Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533500849.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-005B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500849
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 564K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.5K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 81K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 46K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 28K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 13K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 141K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 7.9K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 66K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 92K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749301070869

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-005B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 83 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Transformed 393 places.
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Transformed 358 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 393 places and 358 transitions and 896 arcs in 177 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 117 out of 393 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 393/393 places, 358/358 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 366 transition count 331
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 366 transition count 331
Applied a total of 54 rules in 64 ms. Remains 366 /393 variables (removed 27) and now considering 331/358 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 331 rows 366 cols
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 299 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 240 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 568 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 330 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:57:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/366 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 124 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 87 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 20/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 11/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 331/697 variables, 366/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/697 variables, 5/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 102 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/697 variables, 3/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/697 variables, 1/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 697/697 variables, and 482 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved in 30053 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 366/366 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 330/330 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/365 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/366 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 60/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/366 variables, 0/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 331/697 variables, 366/482 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/697 variables, 330/812 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 108 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/697 variables, 20/832 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/697 variables, 15/847 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/697 variables, 7/854 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 78 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/697 variables, 2/856 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 697/697 variables, and 856 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 366/366 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 330/330 constraints, Known Traps: 104/104 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60133ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 330 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60152ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 366/393 places, 331/358 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60803 ms. Remains : 366/393 places, 331/358 transitions.
Support contains 117 out of 366 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 12:58:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 44 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 331 transitions.
Support contains 107 out of 366 places (down from 117) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1246 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 3/67 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 210 ms. (189 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 35334 steps (7 resets) in 155 ms. (226 steps per ms) remains 0/2 properties
[2025-06-07 12:58:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 331 transitions.
Computed a total of 88 stabilizing places and 88 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 340 transition count 305
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 340 transition count 305
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 339 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 339 transition count 304
Applied a total of 54 rules in 102 ms. Remains 339 /366 variables (removed 27) and now considering 304/331 (removed 27) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 304 rows 339 cols
[2025-06-07 12:58:54] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 130 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:58:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 217 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 350 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 303 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:58:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/339 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 89 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:58:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 304/643 variables, 339/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 1/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 1/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 2/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 643/643 variables, and 432 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 339/339 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 303/303 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/339 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 37/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/339 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 304/643 variables, 339/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 303/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 64 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 20/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 11/766 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 3/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/643 variables, 2/771 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 643/643 variables, and 771 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 339/339 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 303/303 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 303 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 339/366 places, 304/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60503 ms. Remains : 339/366 places, 304/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 304 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2308508255640170337.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:59:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17037832161893848574.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2308508255640170337.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17037832161893848574.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11753737771360113406.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11753737771360113406.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11753737771360113406.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11753737771360113406.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11753737771360113406.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:00:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 54 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 53 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5539867711247021806.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15250625650013528078.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5539867711247021806.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15250625650013528078.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.09695e+32,5.33369,156012,4496,29,283036,399,649,826527,50,958,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(((i0.u1.p3==0)&&(i12.u75.p226==1))) * (AG((((i17.i1.i0.u108.p324==0)&&(i7.u49.p149==0))&&((i17.i1.i2.u120.p366==1)&&((i8.u66.p203=...304
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((i0.u1.p3==0)&&(i12.u75.p226==1))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((i17.i1.i0.u108.p324==0)&&(i7.u49.p...385
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t101, t142, t145, t189, t192, t236, t239, t269, t278, t283, t287, t292, t295, t301,...1126
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 72 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 72 transitions
Performed 72 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 72
