Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600050.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600050
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 508K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 94K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749035499020

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-004A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 51 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Transformed 59 places.
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Transformed 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 59 places and 79 transitions and 368 arcs in 138 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 15 ms.
Support contains 57 out of 59 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 311 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 58 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5276 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8480 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13826ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13837ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14174 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Support contains 57 out of 59 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 93 to 80
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (610 resets) in 858 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 1/80 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (141 resets) in 188 ms. (211 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp75 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 13/138 variables, and 7 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 27 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 3/17 constraints, State Equation: 0/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 31ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 180 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 255 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4873 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8146 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13035ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13036ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13294 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15140056937255917305.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7840570466990489141.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15140056937255917305.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7840570466990489141.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.20064,11808,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX((((p52==1)&&(p58==1))||((p8==1)&&(p13==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((p52==1)&&(p58==1))||((p8==1)&&(p13==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16981822301543805226.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16981822301543805226.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16981822301543805226.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16981822301543805226.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16981822301543805226.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability434100460326943152.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11212841819708980837.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability434100460326943152.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11212841819708980837.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.579094,25788,518,29,35649,364,112,143999,31,2239,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX((((i3.u15.p52==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))||((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u4.p13==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((i3.u15.p52==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))||((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u4.p13==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4574 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8052 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12639ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12640ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12767 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2997607804567278702.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2719146891675165969.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2997607804567278702.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2719146891675165969.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.201511,11852,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((p24==0)) * AG(((((((p47==0)||(p49==0))||(p53==0)) * EX((((p17==0)||(p34==0))||(p44==0)))) + AX((p43==0))) + ((p33==0)||(((p47==1)&&(...178
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG((p24==0))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p33==0)||(((p47==1)&&(p49==1))&&(p53==1))))) ...260
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph303115649394761268.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph303115649394761268.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph303115649394761268.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph303115649394761268.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph303115649394761268.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8120740128999481110.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9162375702690308357.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8120740128999481110.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9162375702690308357.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.550932,25924,518,29,35511,415,112,144650,31,2485,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG((i1.u7.p24==0)) * AG(((((((i3.u13.p47==0)||(i3.u14.p49==0))||(i3.u15.p53==0)) * EX((((i1.u5.p17==0)||(i2.u9.p34==0))||(i2.u12.p44==0)...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG((i1.u7.p24==0))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i2.u9.p33==0)||(((i3.u13.p47==1)&&(i3.u...340
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4573 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 7975 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12563ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12564ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12686 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17491182310718732297.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8469845184069235643.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17491182310718732297.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8469845184069235643.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.182271,11860,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((p19!=1) + AX(((!((((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&((p29==1)&&(p46==1)))) + AF((((p48==1)&&(p49==1))&&(p53==1)))) + E((((p40==1)&&(p44==1))&&(p5...311
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * E(((p19!=1) + !(EX(!(((!((((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&((p29==1)&&(p46==1)))) + !(EG(!((((p48==1)&&(p49==1)...398
