Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600065.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-005A, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600065
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 492K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 100K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 82K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 32K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749038412191

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-005A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 55 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Transformed 73 places.
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Transformed 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 73 places and 98 transitions and 460 arcs in 147 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 57 out of 73 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 101 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 327 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:00:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 9455 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 39539ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39550ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39901 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Support contains 57 out of 73 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 12:00:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:53] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 12:00:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Support contains 42 out of 73 places (down from 57) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 30 to 29
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (504 resets) in 980 ms. (40 steps per ms) remains 1/29 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (97 resets) in 259 ms. (153 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/5 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp6 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 15/171 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 23 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 5/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/21 constraints, State Equation: 0/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 27ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 9 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:00:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 9018 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 39051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39056ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39187 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:01:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:01:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8055476405199217394.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:01:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14725693973088044834.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8055476405199217394.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14725693973088044834.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.561407,23648,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF(((p15==0)||(p44==1))) * (EG(((p2==0)||(p1==1))) + AG(AF(((p20==0)||(p22==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((EY(Init) * E(TRUE U ((p15==0)||(p44==1)))),((p2==0)||(p1==1)))] != FALSE + [((EY(Init) * E(TRUE U ((p15=...232
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 92/0/6
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10746936776472825100.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10746936776472825100.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10746936776472825100.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10746936776472825100.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10746936776472825100.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15965583694997797824.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6965899455074739672.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15965583694997797824.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6965899455074739672.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.25191,42780,553,29,54465,411,116,281142,31,2466,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF(((i0.u4.p15==0)||(i2.u12.p44==1))) * (EG(((i0.u0.p2==0)||(i0.u0.p1==1))) + AG(AF(((i1.u5.p20==0)||(i1.u6.p22==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((EY(Init) * E(TRUE U ((i0.u4.p15==0)||(i2.u12.p44==1)))),((i0.u0.p2==0)||(i0.u0.p1==1)))] != FALSE + [((E...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:02:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:02:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:02:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8839 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:02:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38868ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38868ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39013 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5255308802091486527.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2478322683280901148.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5255308802091486527.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2478322683280901148.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.54529,23832,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!((AF((p57==1)) + EX(((p56==0)||(p12==1))))) U ((p55==0)||(p60==1))) * E(EF((p28==1)) U EG(E(((p21==0)||(p68==1)) U ((p48==0)||(p12==1...161
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * E(!((!(EG(!((p57==1)))) + EX(((p56==0)||(p12==1))))) U ((p55==0)||(p60==1)))),E(TRUE U (p28==...217
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:03:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:03:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7630841580055992862.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7630841580055992862.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7630841580055992862.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7630841580055992862.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7630841580055992862.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:03:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:03:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:03:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:03:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:03:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9446514415569435706.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:03:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9711803282188649859.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9446514415569435706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9711803282188649859.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.00471,38944,553,29,51362,410,116,245047,31,2599,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!((AF((i3.u16.p57==1)) + EX(((i3.u16.p56==0)||(i0.u3.p12==1))))) U ((i3.u16.p55==0)||(i4.u17.p60==1))) * E(EF((i1.u8.p28==1)) U EG(E((...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * E(!((!(EG(!((i3.u16.p57==1)))) + EX(((i3.u16.p56==0)||(i0.u3.p12==1))))) U ((i3.u16.p55==0)||...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8619 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38648ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38649ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38772 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16489897708958158227.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:04:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18281804945570192960.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16489897708958158227.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18281804945570192960.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.51839,23828,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX((p5==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!((p5==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
(forward)formula 0,0,11.245,370484,1,0,398,1.25817e+06,219,104,3333,3.13397e+06,318
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:05:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:05:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:05:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8659 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Broken pipe")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38706ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38707ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38821 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6368223837347551446.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:05:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16520877465998956568.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6368223837347551446.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16520877465998956568.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.536267,23824,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(EX(((p0==0)||(p44==1)))) * (AF(((p29!=1)&&(p71!=1))) + EG((AG(((p55!=0)&&(p40!=1))) * EG(((p63!=0)&&(p10!=1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((p0==0)||(p44==1))))))) * !(EG(!(((p29!=1)&&(p71!=1))))))] != FALSE + [Fw...295
