Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r212-tall-174901993500009.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...............
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldRVs-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500009
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 44K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.5K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 52K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.4K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 12K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 132K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.3K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 73K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749034837733

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldRVs-PT-001B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-04 11:00:38] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-04 11:00:38] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 39 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Transformed 43 places.
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Transformed 48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 43 places and 48 transitions and 144 arcs in 126 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 16 ms.
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 37 out of 43 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 43 /43 variables (removed 0) and now considering 48/48 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 48 rows 43 cols
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 294 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 47 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 42/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 13/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 48/91 variables, 43/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 3/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 91/91 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 3129 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 42/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/43 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 21/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/43 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 48/91 variables, 43/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 47/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 2/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 1/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/91 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/91 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 91/91 variables, and 165 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved in 7852 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 43/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 43/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 11022ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 47 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 11037ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 11359 ms. Remains : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Support contains 37 out of 43 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 42 to 39
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (86 resets) in 1057 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 2/39 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (40 resets) in 309 ms. (129 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (22 resets) in 256 ms. (155 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp29 is UNSAT
Problem AtomicPropp41 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 40/91 variables, and 8 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 32 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 4/43 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/5 constraints, State Equation: 0/43 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 38ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 48 transitions.
Computed a total of 12 stabilizing places and 12 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 36 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 36 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 35 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 35 transition count 40
Applied a total of 16 rules in 7 ms. Remains 35 /43 variables (removed 8) and now considering 40/48 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 35 cols
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 39 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 40/75 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 75/75 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1183 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 11/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 40/75 variables, 35/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 39/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 75/75 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1938 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3137ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3138ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/43 places, 40/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3214 ms. Remains : 35/43 places, 40/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3356312577565006944.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4091755369608917524.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3356312577565006944.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4091755369608917524.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2736,0.02926,4504,2,397,5,3176,6,0,182,4464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG(EX(AF((p22==1)))) + AF(((p4==0)&&(p15==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(EG(!((p22==1)))))))))),!(((p4==0)&&(p15==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t20, t25, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 33/0/7
(forward)formula 0,1,0.289978,17216,1,0,343,69967,117,169,1268,96808,374
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 42
Applied a total of 12 rules in 5 ms. Remains 37 /43 variables (removed 6) and now considering 42/48 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:00:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 33 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 7/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 5/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 79/79 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1245 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 14/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 41/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 79/79 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 3411 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 4662ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4663ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4734 ms. Remains : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16907291846519026811.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:00:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality30515170895974984.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16907291846519026811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality30515170895974984.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2834,0.021048,4720,2,474,5,3418,6,0,192,4973,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((EX(((p9==0)&&(p3==1))) * (p16==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((EX(((p9==0)&&(p3==1))) * (p16==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t23, t25, t26, Intersection with reachable at each...217
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,0.526915,25392,1,0,630,127585,109,375,1241,162986,605
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 42
Applied a total of 12 rules in 2 ms. Remains 37 /43 variables (removed 6) and now considering 42/48 (removed 6) transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 73 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 7/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/49 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 5/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 79/79 variables, and 56 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1259 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 14/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 41/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 79/79 variables, and 103 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 3507 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 4772ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4773ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4848 ms. Remains : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14099860298116923357.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality37648882059666581.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14099860298116923357.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality37648882059666581.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2834,0.020685,4716,2,474,5,3418,6,0,192,4973,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((AX((p9==1)) + AG(((p37==0)||(p10==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!((p9==1)))) + !(E(TRUE U !(((p37==0)||(p10==1))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t23, t25, t26, Intersection with reachable at each...217
(forward)formula 0,1,0.107505,8556,1,0,126,23038,108,61,1224,26754,124
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 42 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 39 transition count 44
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 39 transition count 39
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 34 transition count 39
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 28 transition count 33
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 28 transition count 33
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 28 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 26 transition count 31
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 20 transition count 25