Iterating post reduction 0 with 72 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 365 transition count 258
Reduce places removed 72 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 73 rules applied. Total rules applied 145 place count 293 transition count 257
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 292 transition count 257
Performed 29 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 29 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 292 transition count 228
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 263 transition count 228
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 223 place count 244 transition count 209
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 244 transition count 209
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 242 place count 244 transition count 197
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 266 place count 232 transition count 197
Performed 77 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 77 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 154 rules applied. Total rules applied 420 place count 155 transition count 120
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 422 place count 153 transition count 118
Applied a total of 422 rules in 91 ms. Remains 153 /366 variables (removed 213) and now considering 118/331 (removed 213) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 153 cols
[2025-06-07 13:00:55] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 113 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:00:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 266 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 8 ms returned []
Running 114 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:00:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/153 variables, 4/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 2/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 118/271 variables, 153/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 1/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:00:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/214 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 271/271 variables, and 214 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 7281 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 52/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/149 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/153 variables, 4/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/153 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 118/271 variables, 153/212 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 114/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 2/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/271 variables, 0/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 271/271 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 8252 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 153/153 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 15540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 15541ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 153/366 places, 118/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 15911 ms. Remains : 153/366 places, 118/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:01:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:01:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11736298329313238257.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7299794489677908689.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11736298329313238257.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7299794489677908689.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.22425e+22,1.28866,50916,2,528,5,188885,6,0,731,340078,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((p31==0) * !(E(AG(((p227==0)||(p50==1))) U ((p153==0)||(p352==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p31==0)) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(((p227==0)||(p50==1))))) U ((p153==0)||(p352==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t10, t16, t17, t37, t40, t42, t46, t48, t50, t51, t54, t5...267
(forward)formula 0,0,1.48632,50916,1,0,269,188885,262,121,4338,340078,261
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 337 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 337 transition count 302
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 336 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 336 transition count 301
Applied a total of 60 rules in 27 ms. Remains 336 /366 variables (removed 30) and now considering 301/331 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 336 cols
[2025-06-07 13:01:12] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 114 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:01:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 211 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 326 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:01:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 3/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 637/637 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 300/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 20/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 7/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:01:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 4/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 637/637 variables, and 768 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/366 places, 301/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60407 ms. Remains : 336/366 places, 301/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:02:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:02:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7329145150952844075.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14880381465708544314.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7329145150952844075.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14880381465708544314.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3721703677967361982.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3721703677967361982.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3721703677967361982.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3721703677967361982.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3721703677967361982.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5399800737431970793.gal : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12572358189842079177.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5399800737431970793.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12572358189842079177.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83849e+32,3.83113,102292,2383,49,179509,523,619,410657,59,1309,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AX(AG((i7.i0.u27.p87==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i7.i0.u27.p87==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t55, t95, t98, t141, t144, t187, t193, t233, t239, t271, t280, t289, t298, i0.t236, i0.i0.u2....1178
(forward)formula 0,1,9.0185,194708,1,0,347950,523,3591,925104,343,1541,374588
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 339 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 339 transition count 304
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 338 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 338 transition count 303
Applied a total of 56 rules in 14 ms. Remains 338 /366 variables (removed 28) and now considering 303/331 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 303 rows 338 cols
[2025-06-07 13:02:52] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 102 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:02:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 190 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 312 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 302 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:02:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 16/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 2/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 4/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/437 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 641/641 variables, and 437 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 302/734 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 94 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 20/754 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 13/767 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 6/773 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/774 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60039ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60040ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60367 ms. Remains : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 303 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14434042947841799289.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:03:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2626888479814768894.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14434042947841799289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2626888479814768894.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8930890828829211983.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8930890828829211983.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8930890828829211983.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8930890828829211983.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8930890828829211983.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1536556004317225353.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15278336974136336767.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1536556004317225353.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15278336974136336767.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.36898e+32,7.62812,202504,3343,52,366408,544,653,1.0888e+06,61,1577,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AF(((((i2.i1.u26.p78==1)||(i15.u83.p278==1))&&(i17.i2.u117.p391==1)) * ((EG(((i0.u73.p239==0)||(i9.i0.u32.p98==1))) + EG((i14.i1.u95....309
