Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533500833.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-004B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500833
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 568K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.3K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.9K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 40K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 176K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 79K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 74K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749298815752

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-004B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 12:20:16] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 12:20:16] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 76 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Transformed 315 places.
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Transformed 287 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 315 places and 287 transitions and 718 arcs in 176 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 72 out of 315 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 315/315 places, 287/287 transitions.
Discarding 26 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 26 rule applications. Total rules 26 place count 289 transition count 261
Iterating global reduction 0 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 289 transition count 261
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 53 place count 288 transition count 260
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 54 place count 288 transition count 260
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 287 transition count 259
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 287 transition count 259
Applied a total of 56 rules in 70 ms. Remains 287 /315 variables (removed 28) and now considering 259/287 (removed 28) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 259 rows 287 cols
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 17 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 266 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 218 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 513 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 258 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:20:17] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/287 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 70 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 15/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 1/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 259/546 variables, 287/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 1/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 6/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 0/378 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 546/546 variables, and 378 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 30023 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/286 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/287 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 40/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/287 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 259/546 variables, 287/375 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 258/633 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 86 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 84 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 12/645 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 74 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 77 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 84 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 79 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 13/658 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 3/661 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/546 variables, 6/667 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 546/546 variables, and 667 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 287/287 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 258/258 constraints, Known Traps: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60086ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 258 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60096ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 287/315 places, 259/287 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60696 ms. Remains : 287/315 places, 259/287 transitions.
Support contains 72 out of 287 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 12:21:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:17] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
Support contains 60 out of 287 places (down from 72) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 17532 steps (3 resets) in 377 ms. (46 steps per ms) remains 0/35 properties
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
Computed a total of 68 stabilizing places and 68 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 286 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 225 transition count 197
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 225 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 202 transition count 174
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 180 place count 190 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 190 transition count 162
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 190 transition count 154
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 182 transition count 154
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 120 transition count 92
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 120 transition count 91
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 335 place count 119 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 117 transition count 88
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 116 transition count 88
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 116 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 342 place count 114 transition count 86
Applied a total of 342 rules in 51 ms. Remains 114 /287 variables (removed 173) and now considering 86/259 (removed 173) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 114 cols
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned [94, 98]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 112/287 places, 86/259 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 110 transition count 84
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 110 /112 variables (removed 2) and now considering 84/86 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 84 rows 110 cols
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 63 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 146 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 110/287 places, 84/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 269 ms. Remains : 110/287 places, 84/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 84 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6890013707532359495.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17244653726353077962.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6890013707532359495.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17244653726353077962.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.39148e+16,0.214588,13880,2,197,5,42308,6,0,527,69410,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AG(EF((p68==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE U (p68==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,0,3.98171,147240,1,0,10,677146,20,3,2541,938538,9
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 271 transition count 243
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 271 transition count 243
Applied a total of 32 rules in 8 ms. Remains 271 /287 variables (removed 16) and now considering 243/259 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 243 rows 271 cols
