Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993500041.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500041
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 492K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 127K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 84K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 36K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749035264641

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:07:45] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:07:45] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:07:45] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 57 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Transformed 123 places.
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Transformed 138 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 123 places and 138 transitions and 432 arcs in 144 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
Support contains 84 out of 123 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 123/123 places, 138/138 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 121 transition count 136
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 121 transition count 136
Applied a total of 4 rules in 18 ms. Remains 121 /123 variables (removed 2) and now considering 136/138 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 136 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 233 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 131 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 395 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 135 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 64 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 65 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 65 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 55 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 20/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 7/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 12/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 8/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 56 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 54 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 15/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 8/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 3/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 10/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 10/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 136/257 variables, 121/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 4/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 6/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 4/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 2/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 5/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 4/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 42 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 2/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 3/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 5/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 2/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 257/257 variables, and 326 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 189/189 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/121 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 189/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 53 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 8/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 12/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 136/257 variables, 121/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 135/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 6/487 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 4/491 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 3/494 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 3/497 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 257/257 variables, and 499 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 135/135 constraints, Known Traps: 230/230 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60108ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 135 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60121ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/123 places, 136/138 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60550 ms. Remains : 121/123 places, 136/138 transitions.
Support contains 84 out of 121 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:08:46] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-04 11:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 11:08:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
Support contains 76 out of 121 places (down from 84) after GAL structural reductions.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (266 resets) in 1529 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 3/64 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (56 resets) in 218 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (56 resets) in 275 ms. (144 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (52 resets) in 113 ms. (350 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-04 11:08:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 98/114 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/121 variables, 2/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 136/257 variables, 121/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/257 variables, 0/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 257/257 variables, and 134 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved in 113 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp1 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 98/114 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp48 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 4/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 7/121 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 136/257 variables, 121/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 51 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 4/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/257 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/257 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 257/257 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved in 573 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/3 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 698ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 23 ms.
Support contains 4 out of 121 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 121 transition count 124
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 109 transition count 124
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 109 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 95 transition count 110
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 69 place count 78 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 2 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 78 transition count 93
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 78 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 71 transition count 86
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 48 transition count 63
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 48 transition count 63
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 155 place count 47 transition count 62
Applied a total of 155 rules in 31 ms. Remains 47 /121 variables (removed 74) and now considering 62/136 (removed 74) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 31 ms. Remains : 47/121 places, 62/136 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1949 steps (32 resets) in 15 ms. (121 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
Computed a total of 34 stabilizing places and 34 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 120 transition count 123
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 108 transition count 123
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 108 transition count 108
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 93 transition count 108
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 72 place count 75 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 75 transition count 90
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 75 transition count 83
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 68 transition count 83
Performed 21 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 21
Deduced a syphon composed of 21 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 21 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 42 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 47 transition count 62
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 45 transition count 60
