Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533500866.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-010B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500866
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 596K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 185K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749303007702

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 13:30:08] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 13:30:08] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 13:30:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 99 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:09] [INFO ] Transformed 783 places.
[2025-06-07 13:30:09] [INFO ] Transformed 713 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:30:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 13:30:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 783 places and 713 transitions and 1786 arcs in 202 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 137 out of 783 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 783/783 places, 713/713 transitions.
Discarding 77 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 77 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 706 transition count 636
Iterating global reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 706 transition count 636
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 155 place count 705 transition count 635
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 705 transition count 635
Applied a total of 156 rules in 152 ms. Remains 705 /783 variables (removed 78) and now considering 635/713 (removed 78) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 635 rows 705 cols
[2025-06-07 13:30:09] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 28 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 424 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:30:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 481 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 934 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 634 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:30:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/705 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 215 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 159 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 163 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 128 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 705/1340 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved in 30028 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/705 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 634/634 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/704 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/705 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 109 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 20/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 11/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 705/1340 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/705 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/634 constraints, Known Traps: 93/93 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60168ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 634 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60180ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 705/783 places, 635/713 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61285 ms. Remains : 705/783 places, 635/713 transitions.
Support contains 137 out of 705 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 13:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:10] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 635 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1986 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 9/90 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 122 ms. (325 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 150 ms. (264 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 104 ms. (380 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 123 ms. (322 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 102 ms. (388 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 9/9 properties
[2025-06-07 13:31:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 307/341 variables, 47/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 364/705 variables, 64/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 0/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 635/1340 variables, 705/816 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1340 variables, 0/816 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/1340 variables, 0/816 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1340/1340 variables, and 816 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved in 771 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 705/705 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 9 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp53 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 307/341 variables, 47/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 8 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp31 is UNSAT
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 4/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 364/705 variables, 64/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 72 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 57 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 61 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 60 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 13/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 2/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/705 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 635/1340 variables, 705/836 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1340 variables, 7/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 100 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1340 variables, 8/851 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1340 variables, 1/852 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1340 variables, 8/860 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 5827ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 7 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Support contains 24 out of 705 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 134 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 134 transitions
Performed 134 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 134
Iterating post reduction 0 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 705 transition count 501
Reduce places removed 134 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 136 rules applied. Total rules applied 270 place count 571 transition count 499
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 569 transition count 499
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 569 transition count 435
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 400 place count 505 transition count 435
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 421 place count 484 transition count 414
Iterating global reduction 3 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 442 place count 484 transition count 414
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 442 place count 484 transition count 402
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 466 place count 472 transition count 402
Performed 164 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 164
Deduced a syphon composed of 164 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 164 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 328 rules applied. Total rules applied 794 place count 308 transition count 238
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 795 place count 308 transition count 237
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 797 place count 307 transition count 236
Performed 25 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 847 place count 282 transition count 236
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 26 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 26 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 873 place count 282 transition count 236
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 874 place count 281 transition count 235
Applied a total of 874 rules in 133 ms. Remains 281 /705 variables (removed 424) and now considering 235/635 (removed 400) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 133 ms. Remains : 281/705 places, 235/635 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 469 ms. (85 steps per ms) remains 6/7 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 134 ms. (296 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 139 ms. (285 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 126 ms. (314 steps per ms) remains 6/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 148 ms. (268 steps per ms) remains 5/6 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 138 ms. (287 steps per ms) remains 4/5 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 127 ms. (312 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 235 rows 281 cols
[2025-06-07 13:31:18] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 12 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 66/79 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 25/104 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 107/211 variables, 104/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 10/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 91/302 variables, 49/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 14/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 8/310 variables, 8/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 8/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 12/322 variables, 6/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/237 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 68/390 variables, 47/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 15/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 2/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 1/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 70/461 variables, 34/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 9/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 2/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 8/469 variables, 7/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 6/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 0/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 10/479 variables, 5/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 0/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 30/509 variables, 26/391 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/509 variables, 4/395 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/509 variables, 2/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/509 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 2/511 variables, 3/400 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 2/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 0/402 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 5/516 variables, 4/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 2/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 0/516 variables, 0/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 516/516 variables, and 408 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1173 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 281/281 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/13 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 66/79 variables, 26/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 1/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 25/104 variables, 10/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 107/211 variables, 104/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 10/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 3/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 91/302 variables, 49/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 14/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/302 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 8/310 variables, 8/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 8/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/310 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 12/322 variables, 6/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/322 variables, 0/241 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 68/390 variables, 47/288 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 15/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 1/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/390 variables, 0/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 1/391 variables, 2/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 1/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/391 variables, 0/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 70/461 variables, 34/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 9/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 8/469 variables, 7/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 6/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/469 variables, 0/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 10/479 variables, 5/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/479 variables, 0/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 30/509 variables, 26/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/509 variables, 4/401 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/509 variables, 2/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/509 variables, 0/403 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 2/511 variables, 3/406 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 2/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/511 variables, 0/408 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (OVERLAPS) 5/516 variables, 4/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 2/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (OVERLAPS) 0/516 variables, 0/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 516/516 variables, and 414 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved in 1137 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 281/281 constraints, ReadFeed: 12/12 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 2317ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 4 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 406 ms.