Applied a total of 44 rules in 37 ms. Remains 20 /43 variables (removed 23) and now considering 25/48 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 32 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned [24]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 24 rows 20 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/20 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 24/44 variables, 20/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/44 variables, and 35 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 720 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 6/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/20 variables, 4/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 3/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 24/44 variables, 20/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 23/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/44 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 44/44 variables, and 63 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 853 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 20/20 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 1580ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1581ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 20/43 places, 24/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 20 /20 variables (removed 0) and now considering 24/24 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1712 ms. Remains : 20/43 places, 24/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 24 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2312928885212576085.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1746762120413046424.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2312928885212576085.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1746762120413046424.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,152,0.008919,4004,2,174,5,1017,6,0,106,1106,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF((AG((p17==0)) * EF((p39==1)))) + ((p5==0)&&(p6==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U (!(E(TRUE U !((p17==0)))) * E(TRUE U (p39==1)))) + ((p5==0)&&(p6==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t7, t13, t14, t15, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, Intersection with reachable...225
(forward)formula 0,1,0.045445,5668,1,0,152,8111,78,85,772,11336,155
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 4 place count 39 transition count 44
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 39 transition count 44
Applied a total of 8 rules in 2 ms. Remains 39 /43 variables (removed 4) and now considering 44/48 (removed 4) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 44 rows 39 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 39 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 43 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 11/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 1/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 44/83 variables, 39/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 0/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 83/83 variables, and 61 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 1691 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/39 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 16/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/39 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 44/83 variables, 39/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 43/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 2/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 1/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/83 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/83 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 83/83 variables, and 109 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved in 2814 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 39/39 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 4512ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 43 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4512ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 39/43 places, 44/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4584 ms. Remains : 39/43 places, 44/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 44 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality131158191007377174.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7306959642872939535.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality131158191007377174.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7306959642872939535.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3152,0.028681,4752,2,573,5,3559,6,0,202,5368,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EX((E(EF((p17==1)) U (((p30==1)&&(p19==1))&&((p39==0)||(p37==1)))) + (!(E(((p30==0)||(p36==1)) U ((p22==0)||(p37==1)))) * EF((((p8==0)...181
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(EY(EY(Init)),E(TRUE U (p17==1))) * (((p30==1)&&(p19==1))&&((p39==0)||(p37==1))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU((EY(...268
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t13, t18, t22, t23, t25, t27, t28, Intersection with...235
(forward)formula 0,0,0.09447,7952,1,0,197,19274,120,108,1308,23654,198
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 38 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 38 transition count 43
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 42
Applied a total of 12 rules in 6 ms. Remains 37 /43 variables (removed 6) and now considering 42/48 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 42 rows 37 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 42 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 77 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 41 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 12/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 1/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 79/79 variables, and 60 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1457 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/37 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 18/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 42/79 variables, 37/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 41/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/79 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 79/79 variables, and 102 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved in 1269 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 37/37 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 2730ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 41 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2731ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2814 ms. Remains : 37/43 places, 42/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 42 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13910517337404527613.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10582334758076215187.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13910517337404527613.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10582334758076215187.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2882,0.017177,4592,2,521,5,3262,6,0,192,3357,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(A((!(E((p39==1) U (p42!=0))) + (p6==0)) U AX(EG(EF(((p19==0)||(p41==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(!(EX(!(EG(E(TRUE U ((p19==0)||(p41==1))))))))) * !((!(E((p39==1) U (p42!=0))) + (p...297
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t13, t16, t18, t21, t22, t23, t27, Intersection with rea...231
(forward)formula 0,1,0.181112,12784,1,0,207,47608,112,88,1234,46710,218
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 38 transition count 43
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 38 transition count 43
Applied a total of 10 rules in 2 ms. Remains 38 /43 variables (removed 5) and now considering 43/48 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 38 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 40 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 42 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 6/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 7/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 43/81 variables, 38/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/81 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 81/81 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 1485 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/37 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/38 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 14/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 3/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/38 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 43/81 variables, 38/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 42/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/81 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/81 variables, 0/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 81/81 variables, and 106 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved in 2508 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 38/38 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 3999ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 42 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4000ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 38/43 places, 43/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4071 ms. Remains : 38/43 places, 43/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 43 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15210203214005785440.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18308731442615309983.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15210203214005785440.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18308731442615309983.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2952,0.022149,4736,2,530,5,3498,6,0,197,5250,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EF(((p17==0)&&(p18==1))) + AX(EX((p28==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(TRUE U ((p17==0)&&(p18==1))) + !(EX(!(EX((p28==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t21, t22, t24, t26, t27, Intersection with rea...231
(forward)formula 0,0,0.129264,9728,1,0,228,27770,114,114,1271,36130,196
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 4 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 4 transitions
Performed 4 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 4
Iterating post reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 42 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 9 place count 38 transition count 42
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 37 transition count 42
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 37 transition count 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 32 transition count 37
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 27 transition count 32