[2025-06-07 12:21:22] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 7 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 98 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:21:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 143 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 242 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 242 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:21:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 5/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 4/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/74 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 2/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 5/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 4/356 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 6/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 0/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/514 variables, 0/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 514/514 variables, and 362 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 36/36 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/271 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 36/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 243/514 variables, 271/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 242/594 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 66 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 18/612 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 64 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:21:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 5/617 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 10/627 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/514 variables, 7/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 514/514 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 271/271 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 242/242 constraints, Known Traps: 59/59 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 17/17 constraints]
After SMT, in 60047ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 242 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60048ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 271/287 places, 243/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60300 ms. Remains : 271/287 places, 243/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:22:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 243 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:22:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6195721567910943102.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11555397157539759149.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6195721567910943102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11555397157539759149.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03985e+26,23.2502,645520,2,28541,5,1.84429e+06,6,0,1329,4.76468e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10208469804451374593.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10208469804451374593.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10208469804451374593.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10208469804451374593.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10208469804451374593.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Removed a total of 38 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 45 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11515888975107303428.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:22:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1729024649572112047.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11515888975107303428.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1729024649572112047.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03985e+26,6.69396,178352,2298,51,321242,806,571,897649,63,2358,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((E(((i2.i1.u97.p306==0)||(i11.i2.u68.p226==1)) U (i12.u73.p230==1)) + (i2.i1.u95.p304==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(E(((i2.i1.u97.p306==0)||(i11.i2.u68.p226==1)) U (i12.u73.p230==1)) + (i2.i1.u95.p304==1)))] != F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t94, t97, t146, t186, t189, t222, t226, t240, i0.i0.u10.t191, i0.i1.t157, i0.i1.u24.t153...1001
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 62 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 62 transitions
Performed 62 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 62
Iterating post reduction 0 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 286 transition count 196
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 62 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 224 transition count 196
Performed 24 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 24 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 224 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 200 transition count 172
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 184 place count 188 transition count 160
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 188 transition count 160
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 188 transition count 152
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 212 place count 180 transition count 152
Performed 58 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 58
Deduced a syphon composed of 58 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 58 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 116 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 122 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 122 transition count 93
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 121 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 119 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 118 transition count 90
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 118 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 116 transition count 88
Applied a total of 338 rules in 28 ms. Remains 116 /287 variables (removed 171) and now considering 88/259 (removed 171) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned [96, 100]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 66 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/287 places, 88/259 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 112 transition count 86
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 112 /114 variables (removed 2) and now considering 86/88 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 170 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 112/287 places, 86/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 270 ms. Remains : 112/287 places, 86/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1429923041859613741.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10739404277666088241.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1429923041859613741.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10739404277666088241.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.20017e+16,0.431562,23080,2,336,5,74143,6,0,536,134818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p87==0)||(p92==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p87==0)||(p92==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 81/0/5
(forward)formula 0,1,0.486508,23208,1,0,9,74143,19,3,2619,134818,8
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 273 transition count 245
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 273 transition count 245
Applied a total of 28 rules in 7 ms. Remains 273 /287 variables (removed 14) and now considering 245/259 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 245 rows 273 cols
[2025-06-07 12:23:24] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 82 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:23:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 144 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 228 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 244 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:23:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/273 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 5/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 1/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 245/518 variables, 273/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 2/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 4/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/518 variables, 0/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 518/518 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved in 23512 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 273/273 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 244/244 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/273 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 28/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/273 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 245/518 variables, 273/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 244/590 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 71 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 61 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 20/610 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 82 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 9/619 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 2/621 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:23:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 67 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 1/622 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 79 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 67 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 3/625 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/518 variables, 4/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 46 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 518/518 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 273/273 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 244/244 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 53542ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 244 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53543ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 273/287 places, 245/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53780 ms. Remains : 273/287 places, 245/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 245 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15093135196695111799.