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EG(!(((((i2.i1.u26.p78==1)||(i15.u83.p278==1))&&(i17.i2.u117.p391==1)) * ((EG(((i0.u73.p239==0)|...467
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t55, t96, t99, t148, t195, t235, t238, t277, t286, t300, i1.t295, i1.i0.u2.t245, i1.i2.u...1232
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 338 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 338 transition count 303
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 57 place count 337 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 337 transition count 302
Applied a total of 58 rules in 13 ms. Remains 337 /366 variables (removed 29) and now considering 302/331 (removed 29) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 302 rows 337 cols
[2025-06-07 13:04:53] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 100 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:04:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 207 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 308 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 301 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:04:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:04:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 302/639 variables, 337/424 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 1/425 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 2/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 1/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 639/639 variables, and 431 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 337/337 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/337 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 302/639 variables, 337/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 301/732 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 96 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 20/752 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 9/761 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 76 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 3/764 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/639 variables, 1/765 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 639/639 variables, and 765 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 337/337 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 301/301 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60051ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 301 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60053ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 337/366 places, 302/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60375 ms. Remains : 337/366 places, 302/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:05:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 302 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:05:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13829608125564543081.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:05:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13162817039074259719.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13829608125564543081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13162817039074259719.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13247130602240036466.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13247130602240036466.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13247130602240036466.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13247130602240036466.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13247130602240036466.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9788866775919955826.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6818794230429431188.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9788866775919955826.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6818794230429431188.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.12564e+32,5.30689,138540,4098,47,248784,582,644,523116,59,1468,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(E(((i17.u107.p347==1) + (EG((i13.i0.u78.p248==0)) * ((i10.i2.u55.p179==0)||(i6.i0.u59.p188==1)))) U (((i5.i1.u33.p99!=1) * !(AX((i5.i1...317
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(((i17.u107.p347==1) + (EG((i13.i0.u78.p248==0)) * ((i10.i2.u55.p179==0)||(i6.i0.u59.p188==1))))...441
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t95, t98, t141, t144, t188, t191, t234, t237, t272, t281, t285, t294, i0.t299, i0.i...1214
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 28 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 28 rule applications. Total rules 28 place count 338 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 338 transition count 303
Applied a total of 56 rules in 14 ms. Remains 338 /366 variables (removed 28) and now considering 303/331 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 303 rows 338 cols
[2025-06-07 13:06:53] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 146 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:06:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 182 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 329 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 302 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:06:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 92 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:06:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 13/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 3/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 641/641 variables, and 433 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 302/734 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 72 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 20/754 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 91 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 87 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 92 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 85 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 8/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 87 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 78 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 4/766 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 2/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60038ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60039ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60385 ms. Remains : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 303 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1790176763795167183.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:07:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11237572993618247565.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1790176763795167183.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11237572993618247565.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10378405172952967144.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10378405172952967144.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10378405172952967144.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10378405172952967144.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10378405172952967144.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10117245313785542434.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10940230239498858984.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10117245313785542434.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10940230239498858984.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.2041e+32,2.67101,78636,2315,55,141173,465,659,299359,61,1260,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(EG((i14.i2.u115.p372==0))) + AX(((((i13.i1.u57.p180==0)||(i6.i0.u28.p89==1)) + EG((AX(((i14.i1.u106.p346==0)||(i4.i0.u35.p111==1))) +...276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY((Init * !(!(EG(!(EG((i14.i2.u115.p372==0)))))))) * !(((i13.i1.u57.p180==0)||(i6.i0.u28.p89==1)))) * !(EG(...416
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t54, t97, t100, t143, t146, t189, t192, t235, t238, t273, t277, t286, t300, i0.t295, i0....1210
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 339 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 339 transition count 304
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 338 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 338 transition count 303
Applied a total of 56 rules in 22 ms. Remains 338 /366 variables (removed 28) and now considering 303/331 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 303 rows 338 cols