Support contains 13 out of 281 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 281/281 places, 235/235 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 281 transition count 233
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 279 transition count 233
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 279 transition count 232
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 278 transition count 232
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 272 transition count 226
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 271 transition count 226
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 269 transition count 224
Applied a total of 22 rules in 32 ms. Remains 269 /281 variables (removed 12) and now considering 224/235 (removed 11) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 32 ms. Remains : 269/281 places, 224/235 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 218 ms. (182 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 92 ms. (430 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 100 ms. (396 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 224 rows 269 cols
[2025-06-07 13:31:21] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:21] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 59/67 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/69 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/144 variables, 69/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 7/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 65/209 variables, 36/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 10/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 8/217 variables, 7/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 14/231 variables, 7/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 69/300 variables, 47/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 14/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/301 variables, 1/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 2/303 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 70/373 variables, 38/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 12/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 5/378 variables, 5/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 5/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 10/388 variables, 5/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/388 variables, 0/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 37/425 variables, 26/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 7/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 2/427 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 44/471 variables, 24/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 4/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 5/476 variables, 7/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 5/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 0/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 2/478 variables, 1/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (OVERLAPS) 12/490 variables, 10/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 4/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 0/384 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (OVERLAPS) 3/493 variables, 2/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/493 variables, 1/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/493 variables, 0/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (OVERLAPS) 0/493 variables, 0/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 493/493 variables, and 387 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 749 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, ReadFeed: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 59/67 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/69 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 75/144 variables, 69/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 7/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 65/209 variables, 36/137 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 10/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 8/217 variables, 7/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 6/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 14/231 variables, 7/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/231 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 69/300 variables, 47/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 14/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/301 variables, 1/230 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 1/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/301 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 2/303 variables, 1/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/303 variables, 0/232 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 70/373 variables, 38/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 12/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/373 variables, 0/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 5/378 variables, 5/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 5/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/378 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 10/388 variables, 5/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/388 variables, 0/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (OVERLAPS) 37/425 variables, 26/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 7/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/425 variables, 0/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 2/427 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/427 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 44/471 variables, 24/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 4/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 3/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/471 variables, 0/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 5/476 variables, 7/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 5/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 5/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/476 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (OVERLAPS) 2/478 variables, 1/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 0/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (OVERLAPS) 12/490 variables, 10/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 4/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/490 variables, 0/394 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (OVERLAPS) 3/493 variables, 2/396 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/493 variables, 1/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/493 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 55 (OVERLAPS) 0/493 variables, 0/397 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 493/493 variables, and 397 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1110 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, ReadFeed: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 1865ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 68 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 269 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 269/269 places, 224/224 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 2 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 2 transitions
Performed 2 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 269 transition count 222
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 267 transition count 222
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 267 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 266 transition count 221
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 263 transition count 218
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 262 transition count 218
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 262 transition count 218
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 261 transition count 217
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 261 transition count 217
Applied a total of 17 rules in 33 ms. Remains 261 /269 variables (removed 8) and now considering 217/224 (removed 7) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 33 ms. Remains : 261/269 places, 217/224 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 471 ms. (84 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 85 ms. (465 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 112 ms. (354 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 440113 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=146 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 440113 steps, saw 334708 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=146 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 217 rows 261 cols
[2025-06-07 13:31:26] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:26] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 54/62 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/64 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 70/134 variables, 64/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 7/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 65/199 variables, 36/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 10/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 7/206 variables, 7/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 7/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 14/220 variables, 7/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 68/288 variables, 45/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 14/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/289 variables, 1/222 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 2/291 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 71/362 variables, 38/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 12/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 5/367 variables, 5/279 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 5/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 0/284 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 10/377 variables, 5/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 35/412 variables, 26/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 8/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 44/456 variables, 22/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 4/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 5/461 variables, 7/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 5/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 0/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 2/463 variables, 1/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/463 variables, 0/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 12/475 variables, 10/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/376 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 3/478 variables, 2/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 1/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (OVERLAPS) 0/478 variables, 0/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 478/478 variables, and 379 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 685 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 54/62 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/64 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 70/134 variables, 64/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 7/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 65/199 variables, 