Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993600049.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004A, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600049
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 508K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 89K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 94K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749035447180

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-004A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 52 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Transformed 59 places.
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Transformed 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 59 places and 79 transitions and 368 arcs in 142 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 16 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 56 out of 59 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 319 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 5412 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8334 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13814ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13830ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14175 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Support contains 56 out of 59 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 68 to 65
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (604 resets) in 718 ms. (55 steps per ms) remains 1/65 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (131 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp56 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 59/138 variables, and 20 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 65 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 3/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 0/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 68ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 135 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4835 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8173 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13039ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13177 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9085173570579648479.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12593899264487902238.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9085173570579648479.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12593899264487902238.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.215474,11936,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(((EX(((p32==0)||(p43==1))) + EF(((p33==1)||(p56==1)))) + (((p44==1)&&((p54==0)||(p21==1)))||(p56==1))) U AX((p35==1))) * (EF((p14==...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(!(EX(!((p35==1))))) U (!(((EX(((p32==0)||(p43==1))) + E(TRUE U ((p33==1)||(p56==1)))) + (((...312
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17108768311498362969.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17108768311498362969.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17108768311498362969.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17108768311498362969.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17108768311498362969.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 58 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:11:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13163763314075728338.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16700643336318537371.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13163763314075728338.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16700643336318537371.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.498205,23996,424,29,31828,414,105,132578,31,2333,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(((EX(((i2.u9.p32==0)||(i2.u12.p43==1))) + EF(((i2.u9.p33==1)||(i3.u16.p56==1)))) + (((i2.u12.p44==1)&&((i3.u15.p54==0)||(i1.u6.p21=...263
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(!(EX(!((i2.u10.p35==1))))) U (!(((EX(((i2.u9.p32==0)||(i2.u12.p43==1))) + E(TRUE U ((i2.u9....405
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 58 transition count 78
Applied a total of 2 rules in 18 ms. Remains 58 /59 variables (removed 1) and now considering 78/79 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned [24]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 57/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 16/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 9/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 5/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 3245 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 57/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 33/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 76/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4540 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7819ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7820ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 13 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8002 ms. Remains : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5852887652866720350.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18048277456690032951.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5852887652866720350.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18048277456690032951.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04819e+08,0.188597,11708,2,1618,5,24746,6,0,311,54052,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AF((((p47==0)||(p30==1))||(p58==1))) U AG(((p13==0)||(p41==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(EG(!((((p47==0)||(p30==1))||(p58==1)))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p13==0)||(p41==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...445
(forward)formula 0,1,9.96735,344920,1,0,534,1.49363e+06,185,186,2712,2.87042e+06,533
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 98 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4747 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8219 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12980ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12981ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13081 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14750555392377676033.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16640321035183277062.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14750555392377676033.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16640321035183277062.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.191106,11856,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((p43==1) * (EX(((p9==0)&&(p46==1))) + ((((p22==0)&&(p6==1))&&((p58==1)&&(p34==1)))&&((p27==0)||(p38==1))))) * (((p41==0)||(p26==1))&...179
