Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993500042.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-003B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500042
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 492K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 127K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749035271953

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 57 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Transformed 123 places.
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Transformed 138 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 123 places and 138 transitions and 432 arcs in 150 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 76 out of 123 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 117 transition count 132
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 117 transition count 132
Applied a total of 12 rules in 19 ms. Remains 117 /123 variables (removed 6) and now considering 132/138 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 132 rows 117 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 14 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 197 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 120 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 348 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 131 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 15/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 10/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 7/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 6/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 2/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 4/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 132/249 variables, 117/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 4/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 4/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 2/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 2/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 4/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 4/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 131/131 constraints, Known Traps: 166/166 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/117 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 166/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 132/249 variables, 117/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 131/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 2/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 7/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 8/447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 4/453 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60115ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 131 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60127ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 117/123 places, 132/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60510 ms. Remains : 117/123 places, 132/138 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 117 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
Support contains 73 out of 117 places (down from 76) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (270 resets) in 1357 ms. (29 steps per ms) remains 4/68 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (47 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (61 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (52 resets) in 49 ms. (800 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (57 resets) in 58 ms. (678 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp50 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 86/98 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 204 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 9/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/98 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 19/117 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 3/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 132/249 variables, 117/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 249/249 variables, and 145 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 1123 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 74/84 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/84 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 33/117 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 8/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 5/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/117 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 132/249 variables, 117/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 3/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 4/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 3/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/249 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/249 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 249/249 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved in 1125 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 117/117 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/4 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2260ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 3 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 196 ms.
Support contains 10 out of 117 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 117 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 106 transition count 120
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 105 transition count 120
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 105 transition count 104
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 89 transition count 104
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 68 place count 77 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 77 transition count 92
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 80 place count 77 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 88 place count 73 transition count 88
Performed 22 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 22
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 51 transition count 66
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 51 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 50 transition count 65
Applied a total of 141 rules in 30 ms. Remains 50 /117 variables (removed 67) and now considering 65/132 (removed 67) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 30 ms. Remains : 50/117 places, 65/132 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (676 resets) in 245 ms. (162 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (151 resets) in 54 ms. (727 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (142 resets) in 43 ms. (909 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 15/19 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 10/29 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/77 variables, 29/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 31/108 variables, 14/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 3/111 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/115 variables, 4/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 2/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 115/115 variables, and 70 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 352 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 15/19 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 10/29 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/77 variables, 29/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 31/108 variables, 14/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 3/111 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 3/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 4/115 variables, 4/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/115 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/115 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 115/115 variables, and 73 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 183 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 543ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 28 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 50 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 50/50 places, 65/65 transitions.
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 50 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 49 transition count 64
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 49 /50 variables (removed 1) and now considering 64/65 (removed 1) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 49/50 places, 64/65 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (697 resets) in 112 ms. (353 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (161 resets) in 59 ms. (666 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (152 resets) in 55 ms. (714 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1848692 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=616 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1848692 steps, saw 318456 distinct states, run finished after 3005 ms. (steps per millisecond=615 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 49 cols
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 15/19 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 10/29 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/77 variables, 29/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 30/107 variables, 14/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 4/113 variables, 4/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 3/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 113/113 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 448 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 15/19 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 10/29 variables, 3/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 4/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/77 variables, 29/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 30/107 variables, 14/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 2/109 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 4/113 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 3/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/113 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 113/113 variables, and 75 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 132 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 49/49 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 584ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 3 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 49 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 49/49 places, 64/64 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 47 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 46 transition count 61
Applied a total of 5 rules in 8 ms. Remains 46 /49 variables (removed 3) and now considering 61/64 (removed 3) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 8 ms. Remains : 46/49 places, 61/64 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (733 resets) in 69 ms. (571 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (169 resets) in 29 ms. (1333 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 3530577 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=1176 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 3530577 steps, saw 579425 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=1176 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/10 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/20 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 36/56 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 45/101 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 5/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 2/103 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 2/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 4/107 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 107/107 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 206 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 8/10 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 10/20 variables, 3/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 36/56 variables, 20/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/56 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 45/101 variables, 20/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 5/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 2/103 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 4/107 variables, 4/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 107/107 variables, and 64 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 68 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 279ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 2 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 46 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 61/61 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 61/61 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 4 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 61/61 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 46/46 places, 61/61 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 61/61 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 9/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 4/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 61/107 variables, 46/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 107/107 variables, and 83 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3181 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 18/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 61/107 variables, 46/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 59/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 4/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 2/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 1/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/107 variables, 0/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 107/107 variables, and 158 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 15696 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 18890ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 18892ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 19028 ms. Remains : 46/46 places, 61/61 transitions.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 132 transitions.
