Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600057.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600057
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 584K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 50K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 15K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 171K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 93K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 49K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749035730833

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 69 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Transformed 163 places.
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Transformed 183 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 163 places and 183 transitions and 576 arcs in 170 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 15 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 86 out of 163 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 163/163 places, 183/183 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 154 transition count 174
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 154 transition count 174
Applied a total of 18 rules in 23 ms. Remains 154 /163 variables (removed 9) and now considering 174/183 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 174 rows 154 cols
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 216 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 392 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 173 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 60 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 16/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 20/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 12/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 13/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 18/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 4/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 8/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 7/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 5/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 9/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 3/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 4/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 57 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 3/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 174/328 variables, 154/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 10/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 11/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 376 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 173/173 constraints, Known Traps: 205/205 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/154 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 205/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 6/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 3/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 7/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 6/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 2/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 14/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 174/328 variables, 154/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 173/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 20/607 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 17/624 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 627 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 173/173 constraints, Known Traps: 283/283 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60100ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 173 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60110ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 154/163 places, 174/183 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60542 ms. Remains : 154/163 places, 174/183 transitions.
Support contains 86 out of 154 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 174 transitions.
Support contains 79 out of 154 places (down from 86) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (206 resets) in 884 ms. (45 steps per ms) remains 1/62 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (32 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-04 11:16:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 41/45 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 109/154 variables, 14/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 174/328 variables, 154/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 328/328 variables, and 171 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 292 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 41/45 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 109/154 variables, 14/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 99 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 18 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 6/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 174/328 variables, 154/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 2/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/328 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/328 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 328/328 variables, and 182 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 793 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 154/154 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1094ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Finished Parikh walk after 256 steps, including 1 resets, run visited all 1 properties in 3 ms. (steps per millisecond=85 )
Parikh walk visited 1 properties in 8 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 174 transitions.
Computed a total of 44 stabilizing places and 44 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 153 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 156
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 116 transition count 136
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 98 transition count 118
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 98 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 90 transition count 110
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 63 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 182 place count 61 transition count 81
Applied a total of 182 rules in 72 ms. Remains 61 /154 variables (removed 93) and now considering 81/174 (removed 93) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 59 ms returned [80]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-04 11:16:34] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 9/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/61 variables, 6/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 20/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 13/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 17/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 80/141 variables, 61/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 4/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 141/141 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 5972 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 47/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/61 variables, 6/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 21/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/61 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 80/141 variables, 61/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 77/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 141/141 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 9048 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 61/61 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 15035ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15035ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 61/154 places, 80/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 61 /61 variables (removed 0) and now considering 80/80 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 15324 ms. Remains : 61/154 places, 80/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5391316377202184509.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11458599536455793096.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5391316377202184509.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11458599536455793096.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.36481e+08,0.285641,14756,2,1750,5,34719,6,0,326,75034,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(!(EG(EF(((p39==0)||(p57==1)))))) U (p4==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(E(TRUE U ((p39==0)||(p57==1))))))))) * (p4==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...450