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((p43==1) * (EX(((p9==0)&&(p46==1))) + ((((p22==0)&&(p6==1))&&((p58==1)&&(p34==1)))&&((p27==0)||(p...224
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5912359549607053305.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5912359549607053305.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5912359549607053305.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5912359549607053305.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5912359549607053305.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13805979462786113136.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16442387012518791663.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13805979462786113136.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16442387012518791663.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.56737,24388,424,29,32566,395,105,135345,31,2418,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((i2.u12.p43==1) * (EX(((i0.u3.p9==0)&&(i3.u13.p46==1))) + ((((i1.u6.p22==0)&&(i0.u1.p6==1))&&((i3.u16.p58==1)&&(i2.u9.p34==1)))&&((i...264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((i2.u12.p43==1) * (EX(((i0.u3.p9==0)&&(i3.u13.p46==1))) + ((((i1.u6.p22==0)&&(i0.u1.p6==1))&&((i3...309
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:13:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4519 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 7911 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12443ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12444ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12555 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1495651780342011781.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12157238721259231258.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1495651780342011781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12157238721259231258.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.208734,11860,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A((AF(((p0==1) + EF(((p37==0)||(p46==1))))) + (AX((p0==1)) * EG(((p45==0)||(p17==1))))) U AF(E(EG(((p1==0)||(p11==1))) U (p12==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(EG(!(E(EG(((p1==0)||(p11==1))) U (p12==0))))))) * !((!(EG(!(((p0==1) + E(TRUE U ((p37=...356
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15686139592851878509.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15686139592851878509.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15686139592851878509.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15686139592851878509.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15686139592851878509.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10022769075585978185.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16397790492684290929.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10022769075585978185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16397790492684290929.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.570509,25924,518,29,35627,406,112,145133,31,2375,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A((AF(((i1.u6.p0==1) + EF(((i2.u11.p37==0)||(i3.u13.p46==1))))) + (AX((i1.u6.p0==1)) * EG(((i3.u13.p45==0)||(i1.u5.p17==1))))) U AF(E(...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(EG(!(E(EG(((i0.u0.p1==0)||(i0.u3.p11==1))) U (i0.u3.p12==0))))))) * !((!(EG(!(((i1.u6....449
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 63 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 110 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4580 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8187 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12788ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12789ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12903 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14237906180936980662.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13908286725767007359.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14237906180936980662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13908286725767007359.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.204704,11856,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG(((p21==1)||(p23==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),((p21==1)||(p23==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 66/0/13
(forward)formula 0,1,3.70437,126504,1,0,89,491463,19,4,1960,918412,86
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 58 transition count 78
Applied a total of 2 rules in 5 ms. Remains 58 /59 variables (removed 1) and now considering 78/79 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 131 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 22 ms returned [24]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 57/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 16/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 9/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 5/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 166 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 3172 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 57/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/58 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 33/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 76/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 4480 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7668ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7668ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 7836 ms. Remains : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18317473371285918524.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15511317801954390500.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18317473371285918524.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15511317801954390500.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04819e+08,0.179335,11716,2,1618,5,24746,6,0,311,54052,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(((p29==0)||(p27==1))) U AG((p36==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p36==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p36==1))))) U (!(!(EG(!(((p29==0)||(p27==1))...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...445
