Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533500865.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-010B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500865
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 596K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 72K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.3K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.7K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 99K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 51K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 185K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749302865644

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-010B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 13:27:46] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 13:27:46] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 13:27:46] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 104 ms
[2025-06-07 13:27:46] [INFO ] Transformed 783 places.
[2025-06-07 13:27:47] [INFO ] Transformed 713 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:27:47] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 13:27:47] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 783 places and 713 transitions and 1786 arcs in 209 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 14 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 96 out of 783 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 783/783 places, 713/713 transitions.
Discarding 87 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 87 rule applications. Total rules 87 place count 696 transition count 626
Iterating global reduction 0 with 87 rules applied. Total rules applied 174 place count 696 transition count 626
Applied a total of 174 rules in 137 ms. Remains 696 /783 variables (removed 87) and now considering 626/713 (removed 87) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 626 rows 696 cols
[2025-06-07 13:27:47] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 24 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:27:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 462 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:27:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 560 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 1053 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 625 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:27:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/695 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/696 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 189 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 163 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 157 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 116 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 696/1322 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/696 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 625/625 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/695 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/696 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 106 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 126 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 20/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 5/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 696/1322 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/696 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/625 constraints, Known Traps: 85/85 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60184ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 625 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60208ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 696/783 places, 626/713 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 61420 ms. Remains : 696/783 places, 626/713 transitions.
Support contains 96 out of 696 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 13:28:48] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-07 13:28:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 68 ms
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-07 13:28:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 34 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 626 transitions.
Support contains 89 out of 696 places (down from 96) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1940 ms. (20 steps per ms) remains 2/54 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 91 ms. (434 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-07 13:28:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 44/47 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 649/696 variables, 108/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 11/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 0/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 626/1322 variables, 696/818 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1322 variables, 0/818 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/1322 variables, 0/818 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 1322/1322 variables, and 818 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1167 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 696/696 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 11/11 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 44/47 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/47 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 649/696 variables, 108/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 11/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/696 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 626/1322 variables, 696/821 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1322 variables, 2/823 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1322 variables, 3/826 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1322 variables, 0/826 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/1322 variables, 0/826 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1322/1322 variables, and 826 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 957 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 696/696 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2137ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Fused 2 Parikh solutions to 1 different solutions.
Finished Parikh walk after 31681 steps, including 166 resets, run visited all 2 properties in 332 ms. (steps per millisecond=95 )
Parikh walk visited 2 properties in 337 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 626 transitions.
Computed a total of 164 stabilizing places and 164 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 142 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 142 transitions
Performed 142 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 142
Iterating post reduction 0 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 695 transition count 483
Reduce places removed 142 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 144 rules applied. Total rules applied 286 place count 553 transition count 481
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 552 transition count 481
Performed 66 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 66 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 287 place count 552 transition count 415
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 2 ms
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 419 place count 486 transition count 415
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 436 place count 469 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 3 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 469 transition count 398
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 469 transition count 384
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 481 place count 455 transition count 384
Performed 158 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 158 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 158 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 316 rules applied. Total rules applied 797 place count 297 transition count 226
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 799 place count 295 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 800 place count 294 transition count 224
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 800 place count 294 transition count 222
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 804 place count 292 transition count 222
Applied a total of 804 rules in 131 ms. Remains 292 /696 variables (removed 404) and now considering 222/626 (removed 404) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 222 rows 292 cols
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Computed 110 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 140 ms returned [272, 276]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 142 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 290/696 places, 222/626 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 288 transition count 220
Applied a total of 4 rules in 18 ms. Remains 288 /290 variables (removed 2) and now considering 220/222 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 288 cols
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Computed 108 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 210 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 353 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 288/696 places, 220/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 644 ms. Remains : 288/696 places, 220/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 220 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:28:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2470216278719919924.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:28:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6093810369433911698.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2470216278719919924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6093810369433911698.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.75917e+42,1.1329,47508,2,931,5,174574,6,0,1373,306852,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((p320==1)) + AG((((p247==0)||(p609==1)) + EF((p627==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((p320==1)))))),TRUE) * !(((p247==0)||(p609==1)))) * !(E(TRUE U (p627==1))))] = FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t13, t30, t52, t56, t58, t62, t66, t68, t70...321
