Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533500834.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-004B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500834
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 568K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 176K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749298823081

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 84 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Transformed 315 places.
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Transformed 287 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 315 places and 287 transitions and 718 arcs in 174 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 11 ms.
Support contains 103 out of 315 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 315/315 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 289 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 289 transition count 261
Applied a total of 52 rules in 48 ms. Remains 289 /315 variables (removed 26) and now considering 261/287 (removed 26) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 261 rows 289 cols
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 276 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 184 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 492 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 260 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:20:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/289 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 109 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 20/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 3/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 1/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 261/550 variables, 289/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 2/380 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 79 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 5/385 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 2/387 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 2/389 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 1/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 550/550 variables, and 390 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 289/289 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/288 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/289 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 56/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/289 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 261/550 variables, 289/390 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 260/650 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 93 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 12/662 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 75 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 7/669 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 1/670 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 1/671 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/550 variables, 3/674 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 550/550 variables, and 674 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 289/289 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 260/260 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 60099ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 260 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60110ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 289/315 places, 261/287 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60677 ms. Remains : 289/315 places, 261/287 transitions.
Support contains 103 out of 289 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 12:21:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 261 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1226 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 4/69 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 99 ms. (400 steps per ms) remains 2/4 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 131 ms. (303 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 20531 steps (3 resets) in 55 ms. (366 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-06-07 12:21:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 261 transitions.
Computed a total of 68 stabilizing places and 68 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 272 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 272 transition count 244
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Applied a total of 36 rules in 27 ms. Remains 271 /289 variables (removed 18) and now considering 243/261 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 271 cols
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 151 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 244 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 242 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 9/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 2/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 514/514 variables, and 353 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 35/35 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 35/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 242/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 102 ms of which 20 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 16/610 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 4/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 2/616 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 2/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 10/628 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 514/514 variables, and 630 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 60044ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60045ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 271/289 places, 243/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60318 ms. Remains : 271/289 places, 243/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:22:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:22:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability898977981385832092.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13891938151589973458.ctl : 7 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability898977981385832092.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13891938151589973458.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.57063e+25,22.662,610844,2,25270,5,1.83927e+06,6,0,1329,4.38032e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16458748417824497072.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16458748417824497072.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16458748417824497072.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16458748417824497072.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16458748417824497072.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 46 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10318436816548700489.gal : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14624248619471428367.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10318436816548700489.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14624248619471428367.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.57063e+25,1.99002,62372,1745,29,115170,525,547,224301,52,1394,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((!(A(EF(((i1.i2.u22.p62==1)||((i1.i1.u13.p35==1)&&(i4.u24.p82==1)))) U E(EG((i2.i0.u14.p46==1)) U (i7.u44.p149==1)))) * ((i13.u84.p275...216
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(EG((i2.i0.u14.p46==1)) U (i7.u44.p149==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(EG((i2.i0.u14.p46==1)) U (i7.u4...469
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t50, t93, t96, t139, t142, t186, t189, t222, t226, t240, t242, i0.i1.u2.t196, i0.i2.u10....996
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 270 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 270 transition count 242
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 269 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 269 transition count 241
Applied a total of 40 rules in 35 ms. Remains 269 /289 variables (removed 20) and now considering 241/261 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 269 cols
[2025-06-07 12:23:26] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:23:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 175 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 269 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 2/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 510/510 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 25105 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 26/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 240/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 18/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 6/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 20/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 510/510 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 55142ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55143ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55448 ms. Remains : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:24:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:24:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4915689162898702044.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12088379267021281686.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4915689162898702044.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12088379267021281686.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,21.0999,564632,2,23815,5,1.71302e+06,6,0,1319,4.04661e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4797492195290243315.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4797492195290243315.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4797492195290243315.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4797492195290243315.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4797492195290243315.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9406372109044662952.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3638110468716239479.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9406372109044662952.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3638110468716239479.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,1.42723,49080,1611,64,90705,557,565,173052,64,1604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((EX((((i14.i0.u80.p254==0)||(i16.i1.u92.p301==0))&&(i15.i1.u82.p258==0))) * AF(((i16.i0.u83.p266==0)||(i15.i2.u94.p313==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !(EX((((i14.i0.u80.p254==0)||(i16.i1.u92.p301==0))&&(i15.i1.u82.p258==0)))))] = FALSE *...240
