Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993500010.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-001B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500010
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 132K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749034837790

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-001B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 47 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Transformed 43 places.
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Transformed 48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 43 places and 48 transitions and 144 arcs in 149 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 16 ms.
Support contains 40 out of 43 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 8 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 48/48 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 86 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 316 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 42/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 48/91 variables, 43/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 3/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 91/91 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 3456 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 42/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 21/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/91 variables, 43/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 47/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 91/91 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 7763 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 11275ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11291ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11633 ms. Remains : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Support contains 40 out of 43 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
Support contains 39 out of 43 places (down from 40) after GAL structural reductions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 60 to 56
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (77 resets) in 2144 ms. (18 steps per ms) remains 10/56 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (38 resets) in 366 ms. (108 steps per ms) remains 9/10 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (82 resets) in 186 ms. (213 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (14 resets) in 114 ms. (347 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (13 resets) in 106 ms. (373 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (13 resets) in 127 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (11 resets) in 105 ms. (377 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (185 resets) in 110 ms. (360 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (223 resets) in 136 ms. (292 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (41 resets) in 145 ms. (273 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp15 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp32 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp40 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp42 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp47 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 26/43 variables, 5/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 26/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 5 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp0 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp22 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/91 variables, 43/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 91/91 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved in 178 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 23/25 variables, 2/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 23/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 18/43 variables, 3/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 18/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 48/91 variables, 43/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 91/91 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved in 120 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/9 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 304ms problems are : Problem set: 8 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 7 ms.
Support contains 2 out of 43 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 43 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 39 transition count 44
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 39 transition count 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 34 transition count 39
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 29 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 29 transition count 34
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 29 transition count 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 28 transition count 33
Performed 9 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 9
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 19 transition count 24
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 4 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 4 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 19 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 53 place count 18 transition count 23
Applied a total of 53 rules in 21 ms. Remains 18 /43 variables (removed 25) and now considering 23/48 (removed 25) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 21 ms. Remains : 18/43 places, 23/48 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 203 ms. (196 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 63 ms. (625 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Probably explored full state space saw : 140 states, properties seen :0
Probabilistic random walk after 446 steps, saw 140 distinct states, run finished after 11 ms. (steps per millisecond=40 ) properties seen :0
Explored full state space saw : 140 states, properties seen :0
Exhaustive walk after 446 steps, saw 140 distinct states, run finished after 2 ms. (steps per millisecond=223 ) properties seen :0
Successfully simplified 9 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 12 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 38 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 38 transition count 43
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 38 /43 variables (removed 5) and now considering 43/48 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 42 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 7/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 43/81 variables, 38/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/81 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 81/81 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1418 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 13/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 43/81 variables, 38/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 42/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 3/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/81 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 81/81 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1947 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 3375ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3376ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/43 places, 43/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3446 ms. Remains : 38/43 places, 43/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 43 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16687139952775500841.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12268063526813798439.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16687139952775500841.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12268063526813798439.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2978,0.031212,4696,2,508,5,3496,6,0,197,5166,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG(AX(EF((p9!=1)))) + (EF((p10==1)) * (AX((((p14==1)&&(p20==1))&&(p28==1))) + (EG((p39!=1)) * ((AF((p11==1)) + EF((p28==1))) + AX((p5==1...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (p9!=1)))))))))) * !(E(TRUE U (p10==1))))] = FALSE * ([(((Init * !(!(E...462
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t13, t18, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with reachable...225
(forward)formula 0,1,0.645746,30804,1,0,882,144418,126,434,1286,200454,962
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 42
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 37 /43 variables (removed 6) and now considering 42/48 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 4/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 79/79 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1273 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 11/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 41/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 79/79 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 4342 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 5622ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5622ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5700 ms. Remains : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10462385272116482185.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability695894496789916774.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10462385272116482185.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability695894496789916774.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2985,0.021347,4720,2,490,5,3413,6,0,192,4975,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EF(EG((AG((p10==1)) * (((p41==1)||(p10==1))||(p38==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE),(!(E(TRUE U !((p10==1)))) * (((p41==1)||(p10==1))||(p38==0))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t13, t18, t23, t26, t27, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,0,0.108274,8688,1,0,135,20831,114,48,1284,26367,131
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 38 transition count 43
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 38 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 33 transition count 38
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 27 transition count 32
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 27 transition count 32
