Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600066.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-005A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600066
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 492K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749038877658

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-005A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 12:07:58] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 12:07:58] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 53 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Transformed 73 places.
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Transformed 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 73 places and 98 transitions and 460 arcs in 139 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 72 out of 73 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 106 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 305 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:07:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 193 ms of which 142 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 63 ms of which 40 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 9762 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 39866ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39876ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40207 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 73 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 12:08:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 95 to 88
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (497 resets) in 1344 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 2/88 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (99 resets) in 152 ms. (261 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (105 resets) in 95 ms. (416 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp69 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 19/171 variables, and 13 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 30 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 8/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/21 constraints, State Equation: 0/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 36ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:08:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8806 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38844ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38845ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38970 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:09:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:09:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6261088383763677705.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18050157488381417553.ctl : 4 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6261088383763677705.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18050157488381417553.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.572998,23780,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p10==1) + !(E(EX((((p45==1)&&(p60==1))&&(p71==1))) U (((p48==1)&&(p49==1))&&(p54==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p10==1) + !(E(EX((((p45==1)&&(p60==1))&&(p71==1))) U (((p48==1)&&(p49==1))&&(p54==1)))))))...165
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
(forward)formula 0,1,19.7,635660,1,0,613,2.39748e+06,226,251,3435,5.64028e+06,509
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:09:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:09:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:09:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8642 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38674ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38675ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38808 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7320506279459722186.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13213134555159613600.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7320506279459722186.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13213134555159613600.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.556648,23828,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((((p62==0)||(p63==0))||(p67==0)) * (AG((((((p3==0)||(p18==0))||(p30==0))&&(p29==1))&&(p11==1))) + AF(((((p2==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p15==1))...304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((EY(Init) * ((((p62==0)||(p63==0))||(p67==0)) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((((p3==0)||(p18==0))||(p30==0))&&(p29=...884
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10853012379844209468.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10853012379844209468.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10853012379844209468.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10853012379844209468.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10853012379844209468.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 48 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4230302393595358414.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12385689410584378927.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4230302393595358414.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12385689410584378927.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.2042,41252,570,29,53365,376,116,264630,31,2369,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((((i4.u17.p62==0)||(i4.u18.p63==0))||(i4.u19.p67==0)) * (AG((((((i0.u1.p3==0)||(i1.u5.p18==0))||(i1.u8.p30==0))&&(i1.u8.p29==1))&&(i...442
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((EY(Init) * ((((i4.u17.p62==0)||(i4.u18.p63==0))||(i4.u19.p67==0)) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((((i0.u1.p3==0)||...1222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:11:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8660 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38690ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38692ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38825 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability360256304083994175.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15753906347290302610.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability360256304083994175.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15753906347290302610.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.537377,23828,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(E(EG(((p47==1)||((p66==1)&&(p70==1)))) U (((p19==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1))) U EF(AG((((p26==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p37==1)))))) + EF(((((p64...509
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U ((((p64==0)||(p69==0)) * !(EX(!(EG((((p40==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p51==1))))))) * (((!(E...692
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
(forward)formula 0,1,1.54747,54452,1,0,284,306993,218,103,3306,337204,209
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:11:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8543 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38565ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38566ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38690 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3436098541273934014.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9969790929805511385.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3436098541273934014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9969790929805511385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.517378,23824,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(E((p46==1) U ((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1)) + ((p10!=1) * !(AX((((p33==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p40==1)))))))) + EF(EG(AX((((p45==1)&&(p62=...395
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !((!(E((p46==1) U ((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1)) + ((p10!=1) * !(!(EX(!((((p33==1)&&(p35==1))...706