[2025-06-07 13:08:54] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 116 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 195 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 312 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 302 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:08:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:08:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 12/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 4/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 5/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 4/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 641/641 variables, and 440 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 42/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 302/738 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 88 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 20/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 9/767 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 4/771 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 4/775 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 641/641 variables, and 775 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 60052ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60052ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60387 ms. Remains : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 303 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1798966048272586022.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:09:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3274123897694444642.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1798966048272586022.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3274123897694444642.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3891962046463991184.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3891962046463991184.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3891962046463991184.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3891962046463991184.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3891962046463991184.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2000994168268400083.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6800469721763329362.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2000994168268400083.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6800469721763329362.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37387e+32,4.26584,117924,2854,50,210612,469,638,534123,59,1264,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(EG(!(E((i3.u14.p51==1) U (i2.i2.u19.p55==1))))) * EG((((((i6.i1.u32.p100==0)&&(i1.i1.u4.p11==1))||(i8.u50.p154==0))||((i9.i2.u60.p18...255
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E((i3.u14.p51==1) U (i2.i2.u19.p55==1))))))] = FALSE * [(Init * !(EG((((((i6.i1.u32.p100==0)...344
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t50, t53, t96, t99, t148, t189, t192, t235, t238, t273, t277, t291, t300, i0.i1.u108.t52, i0....1210
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 337 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 337 transition count 302
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 336 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 336 transition count 301
Applied a total of 60 rules in 20 ms. Remains 336 /366 variables (removed 30) and now considering 301/331 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 336 cols
[2025-06-07 13:10:54] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 106 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:10:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 198 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 317 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:10:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:10:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 81 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 3/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 637/637 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 300/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 20/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 7/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 4/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 637/637 variables, and 768 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60048ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60049ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/366 places, 301/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60389 ms. Remains : 336/366 places, 301/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6533536924890835043.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:11:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality311362719599547485.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6533536924890835043.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality311362719599547485.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7587975261550879486.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7587975261550879486.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7587975261550879486.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7587975261550879486.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7587975261550879486.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 53 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11654896871894491100.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14757147014609737677.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11654896871894491100.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14757147014609737677.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83849e+32,3.07329,86424,2547,50,154486,423,642,360433,59,1065,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i14.i4.u97.p309==1) + EX(A(A(((i18.i1.u108.p347==0)||(i7.i0.u38.p117==1)) U (i20.i0.u106.p334==1)) U ((i6.i1.u32.p96==0)||(i8.i0.u34....203
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((EX(TRUE) * (i6.i2.u41.p129!=0)))))) * !(E(!((EX(TRUE) * (i6.i2.u41.p129!=0))) U (!(((i14.i4.u9...526
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t101, t141, t144, t187, t190, t233, t236, t266, t275, t289, t293, i0.i0.u2.t243, i0...1179
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 68 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 68 transitions
Performed 68 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 68
Iterating post reduction 0 with 68 rules applied. Total rules applied 68 place count 365 transition count 262
Reduce places removed 68 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 71 rules applied. Total rules applied 139 place count 297 transition count 259
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 295 transition count 259
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 141 place count 295 transition count 231
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 267 transition count 231
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 216 place count 248 transition count 212
Iterating global reduction 3 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 248 transition count 212
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 235 place count 248 transition count 200
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 236 transition count 200
Performed 71 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 71
Deduced a syphon composed of 71 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 71 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 142 rules applied. Total rules applied 401 place count 165 transition count 129
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 402 place count 164 transition count 128
Applied a total of 402 rules in 45 ms. Remains 164 /366 variables (removed 202) and now considering 128/331 (removed 203) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 164 cols
[2025-06-07 13:12:55] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:12:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 102 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 173 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 3 ms returned []
Running 126 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:12:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/164 variables, 54/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 9/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 128/292 variables, 164/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 292/292 variables, and 231 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 5901 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 2/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/162 variables, 0/2 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/164 variables, 54/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 9/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/164 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 128/292 variables, 164/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 126/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 2/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 4/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 1/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/292 variables, 0/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/292 variables, 0/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 292/292 variables, and 362 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved in 20898 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 164/164 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 126/126 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 26807ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 126 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 26808ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 164/366 places, 128/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 27031 ms. Remains : 164/366 places, 128/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10674859561754025343.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16155951178778172595.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10674859561754025343.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16155951178778172595.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.97639e+22,0.946395,38288,2,1086,5,129882,6,0,785,245204,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((!((p99==0)||(p78==1)))||(!(((p360==0)||(p175==1))||(p255==1)))) U ((((p375==0)||(p148==1))&&(((p355==0)||(p18==0))||(p2==1))) + (A...209
