Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533500850.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-005B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500850
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 141K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749301099044

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-005B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 87 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Transformed 393 places.
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Transformed 358 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 393 places and 358 transitions and 896 arcs in 183 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 111 out of 393 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 393/393 places, 358/358 transitions.
Discarding 37 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 37 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 356 transition count 321
Iterating global reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 356 transition count 321
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 75 place count 355 transition count 320
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 355 transition count 320
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 77 place count 354 transition count 319
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 354 transition count 319
Applied a total of 78 rules in 84 ms. Remains 354 /393 variables (removed 39) and now considering 319/358 (removed 39) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 319 rows 354 cols
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 16 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 294 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:21] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 254 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 588 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 318 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:58:21] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/354 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 95 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 98 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 7/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/103 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 319/673 variables, 354/457 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 1/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 1/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 673/673 variables, and 464 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 354/354 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 318/318 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/353 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/354 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 49/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 2/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 319/673 variables, 354/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 318/779 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 101 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 20/799 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 97 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 5/804 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 1/805 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 85 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 81 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 4/809 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60104ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 318 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60117ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 354/393 places, 319/358 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60813 ms. Remains : 354/393 places, 319/358 transitions.
Support contains 111 out of 354 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 12:59:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 319 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1502 ms. (26 steps per ms) remains 4/75 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 230 ms. (173 steps per ms) remains 4/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 209 ms. (190 steps per ms) remains 3/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (8 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
[2025-06-07 12:59:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/10 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 138/148 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 3 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 206/354 variables, 35/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 319/673 variables, 354/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/673 variables, 0/412 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 673/673 variables, and 412 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 283 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 354/354 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 59/65 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 289/354 variables, 48/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 5/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/354 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 319/673 variables, 354/417 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 2/419 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 5/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 1/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/673 variables, 0/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/673 variables, 0/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 673/673 variables, and 425 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved in 1056 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 354/354 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/3 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 1347ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 268 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 354 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 71 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 71 transitions
Performed 71 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 71
Iterating post reduction 0 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 354 transition count 248
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 283 transition count 248
Performed 34 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 34 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 283 transition count 214
Deduced a syphon composed of 34 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 249 transition count 214
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 236 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 236 transition count 201
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 236 transition count 193
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 228 transition count 193
Performed 81 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 81 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 81 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 162 rules applied. Total rules applied 414 place count 147 transition count 112
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 147 transition count 111
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 417 place count 146 transition count 110
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 445 place count 132 transition count 110
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 12 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 12 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 457 place count 132 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 458 place count 131 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 130 transition count 109
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 459 place count 130 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 463 place count 128 transition count 107
Applied a total of 463 rules in 72 ms. Remains 128 /354 variables (removed 226) and now considering 107/319 (removed 212) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 73 ms. Remains : 128/354 places, 107/319 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 388 ms. (102 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 128 cols
[2025-06-07 12:59:24] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:24] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/12 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/20 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 24/44 variables, 20/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/74 variables, 17/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 33/109 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 6/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 43/153 variables, 21/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 8/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 2/155 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 4/159 variables, 2/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 52/211 variables, 30/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 7/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 3/214 variables, 5/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 3/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 15/230 variables, 10/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (OVERLAPS) 2/232 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 3/235 variables, 4/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 235/235 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 227 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/12 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 8/20 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/20 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 24/44 variables, 20/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/44 variables, 0/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/74 variables, 17/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/75 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/76 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 33/109 variables, 17/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 6/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/109 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 1/110 variables, 2/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 43/153 variables, 21/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 8/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 2/155 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 2/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/155 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 4/159 variables, 2/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/159 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 52/211 variables, 30/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 7/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/211 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 3/214 variables, 5/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 3/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/214 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 1/215 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 15/230 variables, 10/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 3/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/230 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (OVERLAPS) 2/232 variables, 2/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/232 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (OVERLAPS) 3/235 variables, 4/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/235 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (OVERLAPS) 0/235 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 235/235 variables, and 189 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 206 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 438ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 12 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 128 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 128/128 places, 107/107 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 1 place count 128 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 127 transition count 106