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9307291449705032547.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9307291449705032547.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9307291449705032547.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9307291449705032547.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9307291449705032547.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 85 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 70 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7171494648985503958.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4980677968317702738.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7171494648985503958.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4980677968317702738.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.36481e+08,0.628921,25280,574,37,31494,135,171,152408,46,472,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(!(EG(EF(((i0.u4.p39==0)||(i1.i0.u5.p57==1)))))) U (i0.u0.p4==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(E(TRUE U ((i0.u4.p39==0)||(i1.i0.u5.p57==1))))))))) * (i0.u0.p4==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t30, t35, t54, t62, t68, t69, t72, i0.t49, i0.t47, i0.u0.t25, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i...564
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 153 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 156
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 116 transition count 136
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 98 transition count 118
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 98 transition count 109
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 89 transition count 109
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 60 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 58 transition count 78
Applied a total of 188 rules in 31 ms. Remains 58 /154 variables (removed 96) and now considering 78/174 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 23 ms returned [77]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 12/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 9/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 8/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 4/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 9/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 162 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 12183 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 85/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 76/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 7277 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 19474ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 19474ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/154 places, 77/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 19660 ms. Remains : 58/154 places, 77/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17172351253965254126.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17599913696171972060.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17172351253965254126.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality17599913696171972060.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

RANDOM walk for 828 steps (10 resets) in 8 ms. (92 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 138 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 138 transition count 158
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 137 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 137 transition count 157
Applied a total of 34 rules in 12 ms. Remains 137 /154 variables (removed 17) and now considering 157/174 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 98 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 156 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 12/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 19/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 157/294 variables, 137/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 4/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 6/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 4/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 14/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 4/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 294/294 variables, and 299 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 28235 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 145/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 8/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 157/294 variables, 137/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 156/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 12/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 18/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/500 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 54 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 294/294 variables, and 505 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 190/190 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 58262ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58263ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/154 places, 157/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58420 ms. Remains : 137/154 places, 157/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10606222041003548857.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality769826422204382888.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10606222041003548857.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality769826422204382888.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76055e+12,3.75961,90708,2,13114,5,221772,6,0,707,619795,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(E(!((((p151==0)||(p64==1))&&(p39==0))) U !(EG(((p108==0)||(p146==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(!((((p151==0)||(p64==1))&&(p39==0))) U !(EG(((p108==0)||(p146==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...414
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5380656060840478478.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5380656060840478478.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5380656060840478478.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5380656060840478478.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5380656060840478478.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11072840870743201992.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5366902839277676079.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11072840870743201992.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5366902839277676079.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76055e+12,3.86346,78404,2026,63,99468,453,436,397182,53,2460,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX(E(!((((i8.i0.u46.p151==0)||(i3.i1.u21.p64==1))&&(i2.u13.p39==0))) U !(EG(((i5.i1.u34.p108==0)||(i8.i0.u44.p146==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(E(!((((i8.i0.u46.p151==0)||(i3.i1.u21.p64==1))&&(i2.u13.p39==0))) U !(EG(((i5.i1.u34.p...198
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i1.u2.t103, i1.i1.u5.t100, i1.i1.u6.t0, i1.i1.u6.t1, i1.i1.u6.t2, i1.i2.u10.t3, i1.i2.u10....869
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 137 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 137 transition count 157
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 136 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 136 transition count 156
Applied a total of 36 rules in 13 ms. Remains 136 /154 variables (removed 18) and now considering 156/174 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 156 rows 136 cols
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 162 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 155 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 9/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 7/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 4/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 6/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 4/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 2/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 156/292 variables, 136/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 6/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 7/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 3/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 277 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 155/155 constraints, Known Traps: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 122/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 3/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 3/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 3/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 5/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 2/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 8/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 2/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 3/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 156/292 variables, 136/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 155/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 20/488 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 10/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 5/503 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 506 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 155/155 constraints, Known Traps: 198/198 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60036ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 155 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/154 places, 156/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60214 ms. Remains : 136/154 places, 156/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 156 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8270576895705217155.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11983534752817592398.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8270576895705217155.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11983534752817592398.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.57227e+12,2.71083,86928,2,12752,5,213749,6,0,702,588116,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(((((p151!=0)&&(p86!=1))||(p154==1))&&(((p74==0)||(p5==1))||(p81==1)))) + (EG((EX((p55!=1)) * ((p134!=1)||((p118!=0)&&(p37!=1))))) ...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(((((p151!=0)&&(p86!=1))||(p154==1))&&(((p74==0)||(p5==1))||(p81==1)))))))] != FALSE ...402