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 27 transition count 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 25 transition count 30
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 18 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 17 transition count 22
Applied a total of 49 rules in 15 ms. Remains 17 /43 variables (removed 26) and now considering 22/48 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 17 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned [21]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 17 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/17 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 5/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 21/38 variables, 17/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/38 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 38/38 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 679 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 10/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/17 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 21/38 variables, 17/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 20/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/38 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/38 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 38/38 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 487 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1173ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1173ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/43 places, 21/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 17 /17 variables (removed 0) and now considering 21/21 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1273 ms. Remains : 17/43 places, 21/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9631255057458643832.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10360844557469932291.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9631255057458643832.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10360844557469932291.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,123,0.006531,3960,2,121,5,802,6,0,91,988,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((p31==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (p31==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t7, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, Intersection with reachable at eac...217
(forward)formula 0,0,0.014548,4216,1,0,69,2361,69,30,660,2342,63
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 38 transition count 43
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 38 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 33 transition count 38
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 26 transition count 31
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 26 transition count 31
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 26 transition count 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 24 transition count 29
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 18 transition count 23
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 17 transition count 22
Applied a total of 49 rules in 10 ms. Remains 17 /43 variables (removed 26) and now considering 22/48 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 17 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 29 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 55 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned [21]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 20 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 17 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/17 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 21/38 variables, 17/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/38 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 38/38 variables, and 28 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 480 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 4/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/17 variables, 1/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 1/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/17 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 21/38 variables, 17/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 20/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/38 variables, 0/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 38/38 variables, and 49 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved in 335 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 17/17 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 820ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 20 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 821ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 17/43 places, 21/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 17 /17 variables (removed 0) and now considering 21/21 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 907 ms. Remains : 17/43 places, 21/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9255598501289203835.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability140327173628319918.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9255598501289203835.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability140327173628319918.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,185,0.006764,3956,2,99,5,796,6,0,92,990,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((p41==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((p41==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, Intersection with reachable at each st...213
(forward)formula 0,0,0.013711,4212,1,0,64,2208,64,24,662,2112,52
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 36 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 36 transition count 41
Applied a total of 14 rules in 2 ms. Remains 36 /43 variables (removed 7) and now considering 41/48 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:04] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 63 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 6/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 41/77 variables, 36/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 4/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 77/77 variables, and 52 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1129 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 11/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/77 variables, 36/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 40/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 3/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 77/77 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 2305 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 3438ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3439ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/43 places, 41/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3505 ms. Remains : 36/43 places, 41/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13997997324827991088.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2875367872510991730.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13997997324827991088.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2875367872510991730.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2785,0.02216,4696,2,451,5,3352,6,0,187,4828,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((!(E(!(AG((((p3==1)&&(p12==1))&&(p39==1)))) U EG(((p32==1)||(p10==1))))) + ((p2==1)&&(((p14==0)||(p20==0))||((p28==0)||(p41==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU((EY(Init) * !(((p2==1)&&(((p14==0)||(p20==0))||((p28==0)||(p41==0)))))),!(!(E(TRUE U !((((p3==1)&&(p1...208
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t22, t25, t26, Intersection with reachable at each...217
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 35/0/6
(forward)formula 0,1,0.111933,8536,1,0,131,20726,117,49,1340,25625,129
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 42
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 37 /43 variables (removed 6) and now considering 42/48 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 79/79 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1637 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 15/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 41/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 79/79 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1803 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3446ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3446ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3520 ms. Remains : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13202811739801463121.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3807532436535893308.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13202811739801463121.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3807532436535893308.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2917,0.023894,4768,2,502,5,3431,6,0,192,5071,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(((p8==1)||(p19==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(((p8==1)||(p19==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t21, t22, t23, t26, t27, Intersection with rea...231
(forward)formula 0,1,0.375234,20480,1,0,522,93438,106,228,1207,118500,581
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 39 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 39 transition count 44
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 39 /43 variables (removed 4) and now considering 44/48 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 70 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 9/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 3/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 44/83 variables, 39/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 4/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 83/83 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 1699 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 19/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/83 variables, 39/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 43/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 83/83 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 2104 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 3811ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3811ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/43 places, 44/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3884 ms. Remains : 39/43 places, 44/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability450349200917662196.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13426996188460393302.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability450349200917662196.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13426996188460393302.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2834,0.025601,4752,2,510,5,3533,6,0,202,5100,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG(EX((E((p0==1) U (p9==1)) * ((p32==1)||(p16==1))))) + (AF((AG((((p15==1)&&(p20==1))&&(p29==1))) * EG((p42==1)))) * A(A((p31!=1) U (...219