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 127 transition count 105
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 126 transition count 105
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 6 place count 125 transition count 104
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 7 place count 125 transition count 104
Applied a total of 7 rules in 16 ms. Remains 125 /128 variables (removed 3) and now considering 104/107 (removed 3) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 16 ms. Remains : 125/128 places, 104/107 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 157 ms. (253 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 97 ms. (408 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1372475 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=457 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1372475 steps, saw 979546 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=456 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 104 rows 125 cols
[2025-06-07 12:59:27] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 4 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/12 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/19 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/42 variables, 19/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/72 variables, 17/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 7/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 33/107 variables, 17/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 6/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 2/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 43/151 variables, 21/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 8/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 2/153 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 4/157 variables, 2/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 49/206 variables, 29/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 7/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 3/209 variables, 5/160 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 3/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 16/226 variables, 10/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 3/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 45 (OVERLAPS) 1/227 variables, 2/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (OVERLAPS) 2/229 variables, 2/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 229/229 variables, and 185 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 224 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/12 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/19 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/42 variables, 19/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 30/72 variables, 17/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 7/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 33/107 variables, 17/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 6/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/107 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/108 variables, 2/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/108 variables, 0/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 43/151 variables, 21/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 8/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 2/153 variables, 2/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 4/157 variables, 2/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 49/206 variables, 29/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 7/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 1/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/206 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (OVERLAPS) 3/209 variables, 5/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 3/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/209 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (OVERLAPS) 1/210 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 1/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 42 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/210 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (OVERLAPS) 16/226 variables, 10/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 45 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 46 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/226 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 47 (OVERLAPS) 1/227 variables, 2/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 48 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 49 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/227 variables, 0/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 50 (OVERLAPS) 2/229 variables, 2/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 51 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 52 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 5/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 53 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 54 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 229/229 variables, and 193 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 414 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 55/55 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, ReadFeed: 4/4 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 645ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 16 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 125 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 125 /125 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 125/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 26 ms. Remains 125 /125 variables (removed 0) and now considering 104/104 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [106, 110]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 123/125 places, 104/104 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 121 transition count 102
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 121 transition count 102
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 121 /123 variables (removed 2) and now considering 102/104 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 12:59:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 110 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 177 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 121/125 places, 102/104 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 2 iterations and 281 ms. Remains : 121/125 places, 102/104 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 130 ms. (305 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 50 ms. (784 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1274907 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=424 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 1274907 steps, saw 947505 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=424 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/12 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/19 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/42 variables, 19/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 29/71 variables, 17/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 33/104 variables, 17/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 6/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 2/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 43/148 variables, 21/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 8/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 2/150 variables, 2/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 48/202 variables, 29/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 8/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 2/204 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 16/220 variables, 10/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (OVERLAPS) 1/221 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (OVERLAPS) 2/223 variables, 2/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 223/223 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 209 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 53/53 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 90.0 s and query timeout 9000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/3 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 9/12 variables, 4/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/12 variables, 0/4 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 7/19 variables, 3/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/19 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 23/42 variables, 19/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/42 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 29/71 variables, 17/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 33/104 variables, 17/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 6/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 1/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/104 variables, 0/78 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/105 variables, 2/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/105 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 43/148 variables, 21/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 8/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (OVERLAPS) 2/150 variables, 2/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 2/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 4/154 variables, 2/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/154 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 48/202 variables, 29/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 8/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (OVERLAPS) 2/204 variables, 4/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 2/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (OVERLAPS) 16/220 variables, 10/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 35 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/220 variables, 0/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 36 (OVERLAPS) 1/221 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 37 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 38 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/221 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 39 (OVERLAPS) 2/223 variables, 2/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 40 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 41 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 42 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 43 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 44 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 223/223 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved in 252 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 53/53 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 469ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 4 ms.