36/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 10/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/199 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 7/206 variables, 7/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 7/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 14/220 variables, 7/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 68/288 variables, 45/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 14/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/223 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/289 variables, 1/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 0/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 2/291 variables, 1/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/291 variables, 0/226 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 71/362 variables, 38/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 12/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 1/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/362 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 5/367 variables, 5/282 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 5/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/367 variables, 0/287 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 10/377 variables, 5/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/377 variables, 0/292 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 35/412 variables, 26/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 8/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/412 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 44/456 variables, 22/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 4/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/456 variables, 0/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 5/461 variables, 7/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 5/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 2/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 1/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/461 variables, 0/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (OVERLAPS) 2/463 variables, 1/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/463 variables, 0/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (OVERLAPS) 12/475 variables, 10/379 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 4/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/475 variables, 0/383 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (OVERLAPS) 3/478 variables, 2/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 1/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/478 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 55 (OVERLAPS) 0/478 variables, 0/386 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 478/478 variables, and 386 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1063 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 261/261 constraints, ReadFeed: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 1763ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 110 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 261 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 217/217 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 7 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 217/217 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 7 ms. Remains : 261/261 places, 217/217 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 261/261 places, 217/217 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 261 /261 variables (removed 0) and now considering 217/217 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [254]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 125 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 260/261 places, 217/217 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 260 transition count 215
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 258 transition count 215
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 258 /260 variables (removed 2) and now considering 215/217 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 215 rows 258 cols
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] Computed 110 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 124 ms returned [241, 245]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 125 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 256/261 places, 215/217 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 254 transition count 213
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 254 transition count 213
Applied a total of 4 rules in 8 ms. Remains 254 /256 variables (removed 2) and now considering 213/215 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 213 rows 254 cols
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] Computed 108 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 13:31:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 233 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 349 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 254/261 places, 213/217 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 3 iterations and 621 ms. Remains : 254/261 places, 213/217 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 247 ms. (161 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 93 ms. (425 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 491418 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=163 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 491418 steps, saw 381164 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=163 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-07 13:31:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 13:31:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 105.0 s and query timeout 10500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 47/55 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/57 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 66/123 variables, 57/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 5/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 65/188 variables, 36/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 10/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 7/195 variables, 7/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 7/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 14/209 variables, 7/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 68/277 variables, 45/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 14/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 1/278 variables, 1/210 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 1/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 2/280 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 71/351 variables, 38/250 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 12/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 0/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 5/356 variables, 5/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 5/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 10/366 variables, 5/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 0/277 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 35/401 variables, 26/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 8/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 44/445 variables, 22/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 4/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 5/450 variables, 7/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 5/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 2/452 variables, 1/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 12/464 variables, 10/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 3/467 variables, 2/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 1/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (OVERLAPS) 0/467 variables, 0/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 467/467 variables, and 367 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 648 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 108/108 constraints, State Equation: 254/254 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 105.0 s and query timeout 10500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/8 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 47/55 variables, 20/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/55 variables, 0/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/57 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/57 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 66/123 variables, 57/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 5/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 65/188 variables, 36/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 10/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/188 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 7/195 variables, 7/138 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 7/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/195 variables, 0/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 14/209 variables, 7/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 68/277 variables, 45/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 14/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/278 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/278 variables, 0/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 2/280 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/280 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 71/351 variables, 38/252 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 12/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 1/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/351 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 5/356 variables, 5/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 5/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/356 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 10/366 variables, 5/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 0/280 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 35/401 variables, 26/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 8/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/401 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 44/445 variables, 22/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 4/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/445 variables, 0/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 5/450 variables, 7/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 5/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/450 variables, 0/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (OVERLAPS) 2/452 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/452 variables, 0/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 12/464 variables, 10/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 4/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/464 variables, 0/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (OVERLAPS) 3/467 variables, 2/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 1/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 52 (OVERLAPS) 0/467 variables, 0/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 467/467 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 694 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 108/108 constraints, State Equation: 254/254 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1348ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 110 ms.