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17614842425201748470.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17614842425201748470.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17614842425201748470.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17614842425201748470.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17614842425201748470.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12948773947152666330.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9982775956272434365.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12948773947152666330.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9982775956272434365.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.607733,27720,518,29,37983,379,112,160521,31,2467,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(((i1.u5.p19!=1) + AX(((!((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p18==1))&&((i1.u8.p29==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1)))) + AF((((i3.u13.p48==1)&&(i3.u14.p49==1)...449
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * E(((i1.u5.p19!=1) + !(EX(!(((!((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p18==1))&&((i1.u8.p29==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1)))...536
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4787 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8505 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13307ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13308ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13425 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7459133471644671755.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6758622051443532074.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7459133471644671755.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6758622051443532074.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.195265,11864,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (!(E(!(((EF((p56==1)) * ((((p40==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p51==1))||(p46==1))) + ((A((((p40==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p51==1)) U (((p17==1)&&(p32==1))&&(p4...237
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * !(EX((p15==1)))),!(((E(TRUE U (p56==1)) * ((((p40==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p51==1))||(p46==1))) + ((!(...393
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
(forward)formula 0,1,0.651126,27112,1,0,230,143242,180,84,2650,154858,171
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 30 ms returned [27]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 78/137 variables, 59/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 5/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 4969 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 28/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 78/137 variables, 59/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 77/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 11589 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16574ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16575ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/59 places, 78/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 16729 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 78/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4362043773928090079.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7420742398621476679.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4362043773928090079.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7420742398621476679.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.213759,11852,2,1658,5,25197,6,0,316,54865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((((p15==0)&&(p33==1))&&((p35==1)&&(p40==1))) * ((AF(((p54==1)&&(p58==1))) + (p18==1)) + E((((p31==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p58==1)) U (((p3...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((p15==0)&&(p33==1))&&((p35==1)&&(p40==1))) * ((!(EG(!(((p54==1)&&(p58==1))))) + (p1...250
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...450
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2718376361895198349.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2718376361895198349.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2718376361895198349.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2718376361895198349.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2718376361895198349.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11798857776256730916.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12363810887633962294.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11798857776256730916.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12363810887633962294.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.550389,24520,424,29,33074,412,112,135785,31,2487,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(((((i0.u4.p15==0)&&(i2.u9.p33==1))&&((i2.u10.p35==1)&&(i2.u11.p40==1))) * ((AF(((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))) + (i1.u5.p18==1)...273
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((i0.u4.p15==0)&&(i2.u9.p33==1))&&((i2.u10.p35==1)&&(i2.u11.p40==1))) * ((!(EG(!(((i...336
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t32, t33, t42, t48, t53, t55, i0.t73, i0.t38, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...521
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4522 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12544ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12544ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12651 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11731947575045887320.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16656631746147564751.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11731947575045887320.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16656631746147564751.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.190052,11980,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(EF(((E((p11==1) U (p53==1)) * (p54==1)) * (p58==1)))) + E(AX((AG((p14==1)) * AX((p57==1)))) U EF((((p2==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p16==1))))) U...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((E((p11==1) U (p53==1)) * (p54==1)) * (p58==1)))) + E(!(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p14==1)...264
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15242882219271540274.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15242882219271540274.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15242882219271540274.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15242882219271540274.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15242882219271540274.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9293017800724923289.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11019163831322926633.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9293017800724923289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11019163831322926633.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.437131,22724,518,29,31633,395,112,119303,31,2316,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!(EF(((E((i0.u3.p11==1) U (i3.u15.p53==1)) * (i3.u15.p54==1)) * (i3.u16.p58==1)))) + E(AX((AG((i0.u4.p14==1)) * AX((i3.u16.p57==1)))) ...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((E((i0.u3.p11==1) U (i3.u15.p53==1)) * (i3.u15.p54==1)) * (i3.u16.p58==1)))) + E(!(...335
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 89 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4687 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8230 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12928ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12928ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13021 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7844490030495680171.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6374634773994711590.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7844490030495680171.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6374634773994711590.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.194996,11860,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((E((EF((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p25==1))) * EG((p46==1))) U (p32==1)) * (p48==1)) * ((p49==1)&&(p54==1))) U E(EX((((p52==1)&&(p58==1))...333