Support contains 3 out of 121 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 121 /121 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 121/121 places, 102/102 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 121/121 places, 102/102 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 121 /121 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 74 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 105 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 180 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 98 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 2 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 7/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/121 variables, 7/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 4/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 102/223 variables, 121/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 223/223 variables, and 188 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 4277 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 53/53 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 46/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 12/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/121 variables, 7/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 102/223 variables, 121/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 98/286 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 8/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 2/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/223 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/223 variables, 0/298 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 223/223 variables, and 298 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved in 10501 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 53/53 constraints, State Equation: 121/121 constraints, ReadFeed: 2/2 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 14792ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 98 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 14793ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 14982 ms. Remains : 121/121 places, 102/102 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 27 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 27 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 27 place count 121 transition count 102
Applied a total of 27 rules in 6 ms. Remains 121 /121 variables (removed 0) and now considering 102/102 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 1 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 102 rows 121 cols
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 53 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] After 87ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:1
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 53 positive place invariants in 6 ms returned sat
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] After 30ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 23 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] After 8ms SMT Verify possible using 23 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 3/2 trap constraints in 89 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] After 114ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] After 194ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :1
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 304 ms.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 319 transitions.
Computed a total of 85 stabilizing places and 85 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 353 transition count 244
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 279 transition count 244
Performed 33 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 33 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 279 transition count 211
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 246 transition count 211
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 232 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 232 transition count 197
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 232 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 223 transition count 188
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 148 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 148 transition count 112
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 147 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 145 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 144 transition count 109
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 144 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 142 transition count 107
Applied a total of 420 rules in 42 ms. Remains 142 /354 variables (removed 212) and now considering 107/319 (removed 212) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned [122, 126]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 71 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/354 places, 107/319 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 138 transition count 105
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 138 /140 variables (removed 2) and now considering 105/107 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 164 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 138/354 places, 105/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 283 ms. Remains : 138/354 places, 105/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 635 steps (0 resets) in 6 ms. (90 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9675628229994894447.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12132772060997636956.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality9675628229994894447.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12132772060997636956.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 337 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 337 transition count 302
Applied a total of 34 rules in 12 ms. Remains 337 /354 variables (removed 17) and now considering 302/319 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 302 rows 337 cols
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:59:47] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 270 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 301 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:59:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 302/639 variables, 337/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 3/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 639/639 variables, and 433 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 337/337 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 3/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 302/639 variables, 337/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 301/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 14 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 20/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 9/764 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/766 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 99 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 4/770 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 639/639 variables, and 770 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 337/337 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/354 places, 302/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60334 ms. Remains : 337/354 places, 302/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:00:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:00:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8860943542128901120.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1749284568029517267.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8860943542128901120.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1749284568029517267.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4426655088922348847.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4426655088922348847.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4426655088922348847.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4426655088922348847.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4426655088922348847.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 47 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 75 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 14 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16613371250736900158.gal : 21 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14751502034800213809.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16613371250736900158.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14751502034800213809.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08134e+32,6.74771,162568,3844,63,281279,534,679,790600,66,1449,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(((i0.i4.u24.p80==1)||((i18.i1.u107.p356==1)&&(i1.i0.u9.p21==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * ((i0.i4.u24.p80==1)||((i18.i1.u107.p356==1)&&(i1.i0.u9.p21==1))))] != FALSE
(forward)formula 0,1,7.55041,162568,1,0,281279,534,898,790600,94,1449,65276
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 336 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 336 transition count 301
Applied a total of 36 rules in 13 ms. Remains 336 /354 variables (removed 18) and now considering 301/319 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 336 cols