(forward)formula 0,0,19.6152,618380,1,0,557,3.05269e+06,466,254,8346,4.08847e+06,577
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 675 transition count 605
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 675 transition count 605
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 674 transition count 604
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 674 transition count 604
Applied a total of 44 rules in 73 ms. Remains 674 /696 variables (removed 22) and now considering 604/626 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 604 rows 674 cols
[2025-06-07 13:29:12] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 369 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:29:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 419 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 789 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 603 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:29:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/674 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 171 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 160 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 139 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 674/1278 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/674 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 603/603 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/674 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 7/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 604/1278 variables, 674/852 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1278 variables, 603/1455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1278/1278 variables, and 1455 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 674/674 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 603/603 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60115ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60118ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 674/696 places, 604/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60982 ms. Remains : 674/696 places, 604/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 604 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18153662856558863643.gal : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8637304636210483128.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18153662856558863643.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8637304636210483128.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph971168133459587042.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph971168133459587042.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph971168133459587042.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph971168133459587042.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph971168133459587042.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Removed a total of 94 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 90 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5248280350121570025.gal : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:30:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12046129695624044955.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5248280350121570025.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12046129695624044955.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 674 transition count 604
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 674 transition count 604
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 673 transition count 603
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 673 transition count 603
Applied a total of 46 rules in 47 ms. Remains 673 /696 variables (removed 23) and now considering 603/626 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 603 rows 673 cols
[2025-06-07 13:31:14] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:14] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 214 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:31:14] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 414 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 630 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 602 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:31:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/673 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 175 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 146 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 132 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 0.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 1.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 0.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 1.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 0.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 0.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 1.0)
(s29 0.0)
(s30 1.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 0.0)
(s33 0.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 1.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 1.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 1.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 1.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 0.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 1.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 0.0)
(s56 1.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 0.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 0.0)
(s69 1.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 1.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 0.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 0.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 1.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 1.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 0.0)
(s99 0.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 1.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 1.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 1.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 1.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 0.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 0.0)
(s118 1.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 1.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 0.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 1.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 0.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 0.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 1.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 1.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 1.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 1.0)
(s163 0.0)
(s164 0.0)
(s165 0.0)
(s166 0.0)
(s167 1.0)
(s168 0.0)
(s169 1.0)
(s170 0.0)
(s171 0.0)
(s172 0.0)
(s173 0.0)
(s174 1.0)
(s175 0.0)
(s176 1.0)
(s177 0.0)
(s178 0.0)
(s179 0.0)
(s180 0.0)
(s181 0.0)
(s182 0.0)
(s183 0.0)
(s184 1.0)
(s185 0.0)
(s186 0.0)
(s187 0.0)
(s188 1.0)
(s189 0.0)
(s190 0.0)
(s191 0.0)
(s192 0.0)
(s193 0.0)
(s194 0.0)
(s195 0.0)
(s196 0.0)
(s197 0.0)
(s198 0.0)
(s199 0.0)
(s200 0.0)
(s201 1.0)
(s202 0.0)
(s203 0.0)
(s204 0.0)
(s205 0.0)
(s206 0.0)
(s207 0.0)
(s208 0.0)
(s209 0.0)
(s210 0.0)
(s211 1.0)
(s212 0.0)
(s213 0.0)
(s214 0.0)
(s215 0.0)
(s216 0.0)
(s217 0.0)
(s218 0.0)
(s219 0.0)
(s220 1.0)
(s221 0.0)
(s222 0.0)
(s223 0.0)
(s224 0.0)
(s225 0.0)
(s226 0.0)
(s227 1.0)
(s228 0.0)
(s229 1.0)
(s230 0.0)
(s231 0.0)
(s232 0.0)
(s233 0.0)
(s234 1.0)
(s235 0.0)
(s236 1.0)
(s237 0.0)
(s238 0.0)
(s239 0.0)
(s240 0.0)
(s241 1.0)
(s242 0.0)
(s243 1.0)
(s244 0.0)
(s245 0.0)
(s246 0.0)
(s247 0.0)
(s248 0.0)
(s249 0.0)
(s250 0.0)
(s251 1.0)
(s252 0.0)
(s253 0.0)
(s254 0.0)
(s255 1.0)
(s256 0.0)
(s257 0.0)
(s258 0.0)
(s259 0.0)
(s260 0.0)
(s261 0.0)
(s262 0.0)
(s263 0.0)
(s264 0.0)
(s265 0.0)
(s266 0.0)
(s267 0.0)
(s268 1.0)
(s269 0.0)
(s270 0.0)
(s271 0.0)
(s272 0.0)
(s273 0.0)
(s274 0.0)
(s275 0.0)
(s276 0.0)
(s277 1.0)
(s278 0.0)
(s279 0.0)
(s280 0.0)
(s281 0.0)
(s282 0.0)
(s283 0.0)
(s284 0.0)
(s285 0.0)
(s286 1.0)
(s287 0.0)
(s288 0.0)
(s289 0.0)
(s290 0.0)
(s291 0.0)
(s292 0.0)
(s293 1.0)
(s294 0.0)
(s295 1.0)
(s296 0.0)
(s297 0.0)
(s298 0.0)
(s299 0.0)
(s300 1.0)
(s301 0.0)
(s302 1.0)
(s303 0.0)
(s304 0.0)
(s305 0.0)
(s306 0.0)
(s307 1.0)
(s308 0.0)
(s309 1.0)
(s310 0.0)
(s311 0.0)
(s312 0.0)
(s313 0.0)
(s314 0.0)
(s315 0.0)
(s316 0.0)
(s317 1.0)
(s318 0.0)
(s319 0.0)
(s320 0.0)
(s321 1.0)
(s322 0.0)
(s323 0.0)
(s324 0.0)
(s325 0.0)
(s326 0.0)
(s327 0.0)
(s328 0.0)
(s329 0.0)
(s330 0.0)
(s331 0.0)
(s332 0.0)
(s333 0.0)
(s334 1.0)
(s335 0.0)
(s336 0.0)
(s337 0.0)
(s338 0.0)
(s339 0.0)
(s340 0.0)
(s341 0.0)
(s342 0.0)
(s343 1.0)
(s344 0.0)
(s345 0.0)
(s346 0.0)
(s347 0.0)
(s348 0.0)
(s349 0.0)
(s350 0.0)
(s351 0.0)
(s352 1.0)
(s353 0.0)
(s354 0.0)
(s355 0.0)
(s356 0.0)
(s357 0.0)
(s358 0.0)
(s359 1.0)
(s360 0.0)
(s361 1.0)
(s362 0.0)
(s363 0.0)
(s364 0.0)
(s365 0.0)
(s366 1.0)
(s367 0.0)
(s368 1.0)
(s369 0.0)
(s370 0.0)
(s371 0.0)
(s372 0.0)
(s373 1.0)
(s374 0.0)
(s375 1.0)
(s376 0.0)
(s377 0.0)
(s378 0.0)
(s379 0.0)
(s380 0.0)
(s381 0.0)
(s382 0.0)
(s383 1.0)
(s384 0.0)
(s385 0.0)
(s386 0.0)
(s387 timeout