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !((E(!(E(EX((((p52==1)&&(p58==1)) + EG((((p3==1)&&(p20==1))&&(p29==1))))) U !(EG(!(EG((p5=...1525
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13420744305616596123.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13420744305616596123.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13420744305616596123.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13420744305616596123.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13420744305616596123.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4911700102162889014.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2148713857233245.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4911700102162889014.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2148713857233245.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...259
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.604087,27328,518,29,37517,379,112,158159,31,2304,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(((E((EF((((i1.u5.p20==1)&&(i1.u6.p21==1))&&(i1.u7.p25==1))) * EG((i3.u13.p46==1))) U (i2.u9.p32==1)) * (i3.u13.p48==1)) * ((i3.u14.p49...483
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !((E(!(E(EX((((i3.u15.p52==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1)) + EG((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p20==1))&&(i1...2083
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 23 ms returned [27]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 77 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 78/137 variables, 59/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 5/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 4732 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 28/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 78/137 variables, 59/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 77/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 241 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved in 11382 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 77/77 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 16126ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 77 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 16127ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 59/59 places, 78/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 12 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 78/78 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 16280 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 78/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 78 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9243156406736984719.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14394863602970775698.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9243156406736984719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14394863602970775698.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.189427,11848,2,1658,5,25197,6,0,316,54865,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((p31==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p57==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p31==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p57==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...450
(forward)formula 0,0,0.586056,25848,1,0,228,138817,178,83,2607,143372,169
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4531 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8168 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12711ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12711ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12817 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2797749314190508240.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2628819203844669176.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2797749314190508240.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2628819203844669176.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.199773,11852,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(AX(!(A((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p15==1)) U (((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p15==1))))) U ((EF(((p54==1)&&(p56==1))) * (EX((((p5==1)&&(p7==1))&&(...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(!(!(!((E(!((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p15==1))) U (!((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p15=...487
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7960152672817501665.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7960152672817501665.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7960152672817501665.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7960152672817501665.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7960152672817501665.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14164443487115871854.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7102973679161313803.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14164443487115871854.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7102973679161313803.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.539111,24260,424,29,32168,387,105,135418,31,2270,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((E(AX(!(A((((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u1.p4==1))&&(i0.u4.p15==1)) U (((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u1.p4==1))&&(i0.u4.p15==1))))) U ((EF(((i3.u15.p54==...359
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(!(!(!((E(!((((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u1.p4==1))&&(i0.u4.p15==1))) U (!((((i0.u0...657
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4439 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8306 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12753ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12754ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12861 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12783105858722406465.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8610135977732356018.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12783105858722406465.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8610135977732356018.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.198336,11984,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!(E(((EG((p43==1)) * (p6==1)) * ((p7==1)&&(p11==1))) U A((p45==1) U (((p48==1)&&(p49==1))&&(p54==1)))))) U !((!(EG(((p54==1)&&(p58==...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((!(EG(((p54==1)&&(p58==1)))) + EG(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((p0==1)))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!((!(EG(((p54==1...505