[2025-06-07 13:01:26] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 120 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:01:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 204 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 338 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:01:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 3/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 637/637 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30035 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 300/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 20/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 7/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 4/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 637/637 variables, and 768 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60094ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60095ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/354 places, 301/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60448 ms. Remains : 336/354 places, 301/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17004006574367105007.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16001306888349675277.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17004006574367105007.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16001306888349675277.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:02:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:02:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5624317043980711210.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5624317043980711210.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5624317043980711210.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5624317043980711210.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5624317043980711210.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:02:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:02:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:02:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 54 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 32 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18069877503032925510.gal : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15194938485572537383.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18069877503032925510.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15194938485572537383.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83849e+32,5.64039,160028,2530,29,299001,420,644,722163,50,1229,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EX(EX(AG((i0.i1.u4.p10==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE))) * !(E(TRUE U !((i0.i1.u4.p10==0)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t95, t98, t141, t144, t193, t233, t236, t266, t280, t284, t298, i0.t293, i0.i0.u2.t...1183
(forward)formula 0,1,10.1466,199068,1,0,364610,420,3944,1.00151e+06,287,1229,365393
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 336 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 336 transition count 301
Applied a total of 36 rules in 10 ms. Remains 336 /354 variables (removed 18) and now considering 301/319 (removed 18) transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:03:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 104 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:03:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 189 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 302 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:03:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 3/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 637/637 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 300/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 20/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 7/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 4/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 637/637 variables, and 768 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/354 places, 301/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60364 ms. Remains : 336/354 places, 301/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:07] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5756590825494693758.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2308773154389276387.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5756590825494693758.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2308773154389276387.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1882057483539194298.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1882057483539194298.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1882057483539194298.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1882057483539194298.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1882057483539194298.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14096592055786100392.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability40720996742592974.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14096592055786100392.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability40720996742592974.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83849e+32,3.1472,89752,1977,49,166817,534,628,323941,59,1415,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(((i17.i1.u101.p324==1)&&(i17.i3.u119.p386==1))) + EG(E(AX(EF((i5.i2.u45.p144==1))) U (EF(EG((i13.i0.u78.p248==1))) + ((i10.i0.u54.p17...187
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((i17.i1.u101.p324==1)&&(i17.i3.u119.p386==1)))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,E(!(EX(!(E(TRUE U (i...275
(forward)formula 0,1,3.15358,89752,1,0,166817,534,640,323941,62,1415,143
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 67 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 67 transitions
Performed 67 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 67
Iterating post reduction 0 with 67 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 353 transition count 251
Reduce places removed 67 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 5 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 5
Iterating post reduction 1 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 286 transition count 246
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 281 transition count 246
Performed 33 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 33 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 281 transition count 213
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 210 place count 248 transition count 213
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 235 transition count 200
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 235 transition count 200
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 236 place count 235 transition count 192
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 227 transition count 192
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 152 transition count 117
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 403 place count 152 transition count 116
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 405 place count 150 transition count 114
Applied a total of 405 rules in 29 ms. Remains 150 /354 variables (removed 204) and now considering 114/319 (removed 205) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 150 cols
[2025-06-07 13:04:40] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:04:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 174 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:41] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 112 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/150 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 114/264 variables, 150/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/264 variables, 0/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 264/264 variables, and 206 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 3971 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 150/150 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 54/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/150 variables, 2/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/150 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 114/264 variables, 150/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 112/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/264 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/264 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 264/264 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved in 4543 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 150/150 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 112/112 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 8520ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 112 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8520ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 150/354 places, 114/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8728 ms. Remains : 150/354 places, 114/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5033369042917595644.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3701975065941360404.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5033369042917595644.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3701975065941360404.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.72187e+22,0.365914,18640,2,273,5,60621,6,0,717,101462,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((p388==0) * (((AG((p277!=1)) * (p80!=1)) * ((p23!=1)||(p25!=1))) + ((p142==0)&&(p354==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p388==0)))] = FALSE * (([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((p142==0)&&(p354==0)))),TRUE) * !((...337
(forward)formula 0,0,0.367915,18768,1,0,11,60621,11,4,736,101462,2
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 338 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 338 transition count 303
Applied a total of 32 rules in 9 ms. Remains 338 /354 variables (removed 16) and now considering 303/319 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 303 rows 338 cols