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),EX((E((p0==1) U (p9==1)) * ((p32==1)||(p16==1)))))] != FALSE + [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG...718
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t13, t16, t19, t21, t25, t27, t28, Intersection with reachab...227
(forward)formula 0,0,0.236055,13456,1,0,290,49473,145,126,1327,57812,343
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 38 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 38 transition count 43
Applied a total of 10 rules in 5 ms. Remains 38 /43 variables (removed 5) and now considering 43/48 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 42 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 9/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 2/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 43/81 variables, 38/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/81 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 81/81 variables, and 55 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1174 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 43/81 variables, 38/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 42/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 3/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 3/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/81 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/81 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 81/81 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 3745 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 4932ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4933ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/43 places, 43/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5005 ms. Remains : 38/43 places, 43/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 43 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12631875317851322132.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12775161320691898080.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12631875317851322132.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12775161320691898080.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2834,0.028686,4740,2,485,5,3516,6,0,197,5109,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(AG((!(A(((p26==1)&&(p37==1)) U ((p1==1)&&(p24==1)))) + EG((p23==1))))) * EF((A(!(((p26==1)&&(p40==1))) U AX(((p29==1)&&(p40==1)))) + ...169
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU((Init * E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !((!(!((E(!(((p1==1)&&(p24==1))) U (!(((p26==1)&&(p37==1))) * !(((p1==1)&&(...604
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t18, t20, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with reachable at...222
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.698776,33572,1,0,742,166248,133,387,1390,206320,836
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 36 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 36 transition count 41
Applied a total of 14 rules in 7 ms. Remains 36 /43 variables (removed 7) and now considering 41/48 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 60 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 41/77 variables, 36/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 77/77 variables, and 53 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1343 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 2/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 41/77 variables, 36/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 40/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 77/77 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 2320 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3668ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3668ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/43 places, 41/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3735 ms. Remains : 36/43 places, 41/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7505550604491245107.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16294823996620213607.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7505550604491245107.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16294823996620213607.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2736,0.019861,4568,2,424,5,3236,6,0,187,4530,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(((AX((AG((((p3==0)||(p12==0))||(p39==0))) * EG((p42==0)))) + EF((AF((((p15==0)||(p20==0))||(p29==0))) * ((p41==0)||(p16==0))))) * ((p4...184
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * ((p42==1)||((p39!=1)&&(p7!=1)))) * !(EX(!((!(E(TRUE U !((((p3==0)||(p12==0))||(p39==0))))) * EG((...320
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t13, t16, t18, t21, t26, Intersection with reachable at ...221
(forward)formula 0,1,0.296898,18132,1,0,411,73404,120,205,1298,102657,477
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-09 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 36 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 36 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 35 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 35 transition count 40
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 35 /43 variables (removed 8) and now considering 40/48 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 35 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 39 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 40/75 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 75/75 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1188 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 11/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 40/75 variables, 35/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 39/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 75/75 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1966 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3159ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3160ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/43 places, 40/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3236 ms. Remains : 35/43 places, 40/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1244403564121629618.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability298533943713225741.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1244403564121629618.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability298533943713225741.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2736,0.024934,4548,2,397,5,3176,6,0,182,4464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p0==1) * EF((AX((((p3==1)&&(p12==1))&&(p39==1))) * EX(((p1==0)||(p24==0)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p0==1)),TRUE) * !(EX(!((((p3==1)&&(p12==1))&&(p39==1))))))) * ((p1==0)||(p24==0))...166
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t20, t25, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,0,0.069707,6596,1,0,101,12022,100,46,1221,15025,92
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 42 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 39 transition count 44
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 39 transition count 38
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 33 transition count 38
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 28 transition count 33
Iterating global reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 28 transition count 33
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 28 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 26 transition count 31
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 20 transition count 25
Applied a total of 44 rules in 8 ms. Remains 20 /43 variables (removed 23) and now considering 25/48 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned [24]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/20 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 6/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 24/44 variables, 20/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 1/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/44 variables, and 33 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 602 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 5/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/20 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 2/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/44 variables, 20/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 23/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 44/44 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 631 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1248ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1248ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/43 places, 24/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 24/24 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1358 ms. Remains : 20/43 places, 24/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 24 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8693673767996084887.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability348664114299162121.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8693673767996084887.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability348664114299162121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,160,0.010277,4012,2,156,5,961,6,0,106,1123,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((A((p13==1) U (p6==1)) * !(E((p39==1) U (p28==1)))) * ((p28==1)||(p31==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p28==1)||(p31==1))) * !((E(!((p6==1)) U (!((p13==1)) * !((p6==1)))) + EG(!((p6==1)))))) ...193
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t8, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, Intersection with reachable at...222
(forward)formula 0,0,0.037962,5548,1,0,141,7311,81,76,761,9494,165