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9712359340567408915.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9712359340567408915.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9712359340567408915.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9712359340567408915.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9712359340567408915.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2418963764123100492.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2470793223771695311.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2418963764123100492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2470793223771695311.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.05426,38436,570,29,50809,415,116,240530,31,2560,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(E((i3.u13.p46==1) U ((((i1.u5.p20==1)&&(i1.u6.p21==1))&&(i1.u7.p26==1)) + ((i0.u3.p10!=1) * !(AX((((i2.u9.p33==1)&&(i2.u10.p35==1))&&...577
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((Init * !((!(E((i3.u13.p46==1) U ((((i1.u5.p20==1)&&(i1.u6.p21==1))&&(i1.u7.p26==1)) + ((i0.u3.p10!=1) *...979
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:13:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:13:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:13:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8847 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38868ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38869ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38986 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:14:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:14:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8107327706955463961.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13396408432893277032.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8107327706955463961.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13396408432893277032.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.513644,23828,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(E(((E(AX((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p25==1))) U (((p3==1)&&(p20==1))&&(p30==1))) * !((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1)))) * (p46==1)) U A...186
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((E(!(EX(!((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p25==1))))) U (((p3==1)&&(p20==1))&&(p30==1))) * !((((...253
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5718837890773943079.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5718837890773943079.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5718837890773943079.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5718837890773943079.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5718837890773943079.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15102606725531773667.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:14:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14360627840233783401.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15102606725531773667.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14360627840233783401.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.10955,41512,570,29,53825,413,116,265924,31,2518,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(E(((E(AX((((i1.u5.p20==1)&&(i1.u6.p21==1))&&(i1.u7.p25==1))) U (((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p20==1))&&(i1.u8.p30==1))) * !((((i1.u5.p20==...261
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((E(!(EX(!((((i1.u5.p20==1)&&(i1.u6.p21==1))&&(i1.u7.p25==1))))) U (((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u...328
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:15:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8420 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38459ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38459ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38591 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9876887171824568880.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17506401930585090640.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9876887171824568880.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17506401930585090640.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.527454,23824,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(EX((((p62==1)&&(p63==1))&&(p68==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EX((((p62==1)&&(p63==1))&&(p68==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17434401705339072849.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17434401705339072849.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17434401705339072849.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17434401705339072849.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17434401705339072849.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16508152174743226412.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6135451863788836568.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16508152174743226412.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6135451863788836568.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.16764,41260,570,29,53233,350,116,266388,31,2319,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF(EX((((i4.u17.p62==1)&&(i4.u18.p63==1))&&(i4.u19.p68==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EX((((i4.u17.p62==1)&&(i4.u18.p63==1))&&(i4.u19.p68==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 72 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 15 ms. Remains 72 /73 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 12:16:55] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:16:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 99 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 30 ms returned [30]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 12:16:55] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 71/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 21/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 17/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 14/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 96/168 variables, 72/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 3/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 11823 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 72/72 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 71/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 21/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 61/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 96/168 variables, 72/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 95/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 323 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 22484 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 72/72 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 34320ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34321ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/73 places, 96/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 34481 ms. Remains : 72/73 places, 96/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1757983866863668251.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:17:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2874907924594888830.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1757983866863668251.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2874907924594888830.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,0.530699,23564,2,2640,5,57370,6,0,386,140167,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((E(AG((((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&(p29==1))) U (p10!=1)) * E((((p31==1)&&(p46==1))&&(p58==1)) U ((p8==1)&&(p13==1)))) * ((p42==1) * AG((((...326
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(((E(!(E(TRUE U !((((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&(p29==1))))) U (p10!=1)) * E((((p31==1)&&(p46==1))&&(p58==1...468
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...520
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11090072753105443656.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11090072753105443656.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11090072753105443656.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11090072753105443656.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11090072753105443656.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4959697922599571508.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10272729635181181349.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4959697922599571508.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10272729635181181349.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,0.984925,38052,612,29,50367,354,131,239954,33,2181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((E(AG((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p18==1))&&(i1.u8.p29==1))) U (i0.u3.p10!=1)) * E((((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1))&&(i3.u16.p58==1)) ...479