[2025-06-07 13:04:50] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 141 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:04:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 212 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 354 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 302 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 14/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 3/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 641/641 variables, and 435 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 41/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 302/737 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 20/757 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 11/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/770 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 641/641 variables, and 770 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60048ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/354 places, 303/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60414 ms. Remains : 338/354 places, 303/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 303 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17341360406239846282.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16423048129329133444.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17341360406239846282.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16423048129329133444.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10203420225902322270.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10203420225902322270.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10203420225902322270.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10203420225902322270.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10203420225902322270.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 17 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14326300072079890667.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6435864463673168295.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14326300072079890667.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6435864463673168295.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.09479e+32,6.6465,169532,3220,43,297325,803,670,785757,56,2215,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(EF((((A((i15.i1.u93.p306==1) U (i5.i1.u40.p134==1)) * AX((i11.u61.p194==1))) * ((i17.i1.u116.p380==1)&&(i8.u1.p7==1))) * (i1.i0.u8....166
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(E(TRUE U (((!((E(!((i5.i1.u40.p134==1)) U (!((i15.i1.u93.p306==1)) * !((i5.i1.u40.p134==1)))) + EG...288
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t56, t97, t100, t103, t143, t146, t195, t235, t238, t268, t277, t286, t300, i0.t228, i0....1224
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 74 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 74 transitions
Performed 74 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 74
Iterating post reduction 0 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 353 transition count 244
Reduce places removed 74 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 74 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 279 transition count 244
Performed 33 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 33 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 279 transition count 211
Deduced a syphon composed of 33 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 33 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 66 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 246 transition count 211
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 232 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 232 transition count 197
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 232 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 223 transition count 188
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 148 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 148 transition count 112
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 147 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 145 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 144 transition count 109
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 144 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 142 transition count 107
Applied a total of 420 rules in 34 ms. Remains 142 /354 variables (removed 212) and now considering 107/319 (removed 212) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-07 13:06:50] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned [122, 126]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 97 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/354 places, 107/319 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 138 transition count 105
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 138 /140 variables (removed 2) and now considering 105/107 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-07 13:06:50] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:06:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 109 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 184 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 138/354 places, 105/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 321 ms. Remains : 138/354 places, 105/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 504 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (63 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6949462826152528985.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10353084374734419511.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6949462826152528985.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10353084374734419511.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 340 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 340 transition count 305
Applied a total of 28 rules in 7 ms. Remains 340 /354 variables (removed 14) and now considering 305/319 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 305 rows 340 cols
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 175 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 283 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 304 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:06:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 15/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 3/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 305/645 variables, 340/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 2/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 3/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 1/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 645/645 variables, and 440 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 340/340 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 304/304 constraints, Known Traps: 41/41 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 41/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 305/645 variables, 340/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 304/741 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 20/761 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 7/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 4/772 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 3/775 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 3/778 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 645/645 variables, and 778 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 340/340 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 304/304 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 60035ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60036ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 340/354 places, 305/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60327 ms. Remains : 340/354 places, 305/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 305 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14112437606566435706.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15065855808602296648.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14112437606566435706.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15065855808602296648.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2924544701933446918.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2924544701933446918.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2924544701933446918.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2924544701933446918.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2924544701933446918.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10178302462418380134.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4318969634492003946.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10178302462418380134.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4318969634492003946.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.38305e+32,9.84963,223000,3898,55,351933,567,655,1.28679e+06,64,1433,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((EG(!(A((EF((i18.i0.u99.p319==1)) + (i4.i1.u20.p62!=1)) U (i12.u92.p294==1)))) + !(E(EF(((i15.i2.u80.p253==1)&&(i13.i1.u86.p280==1))) U ...363
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((Init * !((EG(!(!((E(!((i12.u92.p294==1)) U (!((E(TRUE U (i18.i0.u99.p319==1)) + (i4.i1.u20.p62!=1))) * !((i1...838
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t56, t97, t100, t151, t197, t237, t240, t279, t288, t297, t302, i0.t28, i0.u116.t32, i1.i0.u9...1256
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 340 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 340 transition count 305