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph450369172750577326.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph450369172750577326.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph450369172750577326.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph450369172750577326.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph450369172750577326.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16868779182574737765.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2087935153236532188.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16868779182574737765.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2087935153236532188.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.04819e+08,0.528996,24900,559,29,33702,400,125,138338,33,2300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AF(((i1.u8.p29==0)||(i1.u8.p27==1))) U AG((i2.u10.p36==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i2.u10.p36==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i2.u10.p36==1))))) U (!(!(EG(!(((i1.u...236
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t28, t31, t41, t43, t52, t73, i0.t66, i0.t37, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...509
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-04 11:16:25] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:16:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4705 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8160 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12878ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12878ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12978 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4206674337848304771.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5280047048722135754.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4206674337848304771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5280047048722135754.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.189449,11856,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((EX((EF((p28==1)) * EG(((p27==0)||(p8==1))))) + (p57==0)) + (p7==1)) U A(((!(A((p35==0) U (p5==1))) * E(EF(((p32==0)||(p10==1))) U (p8...305
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!((E(!(!((E(!((p14==1)) U (!(((p50==1)||(p9==0))) * !((p14==1)))) + EG(!((p14==1)))))) U...3935
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9328821228701320269.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9328821228701320269.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9328821228701320269.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9328821228701320269.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9328821228701320269.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14092730926488265067.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7272213676306893281.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14092730926488265067.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7272213676306893281.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.556085,26176,532,29,35217,363,112,150008,31,2261,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((EX((EF((i1.u8.p28==1)) * EG(((i1.u8.p27==0)||(i0.u2.p8==1))))) + (i3.u16.p57==0)) + (i0.u2.p7==1)) U A(((!(A((i2.u10.p35==0) U (i0.u1...432
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!((E(!(!((E(!((i0.u4.p14==1)) U (!(((i3.u14.p50==1)||(i0.u3.p9==0))) * !((i0.u4.p14==1))...5262
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4535 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8042 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12588ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12589ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12686 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10353201433009423518.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality186692022919575335.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10353201433009423518.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality186692022919575335.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.190626,11856,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF(!(E(((p28==0)||(p31==1)) U ((p13==0)||(p20==1)))))) + EG((((AX(((p1==0)&&(p17==1))) + AX(FALSE)) + (!(A(((p4==0)||(p40==1)) U (p22...192
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(((p28==0)||(p31==1)) U ((p13==0)||(p20==1))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,(((!(EX(!(((p1==...316
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10457546179157703585.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10457546179157703585.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10457546179157703585.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10457546179157703585.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10457546179157703585.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15160690060193894454.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3152043161284475932.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15160690060193894454.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3152043161284475932.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.526167,26048,518,29,35782,399,112,145780,31,2415,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AF(!(E(((i1.u8.p28==0)||(i2.u9.p31==1)) U ((i0.u4.p13==0)||(i1.u5.p20==1)))))) + EG((((AX(((i0.u0.p1==0)&&(i1.u5.p17==1))) + AX(FALSE...260
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(((i1.u8.p28==0)||(i2.u9.p31==1)) U ((i0.u4.p13==0)||(i1.u5.p20==1))))))))] != FALSE + [Fw...396
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4620 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8075 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12704ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12704ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12809 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6285878169457856995.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4245547856085033740.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6285878169457856995.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4245547856085033740.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.192823,11856,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AG(((EG((p38!=1)) * AG((p47!=1))) * (AG((p3==1)) + ((((p20==0)||(p52==1))||(p5==1)) * AX(((p46==0)||(p58==1)))))))) + AF((p24==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((EG((p38!=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((p47!=1))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((p3==1)))) + ((((...249
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9810417652617090388.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9810417652617090388.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9810417652617090388.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9810417652617090388.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9810417652617090388.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12584067211647867558.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4522924576454026364.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12584067211647867558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4522924576454026364.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.533413,24388,424,29,32631,380,105,135319,31,2431,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(AG(((EG((i2.u11.p38!=1)) * AG((i3.u13.p47!=1))) * (AG((i0.u1.p3==1)) + ((((i1.u5.p20==0)||(i3.u15.p52==1))||(i0.u1.p5==1)) * AX(((i3....212