Support contains 8 out of 254 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 254/254 places, 213/213 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 5 ms. Remains 254 /254 variables (removed 0) and now considering 213/213 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 5 ms. Remains : 254/254 places, 213/213 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 254/254 places, 213/213 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 15 ms. Remains 254 /254 variables (removed 0) and now considering 213/213 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 233 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 353 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 210 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 92/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 16/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 2/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 3/254 variables, 16/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 5/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 213/467 variables, 254/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 5/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 2/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 0/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/467 variables, 0/392 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 467/467 variables, and 392 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved in 16603 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 108/108 constraints, State Equation: 254/254 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 210/210 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 92/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 22/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/251 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/254 variables, 16/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 1/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/254 variables, 0/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 213/467 variables, 254/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 5/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 210/600 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 2/602 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 18/620 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/467 variables, 3/623 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 2)
(t1 1)
(t2 1)
(t3 2)
(t4 3)
(t5 2)
(t6 timeout
1 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 467/467 variables, and 624 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 108/108 constraints, State Equation: 254/254 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 210/210 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 24/24 constraints]
After SMT, in 46631ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 210 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 46632ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 47017 ms. Remains : 254/254 places, 213/213 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 54 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 54 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 254 transition count 213
Applied a total of 54 rules in 11 ms. Remains 254 /254 variables (removed 0) and now considering 213/213 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 213 rows 254 cols
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] Computed 108 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 108 positive place invariants in 16 ms returned sat
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] After 170ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 108 positive place invariants in 12 ms returned sat
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] After 72ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 47 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] After 52ms SMT Verify possible using 47 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 63 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 5/4 trap constraints in 264 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 6/5 trap constraints in 301 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 66 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 2
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] After 784ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] After 956ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 1155 ms.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 635 transitions.
Computed a total of 169 stabilizing places and 169 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 675 transition count 605
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 675 transition count 605
Applied a total of 60 rules in 29 ms. Remains 675 /705 variables (removed 30) and now considering 605/635 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 605 rows 675 cols
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:32:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 368 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 541 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 604 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:32:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/675 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 173 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 155 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 122 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 675/1280 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/675 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 604/604 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/675 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 41/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 8/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 605/1280 variables, 675/855 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1280 variables, 604/1459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1280/1280 variables, and 1459 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 675/675 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 604/604 constraints, Known Traps: 69/69 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60093ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60097ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 675/705 places, 605/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60669 ms. Remains : 675/705 places, 605/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:33:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 22 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 605 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:33:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9682211715773930574.gal : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5529776781288503831.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9682211715773930574.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5529776781288503831.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14512165814538073959.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14512165814538073959.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14512165814538073959.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14512165814538073959.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14512165814538073959.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 97 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 66 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12059403378973197794.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12695469666590623212.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12059403378973197794.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12695469666590623212.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 672 transition count 602
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 672 transition count 602
Applied a total of 66 rules in 41 ms. Remains 672 /705 variables (removed 33) and now considering 602/635 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 602 rows 672 cols
[2025-06-07 13:34:22] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 195 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:34:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 359 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 556 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 601 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:34:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/672 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 170 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 672/1274 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/672 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 601/601 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/672 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 602/1274 variables, 672/846 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1274 variables, 601/1447 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1274/1274 variables, and 1447 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 672/672 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 601/601 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60073ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 672/705 places, 602/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60673 ms. Remains : 672/705 places, 602/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 602 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9426603793369414757.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2080264291033259322.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9426603793369414757.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2080264291033259322.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12734435875281294980.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12734435875281294980.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12734435875281294980.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12734435875281294980.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12734435875281294980.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6515166979463937881.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1135498158826676700.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6515166979463937881.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1135498158826676700.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 673 transition count 603
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 673 transition count 603
Applied a total of 64 rules in 38 ms. Remains 673 /705 variables (removed 32) and now considering 603/635 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 603 rows 673 cols