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...408
(forward)formula 0,1,8.95354,230260,1,0,358,1.25404e+06,329,161,4562,1.37394e+06,319
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 141 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 141 transition count 161
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 140 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 140 transition count 160
Applied a total of 28 rules in 13 ms. Remains 140 /154 variables (removed 14) and now considering 160/174 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 160 rows 140 cols
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 148 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 159 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 15/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 9/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 10/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 5/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 9/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 4/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 8/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 8/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 7/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 160/300 variables, 140/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 9/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 3/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 5/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 3/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 2/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 3/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/300 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 300/300 variables, and 303 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps: 145/145 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 145/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 12/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 3/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 160/300 variables, 140/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 159/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 6/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 19/506 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 7/513 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/514 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 6/520 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60034ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 159 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60035ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/154 places, 160/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60196 ms. Remains : 140/154 places, 160/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 160 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7798046085280616549.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6563495463286208798.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7798046085280616549.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6563495463286208798.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91069e+12,2.91376,92736,2,13907,5,222403,6,0,722,636588,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX(AG(((!(A(((p83==0)||(p158==1)) U (p121==0))) * (p77!=0)) * (p58!=1)))) + EG(((!(E(EG((p136==0)) U (p123==0))) * (EX((p60==1)) + !(E(...312
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(EY(((Init * !(!((E(!(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p116==0)))) + !((EX((p15==0)) * (p96==1)))))) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(...1487
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...440
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11749615239621668491.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11749615239621668491.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11749615239621668491.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11749615239621668491.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11749615239621668491.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6894383009972941936.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2087059377181583369.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6894383009972941936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2087059377181583369.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.91069e+12,2.53846,80480,2726,71,98735,330,421,603788,54,1584,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX(AG(((!(A(((i2.u26.p83==0)||(i8.u48.p158==1)) U (i5.u37.p121==0))) * (i2.u25.p77!=0)) * (i3.u19.p58!=1)))) + EG(((!(E(EG((i7.u42.p136...459
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(EY(((Init * !(!((E(!(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i5.u36.p116==0)))) + !((EX((i0.i1.i1.u6.p15==0)) * (i4.u31.p96==...2028
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i1.u9.t97, i0.i1.i0.t103, i0.i1.i0.u7.t105, i0.i1.i1.u6.t0, i0.i1.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.i1.u6...875
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 135 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 135 transition count 155
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 134 transition count 154
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 134 transition count 154
Applied a total of 40 rules in 6 ms. Remains 134 /154 variables (removed 20) and now considering 154/174 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 154 rows 134 cols
[2025-06-04 11:23:18] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:23:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 153 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 19/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 13/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 11/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 5/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 10/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 154/288 variables, 134/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 2/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 6/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 4/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 3/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 4/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/288 variables, 4/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 9/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 2/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 288/288 variables, and 273 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 119/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 15/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 6/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 4/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 4/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 154/288 variables, 134/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 153/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 13/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 2/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 10/484 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 3/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 47 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 288/288 variables, and 491 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 153/153 constraints, Known Traps: 184/184 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 153 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/154 places, 154/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60213 ms. Remains : 134/154 places, 154/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 154 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4476588874161122487.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12209943983878141252.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4476588874161122487.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12209943983878141252.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38047e+12,2.60415,84860,2,12385,5,209617,6,0,692,575565,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((p107==0) U !(EF(AX(!(((p126==0)||(p83==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(((p126==0)||(p83==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(((p126==0)||(p8...251
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...398