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17482567446995810110.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17482567446995810110.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17482567446995810110.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17482567446995810110.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17482567446995810110.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7460284477798807629.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10606249600768808234.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7460284477798807629.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10606249600768808234.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.09058,39456,570,29,52741,403,116,247240,31,2586,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(EX(((i0.u0.p0==0)||(i2.u12.p44==1)))) * (AF(((i1.u8.p29!=1)&&(i4.u20.p71!=1))) + EG((AG(((i3.u16.p55!=0)&&(i2.u11.p40!=1))) * EG((...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((i0.u0.p0==0)||(i2.u12.p44==1))))))) * !(EG(!(((i1.u8.p29!=1)&&(i4.u20.p7...361
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:06:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:06:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:06:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8548 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38575ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38575ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38689 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:07:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:07:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16535005683425931282.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17693338986693494664.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16535005683425931282.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17693338986693494664.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.526102,23824,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EX(((((p53==0)&&(p50==1))&&((p42==0)&&(p63==1)))&&(((p6==0)&&(p68==0))&&((p31==0)&&((p45==0)||((p7==0)&&(p69==1))))))) + (EF(((p24==0...243
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EX(((((p53==0)&&(p50==1))&&((p42==0)&&(p63==1)))&&(((p6==0)&&(p68==0))&&((p31==0)&&((p45==0)||((p7==...292
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9062794832757979632.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9062794832757979632.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9062794832757979632.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9062794832757979632.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9062794832757979632.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8531784086531709901.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:07:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5130908587473603566.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8531784086531709901.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5130908587473603566.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.979602,38568,570,29,51085,417,116,241737,31,2453,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EX(((((i3.u15.p53==0)&&(i3.u14.p50==1))&&((i2.u12.p42==0)&&(i4.u18.p63==1)))&&(((i0.u1.p6==0)&&(i4.u19.p68==0))&&((i2.u9.p31==0)&&((i...363
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EX(((((i3.u15.p53==0)&&(i3.u14.p50==1))&&((i2.u12.p42==0)&&(i4.u18.p63==1)))&&(((i0.u1.p6==0)&&(i4.u...412
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 72 transition count 97
Applied a total of 2 rules in 21 ms. Remains 72 /73 variables (removed 1) and now considering 97/98 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 97 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 12:08:21] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:08:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 34 ms returned [30]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 95 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 96 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 12:08:21] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 71/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 21/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 17/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 14/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 96/168 variables, 72/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 3/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 3/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 4/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 168/168 variables, and 228 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 11470 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 72/72 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 71/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 21/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 61/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 96/168 variables, 72/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 95/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/168 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/168 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 168/168 variables, and 323 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved in 22629 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 72/72 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 95/95 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 34119ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 95 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34119ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/73 places, 96/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 14 ms. Remains 72 /72 variables (removed 0) and now considering 96/96 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 34338 ms. Remains : 72/73 places, 96/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:08:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 96 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:08:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7661558201252152195.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:08:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13064807677068300352.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7661558201252152195.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13064807677068300352.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,0.52971,23476,2,2640,5,57370,6,0,386,140167,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((p12==0)&&(p69==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((p12==0)&&(p69==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 84/0/12
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1542429722174741337.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1542429722174741337.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1542429722174741337.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1542429722174741337.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1542429722174741337.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18339076161436621826.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3271208467852924613.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18339076161436621826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3271208467852924613.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.00264e+10,1.26343,44964,696,29,58749,396,138,296548,33,2368,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((i0.u3.p12==0)&&(i4.u20.p69==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((i0.u3.p12==0)&&(i4.u20.p69==1))))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 98 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 12:09:55] [INFO ] Computed 21 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:09:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:09:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8534 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38562ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38562ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38685 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:10:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:10:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12377816755643037271.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:10:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality727108259655604304.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12377816755643037271.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality727108259655604304.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.568467,23836,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(AG((AF((p71==1)) + AF(((p62==0)||(p57==1)))))) * (AF(((((p22==0)&&(p42==1))&&(p3==0))||((p68==0)&&(p10==1)))) + AG(AX((p27==0)))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((p71==1)))) + !(EG(!(((p62==0)||(p57==1))))))))))))) * !(EG(!(...377
