Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533400817.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533400817
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 524K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 55K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 45K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.4K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 21K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 150K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 69K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 56K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749295693784

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-003B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 11:28:14] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 11:28:14] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 67 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Transformed 237 places.
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Transformed 216 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 237 places and 216 transitions and 540 arcs in 168 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 81 out of 237 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 237/237 places, 216/216 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 219 transition count 198
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 219 transition count 198
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 218 transition count 197
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 218 transition count 197
Applied a total of 38 rules in 44 ms. Remains 218 /237 variables (removed 19) and now considering 197/216 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 197 rows 218 cols
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 25 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 240 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 199 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 469 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 196 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 1053 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 93 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 9/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 197/415 variables, 218/283 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 2/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 39 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 4/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 1/290 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 1/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/415 variables, 0/291 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 415/415 variables, and 291 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 25720 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/217 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/218 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 33/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 197/415 variables, 218/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 196/481 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 12/493 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 52 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 5/498 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 1/499 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 2/501 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 2/503 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 6/509 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 102 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 2/511 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 415/415 variables, and 511 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 196/196 constraints, Known Traps: 57/57 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 55795ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 196 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 55807ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 218/237 places, 197/216 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 56337 ms. Remains : 218/237 places, 197/216 transitions.
Support contains 81 out of 218 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 11:29:11] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-07 11:29:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 37 ms
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-07 11:29:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
Support contains 75 out of 218 places (down from 81) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 1229 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 2/46 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 221 ms. (180 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 142 ms. (279 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-07 11:29:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 86/92 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 126/218 variables, 21/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 3/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 197/415 variables, 218/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/415 variables, 0/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 415/415 variables, and 256 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 417 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 4/4 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 86/92 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/92 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 126/218 variables, 21/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 4/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 2/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/218 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 197/415 variables, 218/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 2/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 73 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 64 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 68 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 59 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 5/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 4/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 2/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 1/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/415 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/415 variables, 0/272 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 415/415 variables, and 272 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 1294 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 218/218 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 1714ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 440 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 218 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 47 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 47 transitions
Performed 47 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 47
Iterating post reduction 0 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 47 place count 218 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 47 rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 171 transition count 150
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 94 place count 171 transition count 132
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 153 transition count 132
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 138 place count 145 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 145 transition count 124
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 145 transition count 120
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 141 transition count 120
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 92 transition count 71
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 92 transition count 70
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 91 transition count 69
Performed 8 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 0
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 271 place count 83 transition count 69
Free-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 272 place count 83 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 273 place count 82 transition count 68
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 8 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 8 transitions
Iterating global reduction 4 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 281 place count 82 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 282 place count 81 transition count 67
Applied a total of 282 rules in 48 ms. Remains 81 /218 variables (removed 137) and now considering 67/197 (removed 130) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 48 ms. Remains : 81/218 places, 67/197 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 285 ms. (139 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 101 ms. (392 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (9 resets) in 137 ms. (289 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1277219 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=425 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1277219 steps, saw 244860 distinct states, run finished after 3006 ms. (steps per millisecond=424 ) properties seen :0
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-07 11:29:17] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:17] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 7 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 28/34 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/36 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 39/75 variables, 36/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 6/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 46/121 variables, 27/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 11/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 2/124 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 20/144 variables, 14/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 5/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 2/147 variables, 1/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 2/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/123 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 123 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 175 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 45.0 s and query timeout 4500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 28/34 variables, 13/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/34 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/36 variables, 1/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 1/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/36 variables, 0/15 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 39/75 variables, 36/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 6/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 1/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 46/121 variables, 27/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 11/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/121 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 1/122 variables, 1/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/101 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 2/124 variables, 1/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/102 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 20/144 variables, 14/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 5/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 1/122 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 3/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/144 variables, 0/125 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 1/145 variables, 1/126 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 1/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/145 variables, 0/127 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 2/147 variables, 1/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/147 variables, 0/128 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (OVERLAPS) 1/148 variables, 2/130 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 32 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 2/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 33 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 34 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/132 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 132 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 528 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 81/81 constraints, ReadFeed: 7/7 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 709ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 40 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 81 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 67/67 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 67/67 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 3 ms. Remains : 81/81 places, 67/67 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 67/67 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 81 /81 variables (removed 0) and now considering 67/67 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [74]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 61 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 1 : 80/81 places, 67/67 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 80 transition count 65
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 78 transition count 65
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 78 /80 variables (removed 2) and now considering 65/67 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 78 cols
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned [61, 65]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 51 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 2 : 76/81 places, 65/67 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 74 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 74 transition count 63
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 74 /76 variables (removed 2) and now considering 63/65 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 11:29:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 68 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 3 : 74/81 places, 63/67 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 3 iterations and 242 ms. Remains : 74/81 places, 63/67 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9 resets) in 161 ms. (246 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40003 steps (8 resets) in 86 ms. (459 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (9 resets) in 82 ms. (481 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 1371733 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=457 ) properties seen :0 out of 2
Probabilistic random walk after 1371733 steps, saw 235234 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=457 ) properties seen :0
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 21/27 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 46/110 variables, 27/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 11/82 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 2/113 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 20/133 variables, 14/100 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 5/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/106 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 2/136 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 2/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 27 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 110 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 105 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 75.0 s and query timeout 7500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/6 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 21/27 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/27 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/29 variables, 1/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/29 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 35/64 variables, 29/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 46/110 variables, 27/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 11/83 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/84 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 1/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 6/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/110 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 1/111 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 1/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/111 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (OVERLAPS) 2/113 variables, 1/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/113 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (OVERLAPS) 20/133 variables, 14/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 5/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 1/114 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 25 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/115 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 26 (OVERLAPS) 2/136 variables, 1/116 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 27 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 28 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/117 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 29 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 2/119 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 30 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 31 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
At refinement iteration 32 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 120 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved in 492 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 604ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Parikh walk visited 0 properties in 57 ms.