Applied a total of 148 rules in 20 ms. Remains 45 /121 variables (removed 76) and now considering 60/136 (removed 76) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned [59]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 12/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 5/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 59/104 variables, 45/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 3/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 5193 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 41/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 59/104 variables, 45/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 57/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 5178 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 46/46 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 10382ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10384ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/121 places, 59/136 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 59/59 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 10528 ms. Remains : 45/121 places, 59/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12989951431374808852.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality735485498322302246.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12989951431374808852.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality735485498322302246.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.09601e+06,0.073686,6708,2,948,5,10472,6,0,241,20082,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p53==0)||(p83==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p53==0)||(p83==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 52/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.291232,15156,1,0,46,52228,19,4,1422,69963,44
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 105 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 105 transition count 120
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 104 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 104 transition count 119
Applied a total of 34 rules in 11 ms. Remains 104 /121 variables (removed 17) and now considering 119/136 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 119 rows 104 cols
[2025-06-04 11:08:59] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:08:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 118 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:08:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 9/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 119/223 variables, 104/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 10/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 4/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 223/223 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 20000 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/104 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 79/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 4/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 119/223 variables, 104/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 118/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 3/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 4/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 13/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 9/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 4/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 223/223 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 104/104 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 50025ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 118 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50025ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 104/121 places, 119/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 50175 ms. Remains : 104/121 places, 119/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 119 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9155202212736520473.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality438933853574317587.ctl : 15 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9155202212736520473.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality438933853574317587.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0798e+09,0.713306,29992,2,5768,5,72565,6,0,537,178215,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((AX((p5==1)) + ((p24==0)&&(p8==1))) + (((p116==1)&&(p38==0))&&((p55==0)&&(p13==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(EX(!((p5==1)))) + ((p24==0)&&(p8==1))) + (((p116==1)&&(p38==0))&&((p55==0)&&(p13==1))))))] = FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...351
(forward)formula 0,1,8.54309,265948,1,0,670,1.14381e+06,263,275,3537,1.87344e+06,574
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 11 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 11 transitions
Performed 11 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 11
Iterating post reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 11 place count 120 transition count 124
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 109 transition count 124
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 109 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 95 transition count 110
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 81 transition count 96
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 81 transition count 96
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 81 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 75 transition count 90
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 128 place count 56 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 54 transition count 69
Applied a total of 130 rules in 26 ms. Remains 54 /121 variables (removed 67) and now considering 69/136 (removed 67) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 54 cols
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned []
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 5/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/54 variables, 5/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 12/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 2/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 4/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 1/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 69/123 variables, 54/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 5/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 7/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 2/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 123/123 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 4838 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 36/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/52 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/54 variables, 5/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/54 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 69/123 variables, 54/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 66/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/123 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 123/123 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 21640 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 54/54 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 26504ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26506ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 54/121 places, 69/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26749 ms. Remains : 54/121 places, 69/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17619297688788650460.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9761782436419495220.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17619297688788650460.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9761782436419495220.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.9439e+06,0.155939,11216,2,2063,5,24547,6,0,286,50701,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!((EF(((p30==0)||(p37==1))) * EG((p107==1)))) * !((((((p97==0)||(p74==1))&&(!((p118==0)||(p105==1))))||(p68==0))||(p7==1))))) U EF((...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (p100==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U (p100==1))) U (!(!((!((E(TRUE U ((p30==0)||(p37==1))) ...292
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...385
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,3.60156,123532,1,0,723,605260,175,301,2298,964727,755
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 110 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 110 transition count 125
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 109 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 109 transition count 124