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18328952444942802384.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18328952444942802384.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18328952444942802384.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18328952444942802384.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18328952444942802384.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16903340191143819392.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13081806659530145729.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16903340191143819392.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13081806659530145729.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.567298,25796,518,29,35301,372,112,144368,31,2272,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EF(!(E(((EG((i2.u12.p43==1)) * (i0.u1.p6==1)) * ((i0.u2.p7==1)&&(i0.u3.p11==1))) U A((i3.u13.p45==1) U (((i3.u13.p48==1)&&(i3.u14.p49==...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((!(EG(((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1)))) + EG(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((i1.u6.p0==1)))))))))))))) * !(...660
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4558 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8274 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12842ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12843ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12950 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10272912708612698543.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15801297287624015956.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10272912708612698543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15801297287624015956.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.190687,11988,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((((AX((((p8==1)&&(p13==1))||(p18==1))) + (!(E((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p15==1)) U (p57==1))) * AX((p43==0)))) * AX((((p5==1)&&(p7==1))&...403
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((((EY(Init) * ((p49==1)&&(p53==1))) * ((!(EX(!((((p8==1)&&(p13==1))||(p18==1))))) + (!(E((((p2==1)&&(p4==1...502
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10776752758424371305.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10776752758424371305.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10776752758424371305.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10776752758424371305.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10776752758424371305.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13693607375937276886.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability830098615897146578.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13693607375937276886.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability830098615897146578.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.595934,26904,518,29,36754,378,112,155964,31,2329,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EX(((((AX((((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u4.p13==1))||(i1.u5.p18==1))) + (!(E((((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u1.p4==1))&&(i0.u4.p15==1)) U (i3.u16.p57==1)))...594
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((((EY(Init) * ((i3.u14.p49==1)&&(i3.u15.p53==1))) * ((!(EX(!((((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u4.p13==1))||(i1.u5.p18=...693
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4482 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8346 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12839ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12840ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12936 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10478849203512928817.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10283635028328963702.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10478849203512928817.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10283635028328963702.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.200744,11988,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!((!(E(!((((p6==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p11==1))) U ((p33==1)||(((p31==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p57==1))))) * EG(A((p0==1) U (p28==1))))) + !((AX(A((p10...430
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,(!((!(E(!((((p6==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p11==1))) U ((p33==1)||(((p31==1)&&(p48==1))&&(p57==1))))) * EG(!...719
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6051841592150196756.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6051841592150196756.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6051841592150196756.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6051841592150196756.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6051841592150196756.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5805219317115133848.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9610802857556620820.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5805219317115133848.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9610802857556620820.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.559868,27588,518,29,37866,454,112,159578,31,2595,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((!((!(E(!((((i0.u1.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p11==1))) U ((i2.u9.p33==1)||(((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p48==1))&&(i3.u16.p57==1))))) ...629
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,(!((!(E(!((((i0.u1.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p11==1))) U ((i2.u9.p33==1)||(((i2.u9.p31==1)&&...996
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 58 transition count 78
Applied a total of 2 rules in 10 ms. Remains 58 /59 variables (removed 1) and now considering 78/79 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:24:41] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:24:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned [24]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:24:41] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 57/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 16/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 9/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 5/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 3074 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 57/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 33/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 76/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4477 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7561ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7561ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 10 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 7739 ms. Remains : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3519477538475242094.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17314713718192315780.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3519477538475242094.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17314713718192315780.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04819e+08,0.196062,11708,2,1618,5,24746,6,0,311,54052,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((EF((p4==1)) * (((p6==0)||(p7==0))||(p12==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (p4==1)) * (((p6==0)||(p7==0))||(p12==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...445
