29==1...312
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...468
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7539388532815496853.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7539388532815496853.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7539388532815496853.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7539388532815496853.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7539388532815496853.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10554911458881967366.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5566827859183144630.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10554911458881967366.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5566827859183144630.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.52334e+15,5.24713,130168,2573,56,164008,2288,439,864166,47,17432,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((i2.i1.u22.p69==0)&&(i6.u0.p0==1)) * (!(A(EX((i2.i0.u16.p49==0)) U ((i5.u37.p121==0)||(i1.i1.u10.p29==1)))) * (i4.i1.u33.p104==0)))...259
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((i2.i1.u22.p69==0)&&(i6.u0.p0==1)) * (!(!((E(!(((i5.u37.p121==0)||(i1.i1.u10.p29==1))) U (!(EX((...437
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i1.u2.t126, i0.i1.u12.t113, i0.i1.u13.t7, i0.i1.u13.t8, i0.i1.u13.t9, i1.i0.u5.t123, i1.i0...1042
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 171 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 171 transition count 196
Applied a total of 44 rules in 6 ms. Remains 171 /193 variables (removed 22) and now considering 196/218 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 196 rows 171 cols
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 195 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 59 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 20/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 18/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 4/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 13/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 3/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 9/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 8/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 1/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 9/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 5/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 11/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 367/367 variables, and 368 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 176/176 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/171 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 176/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 196/367 variables, 171/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 195/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 9/578 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 6/584 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 367/367 variables, and 588 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 171/171 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 195/195 constraints, Known Traps: 201/201 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60039ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 195 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60040ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 171/193 places, 196/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60209 ms. Remains : 171/193 places, 196/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 196 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5209982238839304297.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13814472196470601480.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5209982238839304297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13814472196470601480.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.55703e+15,8.75558,233040,2,33141,5,545850,6,0,882,1.70411e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2518910042332995205.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2518910042332995205.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2518910042332995205.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2518910042332995205.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2518910042332995205.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13589926578904069162.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17114339719133957826.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13589926578904069162.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17114339719133957826.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.55703e+15,5.72125,156012,3919,49,190272,1618,501,1.08739e+06,50,14529,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!((A(!(EF((i7.i1.u39.p125==1))) U (AG((i3.i1.u33.p113==0)) + (i6.u50.p163!=0))) + ((EX(AF((i3.i0.u29.p90==1))) * ((i1.i1.u23.p72==0)||...402
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EX(EX(TRUE)))))) * !(E(!(EX(EX(TRUE))) U (!((!((!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i3.i1.u33.p113==0)))) + (...877
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u5.t125, i0.i1.u2.t128, i0.i1.u6.t0, i0.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.u6.t2, i0.i1.u10.t3, i0.i1.u10....1074
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 176 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 176 transition count 201
Applied a total of 34 rules in 3 ms. Remains 176 /193 variables (removed 17) and now considering 201/218 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 201 rows 176 cols
[2025-06-04 12:27:03] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:27:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 108 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 200 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:27:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/176 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 55 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 19/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 16/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 12/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 9/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 15/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 201/377 variables, 176/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 3/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 2/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 1/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 3/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 377/377 variables, and 340 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 143/143 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/175 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/176 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 143/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 13/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 201/377 variables, 176/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 200/559 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 48 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 20/579 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 8/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 377/377 variables, and 587 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 176/176 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 200/200 constraints, Known Traps: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60042ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 200 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 176/193 places, 201/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60207 ms. Remains : 176/193 places, 201/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 201 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4471002601873569456.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3218462458656996604.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4471002601873569456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3218462458656996604.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.51823e+15,9.69583,270012,2,36332,5,611949,6,0,907,2.00772e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13307384917998276723.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13307384917998276723.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13307384917998276723.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13307384917998276723.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13307384917998276723.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3836993463968622627.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13547535824303824917.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3836993463968622627.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13547535824303824917.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.51823e+15,9.38511,217320,5109,82,290347,2644,476,1.46454e+06,53,14111,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AG(((i2.u17.p55==0)&&(i6.u45.p149==1))) + ((i4.u34.p112==0)&&(i2.u16.p60==1))) + ((((i3.u25.p83==0)&&(i8.u57.p182==1)) * ((i7.u48.p1...502
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u17.p55==0)&&(i6.u45.p149==1))))) + ((i4.u34.p112==0)&&(i2.u16.p60==1))) + ((((...905
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i0.i0.u1.t133, i1.i0.i0.u12.t7, i1.i0.i0.u12.t8, i1.i0.i0.u12.t9, i1.i0.i2.t130, i1.i0.i2....1054
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 171 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 171 transition count 196
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 170 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 170 transition count 195
Applied a total of 46 rules in 6 ms. Remains 170 /193 variables (removed 23) and now considering 195/218 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 195 rows 170 cols