Computed a total of 32 stabilizing places and 32 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 101 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 101 transition count 116
Applied a total of 32 rules in 9 ms. Remains 101 /117 variables (removed 16) and now considering 116/132 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 115 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 116/217 variables, 101/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 9/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 217/217 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 17109 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 73/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 6/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 116/217 variables, 101/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 115/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 9/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 217/217 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 47135ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47136ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/117 places, 116/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47286 ms. Remains : 101/117 places, 116/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3730080004764118722.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12613032881444203822.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3730080004764118722.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12613032881444203822.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44904e+09,0.595146,28084,2,5163,5,69033,6,0,522,164528,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((p53==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((p53==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...336
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8831214070100676631.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8831214070100676631.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8831214070100676631.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8831214070100676631.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8831214070100676631.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 47 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6654827301135599766.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10579344946862560709.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6654827301135599766.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10579344946862560709.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44904e+09,0.208573,11596,830,44,14628,214,274,27014,42,711,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((i5.u17.p53==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((i5.u17.p53==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u4.t72, i1.u5.t0, i1.u5.t1, i1.u5.t2, i2.u1.t75, i2.u12.t6, i2.u12.t7, i2.u12.t8, i3.u8.t6...586
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,17.0846,510428,1,0,895138,487,1681,1.48974e+06,220,2287,840435
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 105 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 105 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 104 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 104 transition count 119
Applied a total of 26 rules in 9 ms. Remains 104 /117 variables (removed 13) and now considering 119/132 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 104 cols
[2025-06-04 11:10:58] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:10:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 118 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 4/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 5/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 6/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 119/223 variables, 104/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 5/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 5/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 223/223 variables, and 195 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 20201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 75/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 119/223 variables, 104/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 118/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 6/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 10/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 9/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 4/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 223/223 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 50229ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50230ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/117 places, 119/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50381 ms. Remains : 104/117 places, 119/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3139678209176553061.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8724838048034501591.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3139678209176553061.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8724838048034501591.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.929e+09,0.796492,33720,2,6466,5,82808,6,0,537,207300,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((EG(((EX((p21==1)) * (p91==1)) * (p73==1))) + AF((p27==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(EG(((EX((p21==1)) * (p91==1)) * (p73==1))) + !(EG(!((p27==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...356
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4471988998417400668.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4471988998417400668.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4471988998417400668.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4471988998417400668.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4471988998417400668.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4045892417395476422.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17651018226985293055.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4045892417395476422.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17651018226985293055.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.929e+09,0.327005,17056,960,57,24860,245,321,46240,49,1041,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((EG(((EX((i1.i0.u7.p21==1)) * (i7.u29.p91==1)) * (i6.u23.p73==1))) + AF((i1.i1.u9.p27==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(EG(((EX((i1.i0.u7.p21==1)) * (i7.u29.p91==1)) * (i6.u23.p73==1))) + !(EG(!((i1.i1.u9.p27==1)))))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i0.u7.t73, i1.i0.u7.t74, i1.i1.u8.t69, i1.i1.u9.t3, i1.i1.u9.t4, i1.i1.u9.t5, i1.i1.u9.t6,...648
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,24.2311,703896,1,0,1.24103e+06,507,1853,1.95257e+06,256,1453,1107382
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 117
Applied a total of 30 rules in 4 ms. Remains 102 /117 variables (removed 15) and now considering 117/132 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 11:12:43] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:12:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 18/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 8/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 10/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 5/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 202 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 18738 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 85/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 3/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 116/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 6/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 10/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 48768ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48769ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48882 ms. Remains : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6685768947051416781.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17883732843925160271.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6685768947051416781.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17883732843925160271.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.68335e+09,0.707435,28736,2,5325,5,69432,6,0,527,170301,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(AG(((p109==1)&&(p120==1))) U AG(EF(((p30==1) * AX((p79==1)))))) + A(A((((p70==1)&&(p81==1))&&(p104==1)) U (p47!=1)) U (p30==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((p30==1) * !(EX(!((p79==1))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((...489
