Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533400801.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533400801
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 508K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.6K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 53K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.3K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 24K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 186K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.2K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 37K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749295109016

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 58 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Transformed 159 places.
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Transformed 145 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 159 places and 145 transitions and 362 arcs in 144 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
Initial state reduction rules removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 73 out of 159 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 159/159 places, 145/145 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 157 transition count 143
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 157 transition count 143
Applied a total of 4 rules in 24 ms. Remains 157 /159 variables (removed 2) and now considering 143/145 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 143 rows 157 cols
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 13 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 208 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 132 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 371 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 142 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:18:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 58 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 20/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 4/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 143/300 variables, 157/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 12 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 3/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/300 variables, 0/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 300/300 variables, and 207 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 7759 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 157/157 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 24/24 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/156 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/157 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 24/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/157 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 143/300 variables, 157/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 142/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 57 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 64 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 11/357 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 3/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 53 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 4/364 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 2/366 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 1/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 2/371 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/300 variables, 3/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 300/300 variables, and 374 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved in 30022 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 157/157 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 142/142 constraints, Known Traps: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 37830ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 142 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37847ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 157/159 places, 143/145 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38256 ms. Remains : 157/159 places, 143/145 transitions.
Support contains 73 out of 157 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 11:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 27 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:08] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:08] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
Support contains 71 out of 157 places (down from 73) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 492 ms. (81 steps per ms) remains 1/49 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 1810 steps (0 resets) in 11 ms. (150 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
[2025-06-07 11:19:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 18 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
Computed a total of 39 stabilizing places and 39 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 138 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 138 transition count 124
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 137 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 137 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 136 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 136 transition count 122
Applied a total of 42 rules in 34 ms. Remains 136 /157 variables (removed 21) and now considering 122/143 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 136 cols
[2025-06-07 11:19:09] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 67 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:19:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 99 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 166 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:19:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/258 variables, 136/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 258/258 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 10395 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/258 variables, 136/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 121/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 7/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 6/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 4/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 258/258 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 26/26 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 40425ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40426ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/157 places, 122/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40627 ms. Remains : 136/157 places, 122/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:19:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:19:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8704029412317091691.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:19:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1378047972218538407.ctl : 5 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8704029412317091691.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1378047972218538407.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.75033e+13,1.83923,67512,2,4458,5,209589,6,0,668,436464,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((p67==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((p67==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t13, t18, t22, t27, t31, t36, t37, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t53, t57, t62, t63,...331
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6586688080957666654.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6586688080957666654.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6586688080957666654.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6586688080957666654.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6586688080957666654.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Removed a total of 21 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 38 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16101050894892721739.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12948232972817182349.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16101050894892721739.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12948232972817182349.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.75033e+13,0.256954,15204,532,43,22830,287,365,40257,56,656,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((i5.u20.p67==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((i5.u20.p67==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t43, t46, t87, t90, t119, i0.i0.u1.t97, i0.i1.u9.t92, i1.t93, i1.i0.u7.t95, i1.i1.u6.t96...506
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 35 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 35 transitions
Performed 35 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 35
Iterating post reduction 0 with 35 rules applied. Total rules applied 35 place count 156 transition count 107
Reduce places removed 35 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 121 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 120 transition count 105
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 73 place count 120 transition count 95
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 93 place count 110 transition count 95
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 106 place count 97 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 97 transition count 82
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 97 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 91 transition count 76
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 185 place count 64 transition count 49
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 187 place count 62 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 61 transition count 47
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 188 place count 61 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 59 transition count 45
Applied a total of 192 rules in 32 ms. Remains 59 /157 variables (removed 98) and now considering 45/143 (removed 98) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 59 cols
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 51 ms returned [36, 40]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 52 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 57/157 places, 45/143 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 55 transition count 43
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 55 /57 variables (removed 2) and now considering 43/45 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 55 cols
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 66 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 55/157 places, 43/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 204 ms. Remains : 55/157 places, 43/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 43 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16803851794783419261.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15475112270429401866.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16803851794783419261.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15475112270429401866.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.29681e+07,0.04005,5820,2,437,5,9117,6,0,265,12494,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((AG(((p68!=0)&&(p158!=1))) + (EF((p151!=0)) * (p75==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(TRUE U (p151!=0)) * (p75==0)))),TRUE) * !(((p68!=0)&&(p158!=1))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t4, t12, t15, t17, t21, t23, t25, t26, t29, t39, t41, Intersection with reachabl...226
(forward)formula 0,0,0.281736,17160,1,0,148,70325,111,67,1607,84258,143
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 34 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 34 transitions
Performed 34 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 34
Iterating post reduction 0 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 156 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 34 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 36 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 122 transition count 106
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 120 transition count 106
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 120 transition count 97
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 111 transition count 97
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 102 place count 99 transition count 85
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 99 transition count 85
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 99 transition count 81
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 95 transition count 81
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 180 place count 66 transition count 52
Partial Post-agglomeration rule applied 1 times.