Support contains 6 out of 74 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 74/74 places, 63/63 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 63/63 (removed 0) transitions.
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 2 ms. Remains : 74/74 places, 63/63 transitions.
Starting structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode, iteration 0 : 74/74 places, 63/63 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 63/63 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 5 read => feed constraints.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/74 variables, 8/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 5/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 63/137 variables, 74/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/121 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 137/137 variables, and 121 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 1926 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 8/8 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 7/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/74 variables, 8/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 63/137 variables, 74/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/118 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 61/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 3/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 5/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/137 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 137/137 variables, and 190 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 6357 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 31/31 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, ReadFeed: 5/5 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 8291ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 8292ms
Finished structural reductions in REACHABILITY mode , in 1 iterations and 8430 ms. Remains : 74/74 places, 63/63 transitions.
Attempting over-approximation, by ignoring read arcs.
Partial Free-agglomeration rule applied 15 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Free agglomeration) removed 15 transitions
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 74 transition count 63
Applied a total of 15 rules in 8 ms. Remains 74 /74 variables (removed 0) and now considering 63/63 (removed 0) transitions.
Running SMT prover for 2 properties.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] [Real]Absence check using 31 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] After 61ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in real domain returned unsat :0 sat :0 real:2
Starting Z3 with timeout 450.0 s and query timeout 45000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] [Nat]Absence check using 31 positive place invariants in 4 ms returned sat
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] After 22ms SMT Verify possible using state equation in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] State equation strengthened by 14 read => feed constraints.
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] After 9ms SMT Verify possible using 14 Read/Feed constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
TRAPS : Iteration 0
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 42 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Trap strengthening (SAT) tested/added 2/1 trap constraints in 42 ms
TRAPS : Iteration 1
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] After 120ms SMT Verify possible using trap constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] After 193ms SMT Verify possible using all constraints in natural domain returned unsat :0 sat :2
Over-approximation ignoring read arcs solved 0 properties in 275 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 197 transitions.