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...341
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16523836034182638858.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16523836034182638858.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16523836034182638858.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16523836034182638858.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16523836034182638858.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability544710528930645054.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7443330266617679202.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability544710528930645054.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7443330266617679202.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.68335e+09,0.293302,15024,941,61,20079,276,346,38017,52,1209,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(AG(((i8.u33.p109==1)&&(i9.u34.p120==1))) U AG(EF(((i2.i2.u9.p30==1) * AX((i6.u24.p79==1)))))) + A(A((((i5.u22.p70==1)&&(i6.u25.p81==1)...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U ((i2.i2.u9.p30==1) * !(EX(!((i6.u24.p79==1))))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE...620
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u1.t76, i1.u4.t73, i1.u5.t0, i1.u5.t1, i1.u5.t2, i2.i1.u8.t68, i2.i2.u9.t3, i2.i2.u9.t4, i...615
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,24.5678,711572,1,0,1.22597e+06,675,2020,1.92823e+06,266,2545,1126116
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 101 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 101 transition count 116
Applied a total of 32 rules in 11 ms. Remains 101 /117 variables (removed 16) and now considering 116/132 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 115 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 116/217 variables, 101/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 43 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 9/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 217/217 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 17281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 73/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 6/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 116/217 variables, 101/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 115/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 9/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 217/217 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 47307ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47308ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/117 places, 116/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47452 ms. Remains : 101/117 places, 116/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability925325637086956828.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9997200188837034361.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability925325637086956828.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9997200188837034361.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44904e+09,0.631685,28164,2,5163,5,69033,6,0,522,164528,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX(AG((p41==0))) * (p106==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p106==0)) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p41==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...336
(forward)formula 0,1,10.175,318000,1,0,333,1.4789e+06,255,155,3478,2.1986e+06,323
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 117
Applied a total of 30 rules in 9 ms. Remains 102 /117 variables (removed 15) and now considering 117/132 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 123 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 11242 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 116/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 6/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 10/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 6/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 9/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41260ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41262ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41395 ms. Remains : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11299811412231953207.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16654950619163489089.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11299811412231953207.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16654950619163489089.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.64297e+09,0.633605,29204,2,5298,5,71776,6,0,527,171752,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(((p106==1)&&(p117==1)) U AG((EG((p52==1)) + AF((p0==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((EG((p52==1)) + !(EG(!((p0==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((EG((p52==1)) +...277
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...341
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13609402304798041350.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13609402304798041350.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13609402304798041350.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13609402304798041350.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13609402304798041350.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14826937137588558367.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14269235491843250128.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14826937137588558367.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14269235491843250128.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.64297e+09,0.234111,13852,954,45,18017,166,323,43734,45,623,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(A(((i8.u32.p106==1)&&(i9.u35.p117==1)) U AG((EG((i4.u17.p52==1)) + AF((i0.u0.p0==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((EG((i4.u17.p52==1)) + !(EG(!((i0.u0.p0==1)))))))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((E...330
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u1.t76, i1.u4.t73, i1.u5.t0, i1.u5.t1, i1.u5.t2, i2.i1.u9.t3, i2.i1.u9.t4, i2.i1.u9.t5, i2...606
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,18.6497,543868,1,0,943218,404,1888,1.47477e+06,244,1256,944885
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 116 transition count 121
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 106 transition count 121
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 106 transition count 106
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 91 transition count 106
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 77 transition count 92
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 77 transition count 92
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 77 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 73 transition count 88
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 52 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 50 transition count 65
Applied a total of 130 rules in 16 ms. Remains 50 /117 variables (removed 67) and now considering 65/132 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-04 11:16:55] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:16:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 22 ms returned [64]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 50 cols