[2025-06-07 13:36:24] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 185 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:36:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 410 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 595 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 602 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:36:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/673 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 168 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 673/1276 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/673 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/673 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 603/1276 variables, 673/847 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1276 variables, 602/1449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1276/1276 variables, and 1449 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 673/673 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60081ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60083ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 673/705 places, 603/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60717 ms. Remains : 673/705 places, 603/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 603 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6626094382401949678.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12508932221425224816.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6626094382401949678.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12508932221425224816.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:37:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:37:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1341608492561594328.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1341608492561594328.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1341608492561594328.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1341608492561594328.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1341608492561594328.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:37:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:37:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:37:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 98 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:37:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:37:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16226537747108400510.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14339793644394662114.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16226537747108400510.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14339793644394662114.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 144 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 144 transitions
Performed 144 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 144
Iterating post reduction 0 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 704 transition count 490
Reduce places removed 144 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 560 transition count 490
Performed 64 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 64 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 288 place count 560 transition count 426
Deduced a syphon composed of 64 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 64 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 128 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 496 transition count 426
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 439 place count 473 transition count 403
Iterating global reduction 2 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 473 transition count 403
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 462 place count 473 transition count 386
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 496 place count 456 transition count 386
Performed 156 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 156 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 156 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 312 rules applied. Total rules applied 808 place count 300 transition count 230
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 810 place count 300 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 811 place count 299 transition count 228
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 813 place count 297 transition count 226
Applied a total of 813 rules in 64 ms. Remains 297 /705 variables (removed 408) and now considering 226/635 (removed 409) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 226 rows 297 cols
[2025-06-07 13:38:25] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 137 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 196 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 333 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 222 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:38:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 107/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/297 variables, 4/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 6/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 226/523 variables, 297/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/523 variables, 1/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/523 variables, 0/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/523 variables, 0/415 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 523/523 variables, and 415 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 18444 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 107/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 6/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/293 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/297 variables, 4/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/297 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 226/523 variables, 297/414 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/523 variables, 222/636 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/523 variables, 1/637 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/523 variables, 1/638 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/523 variables, 1/639 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/523 variables, 0/639 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 523/523 variables, and 639 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 297/297 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 222/222 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 48465ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 222 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48465ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 297/705 places, 226/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48877 ms. Remains : 297/705 places, 226/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 226 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9344450343448679866.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16773392842150338045.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9344450343448679866.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16773392842150338045.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.29798e+43,2.14277,75000,2,951,5,276574,6,0,1415,501164,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((((p540==1)||((p231==1)&&(p460==1)))&&((p745==0)||(p587==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (((p540==1)||((p231==1)&&(p460==1)))&&((p745==0)||(p587==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20...420
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph119284371059947280.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph119284371059947280.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph119284371059947280.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph119284371059947280.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph119284371059947280.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2622562319852068.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8905799018385392286.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2622562319852068.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8905799018385392286.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...259
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.29798e+43,2.90973,94848,191,28,158150,133,469,558525,47,937,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((((i11.i1.u56.p540==1)||((i2.i1.u24.p231==1)&&(i8.i0.u48.p460==1)))&&((i14.i1.u80.p745==0)||(i9.i0.u63.p587==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (((i11.i1.u56.p540==1)||((i2.i1.u24.p231==1)&&(i8.i0.u48.p460==1)))&&((i14.i1.u80.p745==0)||...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u6.t58, i0.i1.u3.t1, i0.i1.u8.t62, i0.i2.u2.t0, i0.i2.u7.t152, i0.i3.u5.t149, i0.i3.u11...900
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 147 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 147 transitions
Performed 147 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 147
Iterating post reduction 0 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 147 place count 704 transition count 487
Reduce places removed 147 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 147 rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 557 transition count 487
Performed 63 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 63 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 294 place count 557 transition count 424
Deduced a syphon composed of 63 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 63 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 126 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 494 transition count 424
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 446 place count 468 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 472 place count 468 transition count 398
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 472 place count 468 transition count 379
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 510 place count 449 transition count 379
Performed 153 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 153 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 153 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 306 rules applied. Total rules applied 816 place count 296 transition count 226
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 817 place count 296 transition count 225
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 819 place count 295 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 821 place count 293 transition count 222
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 822 place count 292 transition count 222
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 822 place count 292 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 826 place count 290 transition count 220
Applied a total of 826 rules in 61 ms. Remains 290 /705 variables (removed 415) and now considering 220/635 (removed 415) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 290 cols
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Computed 110 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned [270, 274]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 126 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 288/705 places, 220/635 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 286 transition count 218
Applied a total of 4 rules in 9 ms. Remains 286 /288 variables (removed 2) and now considering 218/220 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 286 cols
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Computed 108 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 133 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 200 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 334 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 286/705 places, 218/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 531 ms. Remains : 286/705 places, 218/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16880737119166239044.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:14] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8338027504069985182.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16880737119166239044.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8338027504069985182.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64899e+42,0.989502,41244,2,735,5,148763,6,0,1364,259976,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(EG((p151==1)) U !(AF((p401==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(EG((p151==1)) U !(!(EG(!((p401==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t19, t29, t49, t53, t57, t61...357