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13797212041837399613.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13797212041837399613.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13797212041837399613.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13797212041837399613.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13797212041837399613.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15953014774144325607.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15781441544408626188.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15953014774144325607.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15781441544408626188.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38047e+12,2.63874,68184,1669,44,86559,223,388,369193,42,927,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((i5.i1.u34.p107==0) U !(EF(AX(!(((i7.u40.p126==0)||(i4.u26.p83==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!(((i7.u40.p126==0)||(i4.u26.p83==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(!((...303
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i0.u5.t97, i1.i0.u6.t0, i1.i0.u6.t1, i1.i0.u6.t2, i1.i1.u9.t92, i1.i1.u10.t3, i1.i1.u10.t4...842
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 136 transition count 156
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 136 transition count 156
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 135 transition count 155
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 135 transition count 155
Applied a total of 38 rules in 13 ms. Remains 135 /154 variables (removed 19) and now considering 155/174 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 155 rows 135 cols
[2025-06-04 11:25:18] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:25:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 89 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 154 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 12/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 12/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 10/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 5/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 8/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 5/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 155/290 variables, 135/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 4/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 13/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 4/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 1/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 2/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 2/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 5/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/290 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 290/290 variables, and 269 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 154/154 constraints, Known Traps: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 115/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 5/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 4/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 155/290 variables, 135/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 154/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 5/441 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 2/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 16/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 3/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 1/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/290 variables, 4/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60029ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 154 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60029ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/154 places, 155/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60202 ms. Remains : 135/154 places, 155/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 155 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11847826395095877057.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6672765478419169965.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11847826395095877057.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6672765478419169965.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38047e+12,2.71246,85468,2,12508,5,210142,6,0,697,577508,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((p34==0)||(p32==1)) + (AG((p0==1)) + (p109==0))) + ((AG(((p40==0)&&(p127==1))) + EF((p43==1))) + (((p43==0)&&(p9==1)) + (EX(TRUE) *...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((p34==0)||(p32==1)) + (!(E(TRUE U !((p0==1)))) + (p109==0))) + ((!(E(TRUE U !(((p40==0)&&(p127==1)...252
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...403
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13297615807941121594.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13297615807941121594.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13297615807941121594.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13297615807941121594.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13297615807941121594.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3862863352673675154.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10676975224188646350.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3862863352673675154.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10676975224188646350.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38047e+12,2.34575,63068,1802,43,83384,294,423,333182,42,1316,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((i1.u9.p34==0)||(i1.u10.p32==1)) + (AG((i0.i0.u0.p0==1)) + (i5.i1.u34.p109==0))) + ((AG(((i2.i2.u13.p40==0)&&(i7.i1.u40.p127==1))) ...254
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((i1.u9.p34==0)||(i1.u10.p32==1)) + (!(E(TRUE U !((i0.i0.u0.p0==1)))) + (i5.i1.u34.p109==0))) + ((!...333
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.t93, i1.u10.t95, i2.i0.u2.t101, i2.i0.u5.t98, i2.i0.u6.t0, i2.i0.u6.t1, i2.i0.u6.t2, i2.i1...845
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 153 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 156
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 116 transition count 136
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 97 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 97 transition count 117
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 112 place count 97 transition count 109
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 89 transition count 109
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 61 transition count 81
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 59 transition count 79
Applied a total of 186 rules in 22 ms. Remains 59 /154 variables (removed 95) and now considering 79/174 (removed 95) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 19 ms returned [78]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 20/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 4/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 5/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 78/137 variables, 59/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 131 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 6539 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 16/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 46/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 9/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 78/137 variables, 59/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 76/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 210 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 5141 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 11689ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11689ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/154 places, 78/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 11865 ms. Remains : 59/154 places, 78/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18358399868491112135.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11040639623044588614.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18358399868491112135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11040639623044588614.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.71531e+08,0.27304,14784,2,1708,5,34405,6,0,317,75664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p43==0)||(p27==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p43==0)||(p27==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 69/0/9
(forward)formula 0,0,1.82288,66204,1,0,77,253373,19,3,1884,464304,76
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 153 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 156
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 117 transition count 137
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 91 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 2 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 98 transition count 118
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 98 transition count 109
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 89 transition count 109
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 60 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 58 transition count 78
Applied a total of 188 rules in 21 ms. Remains 58 /154 variables (removed 96) and now considering 78/174 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 94 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 25 ms returned [77]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 8/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 124 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 5019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 49/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 76/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 3265 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8292ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8292ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/154 places, 77/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8459 ms. Remains : 58/154 places, 77/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