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 40 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 40 transition count 45
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 39 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 39 transition count 44
Applied a total of 8 rules in 1 ms. Remains 39 /43 variables (removed 4) and now considering 44/48 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 34 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 44/83 variables, 39/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 83/83 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 1921 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 13/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 44/83 variables, 39/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 43/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 2/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 0/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 83/83 variables, and 104 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 2413 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 4340ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4340ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/43 places, 44/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4423 ms. Remains : 39/43 places, 44/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6855984955493406512.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7865878889922427101.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6855984955493406512.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7865878889922427101.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3240,0.023825,4748,2,522,5,3495,6,0,202,4990,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((AG(!(((!(EX((p18==1))) * ((p36==1)||(p22==1))) * (((p29==1)&&(p37==1))||(p11==1))))) + !(((!((p26==1)&&(p40==1)))&&(p30==1)))) U AX(((...328
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(!(E(TRUE U !(!(((!(EX((p18==1))) * ((p36==1)||(p22==1))) * (((p29==1)&&(p37==1))||(p11==1))))))) + ...416
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t14, t20, t22, t23, t24, t25, t29, Intersection...240
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.272052,14860,1,0,263,56276,131,133,1340,65875,271
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 5 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 5 transitions
Performed 5 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 5 place count 42 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 37 transition count 42
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 37 transition count 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 32 transition count 37
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 25 transition count 30
Iterating global reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 25 transition count 30
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 25 transition count 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 23 transition count 28
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 17 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 16 transition count 21
Applied a total of 51 rules in 9 ms. Remains 16 /43 variables (removed 27) and now considering 21/48 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 16 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 47 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 16 ms returned [20]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 19 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 16 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/16 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 20/36 variables, 16/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 36/36 variables, and 27 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 444 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 1/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/15 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/16 variables, 1/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 5/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/16 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 20/36 variables, 16/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 19/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 1/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/36 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 36/36 variables, and 47 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved in 409 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 16/16 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 861ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 19 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 861ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 16/43 places, 20/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 16 /16 variables (removed 0) and now considering 20/20 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 987 ms. Remains : 16/43 places, 20/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 20 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 56 steps (1 resets) in 4 ms. (11 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4963471232204923431.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12468776677567603051.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4963471232204923431.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12468776677567603051.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 3 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 3 rule applications. Total rules 3 place count 40 transition count 45
Iterating global reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 40 transition count 45
Applied a total of 6 rules in 4 ms. Remains 40 /43 variables (removed 3) and now considering 45/48 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 40 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 44 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/40 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 11/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 45/85 variables, 40/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 2/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/85 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 85/85 variables, and 62 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 1774 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/40 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 16/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 45/85 variables, 40/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 44/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 3/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/85 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/85 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/85 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 85/85 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved in 4264 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 40/40 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 44/44 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 6047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 44 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6047ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 40/43 places, 45/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6120 ms. Remains : 40/43 places, 45/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4864015128931771633.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2558641407712626371.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4864015128931771633.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2558641407712626371.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3152,0.027049,4896,2,585,5,3657,6,0,207,5501,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX((EG(((((p29==0)||(p40==0))||((p14==0)||(p20==0)))||(p29==0))) * ((AX((p14==0)) + ((p19==0)&&(p9==0))) + ((p36==0)&&((p18==0)||(p23=...164
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((EG(((((p29==0)||(p40==0))||((p14==0)||(p20==0)))||(p29==0))) * ((!(EX(!((p14==0)))) ...228
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t13, t19, t21, t23, t24, t26, t28, t29, Intersection...240
(forward)formula 0,1,0.427144,21300,1,0,380,95334,116,174,1293,130743,380
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 42
Applied a total of 12 rules in 4 ms. Remains 37 /43 variables (removed 6) and now considering 42/48 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 35 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 7/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 5/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 79/79 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1251 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 14/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 41/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 79/79 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 3441 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 4696ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4696ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4770 ms. Remains : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16460769351039413340.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10671582683770106410.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16460769351039413340.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10671582683770106410.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2834,0.020713,4716,2,474,5,3418,6,0,192,4973,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(!(A(((p7==1)||(p17==1)) U AG((p6==1))))) * AF(EG(EX((p37==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U !(!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p6==1))))) U (!(((p7==1)||(p17==1))) * !(!(E(TRUE U !((p6==1))))))) ...246
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t23, t25, t26, Intersection with reachable at each...217
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,0.259784,15084,1,0,254,57268,122,121,1289,67612,273
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLFireability-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 69570 ms.

BK_STOP 1749034908686

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-001B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-001B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500010"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-001B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-001B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;