[2025-06-04 12:29:03] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:29:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 103 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 179 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 194 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:29:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/170 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 63 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 58 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 62 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 17/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 12/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 6/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 14/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 195/365 variables, 170/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 13/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 5/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 2/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 19 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 73 ms of which 23 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 8/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 3/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 365/365 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 170/170 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 146/146 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/170 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 146/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 6/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 7/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 4/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 9/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 195/365 variables, 170/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 194/560 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 9/569 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 20/589 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 10/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60039ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60040ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/193 places, 195/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60225 ms. Remains : 170/193 places, 195/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10020529099941070768.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6063063315952075047.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10020529099941070768.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6063063315952075047.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.67918e+15,9.07317,226348,2,27707,5,537001,6,0,877,1.64631e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(EF(!(EX((p103==0)))) U ((AG(!(((p176==0)||(p42==1)))) * !(AX(((p76==0)||(p56==1))))) * AG(!(E((p167==1) U (p186==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(((p176==0)||(p42==1)))))) * !(!(EX(!(((p76==0)||(p56==1))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !...504
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...479
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13023848629657335460.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13023848629657335460.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13023848629657335460.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13023848629657335460.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13023848629657335460.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3222560705122637214.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5434897642226694379.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3222560705122637214.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5434897642226694379.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.67918e+15,5.83515,143136,3744,73,177693,2329,502,950934,55,17562,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(EF(!(EX((i3.i1.u32.p103==0)))) U ((AG(!(((i8.i0.u54.p176==0)||(i0.i1.u13.p42==1)))) * !(AX(((i2.u24.p76==0)||(i1.i0.u18.p56==1))))) ...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(!(((i8.i0.u54.p176==0)||(i0.i1.u13.p42==1)))))) * !(!(EX(!(((i2.u24.p76==0)||(i...685
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u5.t125, i0.i1.u2.t128, i0.i1.u6.t0, i0.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.u6.t2, i0.i1.u10.t3, i0.i1.u10....1066
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 170 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 170 transition count 195
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 169 transition count 194
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 169 transition count 194
Applied a total of 48 rules in 5 ms. Remains 169 /193 variables (removed 24) and now considering 194/218 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 194 rows 169 cols
[2025-06-04 12:31:03] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:31:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 193 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:31:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/169 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 60 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 66 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 62 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 14/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 8/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 11/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 7/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 194/363 variables, 169/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 16/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 14/300 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 7/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 3/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 5/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 4/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 2/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 3/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 2/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 363/363 variables, and 326 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 169/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 134/134 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/169 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 134/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 5/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 8/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 194/363 variables, 169/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 193/535 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 20/555 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 20/575 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/363 variables, 19/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 363/363 variables, and 603 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 169/169 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 193/193 constraints, Known Traps: 220/220 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60036ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 193 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 169/193 places, 194/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60227 ms. Remains : 169/193 places, 194/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 194 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9648844380946088404.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17929350516741987574.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9648844380946088404.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17929350516741987574.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.74855e+15,8.75606,237508,2,27724,5,553996,6,0,872,1.73572e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(A(A(((p175==0)||(p28==1)) U (p87==1)) U (((p79==0)||(p132==1))&&(((p2==1)||(p201==0))||(p49==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((E(!((((p79==0)||(p132==1))&&(((p2==1)||(p201==0))||(p49==1)))) U (!(!((E(!((p87==1)) U (!(((p1...355
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...473
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10442275980405651444.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10442275980405651444.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10442275980405651444.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10442275980405651444.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10442275980405651444.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13885235323653313783.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10926075307131449031.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13885235323653313783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10926075307131449031.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.74855e+15,5.03717,130664,3268,63,170214,1675,517,838078,53,12796,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(A(A(((i8.i0.u54.p175==0)||(i1.i1.u10.p28==1)) U (i9.u27.p87==1)) U (((i3.u25.p79==0)||(i6.i0.u42.p132==1))&&(((i9.u0.p2==1)||(i8.i2...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((E(!((((i3.u25.p79==0)||(i6.i0.u42.p132==1))&&(((i9.u0.p2==1)||(i8.i2.u61.p201==0))||(i2.i0.u16...525
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i1.u12.t114, i1.i0.u5.t124, i1.i1.u2.t127, i1.i1.u6.t0, i1.i1.u6.t1, i1.i1.u6.t2, i1.i1.u1...1054
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 192 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 172 transition count 197
Performed 24 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 24 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 172 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 148 transition count 173
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 112 place count 124 transition count 149
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 124 transition count 149
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 136 place count 124 transition count 140
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 115 transition count 140
Performed 37 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 37 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 78 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 230 place count 76 transition count 101
