Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993500026.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.........................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500026
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 448K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 41K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 26K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 17K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 10K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 104K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.8K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749034934082

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 51 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Transformed 83 places.
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Transformed 93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 83 places and 93 transitions and 288 arcs in 142 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 65 out of 83 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 9 ms. Remains 83 /83 variables (removed 0) and now considering 93/93 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 186 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 115 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 331 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 92 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:02:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 20/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 20/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 11/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 7/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 10/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 3/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 93/176 variables, 83/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 6/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 37 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 4/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 5/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 2/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 176/176 variables, and 297 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 82/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/82 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/83 variables, 9/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 120/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 93/176 variables, 83/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 92/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/393 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 6/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 2/405 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 176/176 variables, and 406 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps: 137/137 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60066ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 92 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60078ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60433 ms. Remains : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Support contains 65 out of 83 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 67 to 62
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (366 resets) in 1055 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 4/62 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (89 resets) in 223 ms. (178 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (83 resets) in 188 ms. (211 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (88 resets) in 160 ms. (248 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (85 resets) in 89 ms. (444 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/11 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp34 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp39 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 69/80 variables, 8/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 69/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp2 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 3/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/80 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 3/83 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 3/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 93/176 variables, 83/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 176/176 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 398 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 27/29 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 27/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/83 variables, 7/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 54/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 6/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 93/176 variables, 83/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/176 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/176 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 176/176 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved in 293 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 83/83 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 83/83 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/4 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 696ms problems are : Problem set: 3 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 15 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 83 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 83 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 75 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 74 transition count 84
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 74 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 64 transition count 74
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 50 place count 52 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 52 transition count 62
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 52 transition count 57
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 47 transition count 57
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 33 transition count 43
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 6 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 6 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 33 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 32 transition count 42
Applied a total of 107 rules in 42 ms. Remains 32 /83 variables (removed 51) and now considering 42/93 (removed 51) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 42 ms. Remains : 32/83 places, 42/93 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (831 resets) in 254 ms. (156 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (230 resets) in 187 ms. (212 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 11768 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 55943 steps, saw 11768 distinct states, run finished after 115 ms. (steps per millisecond=486 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 11768 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 55943 steps, saw 11768 distinct states, run finished after 39 ms. (steps per millisecond=1434 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 4 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
Support contains 57 out of 83 places (down from 59) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 24 stabilizing places and 24 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 82 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 74 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 83
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 63 transition count 73
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 51 place count 50 transition count 60
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 50 transition count 60
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 50 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 44 transition count 54
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 33 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 32 transition count 42
Applied a total of 99 rules in 15 ms. Remains 32 /83 variables (removed 51) and now considering 42/93 (removed 51) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 32 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:03:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned []
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 5/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 4/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 42/74 variables, 32/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/74 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/74 variables, 0/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 74/74 variables, and 68 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 2552 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 18/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/32 variables, 5/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 8/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 5/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 42/74 variables, 32/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 40/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/74 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 74/74 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 2061 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 32/32 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4625ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4625ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/83 places, 42/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4759 ms. Remains : 32/83 places, 42/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8733187088365238015.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10990098597630008253.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8733187088365238015.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10990098597630008253.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,13991,0.032199,4716,2,427,5,3730,6,0,172,5999,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p5==1) U AF((p65==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p5==1)) * !(EG(!((p65==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, t30, t31...300