Computed a total of 52 stabilizing places and 52 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 205 transition count 184
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 205 transition count 184
Applied a total of 26 rules in 5 ms. Remains 205 /218 variables (removed 13) and now considering 184/197 (removed 13) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 184 rows 205 cols
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 68 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 116 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 186 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 183 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:29:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 4/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 184/389 variables, 205/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 44 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 5/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/389 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/389 variables, 1/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/389 variables, 0/276 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 389/389 variables, and 276 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 27054 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 8/8 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/205 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 29/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/205 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 184/389 variables, 205/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 183/451 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 13/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 3/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 8/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 68 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 2/477 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/389 variables, 1/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 389/389 variables, and 479 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 205/205 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 183/183 constraints, Known Traps: 48/48 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 57080ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 183 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 57081ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 205/218 places, 184/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 57273 ms. Remains : 205/218 places, 184/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:30:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 26 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:28] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 184 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:30:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 21 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10089871738006672856.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16231452152493829374.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10089871738006672856.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16231452152493829374.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.84413e+19,8.85163,239816,2,12236,5,745205,6,0,1006,1.66117e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((p89==0)&&(p12==0)) * ((AF((p205==0)) + (p155==1)) + (((p186==0)&&(p197==1))&&((p1==0)&&(p218==1))))) + (((EF(AX(((p27==0)&&(p149==...283
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((p89==0)&&(p12==0)) * ((!(EG(!((p205==0)))) + (p155==1)) + (((p186==0)&&(p197==1))&&((p1==0)&&(p21...344
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t34, t36, t38, t41, t42, t45, t47, t48, t50, t51, t53, t54, t58, t62...455
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:58] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:30:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3276697383099237006.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3276697383099237006.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3276697383099237006.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3276697383099237006.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3276697383099237006.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:30:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:30:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:30:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 27 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:30:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 274 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:30:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12272866216135508315.gal : 21 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5156347771578349999.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12272866216135508315.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5156347771578349999.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.84413e+19,1.25559,39768,1135,43,69223,465,470,145781,56,1126,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((i5.i1.u28.p89==0)&&(i3.i0.u5.p12==0)) * ((AF((i12.u64.p205==0)) + (i7.i1.u46.p155==1)) + (((i11.i0.u56.p186==0)&&(i10.i1.u60.p197=...455
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((i5.i1.u28.p89==0)&&(i3.i0.u5.p12==0)) * ((!(EG(!((i12.u64.p205==0)))) + (i7.i1.u46.p155==1)) + ((...516
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t51, t91, t94, t138, t141, t167, t181, i0.i0.u1.t148, i0.i2.u11.t140, i1.t183, i1.i0.u9....787
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 204 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 204 transition count 183
Applied a total of 28 rules in 11 ms. Remains 204 /218 variables (removed 14) and now considering 183/197 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-07 11:31:29] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 147 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:31:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 154 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 311 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:31:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 38 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 4/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 269 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 24644 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 22/22 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 22/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/261 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 182/443 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 64 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 84 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 16/459 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 61 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 9/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 4/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/480 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 480 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 45/45 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 15/15 constraints]
After SMT, in 54667ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 54668ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 54991 ms. Remains : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3846782040977335733.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3693742312130597163.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3846782040977335733.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3693742312130597163.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.98918e+19,10.6654,293848,2,12205,5,881151,6,0,1001,2.07904e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((AF(((p174==0)||(p147==1))) * AF((((p28==0)&&(p65==1)) * ((p83==0) * EX((p6==0)))))) * AF(((p67!=0)&&(p116!=1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(EY(Init),!(((p174==0)||(p147==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(EY(Init),!((((p28==0)&&(p65==1)) * ((p83==0) * EX((...229
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 179/0/4
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12427803870428977989.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12427803870428977989.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12427803870428977989.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12427803870428977989.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12427803870428977989.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 29 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5880252848080379111.gal : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10749131298530144066.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5880252848080379111.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10749131298530144066.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.98918e+19,2.48967,78800,1353,51,134188,414,481,465657,67,1090,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(((AF(((i12.i0.u55.p174==0)||(i10.u43.p147==1))) * AF((((i2.u8.p28==0)&&(i4.u21.p65==1)) * ((i6.i0.u26.p83==0) * EX((i5.i0.u2.p6==0))))...201
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([FwdG(EY(Init),!(((i12.i0.u55.p174==0)||(i10.u43.p147==1))))] = FALSE * [FwdG(EY(Init),!((((i2.u8.p28==0)&&(i4...294
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
(forward)formula 0,0,17.0876,419232,1,0,753085,651,1789,1.83828e+06,273,2245,628225
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 217 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 168 transition count 147
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 168 transition count 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 151 transition count 130
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 142 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 142 transition count 121
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 142 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 138 transition count 117
Performed 48 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 90 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 90 transition count 68
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 89 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 87 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 86 transition count 65
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 86 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 84 transition count 63