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:17] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5941344435626055225.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15093135196695111799.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5941344435626055225.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18198e+26,29.5807,776420,2,26579,5,2.20604e+06,6,0,1339,5.7171e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 14 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14697340991460002307.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14697340991460002307.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14697340991460002307.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14697340991460002307.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14697340991460002307.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15665515833191710776.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:24:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13339605551938453142.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15665515833191710776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13339605551938453142.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.18198e+26,1.60667,51136,1664,30,88272,342,588,183846,55,918,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(AX(FALSE)) * (AF((i14.u88.p278==1)) + (AG(((i17.i0.u78.p242==0)&&(i11.u62.p196==1))) * (AF((((i8.u46.p148==1)||(i7.u37.p125==1))||(i2...273
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(EG(!(EX(!(FALSE))))))] = FALSE * ([(FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!((i14.u88.p278==1)))))),TRUE) * !(((i17.i0....428
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t50, t95, t98, t142, t145, t188, t191, t219, t224, t228, t233, t237, i0.i0.u2.t198, i0.i...1016
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 59 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 59 transitions
Performed 59 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 59
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 286 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 227 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 226 transition count 198
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 226 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 203 transition count 175
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 178 place count 191 transition count 163
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 191 transition count 163
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 190 place count 191 transition count 155
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 206 place count 183 transition count 155
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 330 place count 121 transition count 93
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 121 transition count 92
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 120 transition count 91
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 120 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 118 transition count 89
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 117 transition count 89
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 337 place count 117 transition count 87
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 341 place count 115 transition count 87
Applied a total of 341 rules in 33 ms. Remains 115 /287 variables (removed 172) and now considering 87/259 (removed 172) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 115 cols
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned [95, 99]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 57 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 113/287 places, 87/259 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 111 transition count 85
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 111 /113 variables (removed 2) and now considering 85/87 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 85 rows 111 cols
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 55 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 139 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 111/287 places, 85/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 233 ms. Remains : 111/287 places, 85/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 85 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17400790548008994228.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14758206609308528862.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17400790548008994228.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14758206609308528862.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.18865e+16,0.142927,10236,2,446,5,27226,6,0,532,39100,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF(((p29==0)||(p52==1))) + (p46==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!(((p29==0)||(p52==1))))) + (p46==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 81/4/4
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14138578037302788854.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14138578037302788854.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14138578037302788854.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14138578037302788854.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14138578037302788854.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8420367611773010599.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:25:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17818799346480621273.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8420367611773010599.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17818799346480621273.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.18865e+16,0.071052,7004,37,15,5957,134,241,13585,44,667,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((AF(((i2.u3.p29==0)||(i1.u7.p52==1))) + (i3.u5.p46==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(!(EG(!(((i2.u3.p29==0)||(i1.u7.p52==1))))) + (i3.u5.p46==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 269 transition count 241
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 269 transition count 241
Applied a total of 36 rules in 13 ms. Remains 269 /287 variables (removed 18) and now considering 241/259 (removed 18) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 241 rows 269 cols
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 84 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 139 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 224 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 240 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:26:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 72 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 2/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/510 variables, 0/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 510/510 variables, and 343 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 24745 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/268 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/269 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 26/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 241/510 variables, 269/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 240/581 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 18/599 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 6/605 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:26:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 3/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/510 variables, 20/634 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 510/510 variables, and 634 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 269/269 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 240/240 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 23/23 constraints]