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((((p375==0)||(p148==1))&&(((p355==0)||(p18==0))||(p2==1))) + (!(E(TRUE U !((p227==1)))) * (((...549
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t17, t19, t22, t45, t46, t48, t50...350
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2808056144987124679.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2808056144987124679.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2808056144987124679.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2808056144987124679.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2808056144987124679.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 16 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6874060228932284083.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:13:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12735844226746276556.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6874060228932284083.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12735844226746276556.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.97639e+22,0.327144,16508,249,40,24559,215,435,57660,52,988,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(A(((!((i2.u13.p99==0)||(i1.i2.u10.p78==1)))||(!(((i14.u47.p360==0)||(i5.i1.u23.p175==1))||(i10.u32.p255==1)))) U ((((i12.i1.u50.p375==...329
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(!(((((i12.i1.u50.p375==0)||(i2.u18.p148==1))&&(((i12.i0.u46.p355==0)||(i0.i1.u2.p18==0))||(i9.u0...823
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t108, t124, i0.i0.u3.t0, i0.i0.u6.t79, i0.i1.u7.t48, i1.i0.u5.t2, i1.i0.u8.t50, i1.i1.u4.t1, ...654
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 25 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 25 rule applications. Total rules 25 place count 341 transition count 306
Iterating global reduction 0 with 25 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 341 transition count 306
Applied a total of 50 rules in 15 ms. Remains 341 /366 variables (removed 25) and now considering 306/331 (removed 25) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 306 rows 341 cols
[2025-06-07 13:14:22] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 95 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:14:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 177 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 274 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 305 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:14:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/341 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 14/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 306/647 variables, 341/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 3/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 5/439 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 1/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 647/647 variables, and 440 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 341/341 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 305/305 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/340 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/341 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 42/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/341 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 306/647 variables, 341/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 305/745 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 83 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:14:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 20/765 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 8/773 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 4/777 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 2/779 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/647 variables, 1/780 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 60029ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 305 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60029ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 341/366 places, 306/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60319 ms. Remains : 341/366 places, 306/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:15:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 306 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:15:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15199943887417248104.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8961599969438092832.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15199943887417248104.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8961599969438092832.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8902111230846013171.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8902111230846013171.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8902111230846013171.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8902111230846013171.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8902111230846013171.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4238217745324522263.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:15:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17642829103073137920.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4238217745324522263.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17642829103073137920.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.50543e+32,11.8974,285368,4794,30,507402,374,655,1.44444e+06,55,1006,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((((i17.i2.u106.p339==0)||(i9.u49.p142==0)) + ((i0.u120.p380==1) + (((EG((i11.i1.u82.p263==0)) * (i13.i0.u0.p0==0)) * ((i5.i2.u34.p104...458
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (((([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(((i17.i2.u106.p339==0)||(i9.u49.p142==0)))) * !((i0.u120.p380==1))) * !(EG((i11.i1.u...988
(forward)formula 0,0,11.9582,285368,1,0,507402,374,670,1.44444e+06,62,1006,2819
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 29 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 29 rule applications. Total rules 29 place count 337 transition count 302
Iterating global reduction 0 with 29 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 337 transition count 302
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 59 place count 336 transition count 301
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 336 transition count 301
Applied a total of 60 rules in 11 ms. Remains 336 /366 variables (removed 30) and now considering 301/331 (removed 30) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 301 rows 336 cols
[2025-06-07 13:16:05] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 103 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:16:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 287 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 300 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:16:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 77 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 11/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/423 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 3/426 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 637/637 variables, and 436 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 38/38 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/335 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/336 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 38/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 1/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/336 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 301/637 variables, 336/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 300/731 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 20/751 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 7/758 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:16:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 4/762 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/637 variables, 6/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 637/637 variables, and 768 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 336/336 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 300/300 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 300 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60043ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 336/366 places, 301/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60343 ms. Remains : 336/366 places, 301/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 301 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12837374845604173211.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15557857836272653553.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12837374845604173211.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15557857836272653553.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8674071162376418345.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8674071162376418345.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8674071162376418345.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8674071162376418345.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8674071162376418345.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 54 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15260132102755469249.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12265368626167027887.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15260132102755469249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12265368626167027887.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.83849e+32,4.26628,118692,2203,29,221302,381,657,522726,50,1042,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((((i2.i2.u18.p55==0)||(i8.i0.u34.p108==1)) + AX((i13.i4.u96.p311!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY((EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(((i2.i2.u18.p55==0)||(i8.i0.u34.p108==1))))) * !((i13.i4.u96.p311!=1)))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,4.5878,118692,1,0,221302,381,875,522726,69,1042,43325