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 40/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,0.399573,22236,1,0,306,92422,114,129,1387,153430,298
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 82 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 77 transition count 85
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 75 transition count 85
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 75 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 64 transition count 74
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 53 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 53 transition count 63
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 53 transition count 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 50 transition count 60
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 37 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 35 transition count 45
Applied a total of 92 rules in 16 ms. Remains 35 /83 variables (removed 48) and now considering 45/93 (removed 48) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 35 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned [44]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 42 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 35 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 2/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 15/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 7/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 2/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 44/79 variables, 35/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 4/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 79/79 variables, and 78 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 2526 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 23/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 9/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 44/79 variables, 35/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 42/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 1/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 79/79 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 2383 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 4918ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4918ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/83 places, 44/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 35 /35 variables (removed 0) and now considering 44/44 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 5034 ms. Remains : 35/83 places, 44/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3478920149124257771.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11591601263458767288.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3478920149124257771.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11591601263458767288.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,12168,0.032527,5256,2,670,5,4679,6,0,186,9326,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((EG(EF((p79==1))) * E((((p68==1)||(p32==1))&&(p33!=1)) U (p9!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(EG(E(TRUE U (p79==1))) * E((((p68==1)||(p32==1))&&(p33!=1)) U (p9!=1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t15, t16, t25, t26, t28, t29, t30, t32...305
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.415972,21976,1,0,248,83777,126,112,1436,133994,249
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 70 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 70 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 69 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 69 transition count 79
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 69 /83 variables (removed 14) and now considering 79/93 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 69 cols
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 105 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:03:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 6/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 2/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/148 variables, 69/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 4/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 4/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 7313 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 41/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 79/148 variables, 69/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 78/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 3/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 3/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 4/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:03:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 218 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 29742 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 37063ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37065ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/83 places, 79/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 37176 ms. Remains : 69/83 places, 79/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1793103635961517767.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2833247835329208941.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1793103635961517767.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2833247835329208941.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.73267e+06,0.146405,10636,2,2007,5,20985,6,0,357,43725,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(EG(AG(((p51==1)||(p56==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((p51==1)||(p56==1)))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t22, t27...280
(forward)formula 0,0,1.03529,40580,1,0,271,154585,189,88,2472,230718,261
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 72 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 72 transition count 82
Applied a total of 22 rules in 7 ms. Remains 72 /83 variables (removed 11) and now considering 82/93 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 82 rows 72 cols
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 81 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 8/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 5/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 82/154 variables, 72/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 5/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 3/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 2/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 154/154 variables, and 146 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 7639 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/72 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 64/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 4/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 5/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 5/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 4/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 82/154 variables, 72/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 81/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 5/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 1/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 1/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/154 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 154/154 variables, and 262 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved in 27547 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 72/72 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 81/81 constraints, Known Traps: 94/94 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 35194ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 81 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 35195ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 72/83 places, 82/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35285 ms. Remains : 72/83 places, 82/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 82 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability368670778085841205.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11332171860399096241.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability368670778085841205.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11332171860399096241.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0768e+06,0.165293,11224,2,2535,5,23018,6,0,372,49125,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((!(A(((p9==1)||(((p15==1)&&(p21==1))&&((p29==1)&&(p38==1)))) U EF((p48==1)))) * !(E(((p5==1)||(p59==1)) U !((((p27==1)&&(p41==1))&&(...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(!((E(!(E(TRUE U (p48==1))) U (!(((p9==1)||(((p15==1)&&(p21==1))&&((p29==1)&&(p38==1)))...456
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t23...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,15.0443,466504,1,0,1308,2.26483e+06,216,678,2567,3.88288e+06,1328
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 72 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 72 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 71 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 71 transition count 81
Applied a total of 24 rules in 5 ms. Remains 71 /83 variables (removed 12) and now considering 81/93 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 15/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 5/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 13/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 81/152 variables, 71/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 5/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 6/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 152/152 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 9117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 71/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 81/152 variables, 71/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 80/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/242 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 152/152 variables, and 242 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 16276 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 25404ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25405ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/83 places, 81/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 25500 ms. Remains : 71/83 places, 81/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16844825480228520688.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16499074818922160126.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16844825480228520688.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16499074818922160126.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.13104e+06,0.183483,12072,2,2316,5,24836,6,0,367,54567,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EF(EX(AF((p28==1)))) * AG(EX(E((p39==1) U (p12==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * E(TRUE U EX(!(EG(!((p28==1))))))) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(E((p39==1) U (p12==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...290