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((EG((i2.u11.p38!=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((i3.u13.p47!=1))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((i0...308
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:20:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4557 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8060 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12626ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12626ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12718 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18353715896954545728.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10415802963488908907.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18353715896954545728.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10415802963488908907.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.200972,11860,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EF((p6==1)) + ((!((p4==0)||(p28==1)))&&((p1==0)||(p42==1)))) U A(!(((E((((p38==0)||(p58==1))&&((p10==0)||(p8==1))) U A(((p35==0)||(p31...264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p56!=1)))) + EG(!(((p20==0)||(p3==1)))))) U (!(!(((E((((p38==0)||(p58==1)...1287
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8143814910054435733.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8143814910054435733.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8143814910054435733.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8143814910054435733.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8143814910054435733.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7508263031898685370.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality630967877522408444.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7508263031898685370.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality630967877522408444.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.612612,26952,518,29,36402,432,112,156246,31,2431,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((EF((i0.u1.p6==1)) + ((!((i0.u1.p4==0)||(i1.u8.p28==1)))&&((i0.u0.p1==0)||(i2.u12.p42==1)))) U A(!(((E((((i2.u11.p38==0)||(i3.u16.p58==...379
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((i3.u16.p56!=1)))) + EG(!(((i1.u5.p20==0)||(i0.u1.p3==1)))))) U (!(!(((E((...1720
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:21:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4578 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 7964 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 12551ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12551ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12662 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1937382719334971979.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10983355110894360389.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1937382719334971979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10983355110894360389.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.183084,11856,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(EF(!(EG(((p57==0)||(p3==1)))))) * EG((A((((p42==0)||(p24==1))&&(p18==1)) U ((p4==0)&&((p39==0)||(p28==1)))) + EF(((p55==1)||(p15==1)...194
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((p9==1)))) + (p2==1)))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((p9==1)))) + (p2==1))))) U (!((!(...452
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7274501318092522969.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7274501318092522969.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7274501318092522969.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7274501318092522969.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7274501318092522969.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6800197834438425337.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9205788138782883038.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6800197834438425337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9205788138782883038.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.533812,24516,424,29,32855,387,105,135146,31,2430,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((!(EF(!(EG(((i3.u16.p57==0)||(i0.u1.p3==1)))))) * EG((A((((i2.u12.p42==0)||(i1.u7.p24==1))&&(i1.u5.p18==1)) U ((i0.u1.p4==0)&&((i2.u11....270
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((i0.u3.p9==1)))) + (i0.u0.p2==1)))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((i0.u3.p9==1)))) + (i...590
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 59 /59 variables (removed 0) and now considering 79/79 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 97 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 18/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 138/138 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4775 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/59 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 1/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 38/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/138 variables, 59/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 78/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/138 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 138/138 variables, and 254 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 8233 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 59/59 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 59/59 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 13017ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13017ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13117 ms. Remains : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12752273809509280028.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6915787932212354031.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12752273809509280028.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6915787932212354031.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.194067,11856,2,1658,5,25215,6,0,317,55142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((AF(((p18==0)&&(p17==1))) + ((p12==0)&&(p23==1))) + ((p26==0)||(p17==1)))) + (A(((p53==1) + !(EF(((p17==0)||(p52==1))))) U EX((p2...312