1.0 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 673/1276 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/673 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/673 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 3/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 603/1276 variables, 673/847 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1276 variables, 602/1449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1276/1276 variables, and 1452 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 673/673 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60111ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60113ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 673/696 places, 603/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60792 ms. Remains : 673/696 places, 603/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 603 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12299941759410590530.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3949381666295914910.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12299941759410590530.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3949381666295914910.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph751344801914001275.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph751344801914001275.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph751344801914001275.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph751344801914001275.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph751344801914001275.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11057026124511131979.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:32:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5901295729825649461.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11057026124511131979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5901295729825649461.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 673 transition count 603
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 673 transition count 603
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 672 transition count 602
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 672 transition count 602
Applied a total of 48 rules in 47 ms. Remains 672 /696 variables (removed 24) and now considering 602/626 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 602 rows 672 cols
[2025-06-07 13:33:15] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 9 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 186 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:33:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 425 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 622 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 601 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:33:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/672 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 166 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 133 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 672/1274 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/672 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 601/601 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/672 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:33:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 602/1274 variables, 672/845 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1274 variables, 601/1446 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1274/1274 variables, and 1446 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 672/672 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 601/601 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60087ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60089ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 672/696 places, 602/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60759 ms. Remains : 672/696 places, 602/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 602 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10772808209009047556.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7131337807230627856.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10772808209009047556.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7131337807230627856.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3785394644485730496.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3785394644485730496.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3785394644485730496.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3785394644485730496.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3785394644485730496.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 101 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4727234546310471007.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:34:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7650427417743081858.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4727234546310471007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7650427417743081858.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 139 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 139 transitions
Performed 139 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 139
Iterating post reduction 0 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 695 transition count 486
Reduce places removed 139 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 556 transition count 484
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 2 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 555 transition count 482
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 553 transition count 482
Performed 66 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 66 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 553 transition count 416
Deduced a syphon composed of 66 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 66 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 132 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 487 transition count 416
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 435 place count 469 transition count 398
Iterating global reduction 4 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 469 transition count 398
Performed 15 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 15 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 453 place count 469 transition count 383
Deduced a syphon composed of 15 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 30 rules applied. Total rules applied 483 place count 454 transition count 383
Performed 158 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 158
Deduced a syphon composed of 158 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 158 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 316 rules applied. Total rules applied 799 place count 296 transition count 225
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 801 place count 294 transition count 223
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 802 place count 293 transition count 223
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 802 place count 293 transition count 221
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 806 place count 291 transition count 221
Applied a total of 806 rules in 70 ms. Remains 291 /696 variables (removed 405) and now considering 221/626 (removed 405) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 221 rows 291 cols
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Computed 110 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 115 ms returned [271, 275]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 116 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 289/696 places, 221/626 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 287 transition count 219
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 287 /289 variables (removed 2) and now considering 219/221 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 219 rows 287 cols
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Computed 108 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 194 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 315 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 287/696 places, 219/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 512 ms. Remains : 287/696 places, 219/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 219 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4797472687753144315.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10415882091129566142.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4797472687753144315.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10415882091129566142.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37477e+42,1.07066,47424,2,875,5,174732,6,0,1369,306595,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF((p494==1)) + A((p139==0) U EG(AF(((p253==1)&&(p320==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p494==1))] != FALSE + [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!(EG(!(((p253==1)&&(p320==0)))))))))) * !(E(!(EG...263
(forward)formula 0,1,1.07168,47424,1,0,7,174732,8,1,1372,306595,1
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 672 transition count 602
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 672 transition count 602
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 671 transition count 601
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 671 transition count 601
Applied a total of 50 rules in 51 ms. Remains 671 /696 variables (removed 25) and now considering 601/626 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 601 rows 671 cols
[2025-06-07 13:35:18] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:35:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 403 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 576 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 600 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:35:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 161 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 149 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 134 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 114 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 671/1272 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:35:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 601/1272 variables, 671/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1272 variables, 600/1443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1272/1272 variables, and 1443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 671/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60081ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 671/696 places, 601/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60710 ms. Remains : 671/696 places, 601/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:36:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 601 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:36:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10665376355753631302.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13846160288723406131.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10665376355753631302.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13846160288723406131.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12358659032784583161.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12358659032784583161.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12358659032784583161.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12358659032784583161.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12358659032784583161.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2522281449271687577.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:36:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16089170372727646428.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2522281449271687577.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16089170372727646428.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 675 transition count 605
