fond
Model Checking Contest 2025
15th edition, Paris, France, June 24, 2025
Execution of r212-tall-174901993500018
Last Updated
June 24, 2025

About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldRVs-PT-002A

Execution Summary
Max Memory
Used (MB)
Time wait (ms) CPU Usage (ms) I/O Wait (ms) Computed Result Execution
Status
0.000 48366.00 0.00 0.00 FTFTFFFTTFFTTTFF normal

Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993500018.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500018
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 500K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.0K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 91K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 38K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 20K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 135K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 83K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749034875657

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-002A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 50 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Transformed 31 places.
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Transformed 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 31 places and 41 transitions and 184 arcs in 143 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 2 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 30 out of 31 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 64 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 239 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 48 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1243 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1713 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 3022ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3033ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3296 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Support contains 30 out of 31 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 44 to 37
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (1027 resets) in 743 ms. (53 steps per ms) remains 1/37 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 364 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (60 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 30 transition count 40
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 30 /31 variables (removed 1) and now considering 40/41 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 30 ms returned [12]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 38 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 40 ms of which 13 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 8/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 39/69 variables, 30/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 6/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/69 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 69/69 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 1453 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 30/30 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 18/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 39/69 variables, 30/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 38/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/69 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 69/69 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 1147 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 30/30 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2614ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2615ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/31 places, 39/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 39/39 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2814 ms. Remains : 30/31 places, 39/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6123990856525079054.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14699526931554136292.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6123990856525079054.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14699526931554136292.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11472,0.032136,4692,2,406,5,3739,6,0,161,6197,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(((p8==1)&&(p13==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p8==1)&&(p13==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/11/12
(forward)formula 0,0,0.087776,6356,1,0,21,13021,19,2,987,14046,21
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1005 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1441 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2457ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2458ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2537 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16250845559816492455.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18277467075246669073.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16250845559816492455.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18277467075246669073.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.025438,4856,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(E((((p28==1)||(p4!=1)) + !(AX((((p12==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))))) U (EF((p18==1)) * (EF(((p22==1)&&(p27==1))) + ((((p19==1)&&(p21==1))...203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E((((p28==1)||(p4!=1)) + !(!(EX(!((((p12==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))))))) U (E(TRUE U (p18==...275
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
(forward)formula 0,0,0.21176,13432,1,0,203,46784,108,89,1363,67266,194
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 953 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1505 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2468ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2468ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2549 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11812184015192617457.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6468270548120340503.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11812184015192617457.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6468270548120340503.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.027585,4864,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((EF((((p2==0)||(p6==0))||(p16==0))) * ((p11==1) + EX((p25==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((E(TRUE U (((p2==0)||(p6==0))||(p16==0))) * ((p11==1) + EX((p25==0))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
(forward)formula 0,0,0.08504,7424,1,0,145,18615,111,53,1357,22612,119
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 970 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1466 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2443ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2443ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2518 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4279539183778238949.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16446063834112422099.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4279539183778238949.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16446063834112422099.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.026403,4860,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG((!(A(((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1))||(p0==1)) U AG(((p24==1)&&(p28==1))))) + (AF((p14==0)) * (((p19==0)||(p24==0)) + ((p30==0) +...198
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p24==1)&&(p28==1)))))) U (!(((((p20==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1))...374
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
(forward)formula 0,1,0.996635,42168,1,0,564,188562,122,252,1399,304768,621
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 44 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 937 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1487 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2434ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2434ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2514 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7660907721125849630.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6804220673946644992.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7660907721125849630.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6804220673946644992.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.030631,4856,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(AG(AX((p28==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((p28==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
(forward)formula 0,1,0.156299,10616,1,0,163,32369,105,66,1401,47162,142
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 83 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 955 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1436 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2411ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2412ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2497 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13376988866629360987.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2988290690530079096.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13376988866629360987.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2988290690530079096.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.027369,4860,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((A((E(AG(((p22==1)&&(p27==1))) U ((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p16==1))||(((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&(p30==1)))) * ((EX(((p22==1)&&(p27==1))) + AX(...603
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!((E(!(E((!(EG(!((p15==1)))) + (p24!=1)) U !(E(TRUE U !((((p3==1)&&(p18==1))&&(p29==1))))))) U (!((E...930
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
(forward)formula 0,0,1.68155,60480,1,0,884,276002,157,416,1436,448664,980
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 72 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 953 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1468 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2434ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2434ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2509 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7051031218913629986.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14238932668284501707.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7051031218913629986.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14238932668284501707.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.029035,4860,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AG((EF((((p2==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p16==1))) + ((EX((((p12==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))) * (p22==1)) * (p27==1)))) + (EG(AX((p25==0))) * (EF((...226
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U (((p2==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p16==1))) + ((EX((((p12==1)&&(p16==1))&&(p23==1))) * ...301
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.49086,51552,1,0,653,218285,122,378,1399,380149,629
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 43 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 957 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1439 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2406ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2406ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2490 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8771021136356068565.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13373659516835939955.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8771021136356068565.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13373659516835939955.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.029332,4856,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((p19==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((p19==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