Applied a total of 230 rules in 20 ms. Remains 76 /193 variables (removed 117) and now considering 101/218 (removed 117) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 101 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 23 ms returned [100]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 76 cols
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 10/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/76 variables, 3/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 100/176 variables, 76/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 7/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 176/176 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 8294 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 18/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 36/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/76 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 18/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 5/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 100/176 variables, 76/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 96/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 0/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 176/176 variables, and 257 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 14881 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 76/76 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 23186ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 23186ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 76/193 places, 100/218 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 76 /76 variables (removed 0) and now considering 100/100 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 23392 ms. Remains : 76/193 places, 100/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:33:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:33:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality898663176066260546.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14346850859395198127.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality898663176066260546.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14346850859395198127.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.55241e+10,0.765909,31148,2,3276,5,82088,6,0,407,199901,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG(((p25==0) * EG((((p157==0)||(p82==1))&&(p102==1))))) + ((AF(EG((p136==1))) * EG((p97!=1))) * ((p98==1) + AG((p188==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(((p25==0) * EG((((p157==0)||(p82==1))&&(p102==1))))))) + ((!(EG(!(EG((p136==1))))) * EG...220
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...521
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16467299489354925380.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16467299489354925380.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16467299489354925380.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16467299489354925380.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16467299489354925380.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 112 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 76 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2356893402050732714.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18034783726531785207.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2356893402050732714.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18034783726531785207.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.55241e+10,1.18803,44356,908,39,59508,110,168,291370,47,438,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AG(((i0.u2.p25==0) * EG((((i3.u18.p157==0)||(i1.u8.p82==1))&&(i2.u11.p102==1))))) + ((AF(EG((i3.u15.p136==1))) * EG((i2.u9.p97!=1))) ...199
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(((i0.u2.p25==0) * EG((((i3.u18.p157==0)||(i1.u8.p82==1))&&(i2.u11.p102==1))))))) + ((!(...272
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t50, t52, t54, t65, t71, t72, t76, t85, t88, i0.t63, i0.t59, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t...640
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 20 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 20 transitions
Performed 20 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 20
Iterating post reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 193 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 173 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 172 transition count 197
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 172 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 147 transition count 172
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 123 transition count 148
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 123 transition count 148
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 123 transition count 138
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 113 transition count 138
Performed 34 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 34
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 228 place count 79 transition count 104
Applied a total of 228 rules in 16 ms. Remains 79 /193 variables (removed 114) and now considering 104/218 (removed 114) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-04 12:34:27] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:34:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 22 ms returned []
Running 103 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 7/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 104/183 variables, 79/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 8/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 4/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 3/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 4/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 4/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/183 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 183/183 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved in 10051 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 79/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 104/183 variables, 79/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 103/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 12/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 6/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:34:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/183 variables, 2/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 183/183 variables, and 320 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 103/103 constraints, Known Traps: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 40078ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 103 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40078ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/193 places, 104/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40247 ms. Remains : 79/193 places, 104/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 104 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2342393862134168494.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15407581716054929591.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2342393862134168494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15407581716054929591.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.65572e+10,0.767519,31084,2,3062,5,80520,6,0,422,190360,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(E(A((p11==1) U ((p91==0)||(p188==1))) U !(((p32==0)||(p1==1))))) + AG(((p135==0)&&((p184==0)||(p186==1))))) U (p86==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p86==1))))) * !(E(!((p86==1)) U (!((EG(E(!((E(!(((p91==0)||(p188==1))) U (!((p11==1)) * !(((p9...319
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...545
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10734224202494785905.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10734224202494785905.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10734224202494785905.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10734224202494785905.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10734224202494785905.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 108 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 86 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14253282584092176456.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:35:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5835036536503578027.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14253282584092176456.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5835036536503578027.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.65572e+10,1.4408,52756,992,41,71199,1132,178,351224,47,7109,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EG(E(A((i0.u2.p11==1) U ((i2.u11.p91==0)||(i4.u22.p188==1))) U !(((i0.u5.p32==0)||(i3.u0.p1==1))))) + AG(((i3.u16.p135==0)&&((i4.u22.p...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((i2.u13.p86==1))))) * !(E(!((i2.u13.p86==1)) U (!((EG(E(!((E(!(((i2.u11.p91==0)||(i4.u22.p188==...421
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t46, t48, t60, t70, t74, t78, t87, t102, i0.t59, i0.t58, i0.t55, i0.t32, i0.u3.t0, i0.u3...658
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 171 transition count 196
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 171 transition count 196
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 170 transition count 195
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 170 transition count 195
Applied a total of 46 rules in 4 ms. Remains 170 /193 variables (removed 23) and now considering 195/218 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 195 rows 170 cols