Iterating global reduction 3 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 27 transition count 32
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 27 transition count 31
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 26 transition count 31
Performed 7 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 7
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 19 transition count 24
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 18 transition count 23
Applied a total of 47 rules in 11 ms. Remains 18 /43 variables (removed 25) and now considering 23/48 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 18 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 31 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 62 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 18 ms returned [22]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 21 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 22 rows 18 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 6/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/40 variables, 18/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/40 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 40/40 variables, and 29 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 395 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 6/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/18 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 22/40 variables, 18/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 21/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/40 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 40/40 variables, and 50 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved in 241 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 18/18 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 643ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 21 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 644ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 18/43 places, 22/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 18 /18 variables (removed 0) and now considering 22/22 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 743 ms. Remains : 18/43 places, 22/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 22 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1240670001345558585.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13619713403060990341.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1240670001345558585.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13619713403060990341.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,276,0.013854,3976,2,130,5,1084,6,0,97,1282,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(E(EG((p26==1)) U AG(((p10==1)&&(p23==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),E(EG((p26==1)) U !(E(TRUE U !(((p10==1)&&(p23==0)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t9, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, Intersection with reachable at...221
(forward)formula 0,0,0.031482,4872,1,0,117,4993,80,45,710,5961,118
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 43 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 40 transition count 45
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 40 transition count 40
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 35 transition count 40
Discarding 4 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 4 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 31 transition count 36
Iterating global reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 31 transition count 36
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 31 transition count 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 30 transition count 35
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 25 transition count 30
Applied a total of 36 rules in 5 ms. Remains 25 /43 variables (removed 18) and now considering 30/48 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 30 rows 25 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 38 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 15 ms returned []
Running 29 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 4/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 30/55 variables, 25/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 55/55 variables, and 38 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 651 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/24 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/25 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/25 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 30/55 variables, 25/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 29/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/55 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 55/55 variables, and 72 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved in 1159 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 25/25 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 1817ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 29 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1818ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 25/43 places, 30/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1914 ms. Remains : 25/43 places, 30/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 30 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9321442597285823797.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5865414135216238502.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9321442597285823797.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5865414135216238502.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,612,0.014973,4176,2,325,5,1609,6,0,132,1916,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p1==1) * E(!(A(A((p16==1) U (p23==1)) U (p37==0))) U !(A(((p7==0)||(p9==1)) U EF(((p2==0)||(p36==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p1==1)),!(!((E(!((p37==0)) U (!(!((E(!((p23==1)) U (!((p16==1)) * !((p23==1)))...537
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t10, t11, t14, t23, t24, t25, t26, t27, t28, t29, Intersecti...242
(forward)formula 0,0,0.136182,10704,1,0,389,34457,108,180,937,42863,443
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 37 transition count 42
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 37 transition count 42
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 36 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 36 transition count 41
Applied a total of 14 rules in 3 ms. Remains 36 /43 variables (removed 7) and now considering 41/48 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 36 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 26 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 41 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 69 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 40 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 5/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 3/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 3/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 41/77 variables, 36/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 77/77 variables, and 54 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 1244 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/36 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 13/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 41/77 variables, 36/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 40/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 2/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/77 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/77 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 77/77 variables, and 100 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved in 2206 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 36/36 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 3458ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 40 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3458ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 36/43 places, 41/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3530 ms. Remains : 36/43 places, 41/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7776272478299062664.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11473979215090358587.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7776272478299062664.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11473979215090358587.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2882,0.024159,4696,2,440,5,3275,6,0,187,4637,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG((((EX(AX((p35==1))) * AX(FALSE)) * (AF((p3==1)) * (p34==0))) * (p18==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((EX(!(EX(!((p35==1))))) * !(EX(!(FALSE)))) * (!(EG(!((p3==1)))) * (p34==0))) ...180
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t20, t21, t22, t26, Intersection with reachabl...226
(forward)formula 0,0,0.163124,11864,1,0,275,43539,114,109,1221,50847,308
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 36 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 36 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 35 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 35 transition count 40
Applied a total of 16 rules in 5 ms. Remains 35 /43 variables (removed 8) and now considering 40/48 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 35 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 67 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 39 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 40/75 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 75/75 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1107 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 11/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 40/75 variables, 35/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 39/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 75/75 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1946 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3059ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/43 places, 40/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3132 ms. Remains : 35/43 places, 40/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2596928309467799543.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality429361050434767730.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2596928309467799543.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality429361050434767730.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2736,0.025126,4544,2,397,5,3176,6,0,182,4464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(TRUE))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(TRUE)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t20, t25, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,1,0.065269,6336,1,0,116,11570,101,46,1155,13835,106