(forward)formula 0,1,0.071974,6520,1,0,124,16155,99,46,1341,17410,89
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 29 transition count 39
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 29 /31 variables (removed 2) and now considering 39/41 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 29 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 48 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 21 ms returned [11]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 37 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 38 rows 29 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 5/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 38/67 variables, 29/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 3/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/67 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 67/67 variables, and 80 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 1313 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 12/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 38/67 variables, 29/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 37/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 1/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/67 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 67/67 variables, and 118 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved in 1248 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 29/29 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 29/29 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2576ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 37 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2577ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 29/31 places, 38/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 29 /29 variables (removed 0) and now considering 38/38 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2698 ms. Remains : 29/31 places, 38/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 38 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10282250847488374104.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13045082564819282840.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10282250847488374104.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13045082564819282840.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11471,0.02203,4708,2,379,5,3694,6,0,157,6181,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((p2==0)||(p4==0))||(p15==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((p2==0)||(p4==0))||(p15==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 27/0/11
(forward)formula 0,1,0.086546,7780,1,0,22,18145,19,4,926,22367,20
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 965 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1449 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2423ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2423ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2493 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10432238453900343334.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4781859226804632325.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10432238453900343334.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4781859226804632325.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.029602,4860,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p16==1))) * EF(EG(EX(((p1==1)&&(p9==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p16==1))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(EX(((p1==1)&&(p9==1)))))))] = F...160
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.31859,17632,1,0,259,78712,109,120,1347,111038,232
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 30 transition count 40
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 30 /31 variables (removed 1) and now considering 40/41 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 26 ms returned [12]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 38 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 39 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 8/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 39/69 variables, 30/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 6/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 3/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/69 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 69/69 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 1294 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 30/30 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 29/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/30 variables, 9/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 18/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 39/69 variables, 30/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 38/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/69 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 69/69 variables, and 125 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved in 1142 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 30/30 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 30/30 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2445ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 38 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2445ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 30/31 places, 39/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 30 /30 variables (removed 0) and now considering 39/39 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 2564 ms. Remains : 30/31 places, 39/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 39 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6311220132692769447.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17121579789857121399.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6311220132692769447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17121579789857121399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,11472,0.028588,4844,2,406,5,3739,6,0,161,6197,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((EG((((p2==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p16==1))) * (p6==1)) * ((p7==1)&&(p12==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p7==1)&&(p12==1))) * (p6==1)),(((p2==1)&&(p6==1))&&(p16==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 24/25/15
(forward)formula 0,0,0.060074,5868,1,0,25,9679,21,5,999,9270,23
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 31 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 898 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1465 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2369ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2370ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2457 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6189573255626721126.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10600702641687291281.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6189573255626721126.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10600702641687291281.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.035817,4856,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EX(((EF(((p1==1)&&(p9==1))) + (p5==0)) + ((p7==0)||(p11==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(EY(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE)),TRUE) * ((p1==1)&&(p9==1)))] != FALSE + [(EY(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE)) * (p5==0))] !...225
(forward)formula 0,1,0.051879,5112,1,0,10,4747,9,1,349,7914,7
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 954 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1449 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2410ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2410ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2482 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:00] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1022081223761256907.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9189395247708926887.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1022081223761256907.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9189395247708926887.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.034654,4868,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((EX((((((((p24==1)&&(p30==1))&&((p19==1)&&(p21==1)))&&(p25==1))||(((p19==1)&&(p21==1))&&(p26==1)))||(p4==1)) * EF((p5==1)))) * (p2==...455
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * E(TRUE U ((EX((((((((p24==1)&&(p30==1))&&((p19==1)&&(p21==1)))&&(p25==1))||(((p19==1)&&(p21==1))&&...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,1.16243,44240,1,0,483,195876,138,226,1407,317941,517
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 0 ms. Remains 31 /31 variables (removed 0) and now considering 41/41 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 6/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 2/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 72/72 variables, and 79 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 941 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 30/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/30 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/31 variables, 9/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 8/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/31 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/72 variables, 31/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 40/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/72 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 72/72 variables, and 122 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1453 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 31/31 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/9 constraints, State Equation: 31/31 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2402ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2402ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2477 ms. Remains : 31/31 places, 41/41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14229470532478446899.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12309670489792383866.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14229470532478446899.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12309670489792383866.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,16021,0.032319,4860,2,424,5,3971,6,0,167,6428,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(!(A((((p2==1)&&(p4==1))&&(p16==1)) U (AG(AF((p11==1))) * EX(EG((p10==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p11==1))))))) * EX(EG((p10==1)))))))) * !(E(!((!(E(TRUE U !(!(...306
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t14, t15, t17, t19, t21, t22, t23, t24...300
(forward)formula 0,1,0.195161,12028,1,0,257,43427,113,95,1369,58564,258
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-04 11:02:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Total runtime 47048 ms.

BK_STOP 1749034924023

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-002A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500018"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-002A.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-002A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;