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 339 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 339 transition count 304
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 338 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 338 transition count 303
Applied a total of 56 rules in 19 ms. Remains 338 /366 variables (removed 28) and now considering 303/331 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 303 rows 338 cols
[2025-06-07 13:17:40] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:17:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 185 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 278 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 302 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:17:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 83 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 14/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:17:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 2/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/434 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((s0 0.0)
(s1 0.0)
(s2 0.0)
(s3 0.0)
(s4 0.0)
(s5 1.0)
(s6 0.0)
(s7 0.0)
(s8 0.0)
(s9 0.0)
(s10 0.0)
(s11 0.0)
(s12 0.0)
(s13 0.0)
(s14 0.0)
(s15 0.0)
(s16 1.0)
(s17 0.0)
(s18 0.0)
(s19 0.0)
(s20 0.0)
(s21 0.0)
(s22 0.0)
(s23 1.0)
(s24 0.0)
(s25 1.0)
(s26 0.0)
(s27 0.0)
(s28 0.0)
(s29 1.0)
(s30 0.0)
(s31 0.0)
(s32 1.0)
(s33 1.0)
(s34 0.0)
(s35 0.0)
(s36 0.0)
(s37 0.0)
(s38 0.0)
(s39 0.0)
(s40 0.0)
(s41 0.0)
(s42 0.0)
(s43 0.0)
(s44 0.0)
(s45 0.0)
(s46 0.0)
(s47 1.0)
(s48 0.0)
(s49 0.0)
(s50 0.0)
(s51 0.0)
(s52 0.0)
(s53 0.0)
(s54 0.0)
(s55 1.0)
(s56 0.0)
(s57 0.0)
(s58 0.0)
(s59 0.0)
(s60 0.0)
(s61 0.0)
(s62 0.0)
(s63 0.0)
(s64 1.0)
(s65 0.0)
(s66 0.0)
(s67 0.0)
(s68 1.0)
(s69 0.0)
(s70 0.0)
(s71 0.0)
(s72 0.0)
(s73 0.0)
(s74 0.0)
(s75 0.0)
(s76 0.0)
(s77 0.0)
(s78 0.0)
(s79 0.0)
(s80 0.0)
(s81 0.0)
(s82 1.0)
(s83 0.0)
(s84 0.0)
(s85 1.0)
(s86 0.0)
(s87 0.0)
(s88 0.0)
(s89 0.0)
(s90 0.0)
(s91 0.0)
(s92 0.0)
(s93 0.0)
(s94 0.0)
(s95 0.0)
(s96 1.0)
(s97 0.0)
(s98 1.0)
(s99 1.0)
(s100 0.0)
(s101 0.0)
(s102 0.0)
(s103 0.0)
(s104 0.0)
(s105 0.0)
(s106 0.0)
(s107 0.0)
(s108 0.0)
(s109 0.0)
(s110 0.0)
(s111 0.0)
(s112 0.0)
(s113 1.0)
(s114 0.0)
(s115 0.0)
(s116 0.0)
(s117 1.0)
(s118 0.0)
(s119 0.0)
(s120 0.0)
(s121 0.0)
(s122 0.0)
(s123 0.0)
(s124 0.0)
(s125 0.0)
(s126 0.0)
(s127 0.0)
(s128 0.0)
(s129 0.0)
(s130 1.0)
(s131 0.0)
(s132 0.0)
(s133 0.0)
(s134 0.0)
(s135 0.0)
(s136 0.0)
(s137 0.0)
(s138 0.0)
(s139 1.0)
(s140 0.0)
(s141 0.0)
(s142 1.0)
(s143 0.0)
(s144 0.0)
(s145 0.0)
(s146 0.0)
(s147 0.0)
(s148 0.0)
(s149 0.0)
(s150 0.0)
(s151 0.0)
(s152 0.0)
(s153 0.0)
(s154 0.0)
(s155 0.0)
(s156 0.0)
(s157 0.0)
(s158 0.0)
(s159 0.0)
(s160 0.0)
(s161 0.0)
(s162 0.0)
(s163 timeout
0.0)
(s164 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 641/641 variables, and 434 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 40/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 302/737 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 82 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 60 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 20/757 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 80 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 62 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 11/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 70 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 78 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 55 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 641/641 variables, and 785 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 16/16 constraints]
After SMT, in 60043ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60044ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60342 ms. Remains : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 303 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4112348794023160829.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:18:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3311148236359760851.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4112348794023160829.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3311148236359760851.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13180628495494455.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13180628495494455.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13180628495494455.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13180628495494455.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13180628495494455.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 48 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9232332943110993387.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13794784576393332697.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9232332943110993387.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13794784576393332697.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.40869e+32,8.25002,205736,4503,43,394176,691,626,694600,56,1787,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EX(AG(((i10.i2.u67.p217==0)||(i20.u112.p362==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(E(TRUE U !(((i10.i2.u67.p217==0)||(i20.u112.p362==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t56, t96, t99, t143, t146, t189, t192, t235, t238, t273, t279, t282, t291, t295, i0.t211, i0....1249
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 77 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 77 transitions
Performed 77 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 77
Iterating post reduction 0 with 77 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 365 transition count 253
Reduce places removed 77 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 79 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 288 transition count 251
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 287 transition count 250
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 286 transition count 250
Performed 28 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 28 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 159 place count 286 transition count 222
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 258 transition count 222
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 238 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 238 transition count 202
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 238 transition count 190
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 226 transition count 190
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 431 place count 150 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 433 place count 148 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 147 transition count 112
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 434 place count 147 transition count 110
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 145 transition count 110
Applied a total of 438 rules in 42 ms. Remains 145 /366 variables (removed 221) and now considering 110/331 (removed 221) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 110 rows 145 cols
[2025-06-07 13:19:40] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [125, 129]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 143/366 places, 110/331 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 142 transition count 109
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 142 /143 variables (removed 1) and now considering 109/110 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 109 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 189 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 142/366 places, 109/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 312 ms. Remains : 142/366 places, 109/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 109 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17096816869287458141.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:19:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12543382899747207926.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17096816869287458141.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12543382899747207926.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.30842e+20,0.399911,21372,2,304,5,68804,6,0,679,122923,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF(((p301!=0)&&(p22!=1))) * (p257!=0)) * ((p333!=1)&&(p48!=0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U ((p301!=0)&&(p22!=1))) * (p257!=0)) * ((p333!=1)&&(p48!=0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t75, t96, t108, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/in...182