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10033653134689479683.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10033653134689479683.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10033653134689479683.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10033653134689479683.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10033653134689479683.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8397143657767682165.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7498108177220707534.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8397143657767682165.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7498108177220707534.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.64899e+42,0.992607,38580,127,20,63987,150,485,198542,39,834,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(E(EG((i2.i0.u16.p151==1)) U !(AF((i8.i0.u42.p401==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(EG((i2.i0.u16.p151==1)) U !(!(EG(!((i8.i0.u42.p401==1)))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u4.t2, i0.i0.u7.t138, i0.i1.u8.t53, i0.i2.u2.t0, i0.i2.u6.t49, i0.i3.u3.t1, i0.i3.u5.t1...733
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 33 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 33 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 672 transition count 602
Iterating global reduction 0 with 33 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 672 transition count 602
Applied a total of 66 rules in 25 ms. Remains 672 /705 variables (removed 33) and now considering 602/635 (removed 33) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 602 rows 672 cols
[2025-06-07 13:41:15] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:41:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 395 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 569 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 601 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:41:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/672 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 137 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 672/1274 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/672 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 601/601 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/672 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 602/1274 variables, 672/844 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1274 variables, 601/1445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1274/1274 variables, and 1445 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 672/672 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 601/601 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60082ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 672/705 places, 602/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60678 ms. Remains : 672/705 places, 602/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 602 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1177336706796549547.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6645321297962217121.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1177336706796549547.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6645321297962217121.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5336254874512301265.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5336254874512301265.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5336254874512301265.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5336254874512301265.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5336254874512301265.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 104 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 24 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9777442013472747818.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16689787319575482191.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9777442013472747818.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16689787319575482191.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 675 transition count 605
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 675 transition count 605
Applied a total of 60 rules in 25 ms. Remains 675 /705 variables (removed 30) and now considering 605/635 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 605 rows 675 cols
[2025-06-07 13:43:16] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 187 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:43:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 402 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 590 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 604 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:43:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/675 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 157 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 675/1280 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/675 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 604/604 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/675 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 7/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 605/1280 variables, 675/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1280 variables, 604/1457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1280/1280 variables, and 1457 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 675/675 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 604/604 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60082ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 675/705 places, 605/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60698 ms. Remains : 675/705 places, 605/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:44:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 605 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:44:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6661110371796066609.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7304620337259617247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6661110371796066609.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7304620337259617247.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13825980763347689132.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13825980763347689132.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13825980763347689132.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13825980763347689132.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13825980763347689132.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 97 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14027826713153917904.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5006503464919375077.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14027826713153917904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5006503464919375077.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 676 transition count 606
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 676 transition count 606
Applied a total of 58 rules in 36 ms. Remains 676 /705 variables (removed 29) and now considering 606/635 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 606 rows 676 cols
[2025-06-07 13:45:17] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:45:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 383 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 562 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 605 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:45:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/676 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 150 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 113 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 676/1282 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/676 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 605/605 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/676 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 6/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 606/1282 variables, 676/853 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1282/1282 variables, and 1458 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved in 30030 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 676/676 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 605/605 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60095ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 676/705 places, 606/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60696 ms. Remains : 676/705 places, 606/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 606 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6883763320182533628.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16819428119940716908.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6883763320182533628.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16819428119940716908.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12737717720554825519.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12737717720554825519.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12737717720554825519.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12737717720554825519.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12737717720554825519.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Removed a total of 100 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14251299765591442076.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4635710215378633788.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14251299765591442076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4635710215378633788.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 146 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 146 transitions
Performed 146 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 146
Iterating post reduction 0 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 704 transition count 488
Reduce places removed 146 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 146 rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 558 transition count 488
Performed 65 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 65 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 292 place count 558 transition count 423
Deduced a syphon composed of 65 places in 6 ms
Reduce places removed 65 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 130 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 493 transition count 423
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 448 place count 467 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 2 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 474 place count 467 transition count 397
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 474 place count 467 transition count 378
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 512 place count 448 transition count 378
Performed 152 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 152 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 152 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 304 rules applied. Total rules applied 816 place count 296 transition count 226
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 817 place count 296 transition count 225
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 819 place count 295 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 821 place count 293 transition count 222
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 822 place count 292 transition count 222
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 822 place count 292 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 826 place count 290 transition count 220
Applied a total of 826 rules in 60 ms. Remains 290 /705 variables (removed 415) and now considering 220/635 (removed 415) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 290 cols