After SMT, in 54778ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 240 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54779ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 269/287 places, 241/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 55016 ms. Remains : 269/287 places, 241/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 241 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12626893633936802019.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7738530588749645372.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12626893633936802019.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7738530588749645372.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,20.6945,565620,2,23815,5,1.71302e+06,6,0,1319,4.04661e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10778970345954899817.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10778970345954899817.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10778970345954899817.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10778970345954899817.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10778970345954899817.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5467863583803039965.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality134223214702838302.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5467863583803039965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality134223214702838302.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.05333e+25,1.20459,41504,1482,66,71171,728,578,147825,64,1840,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX((i16.i0.u82.p265==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX((i16.i0.u82.p265==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t49, t92, t95, t138, t141, t184, t187, t220, t224, t238, i0.i0.u2.t194, i0.i1.u10.t189, ...964
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 16
(forward)formula 0,1,2.78764,85664,1,0,185066,728,2988,310533,362,2018,225312
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 59 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 59 transitions
Performed 59 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 59
Iterating post reduction 0 with 59 rules applied. Total rules applied 59 place count 286 transition count 199
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 227 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 225 transition count 197
Performed 23 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 23 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 225 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 202 transition count 174
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 193 transition count 165
Iterating global reduction 3 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 193 transition count 165
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 186 place count 193 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 187 transition count 159
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 318 place count 127 transition count 99
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 319 place count 127 transition count 98
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 321 place count 126 transition count 97
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 323 place count 124 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 123 transition count 95
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 123 transition count 94
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 122 transition count 94
Applied a total of 326 rules in 32 ms. Remains 122 /287 variables (removed 165) and now considering 94/259 (removed 165) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 94 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [106]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 121/287 places, 94/259 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 120 transition count 93
Applied a total of 2 rules in 4 ms. Remains 120 /121 variables (removed 1) and now considering 93/94 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 120 cols
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Computed 43 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 120/287 places, 93/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 228 ms. Remains : 120/287 places, 93/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality216997479750115758.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7521180274602969251.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality216997479750115758.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7521180274602969251.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.22872e+16,1.83039,64060,2,460,5,211143,6,0,573,449603,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((EF(((p127==0)&&(p53==1))) * (p194==0)) * (((p211==0)||(p253==1))||((p10==0)||(p91==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p127==0)&&(p53==1)))))] = FALSE * [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((p194==0)))] = FALSE)...238
(forward)formula 0,0,1.83251,64060,1,0,8,211143,9,2,594,449603,1
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 286 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 226 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 225 transition count 197
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 225 transition count 175
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 166 place count 203 transition count 175
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 177 place count 192 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 192 transition count 164
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 192 transition count 159
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 198 place count 187 transition count 159
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 322 place count 125 transition count 97
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 324 place count 125 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 325 place count 124 transition count 95
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 122 transition count 93
Applied a total of 327 rules in 26 ms. Remains 122 /287 variables (removed 165) and now considering 93/259 (removed 166) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 93 rows 122 cols
[2025-06-07 12:27:48] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:27:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 83 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 142 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:48] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 91 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/122 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/215 variables, 122/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/215 variables, 0/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 215/215 variables, and 167 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2490 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 43/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/122 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 93/215 variables, 122/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 91/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/215 variables, 0/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/215 variables, 0/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 215/215 variables, and 258 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved in 2802 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 122/122 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 91/91 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5297ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 91 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5297ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 122/287 places, 93/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5471 ms. Remains : 122/287 places, 93/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 93 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10622222902894670029.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:27:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17396868060242609364.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10622222902894670029.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17396868060242609364.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.56594e+17,0.271237,16808,2,222,5,53447,6,0,584,88722,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E(EF((p200==1)) U !((((p174==0)||(p183==1))||(p142==1)))) * EF(((p277==0)&&(p312==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(E(TRUE U (p200==1)) U !((((p174==0)||(p183==1))||(p142==1)))) * E(TRUE U ((p277==0)&&(p312==1)))))...165