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14321496562013475868.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14321496562013475868.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14321496562013475868.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14321496562013475868.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14321496562013475868.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4595725304552812131.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11097338418169791008.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4595725304552812131.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11097338418169791008.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04819e+08,0.446759,22088,468,29,29611,361,119,119833,33,2181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((EF((i0.u1.p4==1)) * (((i0.u1.p6==0)||(i0.u2.p7==0))||(i0.u3.p12==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (i0.u1.p4==1)) * (((i0.u1.p6==0)||(i0.u2.p7==0))||(i0.u3.p12==0))))))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t28, t31, t41, t43, t52, t73, i0.t66, i0.t37, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...509
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4419 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8184 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12622ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12622ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12725 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8555313371929819411.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8382703437844499589.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8555313371929819411.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8382703437844499589.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.200487,11988,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(EG(((AF(((p54==1)&&(p58==1))) * ((((p5==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p12==1))||(p5==1))) * (E((p52==1) U (p24==1)) + (((p39==1)&&(p33==1))&&((p35=...462
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((!(EG(!(((p54==1)&&(p58==1))))) * ((((p5==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p12==1))||(p5==1))) * (E((p52==1)...1071
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12958306340531102090.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12958306340531102090.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12958306340531102090.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12958306340531102090.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12958306340531102090.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9986596054826207955.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14853182730152586970.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9986596054826207955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14853182730152586970.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.491263,23364,518,29,32040,354,112,126756,31,2177,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(EG(((AF(((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))) * ((((i0.u1.p5==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p12==1))||(i0.u1.p5==1))) * (E((i3.u15.p52==1...671
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((!(EG(!(((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))))) * ((((i0.u1.p5==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p...1492
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4526 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8107 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12642ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12642ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12745 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8805638018210218550.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1297829515904087678.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8805638018210218550.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1297829515904087678.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.203534,11852,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EF((((p18==1) * !(E((p47==1) U (((p12==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))))) * E((((p31==1)&&(p46==1))&&(p57==1)) U ((p54==1)&&(p56==1)))))) + ...291
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !((EG((((p40==0)||(p44==0))||(p51==0))) * !((E(!((((p45==1)&&(p10==1))&&(!(((p31==1)&&(p46==1))&&...501
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5879509128100833021.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5879509128100833021.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5879509128100833021.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5879509128100833021.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5879509128100833021.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15224844748722764002.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14563076457901314166.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15224844748722764002.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14563076457901314166.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.531051,24128,424,29,32186,387,105,133507,31,2347,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(EF((((i1.u5.p18==1) * !(E((i3.u13.p47==1) U (((i0.u3.p12==1)&&(i0.u4.p16==1))&&(i1.u7.p23==1))))) * E((((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==...423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !((EG((((i2.u11.p40==0)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i3.u15.p51==0))) * !((E(!((((i3.u13.p45==1)&&(i0.u3.p...699
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4411 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8046 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12466ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12467ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12562 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14728895724258469132.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability285301005898022646.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14728895724258469132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability285301005898022646.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.191872,11856,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EX(((AX((((p38==0)||(p44==0))||(p51==0))) * (p15==0)) * (((p34==0)||(p35==0))||(p39==0)))) * A(A(((((p3==1)&&(p20==1))&&(p30==1)) + ...488
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EX(((!(EX(!((((p38==0)||(p44==0))||(p51==0))))) * (p15==0)) * (((p34==0)||(p35==0))||(p39==0)))) ...1031
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11803413827929701840.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11803413827929701840.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11803413827929701840.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11803413827929701840.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11803413827929701840.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3719444398428600253.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17710108321490175734.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3719444398428600253.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17710108321490175734.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.595173,26180,532,29,35607,353,112,148209,31,2340,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EX(((AX((((i2.u11.p38==0)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i3.u15.p51==0))) * (i0.u4.p15==0)) * (((i2.u9.p34==0)||(i2.u10.p35==0))||(i2.u11.p39==...722
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EX(((!(EX(!((((i2.u11.p38==0)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i3.u15.p51==0))))) * (i0.u4.p15==0)) * (((i2.u9...1483