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Computed 110 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 123 ms returned [270, 274]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 124 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 288/705 places, 220/635 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 286 transition count 218
Applied a total of 4 rules in 7 ms. Remains 286 /288 variables (removed 2) and now considering 218/220 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 286 cols
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Computed 108 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 186 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 286/705 places, 218/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 505 ms. Remains : 286/705 places, 218/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9356735090617985064.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10398461773401693038.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9356735090617985064.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10398461773401693038.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35277e+42,0.934077,38536,2,839,5,134175,6,0,1363,241648,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(AG(((p558==0) * AF(((p255==1)&&(p291==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p558==0) * !(EG(!(((p255==1)&&(p291==1)))))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t24...454
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13888390950589120873.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13888390950589120873.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13888390950589120873.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13888390950589120873.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13888390950589120873.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14581866115409485418.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14756097395553638155.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14581866115409485418.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14756097395553638155.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.35277e+42,1.53807,56324,154,23,89422,369,471,322625,39,3132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(AG(((i11.i1.u58.p558==0) * AF(((i4.i1.u26.p255==1)&&(i4.i1.u31.p291==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i11.i1.u58.p558==0) * !(EG(!(((i4.i1.u26.p255==1)&&(i4.i1.u31.p291==1))))))))))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t26, i0.i0.u11.t4, i0.i0.u16.t63, i0.i1.u10.t3, i0.i1.u14.t59, i0.i2.u13.t55, i0.i2.u19.t7, i...999
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 32 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 32 rule applications. Total rules 32 place count 673 transition count 603
Iterating global reduction 0 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 673 transition count 603
Applied a total of 64 rules in 36 ms. Remains 673 /705 variables (removed 32) and now considering 603/635 (removed 32) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 603 rows 673 cols
[2025-06-07 13:48:18] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 186 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:48:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 401 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 588 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 602 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:48:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/673 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 168 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 673/1276 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/673 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/673 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 603/1276 variables, 673/846 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1276 variables, 602/1448 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1276/1276 variables, and 1448 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 673/673 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60087ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60089ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 673/705 places, 603/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60714 ms. Remains : 673/705 places, 603/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 603 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14117914519772259179.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6589798876065930658.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14117914519772259179.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6589798876065930658.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10053257400606652224.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10053257400606652224.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10053257400606652224.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10053257400606652224.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10053257400606652224.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14784008807276321775.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3439469019643507280.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14784008807276321775.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3439469019643507280.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 671 transition count 601
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 671 transition count 601
Applied a total of 68 rules in 25 ms. Remains 671 /705 variables (removed 34) and now considering 601/635 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 601 rows 671 cols
[2025-06-07 13:50:19] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 183 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:50:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 404 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 589 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 600 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:50:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 164 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 99 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 671/1272 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 601/1272 variables, 671/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1272 variables, 600/1443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 177 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60220ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60221ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 671/705 places, 601/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60837 ms. Remains : 671/705 places, 601/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 601 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3808889723299868668.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12627494414923421107.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3808889723299868668.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12627494414923421107.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12909855802214105812.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12909855802214105812.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12909855802214105812.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12909855802214105812.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12909855802214105812.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2176100036553722593.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3239469739346200426.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2176100036553722593.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3239469739346200426.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 30 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 30 rule applications. Total rules 30 place count 675 transition count 605
Iterating global reduction 0 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 675 transition count 605
Applied a total of 60 rules in 31 ms. Remains 675 /705 variables (removed 30) and now considering 605/635 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 605 rows 675 cols
[2025-06-07 13:52:20] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 172 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:52:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 385 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 557 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 604 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:52:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/675 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 675/1280 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/675 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 604/604 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/675 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 10/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 675/1280 variables, and 182 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/675 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/604 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60086ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 604 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60088ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 675/705 places, 605/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60677 ms. Remains : 675/705 places, 605/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:53:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 605 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:53:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6787998135521361905.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10606460448015318459.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6787998135521361905.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10606460448015318459.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8296582689803532204.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8296582689803532204.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8296582689803532204.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8296582689803532204.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8296582689803532204.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 95 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4277354906370407457.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:53:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3599646195461233478.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4277354906370407457.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3599646195461233478.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 676 transition count 606
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 676 transition count 606
Applied a total of 58 rules in 32 ms. Remains 676 /705 variables (removed 29) and now considering 606/635 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 606 rows 676 cols