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 675 transition count 605
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 674 transition count 604
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 674 transition count 604
Applied a total of 44 rules in 55 ms. Remains 674 /696 variables (removed 22) and now considering 604/626 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 604 rows 674 cols
[2025-06-07 13:37:19] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:19] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 219 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:37:19] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 412 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 631 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 603 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:37:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/674 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 175 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 156 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 136 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 674/1278 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/674 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 603/603 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/674 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:37:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 7/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 604/1278 variables, 674/852 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1278 variables, 603/1455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1278/1278 variables, and 1455 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved in 30029 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 674/674 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 603/603 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60092ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60093ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 674/696 places, 604/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60781 ms. Remains : 674/696 places, 604/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 604 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16813578918005061366.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8313888776840297846.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16813578918005061366.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8313888776840297846.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5262371444310911852.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5262371444310911852.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5262371444310911852.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5262371444310911852.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5262371444310911852.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 35 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11999766263796783135.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:38:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3177853126215851854.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11999766263796783135.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3177853126215851854.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 22 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 22 rule applications. Total rules 22 place count 674 transition count 604
Iterating global reduction 0 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 674 transition count 604
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 45 place count 673 transition count 603
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 673 transition count 603
Applied a total of 46 rules in 52 ms. Remains 673 /696 variables (removed 23) and now considering 603/626 (removed 23) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 603 rows 673 cols
[2025-06-07 13:39:20] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 199 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:39:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 428 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 628 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 602 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:39:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/673 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 171 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 165 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 151 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 119 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 107 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 673/1276 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/673 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/673 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 95 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 4/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 603/1276 variables, 673/848 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1276 variables, 602/1450 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1276/1276 variables, and 1450 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 673/673 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 602/602 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60104ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 602 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60105ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 673/696 places, 603/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60787 ms. Remains : 673/696 places, 603/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 603 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7363005095206728950.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17295445264987662215.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7363005095206728950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17295445264987662215.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13002287622197331429.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13002287622197331429.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13002287622197331429.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13002287622197331429.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13002287622197331429.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7352288157704384734.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:40:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9116791891983452533.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7352288157704384734.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9116791891983452533.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 675 transition count 605
Iterating global reduction 0 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 675 transition count 605
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 674 transition count 604
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 674 transition count 604
Applied a total of 44 rules in 55 ms. Remains 674 /696 variables (removed 22) and now considering 604/626 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 604 rows 674 cols
[2025-06-07 13:41:21] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 207 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:41:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 382 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 590 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 603 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:41:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/674 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 159 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 141 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 103 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 674/1278 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/674 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 603/603 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/674 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:41:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/674 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 604/1278 variables, 674/846 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1278 variables, 603/1449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1278/1278 variables, and 1449 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 674/674 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 603/603 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60073ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 603 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60074ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 674/696 places, 604/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60720 ms. Remains : 674/696 places, 604/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:42:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 604 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:42:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality316647065070878591.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14143887400918368772.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality316647065070878591.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14143887400918368772.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18256430001334536229.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18256430001334536229.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18256430001334536229.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18256430001334536229.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18256430001334536229.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 103 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality281086698549206141.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:42:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7435303900864583723.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality281086698549206141.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7435303900864583723.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 23 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 23 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 673 transition count 603