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(((E(!(E(TRUE U !((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p18==1))&&(i1.u8.p29==1))))) U (i0.u3.p10!=1)) * E((((i2....633
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t33, t37, t42, t44, t54, t57, t64, t93, i0.t86, i0.t48, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...599
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 72 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 13 ms. Remains 72 /73 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 28 ms returned [30]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 12:18:30] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 71/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 21/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 17/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 14/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 96/168 variables, 72/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 3/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 11979 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 72/72 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 71/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 21/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 61/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 96/168 variables, 72/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 95/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 323 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 22895 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 72/72 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 34888ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34890ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/73 places, 96/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 35064 ms. Remains : 72/73 places, 96/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14501368785577517771.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15071158220559599793.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14501368785577517771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15071158220559599793.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,0.526668,23564,2,2640,5,57370,6,0,386,140167,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(((p52==1) + AF(!(((((p24==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p37==1))||(((p33==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p39==1))))))) U ((!(((!(((p24==1)&&(p6==1))&&((p7==1)&&(...322
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(((!(((p24==1)&&(p6==1))&&((p7==1)&&(p12==1))))&&(!(((p31==1)&&(p46==1))&&(p58==1))))) + ((!...823
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...520
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12049730142841302006.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12049730142841302006.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12049730142841302006.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12049730142841302006.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12049730142841302006.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5289118952948908326.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:19:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16962637753267512119.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5289118952948908326.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16962637753267512119.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,1.03557,39196,768,29,52347,329,135,248561,33,1922,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(((i3.u15.p52==1) + AF(!(((((i1.u7.p24==1)&&(i1.u8.p28==1))&&(i2.u11.p37==1))||(((i2.u9.p33==1)&&(i2.u10.p35==1))&&(i2.u11.p39==1))))...471
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((!(((!(((i1.u7.p24==1)&&(i0.u1.p6==1))&&((i0.u2.p7==1)&&(i0.u3.p12==1))))&&(!(((i2.u9.p31==1)&...1178
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t33, t37, t42, t44, t54, t57, t64, t93, i0.t86, i0.t48, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...599
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:20:05] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:20:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:20:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8885 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38917ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38917ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39037 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12525424796710973213.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:20:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability720259872690882984.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12525424796710973213.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability720259872690882984.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.513114,23760,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AF(EX((p18==0))) * (p50==1)) * ((p55==1) * ((p32==1) + !(E(E(((p36==1)&&(p41==1)) U (((p45==1)&&(p62==1))&&(p71==1))) U EG((((p61==1...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!(EX((p18==0))))) * (p50==1)) * ((p55==1) * ((p32==1) + !(E(E(((p36==1)&&(p41==1)) U (((p45=...236
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11721689171626700664.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11721689171626700664.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11721689171626700664.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11721689171626700664.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11721689171626700664.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5265135751971853787.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18331001432857537017.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5265135751971853787.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18331001432857537017.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.16368,41376,570,29,53249,403,116,267662,31,2459,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AF(EX((i1.u5.p18==0))) * (i3.u14.p50==1)) * ((i3.u16.p55==1) * ((i2.u9.p32==1) + !(E(E(((i2.u10.p36==1)&&(i2.u12.p41==1)) U (((i3.u1...267
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EG(!(EX((i1.u5.p18==0))))) * (i3.u14.p50==1)) * ((i3.u16.p55==1) * ((i2.u9.p32==1) + !(E(E(((i2...318
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:21:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8535 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38560ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38561ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38667 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:22:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:22:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4943366743471664493.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17430307303302222960.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4943366743471664493.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17430307303302222960.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.534465,23824,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(EF((!((((p34==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p39==1))) + EF(((((p40==1)&&(p42==1))&&((p51==1)&&(p61==1)))&&((p63==1)&&(p68==1)))))) U E((AX(EF((((p3...664
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!((((p34==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p39==1))) + E(TRUE U ((((p40==1)&&(p42==1))&&((p51=...1546
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7222694849949222999.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7222694849949222999.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7222694849949222999.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7222694849949222999.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7222694849949222999.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability612315033230474935.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:22:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12524507837831587864.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability612315033230474935.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12524507837831587864.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.22469,43680,570,29,55573,393,116,290178,31,2404,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(EF((!((((i2.u9.p34==1)&&(i2.u10.p35==1))&&(i2.u11.p39==1))) + EF(((((i2.u11.p40==1)&&(i2.u12.p42==1))&&((i3.u15.p51==1)&&(i4.u17.p61=...991