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 59 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 59 transitions
Performed 59 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 59
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 288 transition count 201
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 229 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 228 transition count 199
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 228 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 171 place count 203 transition count 174
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 189 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 189 transition count 160
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 189 transition count 150
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 179 transition count 150
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 118 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 343 place count 116 transition count 87
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 115 transition count 87
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 115 transition count 85
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 348 place count 113 transition count 85
Applied a total of 348 rules in 55 ms. Remains 113 /289 variables (removed 176) and now considering 85/261 (removed 176) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 113 cols
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [92, 96]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 55 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 111/289 places, 85/261 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 109 transition count 83
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 109 /111 variables (removed 2) and now considering 83/85 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 83 rows 109 cols
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 109/289 places, 83/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 247 ms. Remains : 109/289 places, 83/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 83 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7200868188607390595.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3673662972902748049.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7200868188607390595.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3673662972902748049.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.91319e+16,0.195128,13404,2,195,5,38762,6,0,522,65518,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p248==0)||(p289==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p248==0)||(p289==0)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 80/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.351527,15708,1,0,10,52295,19,4,2521,77161,8
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 270 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 270 transition count 242
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 269 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 269 transition count 241
Applied a total of 40 rules in 15 ms. Remains 269 /289 variables (removed 20) and now considering 241/261 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 269 cols
[2025-06-07 12:25:23] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 78 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:25:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 174 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:25:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 2/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 510/510 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 24790 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 26/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 240/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 18/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 6/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 13 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 20/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 510/510 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30025 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 54832ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54834ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55104 ms. Remains : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18222760594077276010.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14153633033819013039.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18222760594077276010.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14153633033819013039.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,21.0565,564640,2,23815,5,1.71302e+06,6,0,1319,4.04661e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((((p167==0)||(p254==0))||(p301==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !((((p167==0)||(p254==0))||(p301==0))))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,21.6345,564640,1,0,9,1.71302e+06,9,2,2183,4.04661e+06,2
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 270 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 270 transition count 242
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 269 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 269 transition count 241
Applied a total of 40 rules in 22 ms. Remains 269 /289 variables (removed 20) and now considering 241/261 (removed 20) transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:26:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 86 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:26:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 140 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:26:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 2/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 510/510 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 25088 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 26/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 240/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 18/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 6/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 20/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 510/510 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 55116ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55118ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55368 ms. Remains : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:35] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4710932571864885295.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17768000322791261228.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4710932571864885295.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17768000322791261228.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,21.5051,564652,2,23815,5,1.71302e+06,6,0,1319,4.04661e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1651540376494927027.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1651540376494927027.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1651540376494927027.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1651540376494927027.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1651540376494927027.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2667314419334568294.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12444280180615960488.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2667314419334568294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12444280180615960488.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,1.5943,50076,1588,62,88945,515,588,173199,65,1405,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!((((i0.i2.u18.p51!=1) + EG((i6.i3.u38.p128!=1))) + E(!(EF((i8.i0.u49.p165==1))) U (AG(((i11.i0.u52.p172==1)&&(i11.i2.u62.p208==1))) *...384
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !((E(!((((i6.i2.u30.p97==1) * !(EG(!(EX((i15.i1.u82.p277==1)))))) + !(EG(!(EX((((i2.i1.u1.p6==1)&&...814
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t52, t92, t95, t138, t141, t184, t187, t220, t229, t233, i0.t190, i0.i0.u5.t193, i0.i1.u...956
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 270 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 270 transition count 242
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 269 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 269 transition count 241