Applied a total of 24 rules in 16 ms. Remains 109 /121 variables (removed 12) and now considering 124/136 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-04 11:10:28] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:10:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 163 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 66 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 66 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 55 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 20/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 12/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 18/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 9/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 5/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 2/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 4/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 124/233 variables, 109/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 7/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 7/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 4/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 2/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 7/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 5/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 0/233 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 233/233 variables, and 287 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 109/109 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 163/163 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/109 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 163/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 124/233 variables, 109/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 123/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/410 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/413 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 1/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 9/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 7/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 2/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/233 variables, 3/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60048ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 109/121 places, 124/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60229 ms. Remains : 109/121 places, 124/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12986399633357364426.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17877125473909422771.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12986399633357364426.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17877125473909422771.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92171e+09,0.893526,34692,2,6731,5,83369,6,0,562,213270,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(A(((p59==0)&&(p28==1)) U (EF(((p21==1) * AX(((p38==0)||(p83==1))))) * E(((p46==1)&&((p53==0)||(p85==1))) U (A(((p53==0)||(p0==1)) U (...373
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !((!(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((p21==1) * !(EX(!(((p38==0)||(p83==1))))))) * E(((p46==1)&&((p53==0)...909
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...386
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:11:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3660904882109691654.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3660904882109691654.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3660904882109691654.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3660904882109691654.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3660904882109691654.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5483506497372754855.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:11:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality150870575452726656.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5483506497372754855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality150870575452726656.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.92171e+09,0.280062,14680,1003,64,19438,277,338,38040,57,1039,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(A(((i3.i1.u19.p59==0)&&(i0.i1.u9.p28==1)) U (EF(((i0.i0.u7.p21==1) * AX(((i2.u12.p38==0)||(i4.u23.p83==1))))) * E(((i6.u14.p46==1)&&(...569
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !((!(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((i0.i0.u7.p21==1) * !(EX(!(((i2.u12.p38==0)||(i4.u23.p83==1))))))) *...1301
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u7.t78, i0.i0.u7.t79, i0.i1.u8.t74, i0.i1.u9.t3, i0.i1.u9.t4, i0.i1.u9.t5, i1.u1.t83, i...720
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 108 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 108 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 107 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 107 transition count 122
Applied a total of 28 rules in 14 ms. Remains 107 /121 variables (removed 14) and now considering 122/136 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 107 cols
[2025-06-04 11:12:29] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:12:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 156 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:12:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 19/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 11/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 12/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 4/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 7/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 3/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 5/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 2/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 122/229 variables, 107/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 4/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 7/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 2/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 2/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 2/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 229/229 variables, and 229 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 23181 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 105/105 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/107 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 105/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/229 variables, 107/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 121/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 6/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 7/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 9/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 4/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 229/229 variables, and 373 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 107/107 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 128/128 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 53225ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53225ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 107/121 places, 122/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53480 ms. Remains : 107/121 places, 122/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3007667308949425558.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1238617290016045331.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3007667308949425558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1238617290016045331.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.14066e+09,0.746805,31348,2,5923,5,74076,6,0,552,190145,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((A(E(((p85==0)||(p28==1)) U (p109==0)) U (EX(((p45==0)||(p103==1))) + ((p79==1)&&(p110==1)))) * (p38==1))) U AF((EG(AX(((p93==0)||(p...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!((E(!((EX(((p45==0)||(p103==1))) + ((p79==1)&&(p110==1)))) U (!(E(((p85==0)||(p28==1)) U ...439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...371
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11184128002415458310.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11184128002415458310.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11184128002415458310.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11184128002415458310.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11184128002415458310.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14515806410441288252.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:13:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9205167555858160248.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14515806410441288252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9205167555858160248.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.14066e+09,0.322171,14260,1018,71,18391,238,319,38482,57,1257,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((A(E(((i0.u26.p85==0)||(i2.u9.p28==1)) U (i8.u33.p109==0)) U (EX(((i0.u14.p45==0)||(i8.u33.p103==1))) + ((i6.u24.p79==1)&&(i8.u33.p1...325
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!((E(!((EX(((i0.u14.p45==0)||(i8.u33.p103==1))) + ((i6.u24.p79==1)&&(i8.u33.p110==1)))) U ...594
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.t78, i1.u1.t81, i1.u4.t0, i1.u4.t1, i1.u4.t2, i1.u5.t80, i2.u8.t72, i2.u9.t3, i2.u9.t4, i2...676
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 103 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 102 transition count 117
Applied a total of 38 rules in 5 ms. Remains 102 /121 variables (removed 19) and now considering 117/136 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 11:14:22] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 83 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 13/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 2/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 18201 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 67/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 7/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 6/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 116/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 9/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 7/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:14:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 355 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 48240ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48241ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/121 places, 117/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48415 ms. Remains : 102/121 places, 117/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15326962927623456440.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10308275009402685143.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15326962927623456440.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10308275009402685143.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44904e+09,0.604898,28036,2,5181,5,68601,6,0,527,163772,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E(!(EX(TRUE)) U !(AG(((AG((p103==0)) + (p49==0)) + (p85==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(!(EX(TRUE)) U !(!(E(TRUE U !(((!(E(TRUE U !((p103==0)))) + (p49==0)) + (p85==1)))))))))]...163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...341