Applied a total of 264 rules in 22 ms. Remains 84 /218 variables (removed 134) and now considering 63/197 (removed 134) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 139 ms returned [64, 68]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 140 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/218 places, 63/197 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 80 transition count 61
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 80 /82 variables (removed 2) and now considering 61/63 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 93 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 126 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 221 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/218 places, 61/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 389 ms. Remains : 80/218 places, 61/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11501852831387393668.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16940344369831161973.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11501852831387393668.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16940344369831161973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.44784e+11,0.145147,10348,2,142,5,28153,6,0,384,44045,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((p40==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((p40==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1068552051320255816.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1068552051320255816.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1068552051320255816.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1068552051320255816.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1068552051320255816.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 8 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 12 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1193439840086025965.gal : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 11:33:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5957273051914743040.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1193439840086025965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5957273051914743040.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.44784e+11,0.0464,5836,26,15,4048,105,166,8877,43,595,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG((u5.p40==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG((u5.p40==1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 204 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 204 transition count 183
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 204 /218 variables (removed 14) and now considering 183/197 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-07 11:34:12] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 201 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:34:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 130 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 341 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 74 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/273 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 1/274 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/275 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 275 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 28642 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 28/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 182/449 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 55 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 13/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/464 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 9/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 476 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30026 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 58697ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 58698ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59046 ms. Remains : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6342973486823811610.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3938385500624390864.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6342973486823811610.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3938385500624390864.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.55098e+19,10.7706,302868,2,13001,5,906180,6,0,1001,2.15687e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EX((AG((p15==1)) * A((p41!=0) U (((p64==1)||(p223==0))||(p102==1)))))) + (AX(AX(((p64==0)||(p35==1)))) * AX(((p90==1) + EG(((p123==0)...172
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U EX((!(E(TRUE U !((p15==1)))) * !((E(!((((p64==1)||(p223==0))||(p102==1))) U (!((p41!...558
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t34, t39, t40, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t51, t52, t56, t60, t65, t69...466
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9723871776099344490.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9723871776099344490.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9723871776099344490.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9723871776099344490.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9723871776099344490.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 32 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17663176441785818577.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:35:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7021759765146394810.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17663176441785818577.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7021759765146394810.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.55098e+19,0.672007,26776,1270,54,46554,498,492,86553,61,1217,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EX((AG((i1.i1.u5.p15==1)) * A((i3.u15.p41!=0) U (((i4.u23.p64==1)||(i12.u67.p223==0))||(i9.u34.p102==1)))))) + (AX(AX(((i4.u23.p64==0...254
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(EY((Init * !(E(TRUE U EX((!(E(TRUE U !((i1.i1.u5.p15==1)))) * !((E(!((((i4.u23.p64==1)||(i12.u67.p223==0))...766
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t90, t93, t137, t140, t166, t174, t175, t182, i0.t180, i0.i0.u10.t139, i0.i1.t107, i0.i1...788
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Discarding 16 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 16 rule applications. Total rules 16 place count 202 transition count 181
Iterating global reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 202 transition count 181
Applied a total of 32 rules in 8 ms. Remains 202 /218 variables (removed 16) and now considering 181/197 (removed 16) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 181 rows 202 cols
[2025-06-07 11:36:12] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 148 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:36:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:12] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 214 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 376 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 180 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:36:12] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 71 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 68 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 19/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 181/383 variables, 202/255 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/256 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 52 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 4/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/383 variables, 3/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/383 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 383/383 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 23060 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 25/25 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/201 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/202 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 25/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 1/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/202 variables, 0/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 181/383 variables, 202/262 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 180/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 78 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 13/455 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 7/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 1/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:36:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 3/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/383 variables, 4/473 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 383/383 variables, and 473 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 202/202 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 180/180 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 14/14 constraints]
After SMT, in 53104ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 180 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53105ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 202/218 places, 181/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53494 ms. Remains : 202/218 places, 181/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 181 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8129952821110162786.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5616744831581565607.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8129952821110162786.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5616744831581565607.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.52767e+19,6.93667,206648,2,10932,5,648203,6,0,991,1.41692e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(((p171==0)||(p24==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(((p171==0)||(p24==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t34, t39, t40, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t51, t52, t56, t60, t65, t69...432