[2025-06-04 12:36:08] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:36:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 194 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:36:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/170 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 61 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 57 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 15/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 10/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 62 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 20/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 8/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 195/365 variables, 170/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 7/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 4/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 7/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 2/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 7/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 9/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 365/365 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 170/170 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 194/194 constraints, Known Traps: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/169 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/170 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 156/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 8/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/170 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 195/365 variables, 170/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 194/549 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 19/568 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 17/585 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 18/603 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60046ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 194 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 170/193 places, 195/218 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60226 ms. Remains : 170/193 places, 195/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 195 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7192857354116709233.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2293348146058377243.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7192857354116709233.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2293348146058377243.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.82006e+15,7.79965,226916,2,27960,5,538293,6,0,877,1.66217e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((AF((p196==1)) * (!(E((p10==1) U (p161==0))) + ((p163==0)&&(p79==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (!(EG(!((p196==1)))) * (!(E((p10==1) U (p161==0))) + ((p163==0)&&(p79==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...478
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8264484091634369384.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8264484091634369384.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8264484091634369384.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8264484091634369384.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8264484091634369384.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1829391207603759310.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6529885286069103258.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1829391207603759310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6529885286069103258.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.82006e+15,7.63332,162024,2994,69,199381,1843,483,962790,50,14446,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF((AF((i8.i1.u60.p196==1)) * (!(E((i1.i0.u4.p10==1) U (i7.u50.p161==0))) + ((i7.u48.p163==0)&&(i3.u25.p79==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (!(EG(!((i8.i1.u60.p196==1)))) * (!(E((i1.i0.u4.p10==1) U (i7.u50.p161==0))) + ((i7.u48....195
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i1.u5.t125, i1.i2.u9.t120, i1.i3.u2.t128, i1.i3.u6.t0, i1.i3.u6.t1, i1.i3.u6.t2, i1.i3.u10...1062
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 193/193 places, 218/218 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 21 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 21 transitions
Performed 21 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 21
Iterating post reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 21 place count 192 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 171 transition count 196
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 171 transition count 171
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 146 transition count 171
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 116 place count 122 transition count 147
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 122 transition count 147
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 122 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 112 transition count 137
Performed 38 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 38 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 38 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 76 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 74 transition count 99
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 238 place count 72 transition count 97
Applied a total of 238 rules in 27 ms. Remains 72 /193 variables (removed 121) and now considering 97/218 (removed 121) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 12:38:08] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:38:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:08] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 33 ms returned [96]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 12:38:08] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 13/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 11/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 5/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 96/168 variables, 72/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 6/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 10/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 6/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 2/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 5/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 5/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 11461 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 88/88 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 88/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 96/168 variables, 72/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 95/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 2/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 280 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 27172 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 38643ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38643ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/193 places, 96/218 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 38853 ms. Remains : 72/193 places, 96/218 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5491897875049199059.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:38:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15728574235983941690.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5491897875049199059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15728574235983941690.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.2562e+10,0.669084,28228,2,2738,5,74151,6,0,387,177744,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((p115==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((p115==1)))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 94/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,14.7332,468880,1,0,114,1.45159e+06,20,3,2320,4.04938e+06,113
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17315286132159277465.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17315286132159277465.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17315286132159277465.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17315286132159277465.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17315286132159277465.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 171 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6419732616898895178.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6912785146111193200.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6419732616898895178.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6912785146111193200.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.89369e+15,10.3163,187604,4649,84,201011,497,539,1.19343e+06,57,2659,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((AF((((i3.u24.p83==0)&&(i0.i1.u2.p7==1))&&(i10.u38.p125==0))) * AF((i3.u24.p84==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((!(EG(!((((i3.u24.p83==0)&&(i0.i1.u2.p7==1))&&(i10.u38.p125==0))))) * !(EG(!((i3.u24.p84==1)))))...167
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i1.u2.t150, i0.i1.u13.t8, i0.i1.u13.t9, i0.i1.u13.t10, i0.i1.u13.t11, i0.i2.t136, i0.i2.u1...1348
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 152 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3390385759656908283.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:54:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9248382018538271017.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3390385759656908283.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9248382018538271017.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.89369e+15,52.3527,1411808,11266,419,1.91629e+06,1351,197,1.23666e+07,97,29800,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((AF((((i0.i0.i0.i1.u19.p83==0)&&(i0.i0.i0.i0.u5.p7==1))&&(i0.i1.u59.p125==0))) * AF((i0.i0.i0.i1.u19.p84==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((!(EG(!((((i0.i0.i0.i1.u19.p83==0)&&(i0.i0.i0.i0.u5.p7==1))&&(i0.i1.u59.p125==0))))) * !(EG(!((i...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.i0.u5.t150, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t8, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t9, i0.i0.i0.i0.i1.u12.t10, i0...1978

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-005B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-005B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600073"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-005B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-005B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;