(forward)formula 0,0,0.716468,30288,1,0,199,118770,187,90,2394,170242,183
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 71 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 71 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 70 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 70 transition count 80
Applied a total of 26 rules in 4 ms. Remains 70 /83 variables (removed 13) and now considering 80/93 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-04 11:05:23] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:05:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:05:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 17/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 10/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 4/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 3/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 4/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 3/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 80/150 variables, 70/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 7789 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 55/55 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 55/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 80/150 variables, 70/135 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 79/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 4/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 4/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:05:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 232 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 28580 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 36379ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36380ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/83 places, 80/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36461 ms. Remains : 70/83 places, 80/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16500801655179707622.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1944503940832153490.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16500801655179707622.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1944503940832153490.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.77857e+06,0.140359,10520,2,2038,5,20991,6,0,362,43408,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(((p44==1)||(p17==0))) * (((p65==0) * (!(E((((p4==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p41==1)) U (p82==1))) + (p73==1))) + (AG(((p69==1)&&(p77==1))) * ...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(((p44==1)||(p17==0)))))] = FALSE * ([(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(((p65==0) * (!(E((((p4==1)&&(p16==1)...362
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t23, t26...285
(forward)formula 0,1,12.2155,385628,1,0,1238,1.87143e+06,192,516,2359,3.37566e+06,1384
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 72 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 72 transition count 82
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 71 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 71 transition count 81
Applied a total of 24 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /83 variables (removed 12) and now considering 81/93 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 81 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 75 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 80 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 11/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 6/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 81/152 variables, 71/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 4/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 152/152 variables, and 141 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 7290 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 59/68 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 5/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 4/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 81/152 variables, 71/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 80/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 2/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/152 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/152 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 152/152 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved in 18729 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 26027ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 80 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26028ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/83 places, 81/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26110 ms. Remains : 71/83 places, 81/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 81 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17738928553845807785.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13549263795275871780.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17738928553845807785.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13549263795275871780.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.79289e+06,0.187995,11816,2,2382,5,23800,6,0,367,52639,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((AF((AF((p43==1)) * AF((p39==0)))) + EX(((p77==0)&&(((p30==0)||(p41==0))||(p64==0))))) + ((p68==1)||(p20==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((!(EG(!((!(EG(!((p43==1)))) * !(EG(!((p39==0)))))))) + EX(((p77==0)&&(((p30==0)||(p41==0))||(p64==0)...194
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t22, t27...295
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,18.2114,595080,1,0,1513,2.63204e+06,203,826,2453,5.14477e+06,1624
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 8 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 8 transitions
Performed 8 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 8
Iterating post reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 82 transition count 84
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 74 transition count 84
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 74 transition count 74
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 64 transition count 74
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 51 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 51 transition count 61
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 51 transition count 56
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 46 transition count 56
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 33 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 31 transition count 41
Applied a total of 100 rules in 13 ms. Remains 31 /83 variables (removed 52) and now considering 41/93 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-04 11:06:56] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:06:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:56] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 17 ms returned [40]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 39 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 6/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 1/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 5/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 7/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 40/71 variables, 31/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 2/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 5/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 71/71 variables, and 67 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1904 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 27/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 1/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 40/71 variables, 31/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 39/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/71 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 71/71 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 2577 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4487ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4487ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 31/83 places, 40/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 40/40 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 4599 ms. Remains : 31/83 places, 40/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14422279548485986488.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8206349566523526582.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14422279548485986488.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8206349566523526582.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11473,0.024005,4848,2,449,5,3868,6,0,166,5819,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((p82==1)) + EF((p13==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U (p13==1)))),!((p82==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29...295
(forward)formula 0,1,0.201292,13040,1,0,171,48603,111,64,1333,59404,150
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 70 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 70 transition count 80
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 69 transition count 79
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 69 transition count 79