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12751319750263497447.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12751319750263497447.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12751319750263497447.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12751319750263497447.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12751319750263497447.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 34 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4229587425965809256.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:37:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10938051132528953628.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4229587425965809256.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10938051132528953628.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.52767e+19,0.724118,30356,881,29,55426,349,453,97897,50,901,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AX(((i10.i2.u53.p171==0)||(i4.i0.u8.p24==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(!(((i10.i2.u53.p171==0)||(i4.i0.u8.p24==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t46, t89, t92, t135, t138, t164, t173, i0.t141, i0.i1.u5.t144, i0.i2.u6.t143, i0.i3.t120...716
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 48 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 48 transitions
Performed 48 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 48
Iterating post reduction 0 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 217 transition count 148
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 48 rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 169 transition count 148
Performed 18 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 18 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 96 place count 169 transition count 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 18 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 18 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 151 transition count 130
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 143 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 143 transition count 122
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 143 transition count 118
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 139 transition count 118
Performed 45 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 45 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 45 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 90 rules applied. Total rules applied 246 place count 94 transition count 73
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 94 transition count 72
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 249 place count 93 transition count 71
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 251 place count 91 transition count 69
Applied a total of 251 rules in 19 ms. Remains 91 /218 variables (removed 127) and now considering 69/197 (removed 128) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 91 cols
[2025-06-07 11:38:05] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [81]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 90/218 places, 69/197 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 90 transition count 67
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 88 transition count 67
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 88 /90 variables (removed 2) and now considering 67/69 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 88 cols
[2025-06-07 11:38:05] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 118 ms returned [68, 72]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 129 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 86/218 places, 67/197 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 84 transition count 65
Applied a total of 4 rules in 5 ms. Remains 84 /86 variables (removed 2) and now considering 65/67 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 66 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 114 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 183 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 84/218 places, 65/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 396 ms. Remains : 84/218 places, 65/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10563385186153974117.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14251171331181226516.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality10563385186153974117.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14251171331181226516.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...330
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality14251171331181226516.prop.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (9 resets) in 133 ms. (298 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 4
SDD size :1 after 3
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 8
SDD size :3 after 18
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 16
SDD size :18 after 49
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 32
SDD size :49 after 90
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 64
SDD size :90 after 482
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 128
SDD size :482 after 1288
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 42 ms. (930 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 256
SDD size :1288 after 5316
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 512
SDD size :5316 after 2.61301e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 1024
SDD size :2.61301e+06 after 9.59272e+06
SDD proceeding with computation,1 properties remain. new max is 2048
SDD size :9.59272e+06 after 1.53428e+09
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
petri\_inst\_inst,8.95655e+11,0.404987,19612,2,309,15,63364,7,0,406,108068,0
Total reachable state count : 895655232006

Verifying 1 reachability properties.
Reachability property ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 does not hold.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL COLLATERAL_PROCESSING
No reachable states exhibit your property : ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05

Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-05,0,0.405497,19612,1,0,15,63364,7,0,408,108068,0
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Interrupted probabilistic random walk after 2228608 steps, run timeout after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=742 ) properties seen :0 out of 1
Probabilistic random walk after 2228608 steps, saw 733518 distinct states, run finished after 3001 ms. (steps per millisecond=742 ) properties seen :0
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 50 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 50 transitions
Performed 50 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 50
Iterating post reduction 0 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 217 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 50 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 167 transition count 146
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 167 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 150 transition count 129
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 143 place count 141 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 141 transition count 120
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 152 place count 141 transition count 116
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 160 place count 137 transition count 116
Performed 47 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 47 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 47 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 94 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 90 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 90 transition count 68
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 89 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 87 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 86 transition count 65
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 86 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 84 transition count 63
Applied a total of 264 rules in 18 ms. Remains 84 /218 variables (removed 134) and now considering 63/197 (removed 134) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned [64, 68]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 59 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/218 places, 63/197 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 80 transition count 61
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 80 /82 variables (removed 2) and now considering 61/63 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 108 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/218 places, 61/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 188 ms. Remains : 80/218 places, 61/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 851 steps (0 resets) in 7 ms. (106 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12760580505166609474.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2653688718729447148.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality12760580505166609474.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality2653688718729447148.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...329
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 204 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 204 transition count 183
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 204 /218 variables (removed 14) and now considering 183/197 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 129 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 196 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:38:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 58 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 60 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 104 ms of which 11 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 73 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 90 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 113 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 20/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 4/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 5/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 268 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 17472 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 21/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 182/442 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 69 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 57 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 56 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 19/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/463 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 9/472 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/474 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 74 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/476 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "ParserException while parsing response: (timeout