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4930018932773467125.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4930018932773467125.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4930018932773467125.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4930018932773467125.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4930018932773467125.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5846701305408223837.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12655095593700844691.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5846701305408223837.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12655095593700844691.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.19769,42140,570,29,53394,432,116,276985,31,2425,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(AG((AF((i4.u20.p71==1)) + AF(((i4.u17.p62==0)||(i3.u16.p57==1)))))) * (AF(((((i1.u6.p22==0)&&(i2.u12.p42==1))&&(i0.u1.p3==0))||((i...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EG(!((i4.u20.p71==1)))) + !(EG(!(((i4.u17.p62==0)||(i3.u16.p57==1))...457
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 73 /73 variables (removed 0) and now considering 98/98 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 12:11:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 97 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:11:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 5/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 6/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 171/171 variables, and 216 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 8446 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 72/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 21/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 47/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 98/171 variables, 73/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 97/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/171 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/171 variables, 0/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 171/171 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved in 30006 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 73/73 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 21/21 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 38464ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 97 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38464ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38587 ms. Remains : 73/73 places, 98/98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 98 transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11316086885307297856.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14341840048048418483.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11316086885307297856.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14341840048048418483.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.554908,23828,2,2700,5,58054,6,0,392,141855,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(EX(TRUE) U AX(E(A((p14==1) U (p68==1)) U (((p39==1)||(p22==0))||(p70==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(EX(!(E(!((E(!((p68==1)) U (!((p14==1)) * !((p68==1)))) + EG(!((p68==1))))) U (((p39==1)||(p2...453
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...530
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1897161345148026619.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1897161345148026619.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1897161345148026619.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1897161345148026619.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1897161345148026619.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11229403465553171212.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:12:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2137076278806669110.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11229403465553171212.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2137076278806669110.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.01759,37924,553,29,49817,382,116,238503,31,2410,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(EX(TRUE) U AX(E(A((i0.u4.p14==1) U (i4.u19.p68==1)) U (((i2.u11.p39==1)||(i1.u6.p22==0))||(i4.u20.p70==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(!(EX(!(E(!((E(!((i4.u19.p68==1)) U (!((i0.u4.p14==1)) * !((i4.u19.p68==1)))) + EG(!((i4.u19.p6...594
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6954635636626626777.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6954635636626626777.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6954635636626626777.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6954635636626626777.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6954635636626626777.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 92 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12924844596938171132.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:13:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2954302235261843672.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12924844596938171132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2954302235261843672.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,1.16539,43424,570,29,55654,414,116,284787,31,2538,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EF(((i0.u4.p15==0)||(i2.u12.p44==1))) * (EG(((i0.u0.p2==0)||(i0.u0.p1==1))) + AG(AF(((i1.u5.p20==0)||(i1.u6.p22==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((EY(Init) * E(TRUE U ((i0.u4.p15==0)||(i2.u12.p44==1)))),((i0.u0.p2==0)||(i0.u0.p1==1)))] != FALSE + [((E...282
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t37, t41, t47, t50, t58, t64, t67, t69, i0.t93, i0.t53, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t...603
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,296.317,2203080,1,0,2.23716e+06,414,327,1.20658e+07,80,2538,234029
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 60 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8312965122012516818.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 12:37:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15677897094575190642.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8312965122012516818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15677897094575190642.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.40013e+10,0.3735,20872,779,28,33276,118,150,67233,29,284,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!((AF((u17.p57==1)) + EX(((u17.p56==0)||(u4.p12==1))))) U ((u17.p55==0)||(u18.p60==1))) * E(EF((u9.p28==1)) U EG(E(((u7.p21==0)||(u20....197
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((Init * E(!((!(EG(!((u17.p57==1)))) + EX(((u17.p56==0)||(u4.p12==1))))) U ((u17.p55==0)||(u18.p60==1)...253
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t32, t38, t41, t47, t51, t52, t58, t61, t66, t69, t75, t78, t85, t90, t94, u2.t0, u2.t1, u4.t...491
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 21
(forward)formula 0,1,344.558,2967348,1,0,4.4842e+06,147,446,1.59945e+07,74,284,3588978
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: EF((AG(EX(((u22.p0==0)||(u13.p44==1)))) * (AF(((u9.p29!=1)&&(u21.p71!=1))) + EG((AG(((u17.p55!=0)&&(u12.p40!=1))) * EG(((u19.p63!=0)&&(u4...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(((u22.p0==0)||(u13.p44==1))))))) * !(EG(!(((u9.p29!=1)&&(u21.p71!=1))))))]...333
(forward)formula 1,0,687.886,4056580,1,0,6.72543e+06,147,371,2.1027e+07,74,284,2677083
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EG((EX(((((u16.p53==0)&&(u15.p50==1))&&((u13.p42==0)&&(u19.p63==1)))&&(((u2.p6==0)&&(u20.p68==0))&&((u10.p31==0)&&((u14.p45==0)||((u3.p7=...310
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EX(((((u16.p53==0)&&(u15.p50==1))&&((u13.p42==0)&&(u19.p63==1)))&&(((u2.p6==0)&&(u20.p68==0))&&((u10...359
(forward)formula 2,1,852.001,4480752,1,0,7.05206e+06,147,338,2.25258e+07,66,284,3754035
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(((u4.p12==0)&&(u21.p69==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((u4.p12==0)&&(u21.p69==1))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 3,0,884.134,4480752,1,0,7.05206e+06,147,466,2.25258e+07,74,284,6260694
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-005A-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-005A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-005A, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600065"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-005A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-005A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;