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15763684213993301144.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15763684213993301144.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15763684213993301144.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15763684213993301144.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15763684213993301144.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3612033210598173990.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3430729491622600178.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3612033210598173990.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3430729491622600178.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.56594e+17,0.102067,8764,49,18,9352,149,296,25487,52,802,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E(EF((i7.u23.p200==1)) U !((((i8.i0.u19.p174==0)||(i6.u21.p183==1))||(i4.u16.p142==1)))) * EF(((i10.u33.p277==0)&&(i9.u36.p312==1))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(E(TRUE U (i7.u23.p200==1)) U !((((i8.i0.u19.p174==0)||(i6.u21.p183==1))||(i4.u16.p142==1)))) * E(T...211
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 3
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 286 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 226 transition count 198
Performed 22 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 22 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 226 transition count 176
Deduced a syphon composed of 22 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 22 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 44 rules applied. Total rules applied 164 place count 204 transition count 176
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 176 place count 192 transition count 164
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 192 transition count 164
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 192 transition count 156
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 204 place count 184 transition count 156
Performed 62 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 62
Deduced a syphon composed of 62 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 62 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 124 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 122 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 122 transition count 93
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 121 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 119 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 118 transition count 90
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 118 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 116 transition count 88
Applied a total of 338 rules in 34 ms. Remains 116 /287 variables (removed 171) and now considering 88/259 (removed 171) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 60 ms returned [95, 99]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/287 places, 88/259 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 112 transition count 86
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 112 /114 variables (removed 2) and now considering 86/88 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 112/287 places, 86/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 226 ms. Remains : 112/287 places, 86/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7867512028032054215.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality174525060225925900.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7867512028032054215.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality174525060225925900.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.82638e+16,0.243515,14464,2,201,5,44573,6,0,537,72997,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG(((p288!=0)&&(p123!=1))) + (p110==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),((p288!=0)&&(p123!=1)))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p110==1))] != FALSE)
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 82/4/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.274765,14720,1,0,8,44573,19,2,2596,72997,8
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-004B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 272 transition count 244
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 272 transition count 244
Applied a total of 30 rules in 9 ms. Remains 272 /287 variables (removed 15) and now considering 244/259 (removed 15) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 244 rows 272 cols
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 77 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:28:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 160 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 243 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:28:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 70 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 5/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/70 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 244/516 variables, 272/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 9/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 1/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 0/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/516 variables, 0/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 516/516 variables, and 355 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/271 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/272 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 27/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/272 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 244/516 variables, 272/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 243/587 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 81 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 73 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 19/606 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 2/608 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 6/614 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 2/616 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 11/627 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 2/629 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/516 variables, 3/632 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 516/516 variables, and 632 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 272/272 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 243/243 constraints, Known Traps: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 60038ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 243 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60038ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 272/287 places, 244/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60286 ms. Remains : 272/287 places, 244/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:29:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 244 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:29:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14900209945603920760.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:29:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8733677737829482233.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14900209945603920760.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8733677737829482233.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06611e+26,24.9333,656272,2,29528,5,1.94191e+06,6,0,1334,4.7368e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11270867855834930844.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11270867855834930844.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11270867855834930844.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11270867855834930844.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11270867855834930844.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 39 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11164349680320374421.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10866385872248237366.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11164349680320374421.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10866385872248237366.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.06611e+26,1.62632,49972,1517,43,85259,949,577,181115,61,2506,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((((i7.u39.p126==0)||(i9.i0.u55.p171==1)) + ((i1.i0.u6.p15==1) + ((AX((i10.i1.u73.p233==0)) * !(((i9.i0.u54.p168==0)||(i2.i1.u12.p35==1)...373
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG((FwdU(FwdU(Init,(((i7.u39.p126==0)||(i9.i0.u55.p171==1)) + ((i1.i0.u6.p15==1) + ((!(EX(!((i10.i1.u73.p233...725
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t52, t92, t95, t141, t144, t187, t190, t223, t232, t241, i0.i0.u1.t197, i0.i1.u9.t192, i...1012
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 270 transition count 242
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 270 transition count 242
Applied a total of 34 rules in 16 ms. Remains 270 /287 variables (removed 17) and now considering 242/259 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 242 rows 270 cols