org.smtlib.IParser$ParserException: Unbalanced parentheses at end of input")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 476 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 47/47 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 47522ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47524ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47727 ms. Remains : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5541310640851883769.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:38:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality8976656368932580539.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5541310640851883769.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8976656368932580539.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.5814e+19,10.5734,290984,2,15433,5,877117,6,0,1001,2.03659e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((!((((p27==1) * !(AF(((p75==0)||(p29==1))))) * (AF((p177==1)) + AX(((p59==0)||(p160==1)))))) * AF(((p139==1)||(p167==1)))) * (p119!=...237
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!(EG(!((p190==1)))))) + !(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!((p96==1)))) * E(TRUE U !(((p29==0)||(p108==1...576
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t34, t39, t40, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t51, t52, t56, t60, t65, t69...449
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph592425929313364632.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph592425929313364632.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph592425929313364632.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph592425929313364632.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph592425929313364632.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 29 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 33 ms
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9727521445970016740.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:39:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13722596152497884625.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9727521445970016740.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13722596152497884625.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.5814e+19,0.66634,25672,1185,54,40242,488,453,81327,59,1200,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(((!((((i1.i1.u10.p27==1) * !(AF(((i5.u25.p75==0)||(i1.i1.u10.p29==1))))) * (AF((i12.i0.u56.p177==1)) + AX(((i2.i2.u19.p59==0)||(i14.i...363
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(EG(!(EG(!((i14.i1.u60.p190==1)))))) + !(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!((i7.i1.u33.p96==1)))) * E(TRUE U ...784
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t49, t90, t93, t137, t140, t166, t175, t180, i0.t113, i0.u21.t117, i1.i0.u1.t147, i1.i1....764
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 204 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 204 transition count 183
Applied a total of 28 rules in 4 ms. Remains 204 /218 variables (removed 14) and now considering 183/197 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-07 11:39:57] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:39:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 99 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:39:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:39:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 117 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 241 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:39:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:39:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 67 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 174 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 19/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 3/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/265 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 2/267 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/268 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/269 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 1/270 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/271 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 271 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 29527 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 24/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/263 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 182/445 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 101 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 75 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 55 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 65 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 16/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 4/465 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/466 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 58 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/467 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/469 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 9/478 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/479 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 479 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30024 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 59570ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 59571ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 59816 ms. Remains : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:40:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:40:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7096070317557384722.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:40:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality9485663354357882017.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7096070317557384722.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9485663354357882017.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.59838e+19,7.92359,235096,2,14339,5,725651,6,0,1001,1.64139e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((p201==1) * EF(((p40==0)||((p87==0)&&(p165==1))))) * AG((((p122==0)&&(p95==1))||(p141==1))))) * AX(((p62==0)||(p230==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((p201==1) * E(TRUE U ((p40==0)||((p87==0)&&(p165==1))))) * !(E(TRUE U !((((p122==0)&&(p95==1))||...231
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t34, t39, t40, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t51, t52, t56, t60, t65, t69...456
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14296036305791949277.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14296036305791949277.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14296036305791949277.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14296036305791949277.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14296036305791949277.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 35 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5475431251751957824.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5949737955939196384.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5475431251751957824.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5949737955939196384.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.59838e+19,0.504215,20032,1017,29,30364,375,488,61593,50,899,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF((((i11.i1.u63.p201==1) * EF(((i2.u14.p40==0)||((i4.i0.u31.p87==0)&&(i12.i1.u55.p165==1))))) * AG((((i7.u41.p122==0)&&(i5.i0.u34.p95==...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(Init,!((((i11.i1.u63.p201==1) * E(TRUE U ((i2.u14.p40==0)||((i4.i0.u31.p87==0)&&(i12.i1.u55.p165==1))))) ...312
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t49, t89, t92, t137, t140, t166, t174, t175, t182, i0.t180, i0.i1.u11.t139, i0.i2.t106, ...750
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 217 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 168 transition count 147
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 168 transition count 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 151 transition count 130
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 143 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 143 transition count 122
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 148 place count 143 transition count 119
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 154 place count 140 transition count 119
Performed 49 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 49
Deduced a syphon composed of 49 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 98 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 91 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 91 transition count 69
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 90 transition count 68
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 256 place count 90 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 88 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 87 transition count 66
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 87 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 85 transition count 64
Applied a total of 263 rules in 20 ms. Remains 85 /218 variables (removed 133) and now considering 64/197 (removed 133) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 85 cols
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned [65, 69]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 62 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 83/218 places, 64/197 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 81 transition count 62
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 81 /83 variables (removed 2) and now considering 62/64 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 62 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/218 places, 62/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 221 ms. Remains : 81/218 places, 62/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18369499985432695560.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11842134799415834132.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18369499985432695560.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11842134799415834132.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.25971e+12,0.08843,8184,2,259,5,18878,6,0,389,27760,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p131==0)||(p68==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p131==0)||(p68==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 58/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.292288,15608,1,0,8,54998,19,4,1914,71996,8