Applied a total of 28 rules in 7 ms. Remains 69 /83 variables (removed 14) and now considering 79/93 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 79 rows 69 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 78 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 79/148 variables, 69/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 7/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 119 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 4543 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/69 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 40/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 79/148 variables, 69/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 78/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 3/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 4/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 3/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 4/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 4/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 1/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 6/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 233 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 69/69 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 34562ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 78 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34563ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 69/83 places, 79/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34652 ms. Remains : 69/83 places, 79/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 79 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2853705691601221043.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15465931950263840011.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2853705691601221043.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15465931950263840011.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76424e+06,0.151317,11156,2,2095,5,22419,6,0,357,47756,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((p26==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((p26==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t22, t27...280
(forward)formula 0,1,0.484861,23352,1,0,186,93473,175,84,2278,122544,165
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 82 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 83
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 63 transition count 73
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 49 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 49 transition count 59
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 49 transition count 53
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 43 transition count 53
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 31 transition count 41
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 104 place count 29 transition count 39
Applied a total of 104 rules in 15 ms. Remains 29 /83 variables (removed 54) and now considering 39/93 (removed 54) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 29 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned [38]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 37 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 29 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:36] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 15/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 3/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 38/67 variables, 29/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/67 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 67/67 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 1053 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 18/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 38/67 variables, 29/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 37/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 2/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/67 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 67/67 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 1258 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2318ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2318ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/83 places, 38/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 38/38 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2411 ms. Remains : 29/83 places, 38/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6938208883637118252.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17167217966365544412.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6938208883637118252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17167217966365544412.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11471,0.020638,4716,2,389,5,3438,6,0,157,5648,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((p66==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((p66==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29...290
(forward)formula 0,1,0.1322,10092,1,0,276,33777,101,104,1274,44618,283
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 71 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 71 transition count 81
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 70 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 70 transition count 80
Applied a total of 26 rules in 9 ms. Remains 70 /83 variables (removed 13) and now considering 80/93 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 7/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 5/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 80/150 variables, 70/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 7/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/133 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 138 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 10093 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 56/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 80/150 variables, 70/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 79/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 5/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:07:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/233 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 1/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 1/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/239 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/240 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 240 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 40118ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40119ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/83 places, 80/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40213 ms. Remains : 70/83 places, 80/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12994700555275595485.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12723511415147952762.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12994700555275595485.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12723511415147952762.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.56547e+06,0.142952,10528,2,2031,5,20649,6,0,362,43249,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A((p10==1) U A(EX(EG(EF((p34==1)))) U (((p4==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p40==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!((E(!((((p4==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p40==1))) U (!(EX(EG(E(TRUE U (p34==1))))) * !((((p4==1)&&(p16==1...571
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t21, t26, t29...285
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,29.0265,873740,1,0,1224,4.28653e+06,200,669,2507,7.45919e+06,1412
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 73 transition count 83
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 73 transition count 83
Applied a total of 20 rules in 3 ms. Remains 73 /83 variables (removed 10) and now considering 83/93 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:08:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 109 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 82 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 20/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 8/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 2/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 7/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 8/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 83/156 variables, 73/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 3/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/156 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 156/156 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 6678 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 60/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 83/156 variables, 73/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 82/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 2/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 4/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 5/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 4/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 5/246 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 2/248 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/249 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/254 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 0/156 variables, 1/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 156/156 variables, and 256 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 82/82 constraints, Known Traps: 89/89 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 36694ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 82 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36695ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/83 places, 83/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36808 ms. Remains : 73/83 places, 83/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12247303277555244311.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13997707223346844769.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12247303277555244311.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13997707223346844769.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.85252e+06,0.163931,11584,2,2524,5,23604,6,0,377,50844,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EG((((AG((p1==1)) + E((p77==1) U (p57==1))) + (p72==0)) * (p50==1)))) + EF((((AF((EG((p19==0)) + (p71==1))) * AX((((p54==1)&&(p60==1)...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(TRUE U (((!(EG(!((EG((p19==0)) + (p71==1))))) * !(EX(!((((p54==1)&&(p60==1))&&(p68==1)))))) * ...348