[2025-06-04 11:16:55] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/50 variables, 5/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 16/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 64/114 variables, 50/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 4/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 2/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 5708 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 20/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/50 variables, 5/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 23/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/50 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 64/114 variables, 50/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 59/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 2/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 2/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 3/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7162 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 50/50 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 12875ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12876ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 50/117 places, 64/132 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 50 /50 variables (removed 0) and now considering 64/64 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 13018 ms. Remains : 50/117 places, 64/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7908081448686444401.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1132802453340161859.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7908081448686444401.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1132802453340161859.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.4245e+06,0.124161,9436,2,2034,5,17703,6,0,265,39294,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((((EF((((p5==0)||(p17==0))||(p41==0))) + AG((((p106==1)&&(p117==1))&&((p10==0)||(p97==0))))) + ((p56==0)||(p61==0))) + (p70==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p70==0))) * !(((p56==0)||(p61==0)))) * !(E(TRUE U (((p5==0)||(p17==0))||(p41==0))...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t36, t37, t38...380
(forward)formula 0,1,0.581405,28076,1,0,190,139766,151,70,2063,170362,142
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 106 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 106 transition count 121
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 105 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 105 transition count 120
Applied a total of 24 rules in 2 ms. Remains 105 /117 variables (removed 12) and now considering 120/132 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 105 cols
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 10/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 11/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 4/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 120/225 variables, 105/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 7/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 3/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 5/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 3/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 3/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 3/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 3/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 6/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 2/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 225/225 variables, and 239 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 119/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 4/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/225 variables, 105/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 119/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 5/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 7/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 3/382 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 12/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 225/225 variables, and 395 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 158/158 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/117 places, 120/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60159 ms. Remains : 105/117 places, 120/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2886728371732572244.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4636681844220347305.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2886728371732572244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4636681844220347305.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.71534e+09,0.765116,28856,2,5462,5,69971,6,0,542,170040,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((p83!=1) * E((p57==1) U EG((((p51==1)&&(p92==1))&&(p120==1))))) * (AG(((((p55==1)&&(p61==1))&&((p69==1)&&(p5==1)))&&((p14==1)&&(p42...334
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(EX(((p106==1)&&(p117==1))) U !((!(EG(!((p116==1)))) * !((((p56==1)&&(p61==1))&&(p69==1)))))))...617
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...356
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17014590369076523588.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17014590369076523588.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17014590369076523588.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17014590369076523588.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17014590369076523588.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2169461691602885241.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10674705357155172658.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2169461691602885241.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10674705357155172658.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.71534e+09,0.29912,14556,901,48,19732,201,350,37422,50,678,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((i6.u23.p83!=1) * E((i4.i1.u18.p57==1) U EG((((i4.i1.u17.p51==1)&&(i7.u28.p92==1))&&(i9.u36.p120==1))))) * (AG(((((i4.i1.u17.p55==1...512
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(EX(((i8.u32.p106==1)&&(i9.u35.p117==1))) U !((!(EG(!((i9.u35.p116==1)))) * !((((i4.i1.u18.p56...891
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i1.u9.t3, i0.i1.u9.t4, i0.i1.u9.t5, i0.i2.t71, i0.i2.u8.t73, i1.u1.t79, i1.u4.t76, i1.u5.t...645
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,28.3285,655248,1,0,1.07878e+06,509,2177,1.70915e+06,262,1486,985251
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 106 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 106 transition count 121
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 105 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 105 transition count 120
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 105 /117 variables (removed 12) and now considering 120/132 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 105 cols
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 117 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 11/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 8/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 120/225 variables, 105/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 9/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 8/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 7/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 5/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 6/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 5/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 2/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 225/225 variables, and 230 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 22169 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 109/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/225 variables, 105/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 119/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 6/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 7/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 5/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/373 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 52192ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 52193ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/117 places, 120/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 52317 ms. Remains : 105/117 places, 120/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10838382303502484106.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14238126253959156873.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10838382303502484106.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14238126253959156873.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.99567e+09,0.727902,31484,2,6382,5,75790,6,0,542,191042,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EG(AG(((p16==1)||(p116==1)))) * AX(((EG((((p28==1)&&(p39==1))&&(p65==1))) + (p18==1)) + (p66==1)))) * (((p64==1) + E((p2==1) U AG(((...269