[2025-06-07 12:30:55] [INFO ] Computed 45 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 81 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:30:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 141 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 223 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 241 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:30:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:30:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 20/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 4/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/339 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 5/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 6/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 0/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/512 variables, 0/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 512/512 variables, and 355 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/269 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/270 variables, 45/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 34/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 1/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/270 variables, 0/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 242/512 variables, 270/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 241/591 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 66 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 20/611 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/613 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 76 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 62 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/615 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 1/616 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 2/618 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/512 variables, 6/624 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 512/512 variables, and 624 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 45/45 constraints, State Equation: 270/270 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 241/241 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 60033ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 241 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 60034ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 270/287 places, 242/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 60274 ms. Remains : 270/287 places, 242/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 242 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5126636140010923225.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:31:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7099231055856381574.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5126636140010923225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7099231055856381574.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.18568e+25,26.925,699120,2,24134,5,2.05658e+06,6,0,1324,5.12612e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17443372729565369077.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17443372729565369077.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17443372729565369077.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17443372729565369077.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17443372729565369077.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 40 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6197572369703012221.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15206541980044942332.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6197572369703012221.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15206541980044942332.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.18568e+25,1.84274,55980,1994,54,96750,474,571,210601,59,1111,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EX(A((AX((i11.u61.p195==1)) * A(((i8.i1.u52.p167==0)||(i10.i1.u56.p185==1)) U (i5.u46.p144==1))) U ((i2.i1.u8.p19==0)||(i3.i2.u13.p35=...162
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,EX(!((E(!(((i2.i1.u8.p19==0)||(i3.i2.u13.p35==1))) U (!((!(EX(!((i11.u61.p195==1)))) * !((E(!((i5.u46...379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t52, t96, t99, t139, t142, t185, t188, t216, t225, t239, i0.i0.t178, i0.i0.u16.t182, i0.i1.u3...972
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 61 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 61 transitions
Performed 61 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 61
Iterating post reduction 0 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 286 transition count 197
Reduce places removed 61 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 61 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 225 transition count 197
Performed 25 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 25 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 225 transition count 172
Deduced a syphon composed of 25 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 25 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 172 place count 200 transition count 172
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 183 place count 189 transition count 161
Iterating global reduction 2 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 189 transition count 161
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 194 place count 189 transition count 154
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 182 transition count 154
Performed 60 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 60
Deduced a syphon composed of 60 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 120 rules applied. Total rules applied 328 place count 122 transition count 94
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 122 transition count 93
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 121 transition count 92
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 333 place count 119 transition count 90
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 118 transition count 90
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 334 place count 118 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 338 place count 116 transition count 88
Applied a total of 338 rules in 25 ms. Remains 116 /287 variables (removed 171) and now considering 88/259 (removed 171) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 88 rows 116 cols
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 62 ms returned [96, 100]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 114/287 places, 88/259 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 112 transition count 86
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 112 /114 variables (removed 2) and now considering 86/88 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 86 rows 112 cols
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 112/287 places, 86/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 224 ms. Remains : 112/287 places, 86/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 86 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8153201875577250133.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:32:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9027950201909863322.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8153201875577250133.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9027950201909863322.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29585e+16,0.583028,28156,2,273,5,94852,6,0,536,172606,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((p9==1)||((p189==0)&&(p223==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((p9==1)||((p189==0)&&(p223==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t4, t32, t67, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect...173
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:33:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph76541734848579153.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph76541734848579153.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph76541734848579153.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph76541734848579153.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph76541734848579153.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:33:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:33:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:33:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 10 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:33:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:33:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12678542126734352575.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17868073096655856275.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12678542126734352575.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17868073096655856275.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.29585e+16,0.171211,10988,65,22,14593,173,270,27756,46,823,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((i1.u1.p9==1)||((i9.u21.p189==0)&&(u25.p223==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((i1.u1.p9==1)||((i9.u21.p189==0)&&(u25.p223==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t67, i1.u9.t32, i2.u12.t4, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reve...186
