Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993500034.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-003A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500034
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 492K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.7K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 75K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.8K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 43K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 109K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 101K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749034981309

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-003A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 45 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Transformed 45 places.
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Transformed 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 45 places and 60 transitions and 276 arcs in 129 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 40 out of 45 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 168 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 264 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 4546 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7944 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 12550ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12575ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12862 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Support contains 40 out of 45 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 56 to 53
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (776 resets) in 1805 ms. (22 steps per ms) remains 2/53 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (200 resets) in 358 ms. (111 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (225 resets) in 120 ms. (330 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp25 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 25/105 variables, and 17 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 26 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 10/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 7/13 constraints, State Equation: 0/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 30ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 88 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 4088 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7842 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 11947ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11948ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12037 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3167140446022661630.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability458399464696783154.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3167140446022661630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability458399464696783154.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.088768,6528,2,922,5,9992,6,0,242,18837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((((p5==1)&&(p7==1))&&(p12==1))) U AX(!(EG(((!(((p17==1)&&(p32==1))&&(p44==1)))||(((p26==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p37==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(EX(!(!(EG(((!(((p17==1)&&(p32==1))&&(p44==1)))||(((p26==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p37==1)))))))))))) * ...398
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...380
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,13.0534,427236,1,0,798,1.90553e+06,149,452,2024,3.70353e+06,898
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 44 transition count 59
Applied a total of 2 rules in 22 ms. Remains 44 /45 variables (removed 1) and now considering 59/60 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:41] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:03:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 36 ms returned [18]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 8/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 58/102 variables, 44/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 3567 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 26/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 58/102 variables, 44/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 57/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 4736 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8333ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8335ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/45 places, 58/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 58/58 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8494 ms. Remains : 44/45 places, 58/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7740371130040672701.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4250133140583306384.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7740371130040672701.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4250133140583306384.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.096e+06,0.072588,6680,2,896,5,9693,6,0,236,18411,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p10==1) + A(AF((((p33==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p39==1))) U EG((((p12==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p10==1))),!(EG((((p12==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))))) * !(!(EG(!((((p33==1)&&(p35==1...316
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t23...370
(forward)formula 0,0,0.494143,25780,1,0,308,115224,142,107,2010,164048,287
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 84 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned [21]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 59/104 variables, 45/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 3791 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 21/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 59/104 variables, 45/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 58/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 4/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 3910 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 7720ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7721ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/45 places, 59/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 59/59 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 7837 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 59/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8572118582177153059.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3113499517122953024.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8572118582177153059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3113499517122953024.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.068399,6820,2,922,5,9980,6,0,241,18782,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG(((A((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p16==1)) U (p32==1)) + (p43==1)) + (((p2==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p16==1)))) * (((p17==0)||(p34==0))||(p43==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !(((!((E(!((p32==1)) U (!((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p16==1))) * !((p32==1)))) + EG(!((p32==...257
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t22...375
(forward)formula 0,0,6.84314,243760,1,0,557,1.07922e+06,155,229,2090,2.0726e+06,565
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3911 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7865 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 11788ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11789ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11877 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13967418239338525232.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6052436212752994414.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13967418239338525232.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6052436212752994414.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.066399,6716,2,922,5,9992,6,0,242,18837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(AX(((((p12==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p23==1)&&(p33==1)))&&((p35==1)&&(p40==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((((p12==1)&&(p14==1))&&((p23==1)&&(p33==1)))&&((p35==1)&&(p40==1)))))))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...380
(forward)formula 0,1,0.241186,14268,1,0,181,61543,142,67,2020,70408,133
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 44 transition count 59
Applied a total of 2 rules in 9 ms. Remains 44 /45 variables (removed 1) and now considering 59/60 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 19 ms returned [18]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 8/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 58/102 variables, 44/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 3489 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 26/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 58/102 variables, 44/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 57/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 4811 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8311ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8311ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/45 places, 58/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 58/58 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8428 ms. Remains : 44/45 places, 58/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3994662607846888306.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12246729770429634765.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3994662607846888306.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12246729770429634765.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.096e+06,0.067591,6676,2,896,5,9693,6,0,236,18411,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((((EF((((p24==1)&&(p22==1))&&(p27==1))) * (p36==1)) * ((p41==1)&&(p12==1))) * ((p14==1)&&(p23==1))) + (((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1...195