(forward)formula 0,0,5.20639,173612,1,0,325,800981,261,153,3477,1.19049e+06,309
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 104 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 104 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 103 transition count 118
Applied a total of 36 rules in 7 ms. Remains 103 /121 variables (removed 18) and now considering 118/136 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 103 cols
[2025-06-04 11:15:16] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:15:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 118 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:15:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/103 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 14/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 5/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 118/221 variables, 103/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 5/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 5/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 221/221 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 13843 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/103 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 61/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 5/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 7/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 118/221 variables, 103/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 117/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 7/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 7/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 4/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 3/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 3/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 221/221 variables, and 341 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 106/106 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 43871ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43871ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/121 places, 118/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43997 ms. Remains : 103/121 places, 118/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6738358509149815956.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15183483258634636413.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6738358509149815956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15183483258634636413.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.74166e+09,0.869596,33300,2,6467,5,80775,6,0,532,205330,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((p75==0)||(p18==1))) * AG(((E(EG((p104==0)) U AG(((p79==1)&&((p48==0)||(p56==1))))) + (p20==0)) + (p95==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(((p75==0)||(p18==1))))] = FALSE * [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p95==1))) * !((p20==0))) * !(E(EG((p1...226
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...351
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13258009891144940978.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13258009891144940978.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13258009891144940978.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13258009891144940978.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13258009891144940978.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9329863579121954902.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:16:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15858982194626394727.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9329863579121954902.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15858982194626394727.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.74166e+09,0.269635,13468,966,42,16309,187,330,35401,54,513,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(((i5.u24.p75==0)||(i0.u6.p18==1))) * AG(((E(EG((i8.u32.p104==0)) U AG(((i5.u24.p79==1)&&((i3.u15.p48==0)||(i3.u18.p56==1))))) + (i1.i...189
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(((i5.u24.p75==0)||(i0.u6.p18==1))))] = FALSE * [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((i7.u29.p95==1))) * !((i1...283
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u1.t77, i0.u4.t74, i0.u5.t0, i0.u5.t1, i0.u5.t2, i1.i0.u8.t68, i1.i0.u9.t3, i1.i0.u9.t4, i...634
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 104 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 104 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 103 transition count 118
Applied a total of 36 rules in 8 ms. Remains 103 /121 variables (removed 18) and now considering 118/136 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 103 cols
[2025-06-04 11:17:00] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:17:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/103 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 18/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 118/221 variables, 103/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 3/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/221 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 221/221 variables, and 176 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 17686 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/103 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 56/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 4/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/103 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 118/221 variables, 103/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 117/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 7/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 14/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 6/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 4/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 6/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 4/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 221/221 variables, and 339 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 103/103 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 102/102 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 47713ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47715ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 103/121 places, 118/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47844 ms. Remains : 103/121 places, 118/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2212208382099938457.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:17:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7135989641316200566.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2212208382099938457.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7135989641316200566.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.72242e+09,0.734899,30184,2,5586,5,72164,6,0,532,181169,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(A(EX(TRUE) U !(((p37==0)||(p77==1))))) U (p60!=0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((p60!=0))))) * !(E(!((p60!=0)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(((p37==0)||(p77==1)))) U (!(EX(TRUE))...253
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...351
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9043494770409390595.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9043494770409390595.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9043494770409390595.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9043494770409390595.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9043494770409390595.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8663226902817537421.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8043347827491148561.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8663226902817537421.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8043347827491148561.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.72242e+09,0.35671,17952,973,60,24945,230,335,49442,54,1157,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AG(A(EX(TRUE) U !(((i3.u12.p37==0)||(i6.u24.p77==1))))) U (i4.i0.u19.p60!=0))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((i4.i0.u19.p60!=0))))) * !(E(!((i4.i0.u19.p60!=0)) U (!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(((i3.u12.p37==0)|...325
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u1.t77, i1.u4.t74, i1.u5.t0, i1.u5.t1, i1.u5.t2, i2.u8.t69, i2.u9.t3, i2.u9.t4, i2.u9.t5, ...636
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 102 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 101 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 101 transition count 116
Applied a total of 40 rules in 7 ms. Remains 101 /121 variables (removed 20) and now considering 116/136 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 101 cols