[2025-06-07 13:54:21] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 175 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:54:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 409 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 584 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 605 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:54:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/676 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 154 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 120 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 108 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 676/1282 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/676 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 605/605 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/676 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:54:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 8/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 606/1282 variables, 676/855 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1282 variables, 605/1460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1282/1282 variables, and 1460 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 676/676 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 605/605 constraints, Known Traps: 68/68 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60074ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 676/705 places, 606/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60691 ms. Remains : 676/705 places, 606/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 606 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4334315962992753735.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14145772680947229923.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4334315962992753735.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14145772680947229923.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5433698506441474795.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5433698506441474795.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5433698506441474795.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5433698506441474795.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5433698506441474795.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 97 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1099642476790360494.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:55:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15092402261764106455.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1099642476790360494.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15092402261764106455.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 671 transition count 601
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 671 transition count 601
Applied a total of 68 rules in 31 ms. Remains 671 /705 variables (removed 34) and now considering 601/635 (removed 34) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 601 rows 671 cols
[2025-06-07 13:56:22] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:56:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 393 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 573 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 600 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:56:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 162 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 116 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 671/1272 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:56:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 601/1272 variables, 671/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1272 variables, 600/1443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 187 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
SMT process timed out in 60174ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60174ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 671/705 places, 601/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60779 ms. Remains : 671/705 places, 601/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:57:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 601 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:57:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17628450967832999670.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16227028331380680239.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17628450967832999670.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16227028331380680239.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14408858911279048913.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14408858911279048913.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14408858911279048913.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14408858911279048913.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14408858911279048913.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9873072286271158451.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:57:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12516480101055993923.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9873072286271158451.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12516480101055993923.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 34 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 34 rule applications. Total rules 34 place count 671 transition count 601
Iterating global reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 671 transition count 601
Applied a total of 68 rules in 32 ms. Remains 671 /705 variables (removed 34) and now considering 601/635 (removed 34) transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:58:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 180 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:58:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 402 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 583 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 600 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:58:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 148 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 135 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 101 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:58:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 1.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 1.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 671/1272 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 601/1272 variables, 671/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1272 variables, 600/1443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1272/1272 variables, and 1443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 671/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60074ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 671/705 places, 601/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60690 ms. Remains : 671/705 places, 601/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 601 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11414393048365553059.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11222650862964703559.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11414393048365553059.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11222650862964703559.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6075293880353644252.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6075293880353644252.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6075293880353644252.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6075293880353644252.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6075293880353644252.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5532441979201432081.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:59:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14918714341042727180.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5532441979201432081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14918714341042727180.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 705/705 places, 635/635 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 676 transition count 606
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 676 transition count 606
Applied a total of 58 rules in 24 ms. Remains 676 /705 variables (removed 29) and now considering 606/635 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 606 rows 676 cols
[2025-06-07 14:00:25] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 179 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 14:00:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 390 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 569 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 605 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 14:00:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/676 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 153 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 129 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 86 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:00:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 676/1282 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/676 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 605/605 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/675 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/676 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 7/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/676 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 606/1282 variables, 676/854 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1282 variables, 605/1459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1282/1282 variables, and 1459 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved in 30027 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 676/676 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 605/605 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60091ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 605 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60092ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 676/705 places, 606/635 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60686 ms. Remains : 676/705 places, 606/635 transitions.
[2025-06-07 14:01:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 606 transitions.
[2025-06-07 14:01:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13249305891189065310.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10565500506398016634.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13249305891189065310.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10565500506398016634.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph962964676316165042.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph962964676316165042.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph962964676316165042.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph962964676316165042.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph962964676316165042.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5270440463161142420.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 14:01:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15204699756107584103.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5270440463161142420.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15204699756107584103.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 14:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 14:02:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5788350978836702239.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5788350978836702239.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5788350978836702239.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5788350978836702239.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5788350978836702239.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 72 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11258977605718390730.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 14:02:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6445728993283157132.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11258977605718390730.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6445728993283157132.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 16 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-010B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500866"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;