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((((E(TRUE U (((p24==1)&&(p22==1))&&(p27==1))) * (p36==1)) * ((p41==1)&&(p12==1))) * ((p14==1)&&(p...246
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t23...370
(forward)formula 0,0,5.2734,191628,1,0,414,793794,148,198,2001,1.55864e+06,347
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:04:31] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:04:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3868 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7784 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 11663ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11664ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11752 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4765538413333476921.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5335662734444773296.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4765538413333476921.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5335662734444773296.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.06482,6724,2,922,5,9992,6,0,242,18837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EX((A((((p34==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p39==1)) U ((((p3==1)&&(p20==1))&&(p30==1))||(((p24==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p37==1)))) * AG((p15==0)))) * AF(...490
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((EX((!((E(!(((((p3==1)&&(p20==1))&&(p30==1))||(((p24==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p37==1)))) U (!((((p34==1)&&...734
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...380
(forward)formula 0,0,19.9324,647676,1,0,1435,2.90576e+06,177,624,2149,5.51955e+06,1574
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 43 transition count 58
Applied a total of 2 rules in 12 ms. Remains 43 /45 variables (removed 2) and now considering 58/60 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned [17]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 11/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 57/100 variables, 43/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 3/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 2137 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 4/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 57/100 variables, 43/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 56/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 182 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 2624 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4795ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4796ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/45 places, 57/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 57/57 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4923 ms. Remains : 43/45 places, 57/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 57 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2886637526034041979.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10571205404755568104.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2886637526034041979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10571205404755568104.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.096e+06,0.062871,6580,2,855,5,9630,6,0,232,18382,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((p24==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p37==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((p24==1)&&(p28==1))&&(p37==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 42/0/15
(forward)formula 0,0,0.350873,19124,1,0,43,64510,20,4,1390,98367,42
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 67 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 4258 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7604 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 11874ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11875ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11955 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9878569916605095976.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9599130825826721670.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9878569916605095976.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9599130825826721670.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.065963,6724,2,922,5,9992,6,0,242,18837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EG(AX(A((p39==1) U (p10==1)))) + EF(((E((((p26==1)&&(p30==1))&&(p37==1)) U (p38==1)) * AF((((p17==1)&&(p32==1))&&(p43==1)))) + (((p3==...429
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,(EG(!(EX(!(!((E(!((p10==1)) U (!((p39==1)) * !((p10==1)))) + EG(!((p10==1))))))))) + E(TRUE...1337
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...380
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15707696508070936477.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15707696508070936477.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15707696508070936477.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15707696508070936477.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15707696508070936477.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 60 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 52 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 48 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4047158775592467137.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8951057662186565644.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4047158775592467137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8951057662186565644.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.144188,10360,316,29,11421,78,107,37029,31,370,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EG(AX(A((i4.u11.p39==1) U (i0.u3.p10==1)))) + EF(((E((((i1.u7.p26==1)&&(u8.p30==1))&&(i4.u11.p37==1)) U (i4.u11.p38==1)) * AF((((i1.u5...600
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU((FwdU(Init,(EG(!(EX(!(!((E(!((i0.u3.p10==1)) U (!((i4.u11.p39==1)) * !((i0.u3.p10==1)))) + EG(!((i0.u3...1776
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, t30, t37, t42, t47, u8.t10, u8.t11, u9.t12, u9.t13, u9.t19, i0.t55, i0.t34, i0.u1.t0, i0...404
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,19.556,557668,1,0,828090,183,767,2.37387e+06,131,456,523015
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:06:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3961 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7836 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 11805ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11805ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11902 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8907371313062711137.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3721486910257471730.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8907371313062711137.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3721486910257471730.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.06666,6716,2,922,5,9992,6,0,242,18837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!((AX((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1))) * !(((p40==1)&&(p42==1))))) U !(AG(!(((((p38==1)&&(p2==1))&&((p4==1)&&(p15==1)))&&(!((p38==1)&&...170
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(FwdU(Init,!((!(EX(!((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1))))) * !(((p40==1)&&(p42==1)))))),TRUE) * ((((p38==1)&...223
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...380
(forward)formula 0,1,2.84346,106984,1,0,302,386136,145,160,2080,898787,270
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3917 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7928 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 11854ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11854ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11940 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6352161180615989911.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1224334987452174701.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6352161180615989911.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1224334987452174701.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.068307,6716,2,922,5,9992,6,0,242,18837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(!(E(!(EF(((p22==1)&&(p27==1)))) U (((E((((p17==1)&&(p34==1))&&(p44==1)) U (p28==1)) + E((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p25==1)) U (p5==1))) +...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([(FwdU(FwdU(EY(Init),!(E(TRUE U ((p22==1)&&(p27==1))))),(((p17==1)&&(p34==1))&&(p44==1))) * (p28==1))] = FALS...519
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...380
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 55/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,1.3006,52836,1,0,267,228982,157,93,2092,357472,235
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned [21]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 59/104 variables, 45/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 2/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 104/104 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 3933 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 21/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 59/104 variables, 45/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 58/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 4/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/104 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 104/104 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 3911 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 7857ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7857ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 45/45 places, 59/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 59/59 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 7984 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 59/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 59 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1428547594711293404.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3496527617005915400.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1428547594711293404.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3496527617005915400.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.068573,6692,2,922,5,9980,6,0,241,18782,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG(A((((p33==1)&&(p35==1))&&(p40==1)) U ((A((((p17==1)&&(p32==1))&&(p43==1)) U (p43==1)) * (p34==1)) * ((p35==1)&&(p39==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(((!((E(!((p43==1)) U (!((((p17==1)&&(p32==1))&&(p43==1))) * !((p43==1)))) + EG(...537