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(EX((p2==1))) U (!(((p53==1) + !(E(TRUE U ((p17==0)||(p52==1)))))) * !(EX((p2=...430
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...455
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16259509754462053946.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16259509754462053946.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16259509754462053946.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16259509754462053946.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16259509754462053946.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6139552745280208153.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14437892833358641432.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6139552745280208153.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14437892833358641432.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.581179,26432,532,29,35752,413,112,151568,31,2440,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((AF(((i1.u5.p18==0)&&(i1.u5.p17==1))) + ((i0.u3.p12==0)&&(i1.u7.p23==1))) + ((i1.u7.p26==0)||(i1.u5.p17==1)))) + (A(((i3.u15.p53=...447
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(EX((i0.u0.p2==1))) U (!(((i3.u15.p53==1) + !(E(TRUE U ((i1.u5.p17==0)||(i3.u1...577
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 59/59 places, 79/79 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 58 /59 variables (removed 1) and now considering 78/79 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 78 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:23:43] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 25 ms returned [26]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 76 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 77 rows 58 cols
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Computed 17 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 13/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 12/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 3142 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 30/30 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 58/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 30/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 3/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/58 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 77/135 variables, 58/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 76/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 247 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved in 9623 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 58/58 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 17/17 constraints, State Equation: 58/58 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 12774ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 76 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12774ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 11 ms. Remains 58 /58 variables (removed 0) and now considering 77/77 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 12930 ms. Remains : 58/59 places, 77/79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 77 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8382650668412284591.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17804008202532737919.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8382650668412284591.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17804008202532737919.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.189747,11796,2,1602,5,25114,6,0,312,54825,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG(A((p45==1) U (p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((p14==1)) U (!((p45==1)) * !((p14==1)))) + EG(!((p14==1))))))...169
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...450
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2241780669805896098.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2241780669805896098.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2241780669805896098.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2241780669805896098.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2241780669805896098.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:24:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:24:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:24:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 68 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9242778359489568658.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2201853912824786845.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9242778359489568658.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2201853912824786845.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.425116,20616,401,29,25037,55,92,116156,29,247,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AG(A((i3.u13.p45==1) U (i0.u4.p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((i0.u4.p14==1)) U (!((i3.u13.p45==1)) * !((i0.u4.p14==1)))) +...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t30, t33, t42, t47, t52, t53, i0.t72, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...521
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12678085931994108857.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12678085931994108857.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12678085931994108857.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12678085931994108857.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12678085931994108857.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 72 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16408522070018308604.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2720153377683659688.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16408522070018308604.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2720153377683659688.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.597628,26692,424,29,35636,399,105,155087,31,2416,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((A(((EX(((i2.u9.p32==0)||(i2.u12.p43==1))) + EF(((i2.u9.p33==1)||(i3.u16.p56==1)))) + (((i2.u12.p44==1)&&((i3.u15.p54==0)||(i1.u6.p21=...263
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!((E(!(!(EX(!((i2.u10.p35==1))))) U (!(((EX(((i2.u9.p32==0)||(i2.u12.p43==1))) + E(TRUE U ((i2.u9....405
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t31, t35, t43, t49, t52, t55, i0.t75, i0.t39, i0.u1.t0, i0.u1.t1, i0.u3.t2, i0.u3.t3, i0.u4.t...513
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,155.041,2070100,1,0,2.2365e+06,399,640,1.33812e+07,127,2416,907780
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AF((((i2.u12.p43==1) * (EX(((i0.u3.p9==0)&&(i3.u13.p46==1))) + ((((i1.u6.p22==0)&&(i0.u1.p6==1))&&((i3.u16.p58==1)&&(i2.u9.p34==1)))&&((i...264