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2293147816493305164.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2293147816493305164.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2293147816493305164.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2293147816493305164.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2293147816493305164.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3712724360871555381.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality863277074619687149.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3712724360871555381.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality863277074619687149.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.30842e+20,0.15118,10692,70,20,13169,166,306,33030,51,824,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((EF(((i7.u32.p301!=0)&&(i0.u3.p22!=1))) * (i10.u28.p257!=0)) * ((i13.i1.u35.p333!=1)&&(i4.u6.p48!=0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((E(TRUE U ((i7.u32.p301!=0)&&(i0.u3.p22!=1))) * (i10.u28.p257!=0)) * ((i13.i1.u35.p333!=1)&&(i4.u6...176
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t96, i10.u30.t75, i11.u31.t52, i12.t108, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (...202
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Discarding 27 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 27 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 339 transition count 304
Iterating global reduction 0 with 27 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 339 transition count 304
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 338 transition count 303
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 338 transition count 303
Applied a total of 56 rules in 15 ms. Remains 338 /366 variables (removed 28) and now considering 303/331 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 303 rows 338 cols
[2025-06-07 13:20:41] [INFO ] Computed 56 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:20:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:41] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 181 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 282 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 302 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:20:41] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 85 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 20/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 13/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/427 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/428 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 2/430 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/431 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 2/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 641/641 variables, and 433 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/337 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/338 variables, 56/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 39/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/338 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 303/641 variables, 338/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 302/735 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 88 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 20/755 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 10/765 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 3/768 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 1/769 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/641 variables, 2/771 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 81 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 66 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 65 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 62 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 53 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 48 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: ((t0 1)
(t1 0)
(t2 2)
(t3 0)
(t4 0)
(t5 2)
(t6 0)
(t7 0)
(t8 2)
(t9 1)
(t10 0)
(t11 1)
(t12 0)
(t13 1)
(t14 1)
(t15 1)
(t16 0)
(t17 0)
(t18 0)
(t19 2)
(t20 0)
(t21 0)
(t22 2)
(t23 2)
(t24 2)
(t25 0)
(t26 0)
(t27 0)
(t28 1)
(t29 1)
(t30 1)
(t31 0)
(t32 1)
(t33 1)
(t34 0)
(t35 0)
(t36 0)
(t37 0)
(t38 0)
(t39 0)
(t40 0)
(t41 0)
(t42 0)
(t43 1)
(t44 1)
(t45 1)
(t46 0)
(t47 1)
(t48 1)
(t49 0)
(t50 1)
(t51 1)
(t52 0)
(t53 1)
(t54 1)
(t55 0)
(t56 0)
(t57 0)
(t58 0)
(t59 0)
(t60 0)
(t61 0)
(t62 0)
(t63 1)
(t64 1)
(t65 1)
(t66 0)
(t67 1)
(t68 1)
(t69 0)
(t70 0)
(t71 0)
(t72 2)
(t73 2)
(t74 2)
(t75 0)
(t76 2)
(t77 2)
(t78 0)
(t79 0)
(t80 0)
(t81 1)
(t82 1)
(t83 1)
(t84 0)
(t85 1)
(t86 0)
(t87 0)
(t88 0)
(t89 1)
(t90 1)
(t91 1)
(t92 0)
(t93 1)
(t94 1)
(t95 0)
(t96 1)
(t97 1)
(t98 0)
(t99 0)
(t100 0)
(t101 0)
(t102 1)
(t103 1)
(t104 1)
(t105 0)
(t106 0)
(t107 0)
(t108 0)
(t109 2)
(t110 1)
(t111 1)
(t112 1)
(t113 1)
(t114 1)
(t115 2)
(t116 0)
(t117 0)
(t118 0)
(t119 2)
(t120 2)
(t121 2)
(t122 0)
(t123 2)
(t124 2)
(t125 0)
(t126 0)
(t127 0)
(t128 1)
(t129 0)
(t130 0)
(t131 1)
(t132 1)
(t133 0)
(t134 0)
(t135 0)
(t136 0)
(t137 0)
(t138 0)
(t139 0)
(t140 0)
(t141 0)
(t142 0)
(t143 2)
(t144 2)
(t145 0)
(t146 0)
(t147 0)
(t148 0)
(t149 0)
(t150 0)
(t151 1)
(t152 0)
(t153 0)
(t154 0)
(t155 0)
(t156 2)
(t157 0)
(t158 0)
(t159 2)
(t160 2)
(t161 2)
(t162 0)
(t163 0)
(t164 0)
(t165 2)
(t166 2)
(t167 2)
(t168 0)
(t169 2)
(t170 2)
(t171 0)
(t172 0)
(t173 0)
(t174 0)
(t175 0)
(t176 0)
(t177 0)
(t178 0)
(t179 0)
(t180 0)
(t181 0)
(t182 0)
(t183 0)
(t184 0)
(t185 0)
(t186 0)
(t187 0)timeout

(t188 org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 641/641 variables, and 777 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 56/56 constraints, State Equation: 338/338 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 302/302 constraints, Known Traps: 75/75 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60039ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 302 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60039ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60337 ms. Remains : 338/366 places, 303/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 303 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7110709950829462352.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:21:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3195268961041835126.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7110709950829462352.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3195268961041835126.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14551389786297505377.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14551389786297505377.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14551389786297505377.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14551389786297505377.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14551389786297505377.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Removed a total of 51 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8672834596034680040.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11146846029781322923.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8672834596034680040.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11146846029781322923.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.37426e+32,9.09098,249884,3304,29,477717,443,617,1.36913e+06,45,1455,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((A(!(((i13.i2.u83.p261==0)||((i10.i2.u59.p186!=0)&&(i10.i4.u75.p230!=0)))) U !(EX((i17.i0.u108.p342!=1)))) + ((i4.u16.p46==1) * E(((i0...298
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(!(EX((i17.i0.u108.p342!=1))))))) * !(E(!(!(EX((i17.i0.u108.p342!=1)))) U (!(!(((i13...714
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t55, t101, t148, t194, t235, t238, t268, t277, t286, t295, i0.i0.u2.t245, i0.i1.u10.t240...1223
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 78 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 78 transitions
Performed 78 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 78
Iterating post reduction 0 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 365 transition count 252
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 287 transition count 250
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 286 transition count 249
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 285 transition count 249
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 285 transition count 222
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 258 transition count 222
Discarding 21 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 21 rule applications. Total rules 236 place count 237 transition count 201
Iterating global reduction 4 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 237 transition count 201
Performed 14 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 14 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 237 transition count 187
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 285 place count 223 transition count 187