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 287/287 places, 259/259 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 60 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 60 transitions
Performed 60 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 60
Iterating post reduction 0 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 286 transition count 198
Reduce places removed 60 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 226 transition count 198
Performed 24 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 24 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 226 transition count 174
Deduced a syphon composed of 24 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 24 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 168 place count 202 transition count 174
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 180 place count 190 transition count 162
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 190 transition count 162
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 190 transition count 154
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 208 place count 182 transition count 154
Performed 59 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 59
Deduced a syphon composed of 59 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 59 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 118 rules applied. Total rules applied 326 place count 123 transition count 95
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 327 place count 123 transition count 94
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 329 place count 122 transition count 93
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 331 place count 120 transition count 91
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 119 transition count 91
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 332 place count 119 transition count 89
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 336 place count 117 transition count 89
Applied a total of 336 rules in 21 ms. Remains 117 /287 variables (removed 170) and now considering 89/259 (removed 170) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 89 rows 117 cols
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Computed 44 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned [96, 100]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 115/287 places, 89/259 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 113 transition count 87
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 113 /115 variables (removed 2) and now considering 87/89 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 87 rows 113 cols
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Computed 42 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 79 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 113/287 places, 87/259 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 217 ms. Remains : 113/287 places, 87/259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 87 transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12516928521761045236.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:33:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1774439837669844344.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12516928521761045236.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1774439837669844344.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0611e+16,0.285722,16684,2,310,5,51408,6,0,541,88670,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(((((p86==0)&&(p82==1))&&(p297==1))||(p94==1))) * (p100==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (p100==0)) * !(EG(!(((((p86==0)&&(p82==1))&&(p297==1))||(p94==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t7, t24, t28, t30, t34, t55, t72, Intersection with reachable at each step enabl...206
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4143280175114078966.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4143280175114078966.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4143280175114078966.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4143280175114078966.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4143280175114078966.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 11 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5828612852180046511.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17473268488381411671.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5828612852180046511.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17473268488381411671.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.0611e+16,0.102958,8472,82,23,9117,175,301,19639,48,808,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AF(((((i2.u9.p86==0)&&(i1.u8.p82==1))&&(i11.u34.p297==1))||(i4.i1.u10.p94==1))) * (i4.i0.u11.p100==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (i4.i0.u11.p100==0)) * !(EG(!(((((i2.u9.p86==0)&&(i1.u8.p82==1))&&(i11.u34.p297==1))||(i4.i...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t72, i0.i0.u3.t1, i0.i0.u7.t30, i0.i1.u2.t0, i0.i1.u5.t24, i1.u6.t28, i1.u8.t34, i2.u18.t55, ...274
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6424714166746138788.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6424714166746138788.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6424714166746138788.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6424714166746138788.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6424714166746138788.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14051371371233146478.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:34:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8996411242757972058.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14051371371233146478.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8996411242757972058.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.79106e+26,13.1048,312104,4166,57,499267,579,612,1.68733e+06,66,1897,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((E(((i13.i2.u101.p306==0)||(i7.u76.p226==1)) U (i10.i4.u81.p230==1)) + (i13.i2.u105.p304==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(E(((i13.i2.u101.p306==0)||(i7.u76.p226==1)) U (i10.i4.u81.p230==1)) + (i13.i2.u105.p304==1)))] !...162
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t57, t109, t154, t157, t208, t241, t242, t244, t251, i0.i1.u2.t212, i1.t256, i1.t205, i1.t202...1247
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 6 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6913617700031241420.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 12:37:08] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5099297764817584831.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6913617700031241420.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5099297764817584831.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.79106e+26,340.107,8923392,12696,354,1.52593e+07,755,388,7.77438e+07,137,6320,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((E(((i1.u88.p306==0)||(i0.i1.i0.u66.p226==1)) U (i0.i1.u67.p230==1)) + (i1.u88.p304==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(E(((i1.u88.p306==0)||(i0.i1.i0.u66.p226==1)) U (i0.i1.u67.p230==1)) + (i1.u88.p304==1)))] != FAL...157
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.i0.u4.t212, i0.i0.i0.i1.t256, i0.i0.i0.i1.u25.t167, i0.i0.i0.i1.u25.t171, i0.i0.i0.i1.i...2284
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 13:02:02] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 120 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 259 transitions.
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Transformed 287 places.
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Transformed 259 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17484487280190743984.gal : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 13:02:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7814443613720247000.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17484487280190743984.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7814443613720247000.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.79106e+26,35.842,889852,2,73371,5,2.67956e+06,6,0,1409,6.41641e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(EG((E(((p306==0)||(p226==1)) U (p230==1)) + (p304==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),(E(((p306==0)||(p226==1)) U (p230==1)) + (p304==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t16, t17, t21, t23, t24, t27, t28, t32, t34, t37, t41, t45, t47, t48, t50, t51, t53, t54, t56...650

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-004B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-004B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533500833"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-004B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-004B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;