Drop transitions (Partial Post agglomeration) removed 1 transitions
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 181 place count 66 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 64 transition count 50
Applied a total of 183 rules in 20 ms. Remains 64 /157 variables (removed 93) and now considering 50/143 (removed 93) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 50 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:20:50] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 67 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 115 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:51] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 49 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:20:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 50/114 variables, 64/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 87 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 904 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 50/114 variables, 64/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 49/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/136 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 136 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved in 917 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 49/49 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 1827ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 49 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 1828ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/157 places, 50/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 1969 ms. Remains : 64/157 places, 50/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:20:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:52] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 50 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:20:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality12811974801697408384.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:20:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16386534337445573883.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12811974801697408384.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16386534337445573883.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.43e+09,0.147931,11256,2,118,5,32469,6,0,309,51163,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(((p154==0)||(p112==1)) U (EF(AG((p61==0))) * (p116==1))) U AG((p121==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p121==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p121==1))))) U (!(!((E(!((E(TRUE U !(E(TRUE...377
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:21:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:22] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:21:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16541305133244213681.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16541305133244213681.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16541305133244213681.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16541305133244213681.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16541305133244213681.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:21:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:21:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:21:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 6 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:21:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:21:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9697034973611775215.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13040053695284797997.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9697034973611775215.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13040053695284797997.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.43e+09,0.030415,5396,26,15,3171,107,166,5862,50,605,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(A(((i3.u17.p154==0)||(u12.p112==1)) U (EF(AG((i2.u7.p61==0))) * (i6.u13.p116==1))) U AG((i6.u14.p121==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i6.u14.p121==1)))))))) * !(E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((i6.u14.p121==1))))) U (!(!((E(!((E(T...448
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 4
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 5
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 6
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
(forward)formula 0,0,15.1087,442412,1,0,764022,252,681,1.47385e+06,193,1118,492275
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 137 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 137 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 136 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 136 transition count 122
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 135 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 135 transition count 121
Applied a total of 44 rules in 14 ms. Remains 135 /157 variables (removed 22) and now considering 121/143 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 135 cols
[2025-06-07 11:21:38] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:21:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:38] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 94 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 159 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:21:38] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 12/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/256 variables, 135/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/256 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 3/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/256 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/256 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/256 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 256/256 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 13163 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 15/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 121/256 variables, 135/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 120/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 7/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 3/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 6/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 256/256 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 43187ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43187ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/157 places, 121/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43361 ms. Remains : 135/157 places, 121/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14166484944097477873.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16614162570767614503.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14166484944097477873.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16614162570767614503.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5451e+13,1.32773,55440,2,4099,5,173270,6,0,663,348353,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AG(((EX(AF(((p9==0)||(p93==1)))) + (p59==0)) + (p107==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(EY(Init),TRUE) * !((p107==1))) * !((p59==0))) * !(EX(!(EG(!(((p9==0)||(p93==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t13, t18, t22, t27, t31, t36, t37, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t53, t57, t62, t66,...327
(forward)formula 0,1,7.12564,233128,1,0,715,1.01653e+06,270,276,3831,1.66908e+06,782
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 138 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 138 transition count 124
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 137 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 137 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 136 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 136 transition count 122
Applied a total of 42 rules in 7 ms. Remains 136 /157 variables (removed 21) and now considering 122/143 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 136 cols
[2025-06-07 11:22:28] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:22:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:28] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 82 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:22:28] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 12/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/258 variables, 136/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 3/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 258/258 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 9065 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 15/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/258 variables, 136/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 121/295 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 10/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 5/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 4/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:22:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 0/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 258/258 variables, and 318 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 25491 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 34568ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34569ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/157 places, 122/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 34715 ms. Remains : 136/157 places, 122/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14441163533564333225.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4114774559369388234.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14441163533564333225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4114774559369388234.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.75546e+13,1.51957,57912,2,4556,5,180139,6,0,668,367193,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AX((p150==0)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU(Init,TRUE)) * !((p150==0)))] = FALSE
(forward)formula 0,0,1.57481,57912,1,0,8,180139,9,2,1100,367193,2
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 156 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 119 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 118 transition count 103
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 118 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 108 transition count 93