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(((FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!((((i2.u9.p34==1)&&(i2.u10.p35==1))&&(i2.u11.p39==1))) + E(TRUE U ((((i2.u11...2215
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:23:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8643 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38666ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38666ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38775 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1692418108823034292.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1200704066586838666.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1692418108823034292.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1200704066586838666.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.524689,23828,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((((p32==1) * (EG(!(((p68==1)&&(p72==1)))) + !(((((p17==1)&&(p32==1))&&((p44==1)&&(p68==1)))&&(((p70==1)&&(p2==1))&&((p4==1)&&(p16==1...400
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(((p1==1)&&(p9==1))) + EX((p71==1))) + !((E(!(((p66==1)&&(p70==1))) U (!((((p...1035
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3527416741433420020.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3527416741433420020.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3527416741433420020.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3527416741433420020.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3527416741433420020.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14615907584456779332.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:24:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11397887941589318351.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14615907584456779332.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11397887941589318351.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.03454,38564,570,29,50945,420,116,242438,31,2597,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((((i2.u9.p32==1) * (EG(!(((i4.u19.p68==1)&&(i4.u20.p72==1)))) + !(((((i1.u5.p17==1)&&(i2.u9.p32==1))&&((i2.u12.p44==1)&&(i4.u19.p68=...583
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(((i0.u0.p1==1)&&(i0.u3.p9==1))) + EX((i4.u20.p71==1))) + !((E(!(((i4.u19.p66...1446
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:25:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8531 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38562ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38562ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38683 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1959625242334822516.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:25:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3433911084307740762.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1959625242334822516.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3433911084307740762.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.526669,23824,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((EG((p15==1)) * (p66==1)) * (p72==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * (p72==1)) * (p66==1)),(p15==1))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 93/0/5
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14252561916667276459.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14252561916667276459.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14252561916667276459.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14252561916667276459.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14252561916667276459.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8624531762905220225.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13428510882548895510.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8624531762905220225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13428510882548895510.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.09446,41444,570,29,53286,439,116,267694,31,2623,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((EG((i0.u4.p15==1)) * (i4.u19.p66==1)) * (i4.u20.p72==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * (i4.u20.p72==1)) * (i4.u19.p66==1)),(i0.u4.p15==1))] != FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:26:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8624 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0)
(s1 1)
(s2 0)
(s3 0)
(s4 0)
(s5 0)
(s6 1)
(s7 1)
(s8 0)
(s9 0)
(s10 0)
(s11 1)
(s12 0)
(s13 0)
(s14 0)
(s15 1)
(s16 0)
(s17 0)
(s18 0)
(s19 0)
(s20 1)timeout

(s21 0) org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38651ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38652ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38780 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18122234527733915699.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17079081729971783065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18122234527733915699.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17079081729971783065.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.52,23832,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((AX((p28==1)) * EX(EG((((p12==0)||(p16==0))||(p23==0))))) * ((p31==1)&&(p46==1))) * ((p57==1) * (((p14==1) + AG(E((((p54==1)&&(p56==...280
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((!(EX(!((p28==1)))) * EX(EG((((p12==0)||(p16==0))||(p23==0))))) * ((p31==1)&&(p46==1))) * ((p57==...349
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2385029731679724851.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2385029731679724851.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2385029731679724851.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2385029731679724851.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2385029731679724851.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4040443726620916823.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:27:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4713375130768106870.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4040443726620916823.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4713375130768106870.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.35549,42276,750,29,56950,391,123,269335,31,2477,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((AX((i1.u8.p28==1)) * EX(EG((((i0.u3.p12==0)||(i0.u4.p16==0))||(i1.u7.p23==0))))) * ((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1))) * ((i3.u16.p5...405
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((!(EX(!((i1.u8.p28==1)))) * EX(EG((((i0.u3.p12==0)||(i0.u4.p16==0))||(i1.u7.p23==0))))) * ((i2.u9...474
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:28:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8569 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38608ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38608ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38717 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7882834233627305731.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:28:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5396501203713022999.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7882834233627305731.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5396501203713022999.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.548316,23828,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p12==1)&&(p14==1)) * ((p23==1) * ((AG((AF((p59==0)) * ((((p45==0)||(p60==0))||((p72==0)||(p40==0)))||((p44==0)||(p51==0))))) + AG((...388
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p12==1)&&(p14==1))) * (p23==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((p59==0)))) * ((((p45==0)||(p60...689
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11964856560457962580.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11964856560457962580.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11964856560457962580.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11964856560457962580.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11964856560457962580.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9575267195451257706.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability138898603223977884.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9575267195451257706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability138898603223977884.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.05439,37920,570,29,50334,385,116,236733,31,2356,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((i0.u3.p12==1)&&(i0.u4.p14==1)) * ((i1.u7.p23==1) * ((AG((AF((i4.u17.p59==0)) * ((((i3.u13.p45==0)||(i4.u17.p60==0))||((i4.u20.p72==...568