Iterating global reduction 0 with 23 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 673 transition count 603
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 47 place count 672 transition count 602
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 672 transition count 602
Applied a total of 48 rules in 55 ms. Remains 672 /696 variables (removed 24) and now considering 602/626 (removed 24) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 602 rows 672 cols
[2025-06-07 13:43:23] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 190 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:43:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 386 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 578 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 601 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:43:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/672 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 176 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 147 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 127 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 118 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 98 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 672/1274 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/672 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 601/601 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/672 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:43:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/672 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60067ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 601 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60068ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 672/696 places, 602/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60702 ms. Remains : 672/696 places, 602/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 602 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18043188820300597686.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14171576613952492700.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18043188820300597686.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14171576613952492700.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11542713147911755006.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11542713147911755006.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11542713147911755006.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11542713147911755006.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11542713147911755006.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8192141153738099757.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:44:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9616707603992076433.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8192141153738099757.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9616707603992076433.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 679 transition count 609
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 679 transition count 609
Applied a total of 34 rules in 45 ms. Remains 679 /696 variables (removed 17) and now considering 609/626 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 609 rows 679 cols
[2025-06-07 13:45:24] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:45:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 372 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 551 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 608 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:45:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/679 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 174 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 166 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/679 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 118 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:45:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/679 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 679/1288 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/679 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 608/608 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/678 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/679 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/679 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/679 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/679 variables, 11/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/679 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 609/1288 variables, 679/861 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1288 variables, 608/1469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1288/1288 variables, and 1469 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 679/679 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 608/608 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60074ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 608 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60075ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 679/696 places, 609/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60673 ms. Remains : 679/696 places, 609/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 609 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8846928334532208689.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17367689193198245425.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8846928334532208689.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17367689193198245425.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5116828674135661722.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5116828674135661722.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5116828674135661722.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5116828674135661722.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5116828674135661722.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 94 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 10 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16486233489288359810.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:46:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10572698870229455437.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16486233489288359810.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10572698870229455437.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 139 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 139 transitions
Performed 139 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 139
Iterating post reduction 0 with 139 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 695 transition count 486
Reduce places removed 139 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 141 rules applied. Total rules applied 280 place count 556 transition count 484
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 555 transition count 483
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 554 transition count 483
Performed 67 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 67 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 283 place count 554 transition count 416
Deduced a syphon composed of 67 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 134 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 487 transition count 416
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 436 place count 468 transition count 397
Iterating global reduction 4 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 468 transition count 397
Performed 16 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 16 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 455 place count 468 transition count 381
Deduced a syphon composed of 16 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 32 rules applied. Total rules applied 487 place count 452 transition count 381
Performed 157 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 157
Deduced a syphon composed of 157 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 157 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 314 rules applied. Total rules applied 801 place count 295 transition count 224
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 803 place count 293 transition count 222
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 804 place count 292 transition count 222
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 804 place count 292 transition count 220
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 808 place count 290 transition count 220
Applied a total of 808 rules in 84 ms. Remains 290 /696 variables (removed 406) and now considering 220/626 (removed 406) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 220 rows 290 cols
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Computed 110 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 126 ms returned [268, 272]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 127 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 288/696 places, 220/626 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 286 transition count 218