RANDOM walk for 74 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (14 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9379950966064429906.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9714660852596692841.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9379950966064429906.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9714660852596692841.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 153 transition count 159
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 139 transition count 158
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 138 transition count 158
Performed 21 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 21 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 138 transition count 137
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 117 transition count 137
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 90 place count 99 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 99 transition count 119
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 108 place count 99 transition count 112
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 92 transition count 112
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 178 place count 64 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 62 transition count 82
Applied a total of 180 rules in 14 ms. Remains 62 /154 variables (removed 92) and now considering 82/174 (removed 92) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 20 ms returned [81]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 13/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 2/62 variables, 3/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 13/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 81/143 variables, 62/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 9/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 3/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 4/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 143/143 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5797 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 14/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 38/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/62 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 6/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 81/143 variables, 62/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 78/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 3/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 2/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/143 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/143 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 143/143 variables, and 223 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 30006 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 35813ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35814ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/154 places, 81/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 62 /62 variables (removed 0) and now considering 81/81 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 35954 ms. Remains : 62/154 places, 81/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16358515024926416705.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1728091010138433638.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16358515024926416705.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1728091010138433638.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50792e+08,0.41992,19532,2,2105,5,47436,6,0,331,114317,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((!(A((p157==1) U (p134==0))) * (p105==1))) + EF(AG(((p11==0)||(p136==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((Init * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p11==0)||(p136==1)))))))),TRUE) * !(EG(!((p134==0))))) * !(E(!((p134=...304
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...445
(forward)formula 0,1,29.7515,853308,1,0,692,3.404e+06,198,227,2708,7.67213e+06,713
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 138 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 138 transition count 158
Applied a total of 32 rules in 1 ms. Remains 138 /154 variables (removed 16) and now considering 158/174 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-04 11:28:47] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:28:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 140 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 15/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 48 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 6/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 4/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 8/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 158/296 variables, 138/281 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 5/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 4/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/296 variables, 4/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 3/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 5/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 4/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 5/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 3/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 296/296 variables, and 319 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 164/164 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 164/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 48 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 46 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 43 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 8/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 9/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 4/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 158/296 variables, 138/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 157/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 11/510 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 15/525 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 20/545 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 296/296 variables, and 550 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 238/238 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/154 places, 158/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60181 ms. Remains : 138/154 places, 158/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13672224663658062692.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4213427308077506808.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13672224663658062692.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4213427308077506808.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.47572e+12,2.91214,91720,2,15672,5,220525,6,0,712,628451,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((p63==1) * ((AX(FALSE) + AF((p154==0))) + !(E(((p100==0)||(p113==1)) U ((p77==0)||(p49==1)))))) * ((p137==0)||(p60==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((p63==1) * ((!(EX(!(FALSE))) + !(EG(!((p154==0))))) + !(E(((p100==0)||(p113==1)) U ((p77==0)||(p4...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...424
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph681381405589362140.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph681381405589362140.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph681381405589362140.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph681381405589362140.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph681381405589362140.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14815476893416359219.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17752791979268959236.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14815476893416359219.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17752791979268959236.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.47572e+12,2.43379,65712,2064,45,86580,683,409,362018,46,3141,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((i3.i0.u20.p63==1) * ((AX(FALSE) + AF((i8.i1.u50.p154==0))) + !(E(((i5.i0.u32.p100==0)||(i6.u36.p113==1)) U ((i4.u25.p77==0)||(i3.i0...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((i3.i0.u20.p63==1) * ((!(EX(!(FALSE))) + !(EG(!((i8.i1.u50.p154==0))))) + !(E(((i5.i0.u32.p100==0...272
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i0.u5.t100, i1.i0.u6.t0, i1.i0.u6.t1, i1.i0.u6.t2, i1.i1.u9.t95, i1.i1.u10.t3, i1.i1.u10.t...915
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 153 transition count 156
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 156
Performed 20 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 20 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 136 transition count 136
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 116 transition count 136
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 92 place count 98 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 98 transition count 118