Applied a total of 40 rules in 22 ms. Remains 269 /289 variables (removed 20) and now considering 241/261 (removed 20) transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:28:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 80 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:28:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:35] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:28:35] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 2/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 510/510 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 25127 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 26/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 240/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 18/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 6/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 20/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 510/510 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 55155ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55156ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55419 ms. Remains : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2313944389176301709.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13378626102933192756.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2313944389176301709.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13378626102933192756.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,20.9794,566104,2,23815,5,1.71302e+06,6,0,1319,4.04661e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5278522097330981625.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5278522097330981625.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5278522097330981625.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5278522097330981625.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5278522097330981625.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 43 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6153760615732348259.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7664549728321504197.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6153760615732348259.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7664549728321504197.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,2.62603,86684,2475,54,156094,525,559,487780,59,1289,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EF(((i10.u81.p261==1)&&(i16.u93.p313==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U ((i10.u81.p261==1)&&(i16.u93.p313==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t92, t138, t141, t184, t187, t215, t229, t233, i0.t220, i0.t63, i0.u59.t94, i0.u71....876
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 270 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 270 transition count 242
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 269 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 269 transition count 241
Applied a total of 40 rules in 21 ms. Remains 269 /289 variables (removed 20) and now considering 241/261 (removed 20) transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:30:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:30:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 230 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:30:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 2/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 510/510 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 24436 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 26/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 240/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 18/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 6/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 20/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 510/510 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 54464ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54465ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54716 ms. Remains : 269/289 places, 241/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:31:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:31:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9912377720046271927.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13671116145924944693.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9912377720046271927.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13671116145924944693.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,20.9985,565136,2,23815,5,1.71302e+06,6,0,1319,4.04661e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5410948428620947236.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5410948428620947236.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5410948428620947236.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5410948428620947236.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5410948428620947236.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability10586887727010085970.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2016490563353059213.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability10586887727010085970.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2016490563353059213.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,3.14213,80144,1720,62,148324,784,542,375595,64,2152,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG((i15.i0.u78.p250==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG((i15.i0.u78.p250==0))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t52, t98, t138, t141, t184, t187, t215, t224, t229, t238, i0.i0.u2.t194, i0.i1.u10.t189,...958
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 272 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 272 transition count 244
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 270 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 270 transition count 242
Applied a total of 38 rules in 13 ms. Remains 270 /289 variables (removed 19) and now considering 242/261 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 270 cols
[2025-06-07 12:32:26] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 97 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:32:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:26] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 158 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 257 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 241 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:32:26] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 5/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/512 variables, 0/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 512/512 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 28207 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 25/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 241/582 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 17/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 7/606 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 3/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 58238ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58239ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 270/289 places, 242/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 58510 ms. Remains : 270/289 places, 242/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 242 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9754004121613206616.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15752956296585904692.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9754004121613206616.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15752956296585904692.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05348e+25,22.9549,569808,2,24262,5,1.72249e+06,6,0,1324,4.07694e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13693139168100990605.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13693139168100990605.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13693139168100990605.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13693139168100990605.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13693139168100990605.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 42 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 16 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7875521784233687971.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5669353921807674247.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7875521784233687971.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5669353921807674247.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05348e+25,2.4541,79920,1853,43,146397,671,572,413596,54,1723,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(E((AX(!(((i3.u22.p67==1)||(i1.i1.u6.p16==1)))) * ((EF(EX((i1.i1.u5.p12==1))) + AG((i3.u24.p71==1))) + (i14.i0.u76.p244!=1))) U AG(!(((...197
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(EY(Init),(!(EX(!(!(((i3.u22.p67==1)||(i1.i1.u6.p16==1)))))) * ((E(TRUE U EX((i1.i1.u5.p12==1))) + !(E(TRU...285
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t52, t98, t138, t141, t185, t188, t216, t225, t230, t234, i0.t178, i0.u13.t182, i1.t191,...965
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 58 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 58 transitions
Performed 58 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 58
Iterating post reduction 0 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 288 transition count 202
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 118 place count 230 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 229 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 228 transition count 199
Performed 26 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 26 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 228 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 202 transition count 173
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 185 place count 190 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 4 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 190 transition count 161
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 197 place count 190 transition count 153
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 213 place count 182 transition count 153
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 121 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 119 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 118 transition count 90
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 118 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 116 transition count 88
Applied a total of 342 rules in 46 ms. Remains 116 /289 variables (removed 173) and now considering 88/261 (removed 173) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-07 12:34:24] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [96, 100]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 67 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/289 places, 88/261 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 112 transition count 86