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 46 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 46 transitions
Performed 46 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 46
Iterating post reduction 0 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 46 place count 217 transition count 150
Reduce places removed 46 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 171 transition count 150
Performed 19 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 19 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 92 place count 171 transition count 131
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 152 transition count 131
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 140 place count 142 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 142 transition count 121
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 142 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 138 transition count 117
Performed 43 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 43 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 43 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 86 rules applied. Total rules applied 244 place count 95 transition count 74
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 245 place count 95 transition count 73
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 247 place count 94 transition count 72
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 248 place count 94 transition count 72
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 250 place count 92 transition count 70
Applied a total of 250 rules in 14 ms. Remains 92 /218 variables (removed 126) and now considering 70/197 (removed 127) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 70 rows 92 cols
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 73 ms returned [82]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 73 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 91/218 places, 70/197 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 91 transition count 68
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 89 transition count 68
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 89 /91 variables (removed 2) and now considering 68/70 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 68 rows 89 cols
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 76 ms returned [69, 73]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 77 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 87/218 places, 68/197 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 85 transition count 66
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 85 /87 variables (removed 2) and now considering 66/68 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 85 cols
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 85/218 places, 66/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 316 ms. Remains : 85/218 places, 66/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9081979539446121036.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:41:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1599079946438776212.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9081979539446121036.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1599079946438776212.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.51166e+12,0.142493,9432,2,508,5,24123,6,0,407,35096,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((p31==1)) * E((((p163==0)||(p170==1))||((p26==0)||(p128==1))) U !(AF((p81==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((p31==1)) * E((((p163==0)||(p170==1))||((p26==0)||(p128==1))) U !(!(EG(!((p81==1)))))))))] = FA...158
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t18, t20, t22, t24, t30, t34, t37, t40, t42, t44, t48, t61, Intersec...244
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13816446284968029691.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13816446284968029691.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13816446284968029691.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13816446284968029691.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13816446284968029691.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 9 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 2 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5360443665029846124.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10816286966080226649.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5360443665029846124.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10816286966080226649.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.51166e+12,0.061525,6704,97,27,5558,171,244,11462,50,784,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EG((i1.u5.p31==1)) * E((((i9.u18.p163==0)||(i10.u19.p170==1))||((i0.i1.u3.p26==0)||(i3.u15.p128==1))) U !(AF((i1.u9.p81==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EG((i1.u5.p31==1)) * E((((i9.u18.p163==0)||(i10.u19.p170==1))||((i0.i1.u3.p26==0)||(i3.u15.p128==1...201
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t48, t61, u17.t44, i0.i0.u8.t40, i0.i1.u4.t1, i1.u5.t18, i1.u9.t24, i2.u2.t0, i2.u7.t22, i3.u...352
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 217 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 50 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 168 transition count 146
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 167 transition count 146
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 100 place count 167 transition count 129
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 134 place count 150 transition count 129
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 142 place count 142 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 142 transition count 121
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 142 transition count 118
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 156 place count 139 transition count 118
Performed 48 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 252 place count 91 transition count 70
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 253 place count 91 transition count 69
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 90 transition count 68
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 88 transition count 66
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 87 transition count 66
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 258 place count 87 transition count 64
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 262 place count 85 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit places reduction removed 1 places
Iterating post reduction 5 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 263 place count 84 transition count 64
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 6 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 265 place count 83 transition count 63
Applied a total of 265 rules in 24 ms. Remains 83 /218 variables (removed 135) and now considering 63/197 (removed 134) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 83 cols
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Computed 32 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 101 ms returned [67]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 102 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/218 places, 63/197 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 81 transition count 62
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 81 /82 variables (removed 1) and now considering 62/63 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 62 rows 81 cols
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 87 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 111 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 199 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 81/218 places, 62/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 328 ms. Remains : 81/218 places, 62/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 62 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11484293148646245413.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:42:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4141687902584756672.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11484293148646245413.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4141687902584756672.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.41718e+12,0.14329,10608,2,144,5,28996,6,0,389,45818,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AF(((p157==1) + AG((p176==1)))) + EG((p37==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG((p37==0)))),!(((p157==1) + !(E(TRUE U !((p176==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 60/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,9.33473,330036,1,0,94,1.5129e+06,30,68,1944,2.46566e+06,73
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Discarding 14 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 14 rule applications. Total rules 14 place count 204 transition count 183
Iterating global reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 204 transition count 183
Applied a total of 28 rules in 11 ms. Remains 204 /218 variables (removed 14) and now considering 183/197 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 183 rows 204 cols