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 98 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 90 transition count 110
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 60 transition count 80
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 58 transition count 78
Applied a total of 188 rules in 15 ms. Remains 58 /154 variables (removed 96) and now considering 78/174 (removed 96) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:30:47] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:30:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:47] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 23 ms returned [77]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:30:47] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 9/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 6/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4682 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 44/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 76/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4394 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 9089ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9089ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/154 places, 77/174 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 9222 ms. Remains : 58/154 places, 77/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7704187565987241722.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13815369834456785796.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7704187565987241722.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13815369834456785796.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.33467e+08,0.230821,13456,2,1705,5,30847,6,0,312,66887,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((p65==0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(p65==0))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 72/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,1.77421,65960,1,0,77,251794,19,3,1861,463337,76
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 138 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 138 transition count 158
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 137 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 137 transition count 157
Applied a total of 34 rules in 3 ms. Remains 137 /154 variables (removed 17) and now considering 157/174 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-04 11:30:58] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:30:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:30:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 156 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:30:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 57 ms of which 15 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 15/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 4/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 6/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 8/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 157/294 variables, 137/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 7/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 0/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/294 variables, 2/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 294/294 variables, and 270 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 113/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 157/294 variables, 137/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 156/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 11/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 9/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 294/294 variables, and 461 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 148/148 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60041ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60042ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/154 places, 157/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60186 ms. Remains : 137/154 places, 157/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6995602670799001296.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:31:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality243653863811000990.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6995602670799001296.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality243653863811000990.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0571e+12,3.01456,94528,2,13444,5,228789,6,0,707,651674,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((AF((((p142!=0)&&(p11!=1)) * AX(((p66==0)||(p94==1))))) * (AF((p55==1)) + ((p19==0)&&(p119==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(EG(!((((p142!=0)&&(p11!=1)) * !(EX(!(((p66==0)||(p94==1)))))))))) * !(EG(!((p55==1))...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...414
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8995265697599055680.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8995265697599055680.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8995265697599055680.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8995265697599055680.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8995265697599055680.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6228199180041706646.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:32:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3589479600430989449.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6228199180041706646.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3589479600430989449.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0571e+12,3.87186,92124,2140,80,120765,364,410,528530,53,2461,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((AF((((i8.i0.u44.p142!=0)&&(i0.i1.u5.p11!=1)) * AX(((i3.i1.u22.p66==0)||(i5.i0.u30.p94==1))))) * (AF((i3.i0.u18.p55==1)) + ((i0.i1....188
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(EG(!((((i8.i0.u44.p142!=0)&&(i0.i1.u5.p11!=1)) * !(EX(!(((i3.i1.u22.p66==0)||(i5.i0....403
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i1.u2.t103, i0.i1.u5.t100, i0.i1.u6.t0, i0.i1.u6.t1, i0.i1.u6.t2, i0.i2.u10.t3, i0.i2.u10....873
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 139 transition count 159
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 139 transition count 159
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 138 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 138 transition count 158
Applied a total of 32 rules in 10 ms. Remains 138 /154 variables (removed 16) and now considering 158/174 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 158 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-04 11:32:59] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:32:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:32:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:32:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 157 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:32:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 11/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 7/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 6/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 158/296 variables, 138/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 3/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 5/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 4/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 4/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/296 variables, 3/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/296 variables, 2/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 6/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 4/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 2/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 296/296 variables, and 263 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 107/107 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 107/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 13/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 4/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 158/296 variables, 138/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 157/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 7/446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 5/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 19/470 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/296 variables, 1/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 296/296 variables, and 472 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 157/157 constraints, Known Traps: 159/159 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 60034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 157 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/154 places, 158/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60172 ms. Remains : 138/154 places, 158/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:33:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 158 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:33:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12268164122348678793.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:33:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4707081298365119585.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12268164122348678793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4707081298365119585.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0488e+12,2.91183,93392,2,13348,5,225433,6,0,712,644421,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((p71==1)) * AF((p108==1))) * (EX(TRUE) + E(AX((EF(((p119==0)||(p124==1))) * (p86==1))) U ((AG(E(((p47==0)||(p38==1)) U ((p108==0)||(...221