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((i2.u12.p43==1) * (EX(((i0.u3.p9==0)&&(i3.u13.p46==1))) + ((((i1.u6.p22==0)&&(i0.u1.p6==1))&&((i3...309
(forward)formula 1,0,296.659,2221924,1,0,2.4683e+06,399,214,1.41179e+07,72,2416,955978
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AX(A((AF(((i0.u2.p0==1) + EF(((i2.u11.p37==0)||(i3.u13.p46==1))))) + (AX((i0.u2.p0==1)) * EG(((i3.u13.p45==0)||(i1.u5.p17==1))))) U AF(E(...211
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(EG(!(E(EG(((i0.u0.p1==0)||(i0.u3.p11==1))) U (i0.u3.p12==0))))))) * !((!(EG(!(((i0.u2....449
(forward)formula 2,1,459.251,2549988,1,0,2.85693e+06,399,369,1.72313e+07,82,2416,730505
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: A(AF(((i1.u8.p29==0)||(i1.u8.p27==1))) U AG((i2.u10.p36==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i2.u10.p36==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i2.u10.p36==1))))) U (!(!(EG(!(((i1.u...236
(forward)formula 3,0,572.308,2704612,1,0,2.85693e+06,399,228,1.79319e+07,76,2416,395920
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A(((EX((EF((i1.u8.p28==1)) * EG(((i1.u8.p27==0)||(i0.u2.p8==1))))) + (i3.u16.p57==0)) + (i0.u2.p7==1)) U A(((!(A((i2.u10.p35==0) U (i0.u1...432
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!((E(!(!((E(!((i0.u4.p14==1)) U (!(((i3.u14.p50==1)||(i0.u3.p9==0))) * !((i0.u4.p14==1))...3619
java.io.IOException: Stream closed
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.ensureOpen(BufferedInputStream.java:206)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:411)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:405)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.readBytes(StreamDecoder.java:350)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.implRead(StreamDecoder.java:393)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.lockedRead(StreamDecoder.java:217)
at java.base/sun.nio.cs.StreamDecoder.read(StreamDecoder.java:171)
at java.base/java.io.InputStreamReader.read(InputStreamReader.java:188)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.fill(BufferedReader.java:160)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.implReadLine(BufferedReader.java:370)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedReader.readLine(BufferedReader.java:436)
at fr.lip6.move.gal.application.runner.its.ITSRunner$ITSInterpreter.run(ITSRunner.java:211)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583)
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 81 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16808156491107882639.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:49:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2694594633567076550.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16808156491107882639.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2694594633567076550.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 7 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.46374e+08,0.114849,9916,490,28,12685,103,125,21907,29,283,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((EX((EF((u9.p28==1)) * EG(((u9.p27==0)||(u3.p8==1))))) + (u17.p57==0)) + (u3.p7==1)) U A(((!(A((u11.p35==0) U (u2.p5==1))) * E(EF(((u1...373
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!(!((E(!(!((E(!((u5.p14==1)) U (!(((u15.p50==1)||(u4.p9==0))) * !((u5.p14==1)))) + EG(!((u...4629
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t30, t34, t40, t43, t47, t52, t58, t60, t67, t72, t74, u2.t0, u2.t1, u4.t2, u4.t3, u5.t4...422
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
(forward)formula 0,0,564.587,4229632,1,0,7.79476e+06,148,360,1.88502e+07,77,283,4135908
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: (EG(AF(!(E(((u9.p28==0)||(u10.p31==1)) U ((u5.p13==0)||(u6.p20==1)))))) + EG((((AX(((u1.p1==0)&&(u6.p17==1))) + AX(FALSE)) + (!(A(((u2.p4...228
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(((u9.p28==0)||(u10.p31==1)) U ((u5.p13==0)||(u6.p20==1))))))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,(((...358
(forward)formula 1,1,701.35,5395840,1,0,9.78714e+06,148,407,2.44007e+07,77,283,2628042
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

original formula: (AF(AG(((EG((u12.p38!=1)) * AG((u14.p47!=1))) * (AG((u2.p3==1)) + ((((u6.p20==0)||(u16.p52==1))||(u2.p5==1)) * AX(((u14.p46==0)||(u17.p58...185
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((EG((u12.p38!=1)) * !(E(TRUE U !((u14.p47!=1))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((u2.p3==1...281
(forward)formula 2,0,736.909,5395840,1,0,9.78714e+06,148,565,2.44007e+07,88,283,4537730
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A((EF((u2.p6==1)) + ((!((u2.p4==0)||(u9.p28==1)))&&((u1.p1==0)||(u13.p42==1)))) U A(!(((E((((u12.p38==0)||(u17.p58==1))&&((u4.p10==0)||(u...326
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((!(E(TRUE U !((u17.p56!=1)))) + EG(!(((u6.p20==0)||(u2.p3==1)))))) U (!(!(((E((((u12.p38...1519
(forward)formula 3,0,900.255,5994880,1,0,1.12492e+07,148,379,2.63833e+07,78,283,3254210
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: A((!(EF(!(EG(((u17.p57==0)||(u2.p3==1)))))) * EG((A((((u13.p42==0)||(u8.p24==1))&&(u6.p18==1)) U ((u2.p4==0)&&((u12.p39==0)||(u9.p28==1))...234
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((u4.p9==1)))) + (u1.p2==1)))))))) * !(E(!(EG(!((!(EX(!((u4.p9==1)))) + (u1.p2==1))...524
(forward)formula 4,0,968.313,5994880,1,0,1.12492e+07,148,441,2.63833e+07,81,283,6644929
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG((AF(((AF(((u6.p18==0)&&(u6.p17==1))) + ((u4.p12==0)&&(u8.p23==1))) + ((u8.p26==0)||(u6.p17==1)))) + (A(((u16.p53==1) + !(EF(((u6.p17==...384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((!((E(!(EX((u1.p2==1))) U (!(((u16.p53==1) + !(E(TRUE U ((u6.p17==0)||(u16.p52==1))))...508
(forward)formula 5,0,1085.77,6597256,1,0,1.21915e+07,148,405,2.905e+07,82,283,1129189
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

original formula: AG(EF(AG(A((u14.p45==1) U (u5.p14==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!((u5.p14==1)) U (!((u14.p45==1)) * !((u5.p14==1)))) + EG(!((u5...182
(forward)formula 6,0,1098.34,6597256,1,0,1.21915e+07,148,431,2.905e+07,83,283,2056518
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-004A-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 3431039 ms.

BK_STOP 1749038879467

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-004A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-004A, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993600049"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-004A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-004A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;