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t22...375
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,10.9704,370648,1,0,942,1.65203e+06,162,476,2083,3.29626e+06,944
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 43 transition count 58
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 43 /45 variables (removed 2) and now considering 58/60 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 87 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned [17]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 57 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 11/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 57/100 variables, 43/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 3/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 100/100 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 2160 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 4/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 57/100 variables, 43/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 56/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/100 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/100 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 100/100 variables, and 182 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 2674 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4841ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4841ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 43/45 places, 57/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 57/57 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4963 ms. Remains : 43/45 places, 57/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 57 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13785364528698354733.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13721403138548219881.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13785364528698354733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13721403138548219881.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.096e+06,0.060872,6576,2,855,5,9630,6,0,232,18382,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((p38==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((p38==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t19, t21, t22...370
(forward)formula 0,0,7.0821,235108,1,0,561,1.05476e+06,141,223,1854,1.97804e+06,567
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 45 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:09] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:07:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3922 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7938 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 11870ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11870ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11955 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10652145651648429809.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2628559117250511217.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10652145651648429809.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2628559117250511217.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.070871,6720,2,922,5,9992,6,0,242,18837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF((AX((AG((p0==1)) + (p11==0))) * AX((p0==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((p0==1)))) + (p11==0)))))) * !(EX(!((p0==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...380
(forward)formula 0,1,0.326939,17636,1,0,187,72255,144,71,2073,99096,142
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 45 /45 variables (removed 0) and now considering 60/60 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 59 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 10/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 6/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 105/105 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 3945 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 44/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/45 variables, 13/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 26/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/45 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/105 variables, 45/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 59/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 2/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 3/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/105 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 105/105 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved in 7861 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 45/45 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 45/45 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 11814ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 59 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11814ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11898 ms. Remains : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1097586406578030077.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1984168246816455458.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1097586406578030077.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1984168246816455458.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5305e+06,0.071157,6716,2,922,5,9992,6,0,242,18837,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX((!(A((p32==1) U (((p10==1)&&(p14==1))&&(p23==1)))) * AF(EG((((p19==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX((!(!((E(!((((p10==1)&&(p14==1))&&(p23==1))) U (!((p32==1)) * !((((p10==1)&&(p14==1))&&(p23==1)))))...262
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t19, t20, t21...380
(forward)formula 0,0,4.76282,171976,1,0,536,725985,158,217,2052,1.36365e+06,537
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 45/45 places, 60/60 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 44 transition count 59
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 44 /45 variables (removed 1) and now considering 59/60 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 59 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 24 ms returned [18]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 57 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 58 rows 44 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Computed 13 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 8/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 4/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 58/102 variables, 44/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 2/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 102/102 variables, and 128 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 3420 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/44 variables, 13/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 26/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 58/102 variables, 44/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 57/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/102 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 102/102 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved in 4824 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 44/44 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 13/13 constraints, State Equation: 44/44 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 8249ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 57 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8250ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 44/45 places, 58/60 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 44 /44 variables (removed 0) and now considering 58/58 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 8376 ms. Remains : 44/45 places, 58/60 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 58 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18093720612602162622.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1535646797832088749.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18093720612602162622.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1535646797832088749.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.096e+06,0.069909,6676,2,896,5,9693,6,0,236,18411,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((A((p15==1) U (((EG((((p19==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p25==1))) * (p40==1)) * ((p42==1)&&(p6==1))) * ((p7==1)&&(p11==1)))) * (p6==1)) * ((p7...173
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((!((E(!((((EG((((p19==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p25==1))) * (p40==1)) * ((p42==1)&&(p6==1))) * ((p7==...445
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t20, t22, t23...370
(forward)formula 0,0,4.38597,155904,1,0,490,663440,155,198,2004,1.21445e+06,493
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-003A-CTLFireability-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 289175 ms.

BK_STOP 1749035271745

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-003A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-003A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500034"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-003A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-003A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;