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 112 /114 variables (removed 2) and now considering 86/88 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-07 12:34:24] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 144 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 112/289 places, 86/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 261 ms. Remains : 112/289 places, 86/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1368578808268367697.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17003469119121911251.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1368578808268367697.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17003469119121911251.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.55094e+16,0.388164,20856,2,273,5,69883,6,0,536,118195,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((p156!=1) U ((p9==1)&&(p235==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(p156!=1)) * ((p9==1)&&(p235==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 83/0/3
(forward)formula 0,1,0.484344,21112,1,0,10,69883,15,1,954,118195,4
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-08 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 273 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 273 transition count 245
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 272 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 272 transition count 244
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Applied a total of 36 rules in 11 ms. Remains 271 /289 variables (removed 18) and now considering 243/261 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 271 cols
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 147 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 234 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 242 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:34:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 3/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 3/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 3/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/514 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 514/514 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 29372 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 28/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 242/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 20/607 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 89 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 13/620 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 6/626 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 12/638 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 514/514 variables, and 639 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 18/18 constraints]
After SMT, in 59397ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59398ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 271/289 places, 243/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59643 ms. Remains : 271/289 places, 243/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:35:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:35:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7143084301953979591.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14196903371614168412.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7143084301953979591.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14196903371614168412.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.20378e+25,26.1855,696536,2,26537,5,2.09151e+06,6,0,1329,5.02745e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1531821743972714390.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1531821743972714390.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1531821743972714390.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1531821743972714390.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1531821743972714390.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11407889405587432363.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:35:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11244653700385361000.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11407889405587432363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11244653700385361000.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.20378e+25,3.25493,95272,2146,62,169503,1136,576,476948,64,3291,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(AX(!(((i7.i1.u33.p107==1)&&(i7.i3.u47.p159==1)))) U (((i2.u44.p144==1) * !(((((i3.i0.u6.p15==1)&&(i5.i1.u24.p77==1)) + EX(((i9.i0.u31.p...276
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((((i2.u44.p144==1) * !(((((i3.i0.u6.p15==1)&&(i5.i1.u24.p77==1)) + EX(((i9.i0.u31.p98==1)&&(i6....765
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t53, t94, t97, t146, t186, t189, t222, t226, t235, i1.u2.t196, i1.u9.t191, i2.t116, i2.u44.t1...998
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 288 transition count 200
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 228 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 227 transition count 198
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 123 place count 227 transition count 173
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 173 place count 202 transition count 173
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 186 place count 189 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 189 transition count 160
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 199 place count 189 transition count 150
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 219 place count 179 transition count 150
Performed 59 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 120 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 339 place count 118 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 117 transition count 89
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 340 place count 117 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 344 place count 115 transition count 87
Applied a total of 344 rules in 33 ms. Remains 115 /289 variables (removed 174) and now considering 87/261 (removed 174) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 115 cols
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned [95, 99]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 58 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/289 places, 87/261 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 111 transition count 85
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 111 /113 variables (removed 2) and now considering 85/87 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/289 places, 85/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 256 ms. Remains : 111/289 places, 85/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12648107976731218449.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability889092580723196423.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12648107976731218449.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability889092580723196423.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.78003e+16,0.592928,28048,2,283,5,91944,6,0,531,172527,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: !(A(EF((p91==1)) U (p20==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,!((p20==1))) * !((p20==1))) * !(E(TRUE U (p91==1))))] != FALSE + [FwdG(Init,!((p20==1)))] != FALSE...156
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t9, t10, t32, t34, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/...182
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 83/0/2
(forward)formula 0,1,1.48433,49816,1,0,179,195540,199,81,3225,317668,187
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 52 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 52 transitions
Performed 52 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 52
Iterating post reduction 0 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 288 transition count 208
Reduce places removed 52 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 106 place count 236 transition count 206
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 3 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 3
Iterating post reduction 2 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 110 place count 235 transition count 203
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 3 rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 232 transition count 203
Performed 24 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 24 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 113 place count 232 transition count 179
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 208 transition count 179
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 171 place count 198 transition count 169
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 198 transition count 169
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 198 transition count 162
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 195 place count 191 transition count 162
Performed 61 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 61
Deduced a syphon composed of 61 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 122 rules applied. Total rules applied 317 place count 130 transition count 101
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 130 transition count 101
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 129 transition count 100
Applied a total of 319 rules in 23 ms. Remains 129 /289 variables (removed 160) and now considering 100/261 (removed 161) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 100 rows 129 cols