Applied a total of 28 rules in 22 ms. Remains 340 /354 variables (removed 14) and now considering 305/319 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 305 rows 340 cols
[2025-06-07 13:08:51] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:08:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 182 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 284 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 304 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:08:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 305/645 variables, 340/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 1/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 41 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 4/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 0/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 645/645 variables, and 432 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 340/340 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 304/304 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 32/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 305/645 variables, 340/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 304/732 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 111 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 20/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 13/765 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 88 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 4/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 1/770 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60044ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 340/354 places, 305/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60352 ms. Remains : 340/354 places, 305/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 305 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15806287488314300110.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13067270044492808575.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15806287488314300110.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13067270044492808575.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6016502869654513265.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6016502869654513265.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6016502869654513265.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6016502869654513265.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6016502869654513265.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8250831105522962909.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7558491832004420295.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8250831105522962909.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7558491832004420295.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.76e+32,11.1409,225756,4127,30,343939,472,697,1.22845e+06,53,1222,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX(((A(((i13.i2.u97.p311==1)&&(i6.u46.p141==1)) U ((i19.i2.u113.p364==1)||((i5.i3.u36.p115==1)&&(i6.u48.p148==1)))) * !(((AF(((i10.i0.u...979
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((!(((!((((i8.i2.u57.p178==1)&&(i11.i1.u71.p225==1))&&(i2.i1.u8.p20==1))) * E(TRUE U (i18.u122...3040
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t53, t98, t104, t144, t147, t197, t237, t240, t275, t278, t280, t284, t288, t289, t302, ...1278
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 336 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 336 transition count 301
Applied a total of 36 rules in 7 ms. Remains 336 /354 variables (removed 18) and now considering 301/319 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 336 cols
[2025-06-07 13:10:52] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:10:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 187 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 287 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:10:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 3/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 637/637 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 300/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 20/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 7/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 4/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 637/637 variables, and 768 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60041ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/354 places, 301/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60335 ms. Remains : 336/354 places, 301/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:11:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:11:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3367802488153053117.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4179081611860343207.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3367802488153053117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4179081611860343207.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8388095386413946918.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8388095386413946918.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8388095386413946918.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8388095386413946918.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8388095386413946918.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16545283774909469427.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16954727450004154560.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16545283774909469427.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16954727450004154560.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83849e+32,5.75832,158004,2493,29,303922,402,606,766303,45,1085,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!((!((AF((i7.u15.p46==1)) * AX(((i2.i1.u12.p37==1)&&(i2.i1.u12.p39==1))))) + (i2.i2.u26.p80!=1))) U E((i19.i2.u119.p376!=1) U !(AF((((i...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E((i19.i2.u119.p376!=1) U !(!(EG(!((((i0.i3.u84.p265==1)||(i15.i0.u81.p252==1))&&((i12.i1.u61.p...600
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t55, t101, t141, t144, t193, t233, t236, t266, t280, t284, t293, i0.t271, i0.t98, i0.t95...1168
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 75 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 75 transitions
Performed 75 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 75
Iterating post reduction 0 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 75 place count 353 transition count 243
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 75 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 278 transition count 243
Performed 32 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 32 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 278 transition count 211
Deduced a syphon composed of 32 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 32 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 64 rules applied. Total rules applied 214 place count 246 transition count 211
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 228 place count 232 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 232 transition count 197
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 232 transition count 188
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 223 transition count 188
Performed 75 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 75
Deduced a syphon composed of 75 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 75 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 150 rules applied. Total rules applied 410 place count 148 transition count 113
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 411 place count 148 transition count 112
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 413 place count 147 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 415 place count 145 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 144 transition count 109
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 416 place count 144 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 142 transition count 107
Applied a total of 420 rules in 22 ms. Remains 142 /354 variables (removed 212) and now considering 107/319 (removed 212) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-07 13:12:52] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned [121, 125]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 85 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/354 places, 107/319 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 138 transition count 105
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 138 /140 variables (removed 2) and now considering 105/107 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-07 13:12:52] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 71 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 93 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 138/354 places, 105/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 276 ms. Remains : 138/354 places, 105/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 48 steps (0 resets) in 4 ms. (9 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6534645767103010996.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1067989193809590176.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality6534645767103010996.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality1067989193809590176.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 336 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 336 transition count 301
Applied a total of 36 rules in 9 ms. Remains 336 /354 variables (removed 18) and now considering 301/319 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 336 cols