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t22, t28...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,4.71905,170024,1,0,612,795837,210,292,2679,1.31732e+06,613
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 82 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 83
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 67 transition count 77
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 44 place count 53 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 53 transition count 63
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 53 transition count 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 51 transition count 61
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 84 place count 40 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 38 transition count 48
Applied a total of 86 rules in 16 ms. Remains 38 /83 variables (removed 45) and now considering 48/93 (removed 45) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 76 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned []
Running 42 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 6/38 variables, 6/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 11/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 5/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 8/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 48/86 variables, 38/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/86 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 86/86 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 2024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/32 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 6/38 variables, 6/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 21/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/86 variables, 38/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 42/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/86 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/86 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 86/86 variables, and 117 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1580 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3611ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3611ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/83 places, 48/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3721 ms. Remains : 38/83 places, 48/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2242559189936946136.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8502064224342704371.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2242559189936946136.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8502064224342704371.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,118379,0.041491,5544,2,624,5,6481,6,0,203,11029,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(E(AG((!(EF(((p22==1)&&(p35==1)))) + A(E(((p69==1)&&(p80==1)) U (((p54==1)&&(p60==1))&&(p68==1))) U E((p68==1) U (((p30==1)&&(p41==1))&&...193
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((!(E(TRUE U ((p22==1)&&(p35==1)))) + !((E(!(E((p68==1) U (((p30==1)&&(p41==1))&&(p64==1...374
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t32, t33, t34, t35, t36, t37, t38, t39...290
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,2.91611,110308,1,0,699,539700,140,392,1558,923538,660
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 70 transition count 80
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 70 transition count 80
Applied a total of 26 rules in 4 ms. Remains 70 /83 variables (removed 13) and now considering 80/93 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 80 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 79 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 19/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 4/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 4/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 9/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 80/150 variables, 70/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 5/124 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 150/150 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 6812 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 51/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 3/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 80/150 variables, 70/134 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 79/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 9/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 7/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/238 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:09:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 2/243 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 1/244 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 3/247 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 4/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 0/150 variables, 2/253 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 150/150 variables, and 253 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 79/79 constraints, Known Traps: 90/90 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 36836ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 79 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36836ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/83 places, 80/93 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36920 ms. Remains : 70/83 places, 80/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 80 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4825548894179671092.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6544276982963681013.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4825548894179671092.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6544276982963681013.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.75663e+06,0.148659,10776,2,2178,5,21699,6,0,362,45142,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(!(E(!(((p66==1)&&(p80==1))) U ((!(E((p23==1) U (p48==1))) * AG((((p11==1)&&(p52==1))&&(p79==1)))) * (((p52!=1)||(p51==1))||(p6==1)))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(!(((p66==1)&&(p80==1))) U ((!(E((p23==1) U (p48==1))) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p11==1)&&(p52==1))&&(p7...213
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t22, t27...285
(forward)formula 0,1,0.54612,24744,1,0,189,97848,190,84,2409,116653,173
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 83/83 places, 93/93 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 9 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 9 transitions
Performed 9 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 9
Iterating post reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 82 transition count 83
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 83
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 73 transition count 73
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 63 transition count 73
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 52 place count 49 transition count 59
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 49 transition count 59
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 49 transition count 54
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 44 transition count 54
Performed 12 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 12
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 32 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 102 place count 30 transition count 40
Applied a total of 102 rules in 7 ms. Remains 30 /83 variables (removed 53) and now considering 40/93 (removed 53) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 23 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 61 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned [39]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 38 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 14/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 5/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 39/69 variables, 30/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/69 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 69/69 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 1407 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 9/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 39/69 variables, 30/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 38/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 3/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/69 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 69/69 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 1462 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2874ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2874ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/83 places, 39/93 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 39/39 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2968 ms. Remains : 30/83 places, 39/93 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10997544972129761965.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17076783779299139548.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10997544972129761965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17076783779299139548.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,14554,0.025802,4712,2,406,5,3773,6,0,162,6130,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((p54==0)||(p60==0))||(p69==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((p54==0)||(p60==0))||(p69==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 28/0/11
(forward)formula 0,1,0.086452,7528,1,0,24,16044,19,4,948,20947,22
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:10:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Total runtime 482470 ms.

BK_STOP 1749035417815

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500026"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;