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((p16==1)||(p116==1)))))) * !(EX(!(((EG((((p28==1)&&(p39==1))&&(p65==1))) + (p18=...350
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...361
(forward)formula 0,0,17.3027,500448,1,0,791,2.17886e+06,294,269,3826,3.88266e+06,833
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 117
Applied a total of 30 rules in 5 ms. Remains 102 /117 variables (removed 15) and now considering 117/132 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 113 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 13/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 5/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 5/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 15222 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 68/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 116/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 13/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 6/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 13/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 45243ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 45244ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 45362 ms. Remains : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10090411302493882827.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6524843981651498764.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10090411302493882827.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6524843981651498764.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.61895e+09,0.673042,29036,2,5357,5,71062,6,0,527,172632,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AG(((((p51==0)||(p92==0))||(p120==0))&&(p40==0))) + E((p55==1) U A(!((((p55==1)&&(p61==1))&&(p70==1))) U (((p51==1)&&(p92==1))&&(p119...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(E((p55==1) U !((E(!((((p51==1)&&(p92==1))&&(p119==1))) U (!(!((((p55==1)&&(p61==1))&&(p70==...316
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...341
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11024591728034483781.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11024591728034483781.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11024591728034483781.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11024591728034483781.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11024591728034483781.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4084438368018436483.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13044367015034219333.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4084438368018436483.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13044367015034219333.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.61895e+09,0.30969,16088,962,49,21950,182,303,43453,50,650,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AG(((((i4.u17.p51==0)||(i7.u28.p92==0))||(i9.u36.p120==0))&&(i3.u12.p40==0))) + E((i4.u17.p55==1) U A(!((((i4.u17.p55==1)&&(i4.u19.p6...241
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(E((i4.u17.p55==1) U !((E(!((((i4.u17.p51==1)&&(i7.u28.p92==1))&&(i9.u35.p119==1))) U (!(!((...435
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u1.t76, i1.u4.t73, i1.u5.t0, i1.u5.t1, i1.u5.t2, i2.u8.t68, i2.u9.t3, i2.u9.t4, i2.u9.t5, ...594
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,26.6647,762468,1,0,1.25919e+06,539,2024,2.16549e+06,260,1543,1186764
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 117
Applied a total of 30 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /117 variables (removed 15) and now considering 117/132 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 11:21:59] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 17/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 2/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 17703 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 82/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 116/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 8/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 3/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 47727ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47727ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47835 ms. Remains : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12640221280890536693.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17526364703105471621.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12640221280890536693.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17526364703105471621.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44904e+09,0.629679,28132,2,5180,5,68713,6,0,527,164237,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(A(EF((p6!=1)) U !(EX(EX((((p31==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p65==1)))))) U (EF(((p0==1) + A(((p18==1)||(((p55==1)&&(p61==1))&&(p69==1))) U (p6!=1))...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,!((E(!(!(EX(EX((((p31==1)&&(p42==1))&&(p65==1)))))) U (!(E(TRUE U (p6!=1))) * !(!(EX(EX((((p3...622
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...341
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,27.6007,823044,1,0,1254,3.97694e+06,276,542,3853,6.82416e+06,1342
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 103 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 117
Applied a total of 30 rules in 6 ms. Remains 102 /117 variables (removed 15) and now considering 117/132 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 11:23:15] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:23:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 11181 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 116/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 6/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 10/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 6/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 20/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 9/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 348 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41205ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41205ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41334 ms. Remains : 102/117 places, 117/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9542928178661141713.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3826598894257768184.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9542928178661141713.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3826598894257768184.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.64297e+09,0.726747,29192,2,5298,5,71776,6,0,527,171752,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AF((p54==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!((p54==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...341
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15965520564047667363.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15965520564047667363.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15965520564047667363.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15965520564047667363.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15965520564047667363.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4081008324373471492.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3967162948568757374.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4081008324373471492.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3967162948568757374.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.64297e+09,0.427676,20372,998,47,28537,230,331,70968,47,744,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AF((i4.u17.p54==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(EG(!((i4.u17.p54==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u1.t76, i1.u4.t73, i1.u5.t0, i1.u5.t1, i1.u5.t2, i2.i1.u9.t3, i2.i1.u9.t4, i2.i1.u9.t5, i2...606
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,21.6501,562600,1,0,945405,457,1909,1.60467e+06,256,1672,865757
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 102 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 101 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 101 transition count 116