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 286 /288 variables (removed 2) and now considering 218/220 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 218 rows 286 cols
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Computed 108 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 306 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 286/696 places, 218/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 529 ms. Remains : 286/696 places, 218/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 218 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13821323313387370811.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11334955668299841605.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13821323313387370811.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11334955668299841605.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.34523e+42,0.651558,29184,2,532,5,101393,6,0,1364,171879,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF(((p759==1)&&(p435==1))) + (p198==0)) + (p599==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p599==1))) * !((p198==0))) * !(E(TRUE U ((p759==1)&&(p435==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t27, t216, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/to...172
(forward)formula 0,0,1.38176,41864,1,0,413,242060,461,187,8027,183127,447
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-010B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 672 transition count 602
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 672 transition count 602
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 671 transition count 601
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 671 transition count 601
Applied a total of 50 rules in 60 ms. Remains 671 /696 variables (removed 25) and now considering 601/626 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 601 rows 671 cols
[2025-06-07 13:47:27] [INFO ] Computed 111 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 181 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:47:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 408 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 590 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 600 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:47:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 167 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 145 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 130 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 117 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 97 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:47:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 671/1272 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 601/1272 variables, 671/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1272 variables, 600/1443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1272/1272 variables, and 1443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 671/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60073ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 671/696 places, 601/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60724 ms. Remains : 671/696 places, 601/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:27] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 601 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11274898176600203936.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14543623307361351441.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11274898176600203936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14543623307361351441.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5738729366495963908.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5738729366495963908.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5738729366495963908.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5738729366495963908.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5738729366495963908.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Removed a total of 99 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 20 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12478278546602094742.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:48:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1452557623732610195.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12478278546602094742.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1452557623732610195.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 696/696 places, 626/626 transitions.
Discarding 24 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 24 rule applications. Total rules 24 place count 672 transition count 602
Iterating global reduction 0 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 672 transition count 602
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 49 place count 671 transition count 601
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 671 transition count 601
Applied a total of 50 rules in 51 ms. Remains 671 /696 variables (removed 25) and now considering 601/626 (removed 25) transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:49:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 173 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:49:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 389 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 563 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 600 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:49:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 172 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 151 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 138 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/131 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 121 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 94 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:49:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 671/1272 variables, and 151 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 0/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/670 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/671 variables, 111/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 40/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 20/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/671 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 601/1272 variables, 671/843 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/1272 variables, 600/1443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 1272/1272 variables, and 1443 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 111/111 constraints, State Equation: 671/671 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 600/600 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60088ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 600 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60089ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 671/696 places, 601/626 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60705 ms. Remains : 671/696 places, 601/626 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 601 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10602056998372327511.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10228263092267053420.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10602056998372327511.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10228263092267053420.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10396712717430662814.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10396712717430662814.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10396712717430662814.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10396712717430662814.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10396712717430662814.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Removed a total of 102 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 19 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3864844401190545579.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:50:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8925305401698270189.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3864844401190545579.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8925305401698270189.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6055153261677301322.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6055153261677301322.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6055153261677301322.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6055153261677301322.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6055153261677301322.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Removed a total of 79 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17392564134188813774.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7236317811492012433.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17392564134188813774.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7236317811492012433.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 14:19:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 14:19:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 128 ms
[2025-06-07 14:19:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 14:19:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 14:19:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 22 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 14:19:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 320 ms
[2025-06-07 14:19:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 102 labels/synchronizations in 267 ms.
[2025-06-07 14:19:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2924989636744800713.gal : 22 ms
[2025-06-07 14:19:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18408004541171702519.ctl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2924989636744800713.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18408004541171702519.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-010B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-010B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500865"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-010B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-010B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;