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (p71==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!((p108==1)))] = FALSE) * [((Init * !(E(!(EX(!((E(TRUE U...388
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...419
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4926585408364172717.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4926585408364172717.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4926585408364172717.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4926585408364172717.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4926585408364172717.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2837220494125290924.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:34:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5748786573415986747.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2837220494125290924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5748786573415986747.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0488e+12,3.59098,77000,2070,75,99816,416,438,377453,53,2509,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EF((i3.i1.u23.p71==1)) * AF((i5.i1.u34.p108==1))) * (EX(TRUE) + E(AX((EF(((i6.u37.p119==0)||(i0.u39.p124==1))) * (i0.u27.p86==1))) U ((...326
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(Init * !(E(TRUE U (i3.i1.u23.p71==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(Init,!((i5.i1.u34.p108==1)))] = FALSE) * [((Init * ...507
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i1.u2.t104, i1.i1.u5.t101, i1.i1.u6.t0, i1.i1.u6.t1, i1.i1.u6.t2, i1.i2.u10.t3, i1.i2.u10....878
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 154/154 places, 174/174 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 138 transition count 158
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 138 transition count 158
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 137 transition count 157
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 137 transition count 157
Applied a total of 34 rules in 2 ms. Remains 137 /154 variables (removed 17) and now considering 157/174 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 157 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-04 11:34:59] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:34:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:34:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:34:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 85 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 156 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:34:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 20/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 11/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 12/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 157/294 variables, 137/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 6/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 5/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 5/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 11/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 3/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 1/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 294/294 variables, and 296 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 156/156 constraints, Known Traps: 140/140 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 140/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 157/294 variables, 137/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 156/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 14/468 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 7/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 4/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 2/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/294 variables, 5/486 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60035ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 156 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60035ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/154 places, 157/174 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60166 ms. Remains : 137/154 places, 157/174 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 157 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8953920995196805430.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:35:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1579592594435638440.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8953920995196805430.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1579592594435638440.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.58999e+12,2.76551,86492,2,12705,5,211827,6,0,707,584542,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((EF((((p95==0)||(p102==1))&&(p66==1))) * E(AG((p33==1)) U ((p111==1)&&(p68==0)))) * (!(A((p155==1) U !(((p101==0)||(p1==1))))) * (E((...280
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (((p95==0)||(p102==1))&&(p66==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !((p33==1)...569
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...415
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8678278547696920689.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8678278547696920689.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8678278547696920689.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8678278547696920689.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8678278547696920689.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14271216822961340182.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:36:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality963379555151057895.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14271216822961340182.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality963379555151057895.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.58999e+12,2.47616,65868,1714,46,82140,294,389,361284,45,1254,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((EF((((i5.i0.u30.p95==0)||(i5.i0.u32.p102==1))&&(i3.i1.u22.p66==1))) * E(AG((i1.i1.u11.p33==1)) U ((i5.i1.u35.p111==1)&&(i3.i1.u22.p6...454
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (((i5.i0.u30.p95==0)||(i5.i0.u32.p102==1))&&(i3.i1.u22.p66==1)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Ini...815
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i0.t100, i1.i0.u6.t0, i1.i0.u6.t1, i1.i0.u6.t2, i1.i0.u7.t102, i1.i1.u9.t94, i1.i1.u10.t3,...863
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10666978639877848926.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10666978639877848926.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10666978639877848926.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10666978639877848926.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10666978639877848926.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 135 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15650655686024458269.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:36:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14537978966154282263.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15650655686024458269.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14537978966154282263.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.44067e+12,1.7653,56812,2491,81,84306,322,450,239987,61,1924,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(!(EG(EF(((i2.u11.p39==0)||(i3.u16.p57==1)))))) U (i1.i1.u1.p4==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(E(TRUE U ((i2.u11.p39==0)||(i3.u16.p57==1))))))))) * (i1.i1.u1.p4==1))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i1.u1.t119, i1.i1.u4.t0, i1.i1.u4.t1, i1.i1.u4.t2, i1.i1.u5.t116, i1.i1.u5.t118, i1.i2.t11...1067
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 120 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8906332743083472553.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:49:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8527673657299723196.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8906332743083472553.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8527673657299723196.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.44067e+12,18.0165,559028,6069,351,781216,1333,214,4.87222e+06,102,24342,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG(!(EG(EF(((i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.p39==0)||(i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u15.p57==1)))))) U (i0.i0.i0.u4.p4==1))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(E(TRUE U ((i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.p39==0)||(i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.u15.p57==1))))))))) * (i0.i0.i...177
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.u4.t119, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t6, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t7, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11.t8, i0.i0.i0.i1.u11...1547

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600057"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;