[2025-06-07 12:36:27] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 70 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:36:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 12:36:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 90 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 161 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:27] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 96 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:36:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 12:36:27] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 3 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/129 variables, 37/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 100/229 variables, 129/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 229/229 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 2441 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/129 variables, 37/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 1/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 100/229 variables, 129/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 96/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 2/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/229 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/229 variables, 0/278 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 229/229 variables, and 278 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved in 7117 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 129/129 constraints, ReadFeed: 3/3 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 96/96 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 9568ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 96 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9568ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 129/289 places, 100/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9757 ms. Remains : 129/289 places, 100/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:36:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 100 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15456839935458699071.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10603521570615997442.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15456839935458699071.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10603521570615997442.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.44888e+18,0.49792,24508,2,575,5,79980,6,0,615,144653,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((((p190==1)&&(p192==1)) * (((p280==1) + AF(((p45==1)||(p216==1)))) + (((p260==1)&&(p262==1)) + ((((p2==0)||(p300==1))||((p195==1)||(p2...235
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p190==1)&&(p192==1))) * (p280==1))] != FALSE + [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * ((p190==1)&&(p192==...634
(forward)formula 0,1,0.499012,24636,1,0,9,79980,9,2,623,144653,2
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 12 place count 277 transition count 249
Iterating global reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 277 transition count 249
Applied a total of 24 rules in 14 ms. Remains 277 /289 variables (removed 12) and now considering 249/261 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 249 rows 277 cols
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 145 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 227 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 248 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:36:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/277 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 11/76 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 249/526 variables, 277/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 3/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 1/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 3/361 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 1/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:36:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 1/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 1/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 5/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 526/526 variables, and 369 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 277/277 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 248/248 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/276 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/277 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 42/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/277 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 249/526 variables, 277/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 248/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 77 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 20/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 5/638 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 68 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 2/640 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 5/645 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/526 variables, 1/646 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 526/526 variables, and 658 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 277/277 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 248/248 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 60034ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 248 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60035ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 277/289 places, 249/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60276 ms. Remains : 277/289 places, 249/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:37:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 249 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:37:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15515165707638311472.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6341350982015979949.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15515165707638311472.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6341350982015979949.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12031853215604282411.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12031853215604282411.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12031853215604282411.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12031853215604282411.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12031853215604282411.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4992458132389177296.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:07] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14042702407851856639.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4992458132389177296.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14042702407851856639.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.8316e+26,7.16572,186744,2104,56,354906,724,568,593902,61,1930,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AG((i15.u87.p271==1)) U A((EG(!(AG((i13.i2.u75.p232==1)))) * !(((((i14.i1.u81.p249==1)&&(i16.u92.p285==1))&&((i8.u38.p120==1)&&(i10.i0....375
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,!(E(TRUE U !((i15.u87.p271==1))))) * !(EG(!(((i7.u72.p217==1) * (!((E(!(E(((i10.i0.u59.p182==1)&&(i...1328
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t55, t58, t99, t102, t145, t148, t192, t195, t223, t237, t240, i0.i0.u2.t202, i0.i1.u10.t197,...1042
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 273 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 273 transition count 245
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 272 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 272 transition count 244
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 271 transition count 243
Applied a total of 36 rules in 12 ms. Remains 271 /289 variables (removed 18) and now considering 243/261 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 271 cols
[2025-06-07 12:38:38] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 85 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:38:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 148 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 245 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 242 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:38:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 8/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 1/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 3/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 5/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:38:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 514/514 variables, and 357 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 34/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 242/592 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 19/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 3/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 4/619 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 7/626 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 1/627 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 514/514 variables, and 642 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 22/22 constraints]
After SMT, in 60037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 271/289 places, 243/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60296 ms. Remains : 271/289 places, 243/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability497311442975293718.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:39:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11599634183016614661.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability497311442975293718.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11599634183016614661.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4038967984842995024.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4038967984842995024.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4038967984842995024.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4038967984842995024.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4038967984842995024.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14552932225475123879.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4040534997264233270.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14552932225475123879.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4040534997264233270.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.0613e+26,2.42049,68152,1949,29,117048,599,552,240386,52,1512,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AX((((i15.i2.u98.p310==0)||(i12.i1.u60.p186==0))||(i16.i2.u95.p296==0))) * (((i13.u91.p283==1)||(i6.i1.u31.p96==1)) + EG((i8.u50.p158...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EX(!((((i15.i2.u98.p310==0)||(i12.i1.u60.p186==0))||(i16.i2.u95.p296==0)))))) * ((i13.u9...333
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t53, t93, t96, t140, t143, t186, t189, t222, t225, t235, i0.i0.u1.t196, i0.i1.u9.t191, i...993
(forward)formula 0,1,4.17451,94136,1,0,183916,599,2612,339637,264,1512,254351