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 189 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 298 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:12:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 3/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 637/637 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 300/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 20/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 7/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 4/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 637/637 variables, and 768 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60050ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60051ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/354 places, 301/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60358 ms. Remains : 336/354 places, 301/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17754696354698268291.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11396067188338500014.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17754696354698268291.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11396067188338500014.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12154745998933311534.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12154745998933311534.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12154745998933311534.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12154745998933311534.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12154745998933311534.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1240821370987845609.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability790086157649952766.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1240821370987845609.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability790086157649952766.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83849e+32,7.07238,187936,5604,43,319375,777,641,758881,59,2330,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((AF(AG((i8.u46.p145==1))) * EF((i0.u91.p298==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!(!(E(TRUE U !((i8.u46.p145==1))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (i0.u91.p298==1))))] = F...160
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t55, t95, t98, t141, t144, t187, t190, t233, t236, t266, t271, t280, t284, t298, i0.t71, i0.u...1180
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 337 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 337 transition count 302
Applied a total of 34 rules in 15 ms. Remains 337 /354 variables (removed 17) and now considering 302/319 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 302 rows 337 cols
[2025-06-07 13:14:53] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 90 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:14:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 191 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 281 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 301 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:14:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 13/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 302/639 variables, 337/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 6/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 639/639 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 337/337 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 35/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 302/639 variables, 337/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 301/730 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 20/750 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 10/760 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 4/764 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 1/765 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 8/773 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 639/639 variables, and 773 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 337/337 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
After SMT, in 60045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/354 places, 302/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60343 ms. Remains : 337/354 places, 302/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1853202154875914975.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11243573590744723254.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1853202154875914975.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11243573590744723254.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11000789170852740557.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11000789170852740557.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11000789170852740557.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11000789170852740557.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11000789170852740557.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11064985064968121671.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1156180728990104799.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11064985064968121671.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1156180728990104799.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.0824e+32,3.52385,96568,2300,43,180982,554,622,341519,56,1489,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!(E(((i0.i1.u54.p170==1)&&(i12.i1.u71.p232==1)) U ((i19.i1.u101.p324==1)&&(i20.i1.u119.p386==1)))) U ((AG(((i1.i1.u13.p38==1)&&(i5.u21...383
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((Init * !(!((E(!(((!(E(TRUE U !(((i1.i1.u13.p38==1)&&(i5.u21.p71==1))))) * EG(((i1.i0.u3.p8!=1)&&((i12.i1.u...878
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t95, t98, t141, t144, t187, t190, t234, t237, t272, t281, t285, t294, i0.t147, i0.i...1206
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 340 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 340 transition count 305
Applied a total of 28 rules in 8 ms. Remains 340 /354 variables (removed 14) and now considering 305/319 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 305 rows 340 cols
[2025-06-07 13:16:54] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 108 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:16:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 194 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 303 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 304 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:16:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 305/645 variables, 340/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 3/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 4/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 4/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 1/444 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 645/645 variables, and 444 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 340/340 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 304/304 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/340 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 48/104 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 1/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 305/645 variables, 340/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 304/749 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 20/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 6/775 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 84 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 84 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 79 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 71 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 59 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/645 variables, 20/795 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 645/645 variables, and 795 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 340/340 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 304/304 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 20/20 constraints]
After SMT, in 60040ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 304 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60040ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 340/354 places, 305/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60352 ms. Remains : 340/354 places, 305/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 305 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6561344008523757114.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12679208655600310855.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6561344008523757114.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12679208655600310855.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7679057248835608024.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7679057248835608024.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7679057248835608024.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7679057248835608024.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7679057248835608024.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 46 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3267951099668275005.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18418886611193071497.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3267951099668275005.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18418886611193071497.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.69958e+32,8.29474,203468,2981,43,358581,431,671,973012,56,1147,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(E(EF(AX(((i11.i2.u86.p268==1)&&(i11.i2.u86.p270==1)))) U (i1.i1.u9.p21==1)) U E(AX(A((i9.i0.u56.p167==1) U (i3.i2.u47.p147!=1))) U A(!(...273