Performed 76 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 76 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 76 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 152 rules applied. Total rules applied 437 place count 147 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 439 place count 145 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 144 transition count 109
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 440 place count 144 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 444 place count 142 transition count 107
Applied a total of 444 rules in 34 ms. Remains 142 /366 variables (removed 224) and now considering 107/331 (removed 224) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 107 rows 142 cols
[2025-06-07 13:22:41] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned [122, 126]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 81 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/366 places, 107/331 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 138 transition count 105
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 138 /140 variables (removed 2) and now considering 105/107 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 105 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 138/366 places, 105/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 285 ms. Remains : 138/366 places, 105/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 105 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5249167745679554768.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15886416482112224557.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5249167745679554768.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15886416482112224557.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.8742e+20,0.116431,9112,2,469,5,22566,6,0,660,32176,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(!(A((p191!=1) U (p43==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p43==1))) * (!((p191!=1)) * !((p43==1))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((p43==1...169
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 103/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,0.124059,9368,1,0,10,22566,19,3,1224,32176,5
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-005B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 366/366 places, 331/331 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 78 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 78 transitions
Performed 78 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 78
Iterating post reduction 0 with 78 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 365 transition count 252
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 80 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 287 transition count 250
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 286 transition count 249
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 285 transition count 249
Performed 27 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 27 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 285 transition count 222
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 215 place count 258 transition count 222
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 235 place count 238 transition count 202
Iterating global reduction 4 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 238 transition count 202
Performed 12 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 12 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 238 transition count 190
Deduced a syphon composed of 12 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 24 rules applied. Total rules applied 279 place count 226 transition count 190
Performed 78 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 78
Deduced a syphon composed of 78 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 78 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 156 rules applied. Total rules applied 435 place count 148 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 437 place count 146 transition count 110
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 145 transition count 110
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 438 place count 145 transition count 108
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 442 place count 143 transition count 108
Applied a total of 442 rules in 23 ms. Remains 143 /366 variables (removed 223) and now considering 108/331 (removed 223) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 108 rows 143 cols
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Computed 55 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 69 ms returned [123, 127]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 82 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 141/366 places, 108/331 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 139 transition count 106
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 139 /141 variables (removed 2) and now considering 106/108 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 106 rows 139 cols
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Computed 53 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 95 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 172 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 139/366 places, 106/331 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 281 ms. Remains : 139/366 places, 106/331 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 106 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14485530785213925203.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:22:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13567207127486723627.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14485530785213925203.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13567207127486723627.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.16561e+20,0.123168,9448,2,487,5,23867,6,0,665,33664,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((p308==0)||(p279==1)) U EG((p25==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG((p25==1)))))) * !(E(!(EG((p25==1))) U (!(((p308==0)||(p279==1))) * !(EG((p25==1)))))))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 104/0/2
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2494392252865498798.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2494392252865498798.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2494392252865498798.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2494392252865498798.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2494392252865498798.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1427098311932820171.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 13:23:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17547418688641833209.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1427098311932820171.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17547418688641833209.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.16561e+20,0.096369,8380,42,15,9396,122,270,19889,44,669,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i10.u32.p308==0)||(i13.u29.p279==1)) U EG((i1.i0.u2.p25==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG((i1.i0.u2.p25==1)))))) * !(E(!(EG((i1.i0.u2.p25==1))) U (!(((i10.u32.p308==0)||(i13.u29.p279...202
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14157609648525249598.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14157609648525249598.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14157609648525249598.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14157609648525249598.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14157609648525249598.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 31 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7550517037303923263.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:23:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5285906031475432911.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7550517037303923263.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5285906031475432911.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.67499e+33,50.6888,903280,8122,39,1.35008e+06,442,722,3.13683e+06,57,1294,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((AX(((i3.i0.u1.p3==0)&&(i9.i2.u83.p226==1))) * (AG((((i16.i0.u115.p324==0)&&(i1.i1.u53.p149==0))&&((i17.u127.p366==1)&&((i11.u71.p203=...314
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(EX(!(((i3.i0.u1.p3==0)&&(i9.i2.u83.p226==1))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((i16.i0.u115.p324==0)&&(i1.i1....395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t57, t63, t108, t111, t158, t161, t212, t215, t263, t266, t306, t307, t310, t313, t322, t323,...1773
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 7 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 26 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8882921375122984768.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 13:52:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13426050412526829051.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8882921375122984768.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13426050412526829051.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 11 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-005B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-005B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500849"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-005B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-005B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;