[2025-06-07 11:43:08] [INFO ] Computed 34 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 91 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:43:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:08] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 113 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 225 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 182 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:43:08] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 63 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 57 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 51 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 19/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 7/264 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 32 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/387 variables, 0/266 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 387/387 variables, and 266 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 13642 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/203 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/204 variables, 34/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 19/53 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 1/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/204 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 183/387 variables, 204/258 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 182/440 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 70 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 63 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 14/454 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 62 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 4/458 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 59 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 2/460 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/461 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 72 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 1/462 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 9/471 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/387 variables, 4/475 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 387/387 variables, and 475 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 34/34 constraints, State Equation: 204/204 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 182/182 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 43680ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 182 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43681ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43919 ms. Remains : 204/218 places, 183/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:43:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 183 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:43:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13425867383383965549.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:43:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4164057684386318312.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13425867383383965549.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4164057684386318312.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.10332e+19,9.19519,258240,2,12639,5,791913,6,0,1001,1.80949e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((((p176==1) * AX((p174==0))) * (((p83==0)||(p0==1))||((p48==1)||((p2==0)&&(p129==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((((p176==1) * !(EX(!((p174==0))))) * (((p83==0)||(p0==1))||((p48==1)||((p2==0)&&(p129==1))))))...168
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t12, t16, t21, t25, t30, t34, t39, t40, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t51, t52, t56, t60, t65, t69...448
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11808724408446241035.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11808724408446241035.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11808724408446241035.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11808724408446241035.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11808724408446241035.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 30 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8640288823700057858.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality18406958777543448043.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8640288823700057858.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18406958777543448043.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.10332e+19,1.52826,47396,1328,41,76484,412,457,219306,56,1032,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF((((i12.i1.u52.p176==1) * AX((i12.i1.u52.p174==0))) * (((i7.i0.u25.p83==0)||(i0.i0.u0.p0==1))||((i3.u12.p48==1)||((i0.i0.u0.p2==0)&&...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!((((i12.i1.u52.p176==1) * !(EX(!((i12.i1.u52.p174==0))))) * (((i7.i0.u25.p83==0)||(i0.i0.u0.p0=...235
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t46, t90, t143, t166, t175, i0.i0.u1.t147, i0.i2.t112, i0.i2.u20.t116, i1.t180, i1.t140,...780
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 218/218 places, 197/197 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 49 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 49 transitions
Performed 49 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 49
Iterating post reduction 0 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 217 transition count 147
Reduce places removed 49 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 49 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 168 transition count 147
Performed 17 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 17 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 168 transition count 130
Deduced a syphon composed of 17 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 151 transition count 130
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 141 place count 142 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 2 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 142 transition count 121
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 150 place count 142 transition count 117
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 158 place count 138 transition count 117
Performed 48 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 48
Deduced a syphon composed of 48 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 48 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 96 rules applied. Total rules applied 254 place count 90 transition count 69
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 255 place count 90 transition count 68
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 257 place count 89 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 259 place count 87 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 86 transition count 65
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 260 place count 86 transition count 63
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 264 place count 84 transition count 63
Applied a total of 264 rules in 30 ms. Remains 84 /218 variables (removed 134) and now considering 63/197 (removed 134) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 84 cols
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Computed 33 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 92 ms returned [64, 68]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 94 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 82/218 places, 63/197 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 80 transition count 61
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 80 /82 variables (removed 2) and now considering 61/63 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 80 cols
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Computed 31 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 117 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 201 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 80/218 places, 61/197 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 327 ms. Remains : 80/218 places, 61/197 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 1031 steps (0 resets) in 5 ms. (171 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-003B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality460519006378204448.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16842538973071489777.prop : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality460519006378204448.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16842538973071489777.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.

its-reach command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet ...328
Loading property file /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality16842538973071489777.prop.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph8206079365869367837.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph8206079365869367837.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph8206079365869367837.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph8206079365869367837.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph8206079365869367837.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8125963854874445036.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:44:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7586473629781085579.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8125963854874445036.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7586473629781085579.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3892e+20,4.42959,110640,2247,39,184304,444,516,430722,53,1489,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((i6.i1.u33.p89==0)&&(i3.i0.u4.p12==0)) * ((AF((i14.u71.p205==0)) + (i6.i3.u54.p155==1)) + (((i12.i0.u64.p186==0)&&(i13.i1.u67.p197=...453
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((i6.i1.u33.p89==0)&&(i3.i0.u4.p12==0)) * ((!(EG(!((i14.u71.p205==0)))) + (i6.i3.u54.p155==1)) + ((...514
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t52, t99, t105, t151, t154, t180, t194, t196, i0.i0.u1.t161, i0.i1.u8.t156, i1.u10.t153,...915
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18141633498959430287.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 12:10:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality11478603135655351180.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18141633498959430287.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11478603135655351180.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.3892e+20,180.389,5223836,9743,283,9.80962e+06,732,339,4.23458e+07,127,5164,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u68.p89==0)&&(i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u93.p12==0)) * ((AF((i1.i0.i0.u64.p205==0)) + (i0.i1.u45.p155==1)) + ((...637
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((((i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u68.p89==0)&&(i0.i0.i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u93.p12==0)) * ((!(EG(!((i1.i0.i0.u64....698
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.i0.u3.t161, i0.i0.i1.t196, i0.i0.i1.u24.t113, i0.i0.i1.u24.t117, i0.i0.i1.u24.t119, i0.i0....1625
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-003B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-003B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533400817"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-003B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-003B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;