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(FwdU(Init,E(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i11.i2.u86.p268==1)&&(i11.i2.u86.p270==1)))))) U (i1.i1.u9.p21==1))),!(EX(...857
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t101, t142, t145, t191, t194, t237, t240, t270, t278, t293, t295, i0.t302, i0.t297,...1306
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 337 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 337 transition count 302
Applied a total of 34 rules in 15 ms. Remains 337 /354 variables (removed 17) and now considering 302/319 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 302 rows 337 cols
[2025-06-07 13:18:54] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:18:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 202 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 304 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 301 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:18:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 12/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 302/639 variables, 337/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 3/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 639/639 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 337/337 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 302/639 variables, 337/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 301/733 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 20/753 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 7/760 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 1/761 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/763 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 639/639 variables, and 764 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 337/337 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60045ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60046ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/354 places, 302/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60365 ms. Remains : 337/354 places, 302/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:19:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:19:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10612427862526670679.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14184429217823470949.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10612427862526670679.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14184429217823470949.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9096630385881806254.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9096630385881806254.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9096630385881806254.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9096630385881806254.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9096630385881806254.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3714715205174833866.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13979188703056979726.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3714715205174833866.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13979188703056979726.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.86584e+32,3.38097,89116,2346,43,154281,982,646,359310,54,2498,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX((i5.i1.u31.p98==1)) U EF((EF((i5.i2.u42.p137==1)) + (i13.i1.u92.p299==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U (i5.i2.u42.p137==1)) + (i13.i1.u92.p299==1))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U (E(TRUE U...321
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t55, t95, t98, t141, t144, t188, t191, t234, t240, t272, t281, t285, t299, i0.t237, i0.i0.u1....1195
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 354/354 places, 319/319 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 338 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 338 transition count 303
Applied a total of 32 rules in 8 ms. Remains 338 /354 variables (removed 16) and now considering 303/319 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 303 rows 338 cols
[2025-06-07 13:20:55] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 8 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 119 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:20:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 194 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 314 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 302 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:20:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 4/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 3/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 5/438 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 641/641 variables, and 438 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 39/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 302/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 104 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 20/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 5/760 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/761 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 3/764 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 89 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 5/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 5/774 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 641/641 variables, and 774 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 60037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/354 places, 303/319 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60361 ms. Remains : 338/354 places, 303/319 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 303 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9620637936386413875.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15304507994154930841.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9620637936386413875.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15304507994154930841.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2632124233009724331.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2632124233009724331.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2632124233009724331.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2632124233009724331.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2632124233009724331.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 50 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability374487090061637906.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7392265524461097712.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability374487090061637906.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7392265524461097712.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08935e+32,4.10177,100688,2545,43,188547,1067,642,361887,54,2698,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A((EX(!(((i2.i2.u20.p61!=1) * EG((i10.i1.u73.p230==1))))) + AF((i2.i0.u7.p17==1))) U !(EG(((EF(((i5.i1.u35.p108==1)&&(i9.u51.p160==1)))...253
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(Init,!(!(EG(((E(TRUE U ((i5.i1.u35.p108==1)&&(i9.u51.p160==1))) + ((i18.i2.u116.p366==1)&&(i9.u51.p...684
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t95, t98, t142, t145, t189, t192, t235, t238, t268, t273, t282, t291, t295, i0.t135...1210
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 20
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8496505159741185942.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8496505159741185942.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8496505159741185942.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8496505159741185942.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8496505159741185942.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5426659308789178478.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability19409552269766040.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5426659308789178478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability19409552269766040.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.55074e+32,36.9678,762788,4848,30,1.22392e+06,676,719,3.54719e+06,58,3213,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(EF((((A((i15.i2.u104.p306==1) U (i5.i3.u42.p134==1)) * AX((i10.u65.p194==1))) * ((i16.u125.p380==1)&&(i0.i0.u2.p7==1))) * (i0.i1.u1...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(E(TRUE U (((!((E(!((i5.i3.u42.p134==1)) U (!((i15.i2.u104.p306==1)) * !((i5.i3.u42.p134==1)))) + E...290
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t53, t56, t103, t106, t158, t204, t207, t254, t257, t292, t293, t294, t303, t307, t309, t311,...1499
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 17
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 18
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 19
(forward)formula 0,0,47.0169,762788,1,0,1.22392e+06,676,3959,3.54719e+06,327,3213,870863
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 22 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5191560410814277955.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:51:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1171856822442028684.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5191560410814277955.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1171856822442028684.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-005B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-005B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500850"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-005B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-005B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;