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 41 transition count 46
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 41 transition count 46
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 41 /43 variables (removed 2) and now considering 46/48 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 46 rows 41 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 66 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 45 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 10/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 2/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 3/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 46/87 variables, 41/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 3/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/87 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/87 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 87/87 variables, and 66 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved in 1908 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/40 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/41 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 20/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/41 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 46/87 variables, 41/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 45/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 2/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/87 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 87/87 variables, and 115 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved in 2667 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 41/41 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 4579ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 45 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4580ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 41/43 places, 46/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4648 ms. Remains : 41/43 places, 46/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 46 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7745774901338883593.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1949034909702021391.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7745774901338883593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1949034909702021391.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3192,0.028502,4784,2,587,5,3665,6,0,212,5434,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(!(EF(((p5==0)||(p23==1)))) U (EX(E((p12!=1) U ((AX((p42==1)) + (p13==0)) + (p9==1)))) * EF((EG((((p5==0)||(p33==1))&&(p0==1))) * EX(!((...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U ((p5==0)||(p23==1))))) * EX(E((p12!=1) U ((!(EX(!((p42==1)))) + (p13==0)) + (p9...245
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t15, t18, t21, t23, t27, t29, t30, Intersection...240
(forward)formula 0,0,0.090056,7728,1,0,144,17029,116,50,1310,19956,132
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 3 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 3 transitions
Performed 3 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 0 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 3 place count 42 transition count 44
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 39 transition count 43
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 38 transition count 43
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 8 place count 38 transition count 40
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 35 transition count 40
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 29 transition count 34
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 29 transition count 34
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 29 transition count 33
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 28 transition count 33
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 22 transition count 27
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 21 transition count 26
Applied a total of 41 rules in 14 ms. Remains 21 /43 variables (removed 22) and now considering 26/48 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 26 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 24 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 56 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 14 ms returned [25]
Found 1 redundant transitions using SMT.
Drop transitions (Redundant Transitions using SMT with State Equation) removed 1 transitions
Redundant transitions reduction (with SMT) removed 1 transitions.
Running 23 sub problems to find dead transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 21 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/21 variables, 4/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 1/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/46 variables, 21/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 46/46 variables, and 31 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 440 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/1 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 1/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/21 variables, 4/6 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 4/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/21 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 25/46 variables, 21/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 23/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 3/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/46 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/46 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 46/46 variables, and 58 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved in 683 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 21/21 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 1126ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 23 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1127ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 21/43 places, 25/48 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 21 /21 variables (removed 0) and now considering 25/25 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 1220 ms. Remains : 21/43 places, 25/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 25 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12164575263312107252.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5931115932785675980.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12164575263312107252.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5931115932785675980.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,343,0.014309,4016,2,160,5,1191,6,0,111,1547,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A((EF(AG(((p37==0)||(p22==1)))) * EF((((p14==0)||(p41==1))||(p21!=0)))) U (p29!=0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!((p29!=0)) U (!((E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U !(((p37==0)||(p22==1)))))) * E(TRUE U (((p14==0)||(p41==1)...217
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t10, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, Intersection with reachable at ea...219
(forward)formula 0,1,0.083472,7600,1,0,320,19593,85,168,781,25570,353
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 43/43 places, 48/48 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 36 transition count 41
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 36 transition count 41
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 35 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 35 transition count 40
Applied a total of 16 rules in 6 ms. Remains 35 /43 variables (removed 8) and now considering 40/48 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 40 rows 35 cols
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Computed 5 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 65 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 39 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 4/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 2/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 40/75 variables, 35/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 75/75 variables, and 51 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1163 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/35 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 11/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/35 variables, 0/16 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 40/75 variables, 35/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 39/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/75 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 75/75 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved in 1917 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 5/5 constraints, State Equation: 35/35 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 3086ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 39 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3088ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 35/43 places, 40/48 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3160 ms. Remains : 35/43 places, 40/48 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 40 transitions.
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7226623732111829339.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2409494174653920139.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7226623732111829339.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2409494174653920139.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2736,0.023517,4552,2,397,5,3176,6,0,182,4464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AG(AF((p0==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p0==0))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t12, t17, t20, t25, Intersection with reachable at each ...216
(forward)formula 0,1,0.059487,6216,1,0,112,10475,106,44,1151,11405,110
FORMULA ShieldRVs-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-04 11:01:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 59183 ms.

BK_STOP 1749034898203

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldRVs-PT-001B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldRVs-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r212-tall-174901993500009"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldRVs-PT-001B.tgz
mv ShieldRVs-PT-001B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;