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 274 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 274 transition count 246
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 273 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 273 transition count 245
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 272 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 272 transition count 244
Applied a total of 34 rules in 12 ms. Remains 272 /289 variables (removed 17) and now considering 244/261 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 272 cols
[2025-06-07 12:40:12] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:40:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 142 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 243 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:40:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 12/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 244/516 variables, 272/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 3/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 3/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/516 variables, 6/363 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 516/516 variables, and 364 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 37/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 244/516 variables, 272/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 243/597 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 17/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 4/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:40:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/619 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 10/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 5/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 516/516 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30008 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 60037ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 272/289 places, 244/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60287 ms. Remains : 272/289 places, 244/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 244 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability494611453243289919.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12899138297013083095.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability494611453243289919.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12899138297013083095.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9180512986134524588.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9180512986134524588.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9180512986134524588.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9180512986134524588.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9180512986134524588.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18096246172629772930.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:41:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12781617801186529689.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18096246172629772930.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12781617801186529689.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18509e+26,13.3827,334912,2726,49,573246,680,570,1.83114e+06,61,3012,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AF(!(A(EF((i8.i1.u43.p134==1)) U (E((i9.i3.u73.p235==1) U (i6.i4.u49.p158==1)) * (((i10.u61.p197==1)&&(i14.i1.u80.p256==1))||((i2.i1.u8...512
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(Init,!(!(!((E(!((E((i9.i3.u73.p235==1) U (i6.i4.u49.p158==1)) * (((i10.u61.p197==1)&&(i14.i1.u80.p256==1...925
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t99, t147, t187, t190, t218, t229, t241, i1.t236, i1.i0.u2.t197, i1.i2.u12.t189, i1.i3.t...1021
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 289/289 places, 261/261 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 274 transition count 246
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 274 transition count 246
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 273 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 273 transition count 245
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 272 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 272 transition count 244
Applied a total of 34 rules in 13 ms. Remains 272 /289 variables (removed 17) and now considering 244/261 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 272 cols
[2025-06-07 12:42:13] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:42:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 152 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 254 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 243 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:42:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 7/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 1/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 244/516 variables, 272/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 4/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 3/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 516/516 variables, and 356 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 34/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 244/516 variables, 272/351 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 243/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 77 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 76 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 60 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 57 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 20/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 3/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 5/622 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:42:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 3/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 5/630 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 516/516 variables, and 641 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 16/16 constraints]
After SMT, in 60035ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60037ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 272/289 places, 244/261 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60304 ms. Remains : 272/289 places, 244/261 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 244 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3044640555757121516.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8996212475049725417.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3044640555757121516.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8996212475049725417.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph933204450921663819.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph933204450921663819.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph933204450921663819.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph933204450921663819.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph933204450921663819.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 41 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability18271497689944487082.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:43:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6335135312837391512.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability18271497689944487082.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6335135312837391512.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.19622e+26,2.1719,65972,2084,43,114275,526,612,253559,62,1317,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((!(AF(((i6.u38.p119==1)&&(i11.i0.u57.p180==1)))) + (i12.i1.u72.p228==1)) + (EX(((((i9.i0.u53.p167==1)||(i2.i2.u20.p51==1))||((i10.u91....350
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((!(!(EG(!(((i6.u38.p119==1)&&(i11.i0.u57.p180==1)))))) + (i12.i1.u72.p228==1)) + (EX(((((i9.i0.u53....402
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t53, t94, t97, t141, t144, t187, t190, t218, t226, t227, t234, t241, i0.t236, i0.i0.u2.t...1033
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16757431057984974922.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16757431057984974922.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16757431057984974922.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16757431057984974922.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16757431057984974922.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 34 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14902575717344537604.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:44:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2531441186565625288.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14902575717344537604.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2531441186565625288.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.29057e+26,13.1574,283348,3308,29,413103,464,617,1.59145e+06,47,1363,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((!(A(EF(((i3.i1.u23.p62==1)||((i3.i0.u12.p35==1)&&(i0.i2.u25.p82==1)))) U E(EG((i1.u13.p46==1)) U (i4.i2.u48.p149==1)))) * ((i15.u93.p...218
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(E(EG((i1.u13.p46==1)) U (i4.i2.u48.p149==1)))))) * !(E(!(E(EG((i1.u13.p46==1)) U (i4.i2.u4...471
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t61, t106, t155, t158, t204, t207, t246, i0.i0.u2.t214, i0.i1.u9.t209, i0.i2.t173, i0.i2.u25....1250
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 4 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 16 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14231983511834198608.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 13:12:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14197654197962893194.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14231983511834198608.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14197654197962893194.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 10 CTL formulae.

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-004B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500834"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;