Applied a total of 32 rules in 6 ms. Remains 101 /117 variables (removed 16) and now considering 116/132 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 115 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 116/217 variables, 101/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 9/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 217/217 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 17068 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 73/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 6/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 116/217 variables, 101/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 115/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 9/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 217/217 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 47098ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47098ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/117 places, 116/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47215 ms. Remains : 101/117 places, 116/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:25:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:25:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6482780727512413686.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:25:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1406386624961564150.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6482780727512413686.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1406386624961564150.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44904e+09,0.629025,28176,2,5163,5,69033,6,0,522,164528,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(((p78==1) + AF((((p16==0)||(p22==0))||(p31==0))))) * EG(EX(EX((((p31==0)||(p39==0))||(p65==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(((p78==1) + !(EG(!((((p16==0)||(p22==0))||(p31==0))))))) * EG(EX(EX((((p31==0)||(p39==0))||(p65...175
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...336
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2758475537812916820.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2758475537812916820.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2758475537812916820.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2758475537812916820.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2758475537812916820.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6974835593961779615.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5117905512429993076.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6974835593961779615.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5117905512429993076.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44904e+09,0.240217,14364,776,42,20141,154,302,35395,42,537,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(((i6.u24.p78==1) + AF((((i0.u5.p16==0)||(i1.i0.u7.p22==0))||(i1.i1.u10.p31==0))))) * EG(EX(EX((((i1.i1.u10.p31==0)||(i3.u12.p39==0...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(((i6.u24.p78==1) + !(EG(!((((i0.u5.p16==0)||(i1.i0.u7.p22==0))||(i1.i1.u10.p31==0))))))) * EG(E...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u1.t75, i0.u4.t72, i0.u5.t0, i0.u5.t1, i0.u5.t2, i1.i1.u8.t67, i1.i1.u9.t3, i1.i1.u9.t4, i...594
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,13.9201,423364,1,0,774993,415,1666,1.05788e+06,218,1206,738594
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 116 transition count 120
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 23 place count 105 transition count 119
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 104 transition count 119
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 104 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 88 transition count 103
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 75 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 75 transition count 90
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 75 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 70 transition count 85
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 138 place count 47 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 46 transition count 61
Applied a total of 139 rules in 22 ms. Remains 46 /117 variables (removed 71) and now considering 61/132 (removed 71) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 23 ms returned [60]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 46 cols
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 7/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 4/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 3/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 4/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 11/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 4/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 60/106 variables, 46/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 106/106 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3042 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 35/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/46 variables, 4/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/106 variables, 46/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 59/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 3/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/106 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 106/106 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 5161 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 46/46 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8213ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8213ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 46/117 places, 60/132 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 46 /46 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8358 ms. Remains : 46/117 places, 60/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11803175539904617919.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8605750119228234703.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11803175539904617919.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8605750119228234703.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.33854e+06,0.097908,7968,2,973,5,13401,6,0,246,27640,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p27==1) U AF((p112==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p27==1)) * !(EG(!((p112==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t20, t33...375
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 57/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,7.84037,262868,1,0,494,1.15616e+06,150,205,1977,2.24938e+06,517
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 10 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 10 transitions
Performed 10 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 10
Iterating post reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 117 transition count 122
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 107 transition count 122
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 107 transition count 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 90 transition count 105
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 63 place count 81 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 81 transition count 96
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 81 transition count 94
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 79 transition count 94
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 60 transition count 75
Applied a total of 114 rules in 20 ms. Remains 60 /117 variables (removed 57) and now considering 75/132 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned []