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i0.u3.p12==1)&&(i0.u4.p14==1))) * (i1.u7.p23==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((i4.u17.p59==...923
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:29:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8559 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38584ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38585ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38687 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4729802703095741496.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:30:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15326226911195303923.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4729802703095741496.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15326226911195303923.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.524694,23824,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((A(AF((((((p10==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))||(((p33==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p40==1)))||(((p52==1)&&(p56==1))&&(p65==1)))) U (((((EG((((p54==1)&&...533
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((((FwdU((EY(Init) * !((E(TRUE U (E((((p6==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p12==1)) U (((p10==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))) + EG...3529
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9562748136494611763.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9562748136494611763.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9562748136494611763.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9562748136494611763.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9562748136494611763.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3042227154839378106.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13765898796594308352.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3042227154839378106.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13765898796594308352.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.17435,41512,570,29,53225,431,116,268859,31,2529,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((A(AF((((((i0.u3.p10==1)&&(i0.u4.p16==1))&&(i1.u7.p23==1))||(((i2.u9.p33==1)&&(i2.u10.p35==1))&&(i2.u11.p40==1)))||(((i3.u15.p52==1)&&...797
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([((((FwdU((EY(Init) * !((E(TRUE U (E((((i0.u1.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p12==1)) U (((i0.u3.p10==1)&&(i...5198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8447 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38471ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38471ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38579 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11055751242452081038.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4474158091496841832.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11055751242452081038.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4474158091496841832.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.536202,23828,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(EX((((AX((p53==1)) + (((p47==1)&&(p49==1))&&(p54==1))) + (p0==0)) * A(!((((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&(p29==1))) U E((((p17==1)&&(p32==1))&&...396
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((!(EX(!((p53==1)))) + (((p47==1)&&(p49==1))&&(p54==1))) + (p0==0)) * !((E(!(E((((p1...631
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7654383492351961714.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7654383492351961714.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7654383492351961714.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7654383492351961714.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7654383492351961714.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16740567557376707940.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:32:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12035809213313394595.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16740567557376707940.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12035809213313394595.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.05587,39468,570,29,52074,443,116,249896,31,2631,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AG(EX((((AX((i3.u15.p53==1)) + (((i3.u13.p47==1)&&(i3.u14.p49==1))&&(i3.u15.p54==1))) + (i0.u0.p0==0)) * A(!((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p1...581
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX((((!(EX(!((i3.u15.p53==1)))) + (((i3.u13.p47==1)&&(i3.u14.p49==1))&&(i3.u15.p54==1)))...866
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15426600892109193962.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15426600892109193962.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15426600892109193962.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15426600892109193962.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15426600892109193962.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1978698137074464637.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:33:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18034614086619426931.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1978698137074464637.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18034614086619426931.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.988358,39348,570,29,51853,397,116,247546,31,2478,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((((i4.u17.p62==0)||(i4.u18.p63==0))||(i4.u19.p67==0)) * (AG((((((i0.u1.p3==0)||(i1.u5.p18==0))||(i1.u8.p30==0))&&(i1.u8.p29==1))&&(i...442
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((EY(Init) * ((((i4.u17.p62==0)||(i4.u18.p63==0))||(i4.u19.p67==0)) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((((i0.u1.p3==0)||...1222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 60 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10008961484649580815.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4372462118278628882.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10008961484649580815.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4372462118278628882.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.378216,20492,779,28,32856,118,150,65090,29,280,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((((u18.p62==0)||(u19.p63==0))||(u20.p67==0)) * (AG((((((u2.p3==0)||(u6.p18==0))||(u9.p30==0))&&(u9.p29==1))&&(u4.p11==1))) + AF(((((...377
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((EY(Init) * ((((u18.p62==0)||(u19.p63==0))||(u20.p67==0)) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((((u2.p3==0)||(u6.p18==0))...1063
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t32, t38, t41, t47, t51, t52, t58, t61, t66, t69, t75, t78, t85, t90, t94, u2.t0, u2.t1, u4.t...491
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 12:39:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:39:01] [INFO ] Transformed 73 places.
[2025-06-04 12:39:01] [INFO ] Transformed 98 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-04 12:39:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15077768767056063938.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:39:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8626107491631617346.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15077768767056063938.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8626107491631617346.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.677556,29848,2,3799,5,89190,6,0,392,170028,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((((((p62==0)||(p63==0))||(p67==0)) * (AG((((((p3==0)||(p18==0))||(p30==0))&&(p29==1))&&(p11==1))) + AF(((((p2==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p15==1))...304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((EY(Init) * ((((p62==0)||(p63==0))||(p67==0)) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((((p3==0)||(p18==0))||(p30==0))&&(p29=...884
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Total runtime 3569629 ms.

BK_STOP 1749042448570

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-005A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-005A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600066"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-005A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-005A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;