[2025-06-04 11:18:48] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:18:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 119 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 185 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 115 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 5/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 116/217 variables, 101/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 9/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/217 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 217/217 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 17805 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/101 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 73/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 2/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 6/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 116/217 variables, 101/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 115/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 9/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 4/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 3/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 217/217 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 101/101 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 109/109 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 47836ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47836ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 101/121 places, 116/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48030 ms. Remains : 101/121 places, 116/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17860769603452961765.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13115243023739169026.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17860769603452961765.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13115243023739169026.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44904e+09,0.671884,28168,2,5163,5,69033,6,0,522,164528,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p43==0) U AG(EX((p55!=1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p43==0)) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX((p55!=1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...336
(forward)formula 0,0,18.2988,507800,1,0,350,2.15084e+06,253,164,3468,3.80682e+06,349
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 103 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 103 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 102 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 102 transition count 117
Applied a total of 38 rules in 8 ms. Remains 102 /121 variables (removed 19) and now considering 117/136 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 102 cols
[2025-06-04 11:19:55] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:19:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 71 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:19:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 10/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:19:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 5/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 58 ms of which 21 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 11/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/219 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 219/219 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 13494 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/101 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/102 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 65/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 4/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 14/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 117/219 variables, 102/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 116/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 12/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 3/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/334 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 2/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/219 variables, 1/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 219/219 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 102/102 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 111/111 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 43524ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43525ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 102/121 places, 117/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43653 ms. Remains : 102/121 places, 117/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1026692821261331947.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:20:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13629051264055036702.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1026692821261331947.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13629051264055036702.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50519e+09,0.775953,32128,2,6198,5,79224,6,0,527,195054,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AG((p70==1))) + AX(EX(AX(EG((p21==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p70==1)))))))))) * !(EX(!(EX(!(EG((p21==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...346
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13740543669074306599.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13740543669074306599.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13740543669074306599.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13740543669074306599.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13740543669074306599.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8144371660202185248.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15567254070968253843.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8144371660202185248.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15567254070968253843.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50519e+09,0.312462,16180,935,42,22668,181,321,42814,46,568,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AG((i4.u22.p70==1))) + AX(EX(AX(EG((i1.i0.u7.p21==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i4.u22.p70==1)))))))))) * !(EX(!(EX(!(EG((i1.i0.u7.p21==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u1.t76, i0.u4.t73, i0.u5.t0, i0.u5.t1, i0.u5.t2, i1.i0.u7.t71, i1.i0.u7.t72, i1.i1.u8.t67,...631
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,22.0543,599132,1,0,1.09861e+06,385,1826,1.7425e+06,227,1213,1130603
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 105 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 105 transition count 120
Applied a total of 32 rules in 4 ms. Remains 105 /121 variables (removed 16) and now considering 120/136 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 105 cols
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:21:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 6/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 6/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 5/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 11/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 4/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 120/225 variables, 105/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 4/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 2/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 2/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/225 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 225/225 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 20849 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 89/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 120/225 variables, 105/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 119/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 13/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 7/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 5/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 1/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/225 variables, 2/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 225/225 variables, and 359 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 105/105 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 118/118 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 50872ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 50873ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 105/121 places, 120/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 51006 ms. Remains : 105/121 places, 120/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15702202606860681603.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11583537574969857135.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15702202606860681603.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11583537574969857135.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.72023e+09,0.710688,29844,2,6617,5,71872,6,0,542,178202,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(EX(!(A(((p9==0)||(p89==1)) U ((p77==0)||(p36==1))))))) * (AF(((p33==0)||(p46==1))) + AG((p7==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EX(!(!((E(!(((p77==0)||(p36==1))) U (!(((p9==0)||(p89==1))) * !(((p77==0)||(p36==1))...289
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...351