Running 74 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 5/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/135 variables, 60/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 8/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 5648 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 42/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 5/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/135 variables, 60/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 74/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 3/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 4/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 4/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:26:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 4/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved in 30007 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 35667ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 74 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35668ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/117 places, 75/132 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35795 ms. Remains : 60/117 places, 75/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 75 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:27:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15434611114305045580.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3445220739328562299.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15434611114305045580.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3445220739328562299.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.16674e+07,0.163209,10972,2,1564,5,22285,6,0,317,45739,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!((E((p27!=1) U !(AF((((p51==1)&&(p95==1))&&(p120==1))))) * (p48==1))) + !(EF(((p53==1)||(p96==1))))) + (p116==1)) U ((p64==1) * (E(E...293
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,((!((E((p27!=1) U !(!(EG(!((((p51==1)&&(p95==1))&&(p120==1))))))) * (p48==1))) + !(E(TRU...543
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...390
(forward)formula 0,0,28.7493,847060,1,0,935,3.8734e+06,211,408,2440,7.17364e+06,973
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 117/117 places, 132/132 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 117 transition count 124
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 109 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 123
Performed 13 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 13 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 108 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 95 transition count 110
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 83 transition count 98
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 83 transition count 98
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 83 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 80 transition count 95
Performed 20 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 20 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 20 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 40 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 60 transition count 75
Applied a total of 114 rules in 19 ms. Remains 60 /117 variables (removed 57) and now considering 75/132 (removed 57) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 75 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned [74]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 73 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 74 rows 60 cols
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 17/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 10/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 3/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 74/134 variables, 60/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 134/134 variables, and 114 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 4331 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/59 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/60 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 40/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/60 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 74/134 variables, 60/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 73/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 2/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/134 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 134/134 variables, and 197 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved in 22993 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 60/60 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 27336ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 73 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 27337ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 60/117 places, 74/132 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 60 /60 variables (removed 0) and now considering 74/74 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 27459 ms. Remains : 60/117 places, 74/132 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 74 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5909075567748025779.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6807199828458469823.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5909075567748025779.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6807199828458469823.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58123e+07,0.139429,9692,2,1464,5,18177,6,0,316,37155,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((AF((((p95==1)&&(p100==1))&&(p109==1))) * !((((p51==1)&&(p95==1))&&(p120==1)))) + (A(AF(((p57==1)&&(p2==1))) U ((p90==1)||((p92==1)&&(...239
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((!(EG(!((((p95==1)&&(p100==1))&&(p109==1))))) * !((((p51==1)&&(p95==1))&&(p120==1)))) + (!((E(!(((...709
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...375
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5941322337145976003.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5941322337145976003.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5941322337145976003.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5941322337145976003.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5941322337145976003.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Removed a total of 82 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 32 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18222964329611784594.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:28:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10958349266710609900.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18222964329611784594.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10958349266710609900.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.58123e+07,0.263252,13028,521,51,14741,363,241,47942,59,2079,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((AF((((u13.p95==1)&&(i5.i0.u14.p100==1))&&(i5.i0.u16.p109==1))) * !((((i2.u7.p51==1)&&(u13.p95==1))&&(i5.i1.u18.p120==1)))) + (A(AF(((...354
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((!(EG(!((((u13.p95==1)&&(i5.i0.u14.p100==1))&&(i5.i0.u16.p109==1))))) * !((((i2.u7.p51==1)&&(u13.p...985
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t47, t48, t55, t60, t61, t62, t69, t73, u12.t12, u12.t13, u13.t14, u13.t15, u13.t16, u13...522
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8378562196959161904.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8378562196959161904.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8378562196959161904.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8378562196959161904.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8378562196959161904.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3774826938452393977.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12820417294506335331.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3774826938452393977.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12820417294506335331.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.51548e+09,0.448705,19468,1327,67,27300,246,336,59103,54,1158,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((AF((((i8.u29.p95==1)&&(i7.i0.u31.p100==1))&&(i7.i1.u34.p109==1))) * !((((i4.u17.p51==1)&&(i8.u29.p95==1))&&(i9.u36.p120==1)))) + (A(A...357
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,((!(EG(!((((i8.u29.p95==1)&&(i7.i0.u31.p100==1))&&(i7.i1.u34.p109==1))))) * !((((i4.u17.p51==1)&&(i...1002
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u1.t90, i1.u4.t87, i1.u5.t0, i1.u5.t1, i1.u5.t2, i2.i0.u7.t85, i2.i0.u7.t86, i2.i1.t81, i2...805
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,232.767,2671164,1,0,3.69806e+06,640,1017,8.59903e+06,154,2251,198904
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Total runtime 1508814 ms.

BK_STOP 1749036782045

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-003B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500042"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;