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13753315348418880242.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13753315348418880242.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13753315348418880242.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13753315348418880242.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13753315348418880242.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6915421243516890719.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2545558225645218086.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6915421243516890719.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2545558225645218086.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 14 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.466573,23108,518,29,32380,405,112,121469,31,2454,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX((((i3.u15.p52==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))||((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u4.p13==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((i3.u15.p52==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))||((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u4.p13==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,92.3371,1521760,1,0,1.60034e+06,480,743,1.03707e+07,128,2501,518702
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (EG((i1.u7.p24==0)) * AG(((((((i3.u13.p47==0)||(i3.u14.p49==0))||(i3.u15.p53==0)) * EX((((i1.u5.p17==0)||(i2.u9.p34==0))||(i2.u12.p44==0)...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG((i1.u7.p24==0))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i2.u9.p33==0)||(((i3.u13.p47==1)&&(i3.u...340
(forward)formula 1,1,174.467,2200580,1,0,2.16695e+06,482,231,1.44898e+07,77,2508,57432
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (E(((i1.u5.p19!=1) + AX(((!((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p18==1))&&((i1.u8.p29==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1)))) + AF((((i3.u13.p48==1)&&(i3.u14.p49==1)...449
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * E(((i1.u5.p19!=1) + !(EX(!(((!((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p18==1))&&((i1.u8.p29==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==1)))...536
(forward)formula 2,0,210.85,2200580,1,0,2.16695e+06,482,385,1.44898e+07,84,2508,276044
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(AG(((((i0.u4.p15==0)&&(i2.u9.p33==1))&&((i2.u10.p35==1)&&(i2.u11.p40==1))) * ((AF(((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))) + (i1.u5.p18==1)...273
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(((((i0.u4.p15==0)&&(i2.u9.p33==1))&&((i2.u10.p35==1)&&(i2.u11.p40==1))) * ((!(EG(!(((i...336
(forward)formula 3,0,256.86,2200580,1,0,2.16695e+06,482,595,1.44898e+07,93,2508,536904
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: E((!(EF(((E((i0.u3.p11==1) U (i3.u15.p53==1)) * (i3.u15.p54==1)) * (i3.u16.p58==1)))) + E(AX((AG((i0.u4.p14==1)) * AX((i3.u16.p57==1)))) ...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U ((E((i0.u3.p11==1) U (i3.u15.p53==1)) * (i3.u15.p54==1)) * (i3.u16.p58==1)))) + E(!(...335
(forward)formula 4,1,438.816,2434692,1,0,2.22172e+06,482,304,1.64934e+07,80,2508,491575
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (A(((E((EF((((i1.u5.p20==1)&&(i1.u6.p21==1))&&(i1.u7.p25==1))) * EG((i3.u13.p46==1))) U (i2.u9.p32==1)) * (i3.u13.p48==1)) * ((i3.u14.p49...483
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(FwdU((Init * !((E(!(E(EX((((i3.u15.p52==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1)) + EG((((i0.u1.p3==1)&&(i1.u5.p20==1))&&(i1...2083
(forward)formula 5,0,642.434,2681732,1,0,2.53511e+06,482,408,1.676e+07,86,2508,448784
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((E(AX(!(A((((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u1.p4==1))&&(i0.u4.p15==1)) U (((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u1.p4==1))&&(i0.u4.p15==1))))) U ((EF(((i3.u15.p54==...359
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(!(!(!((E(!((((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u1.p4==1))&&(i0.u4.p15==1))) U (!((((i0.u0...657
(forward)formula 6,0,787.339,2975620,1,0,2.68761e+06,482,380,1.85062e+07,84,2508,124189
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(EF(!(E(((EG((i2.u12.p43==1)) * (i0.u1.p6==1)) * ((i0.u2.p7==1)&&(i0.u3.p11==1))) U A((i3.u13.p45==1) U (((i3.u13.p48==1)&&(i3.u14.p49==...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((!(EG(((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1)))) + EG(!(EG(!(!(EX(!((i1.u6.p0==1)))))))))))))) * !(...660
(forward)formula 7,0,934.178,2975620,1,0,2.74105e+06,482,527,1.85062e+07,88,2508,795181
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EX(((((AX((((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u4.p13==1))||(i1.u5.p18==1))) + (!(E((((i0.u0.p2==1)&&(i0.u1.p4==1))&&(i0.u4.p15==1)) U (i3.u16.p57==1)))...594
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((((EY(Init) * ((i3.u14.p49==1)&&(i3.u15.p53==1))) * ((!(EX(!((((i0.u2.p8==1)&&(i0.u4.p13==1))||(i1.u5.p18=...693
(forward)formula 8,1,1025.28,3293060,1,0,3.224e+06,482,232,2.15723e+07,72,2508,189495
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: E((!((!(E(!((((i0.u1.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p11==1))) U ((i2.u9.p33==1)||(((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p48==1))&&(i3.u16.p57==1))))) ...629
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((((FwdU(Init,(!((!(E(!((((i0.u1.p6==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p11==1))) U ((i2.u9.p33==1)||(((i2.u9.p31==1)&&...996
(forward)formula 9,0,1076.24,3293060,1,0,3.224e+06,482,372,2.15723e+07,82,2508,535017
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: EF(AG((EF((i0.u1.p4==1)) * (((i0.u1.p6==0)||(i0.u2.p7==0))||(i0.u3.p12==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (i0.u1.p4==1)) * (((i0.u1.p6==0)||(i0.u2.p7==0))||(i0.u3.p12==0))))))...166
(forward)formula 10,0,1128.45,3293060,1,0,3.224e+06,482,385,2.15723e+07,84,2508,816478
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (E(!(EG(((AF(((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))) * ((((i0.u1.p5==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p12==1))||(i0.u1.p5==1))) * (E((i3.u15.p52==1...671
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([((FwdU(Init,!(EG(((!(EG(!(((i3.u15.p54==1)&&(i3.u16.p58==1))))) * ((((i0.u1.p5==1)&&(i0.u2.p7==1))&&(i0.u3.p...1492
(forward)formula 11,1,1189.21,3293060,1,0,3.224e+06,482,648,2.15723e+07,91,2689,1109805
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AG(EF((((i1.u5.p18==1) * !(E((i3.u13.p47==1) U (((i0.u3.p12==1)&&(i0.u4.p16==1))&&(i1.u7.p23==1))))) * E((((i2.u9.p31==1)&&(i3.u13.p46==...423
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !((EG((((i2.u11.p40==0)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i3.u15.p51==0))) * !((E(!((((i3.u13.p45==1)&&(i0.u3.p...699
(forward)formula 12,0,1378.64,4222340,1,0,4.15168e+06,482,429,2.61032e+07,89,2691,388809
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF(((EX(((AX((((i2.u11.p38==0)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i3.u15.p51==0))) * (i0.u4.p15==0)) * (((i2.u9.p34==0)||(i2.u10.p35==0))||(i2.u11.p39==...722
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EX(((!(EX(!((((i2.u11.p38==0)||(i2.u12.p44==0))||(i3.u15.p51==0))))) * (i0.u4.p15==0)) * (((i2.u9...1483
(forward)formula 13,0,1527.4,4222340,1,0,4.15168e+06,482,584,2.61032e+07,93,2691,1077153
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 2596870 ms.

BK_STOP 1749038097125

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-004A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600050"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-004A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-004A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;