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11459725241686016067.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11459725241686016067.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11459725241686016067.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11459725241686016067.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11459725241686016067.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5976264595845687024.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:22:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14261538609753264877.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5976264595845687024.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14261538609753264877.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.72023e+09,0.388043,18412,1141,65,25668,255,349,50193,50,1190,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AX(EX(!(A(((i2.i1.u3.p9==0)||(i7.u30.p89==1)) U ((i6.u24.p77==0)||(i3.u12.p36==1))))))) * (AF(((i2.i1.u10.p33==0)||(i0.u14.p46==1))) ...176
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EX(!(!((E(!(((i6.u24.p77==0)||(i3.u12.p36==1))) U (!(((i2.i1.u3.p9==0)||(i7.u30.p89=...370
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.u1.t78, i1.u4.t75, i1.u5.t0, i1.u5.t1, i1.u5.t2, i2.i0.u9.t3, i2.i0.u9.t4, i2.i0.u9.t5, i2...641
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,26.8604,691244,1,0,1.20576e+06,584,1995,2.14389e+06,252,2233,1321008
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 136/136 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 107 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 107 transition count 122
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 106 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 106 transition count 121
Applied a total of 30 rules in 6 ms. Remains 106 /121 variables (removed 15) and now considering 121/136 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 106 cols
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/106 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 20/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 12/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 11/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 7/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 7/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 2/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 6/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/106 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 121/227 variables, 106/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 49 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 45 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 15/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 5/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 3/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 3/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 4/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 5/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 5/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/227 variables, 1/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 2/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/227 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 30039ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 30040ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 106/121 places, 121/136 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 30161 ms. Remains : 106/121 places, 121/136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18112319962298822406.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:23:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality748281853427549894.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18112319962298822406.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality748281853427549894.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.68335e+09,0.735447,29136,2,5489,5,69944,6,0,547,172697,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!(AF((p48==1))) + ((!((p25==0)||(p46==1)))&&((p122==0)||(p65==1))))) U ((p39==1) * (!(EF(AX((p74==0)))) + EG(AX((((p77==0)||(p69==1)...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((p39==1) * (!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((p74==0)))))) + EG(!(EX(!((((p77==0)||(p69==1))||((p70==0)||(p72...499
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...361
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2225792852652240480.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2225792852652240480.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2225792852652240480.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2225792852652240480.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2225792852652240480.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10247566294327229495.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14693948423442553338.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10247566294327229495.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14693948423442553338.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.68335e+09,0.275084,14736,922,55,20554,188,331,37584,50,694,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!(AF((i4.u15.p48==1))) + ((!((i1.i1.u9.p25==0)||(i0.u14.p46==1)))&&((i9.u36.p122==0)||(i5.u20.p65==1))))) U ((i3.u12.p39==1) * (!(EF...263
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(((i3.u12.p39==1) * (!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!((i6.u25.p74==0)))))) + EG(!(EX(!((((i6.u24.p77==0)||(i5.u...662
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i0.u8.t3, i1.i0.u8.t4, i1.i0.u8.t5, i1.i1.t72, i1.i1.u9.t74, i2.u1.t80, i2.u4.t77, i2.u5.t...641
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5755637743952924549.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5755637743952924549.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5755637743952924549.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5755637743952924549.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5755637743952924549.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18031183974554180324.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:24:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12423998569368882751.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18031183974554180324.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12423998569368882751.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 5 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.19988e+09,0.582345,22920,1376,80,31624,382,369,66528,53,1768,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((!(A(((i4.i0.u19.p59==0)&&(i2.i1.u8.p28==1)) U (EF(((i2.i0.u7.p21==1) * AX(((i3.u12.p38==0)||(i6.u23.p83==1))))) * E(((i0.u14.p46==1)&&(...584
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU((Init * !((!(!((E(!((E(TRUE U ((i2.i0.u7.p21==1) * !(EX(!(((i3.u12.p38==0)||(i6.u23.p83==1))))))) *...1322
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i1.i0.u1.t94, i1.i0.u4.t0, i1.i0.u4.t1, i1.i0.u4.t2, i1.i0.u4.t3, i1.i1.t91, i1.i1.u5.t93, i2...890
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,168.126,2208220,1,0,3.12214e+06,942,899,6.6137e+06,134,3467,947683
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 60 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 88 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16015195620063873724.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:29:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10140566788703549079.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16015195620063873724.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10140566788703549079.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.19988e+09,3.83223,143620,3386,298,200883,1165,162,1.20747e+06,88,16838,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((A(E(((i1.u31.p85==0)||(i0.i0.i1.i0.u9.p28==1)) U (i1.i0.u23.p109==0)) U (EX(((i0.i1.u25.p45==0)||(i1.i0.u23.p103==1))) + ((i0.i1.u1...391
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!((E(!((EX(((i0.i1.u25.p45==0)||(i1.i0.u23.p103==1))) + ((i0.i1.u17.p79==1)&&(i1.i0.u23.p1...684
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u3.t94, i0.i0.i1.u10.t8, i0.i0.i1.u10.t9, i0.i0.i1.u10.t10, i0.i0.i1.u10.t11, i0.i0.i1....1192
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:55:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:55:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 136 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:55:28] [INFO ] Transformed 121 places.
[2025-06-04 11:55:28] [INFO ] Transformed 136 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-04 11:55:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7070910189658324150.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:55:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17593313479200501733.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7070910189658324150.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17593313479200501733.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.19988e+09,39.1565,967896,2,152807,5,3.31696e+06,6,0,622,5.43429e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EF((A(E(((p85==0)||(p28==1)) U (p109==0)) U (EX(((p45==0)||(p103==1))) + ((p79==1)&&(p110==1)))) * (p38==1))) U AF((EG(AX(((p93==0)||(p...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,E(TRUE U (!((E(!((EX(((p45==0)||(p103==1))) + ((p79==1)&&(p110==1)))) U (!(E(((p85==0)||(p28==1)) U ...439
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...441

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500041"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;