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 108 place count 97 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 97 transition count 82
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 97 transition count 77
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 129 place count 92 transition count 77
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 62 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 60 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 59 transition count 45
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 59 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 57 transition count 43
Applied a total of 196 rules in 14 ms. Remains 57 /157 variables (removed 100) and now considering 43/143 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [36, 40]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 47 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/157 places, 43/143 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 53 transition count 41
Applied a total of 4 rules in 3 ms. Remains 53 /55 variables (removed 2) and now considering 41/43 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/157 places, 41/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 155 ms. Remains : 53/157 places, 41/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15785782968712322160.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5802059426235496362.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15785782968712322160.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5802059426235496362.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.28768e+07,0.078073,7456,2,213,5,15587,6,0,255,23534,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(((p57==0)&&(p144==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U ((p57==0)&&(p144==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t4, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/reverse/intersect/total...167
(forward)formula 0,1,4.1676,126916,1,0,249,491197,109,256,1517,1.11857e+06,315
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 15 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 15 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 142 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 142 transition count 128
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 31 place count 141 transition count 127
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 141 transition count 127
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 33 place count 140 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 140 transition count 126
Applied a total of 34 rules in 12 ms. Remains 140 /157 variables (removed 17) and now considering 126/143 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 140 cols
[2025-06-07 11:23:09] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:23:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:23:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 15/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/266 variables, 140/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 6128 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/266 variables, 140/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 125/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 11/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 33 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 5/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/326 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 2/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 31/31 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 12/12 constraints]
After SMT, in 36155ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36155ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/157 places, 126/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36304 ms. Remains : 140/157 places, 126/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:45] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11735181173404484180.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:23:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7177435101364445399.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11735181173404484180.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7177435101364445399.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.00863e+13,2.09852,80104,2,4995,5,246023,6,0,688,522228,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX((AF(AX(FALSE)) * EF((p53==0)))) * (E(EX(EF((p94==1))) U AF(EX((p134==1)))) + E(EG((p137!=1)) U !(((A((p90==1) U (p7==0)) + A(((p91==...267
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([FwdG(EY(Init),!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (p53==0))))] = FALSE) * [((Init * !(E(E...513
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t13, t19, t24, t25, t26, t30, t34, t35, t38, t40, t41, t43, t44, t46, t47, t49, t50, t52,...359
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7157338310054141740.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7157338310054141740.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7157338310054141740.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7157338310054141740.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7157338310054141740.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14748526158696399295.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality722255046652121917.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14748526158696399295.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality722255046652121917.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.00863e+13,0.102109,8468,593,59,10297,363,349,13028,65,730,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: ((AX((AF(AX(FALSE)) * EF((i6.u17.p53==0)))) * (E(EX(EF((i10.u33.p94==1))) U AF(EX((i13.u43.p134==1)))) + E(EG((i14.u47.p137!=1)) U !(((A(...372
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ((([FwdG(EY(Init),!(!(EX(!(FALSE)))))] = FALSE * [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U (i6.u17.p53==0))))] = FALSE) * [((Init ...650
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t50, t91, t94, t97, t118, t123, i0.u1.t101, i1.i1.u5.t100, i2.u6.t99, i3.u8.t96, i4.u10....557
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 156 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 119 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 118 transition count 103
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 118 transition count 93
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 108 transition count 93
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 109 place count 96 transition count 81
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 96 transition count 81
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 121 place count 96 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 91 transition count 76
Performed 26 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 26
Deduced a syphon composed of 26 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 26 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 52 rules applied. Total rules applied 183 place count 65 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 184 place count 64 transition count 49
Applied a total of 184 rules in 21 ms. Remains 64 /157 variables (removed 93) and now considering 49/143 (removed 94) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 49 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-07 11:24:45] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned [53]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 45 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/157 places, 49/143 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 63 transition count 47
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 61 transition count 47
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 61 /63 variables (removed 2) and now considering 47/49 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 47 rows 61 cols
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned [38, 42]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 43 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 59/157 places, 47/143 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 57 transition count 45
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 57 /59 variables (removed 2) and now considering 45/47 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 45 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 80 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 57/157 places, 45/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 193 ms. Remains : 57/157 places, 45/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 45 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13560211779365117081.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14661514955330090925.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13560211779365117081.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14661514955330090925.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.9984e+07,0.094059,8268,2,196,5,19404,6,0,275,30458,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(!(E(((p87==1)&&(p84==0)) U AF(((p109==0)||(p156==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(E(((p87==1)&&(p84==0)) U !(EG(!(((p109==0)||(p156==1))))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t17, t19, t21, t23, t25, t26, t29, t35, Intersection with reachable at each step...212
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,8.15919,292200,1,0,699,1.43597e+06,127,416,1673,2.26506e+06,724
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 140 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 140 transition count 126
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 35 place count 139 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 139 transition count 125
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 138 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 138 transition count 124
Applied a total of 38 rules in 6 ms. Remains 138 /157 variables (removed 19) and now considering 124/143 (removed 19) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-07 11:24:54] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:24:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:54] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:24:54] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 52 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 12/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 124/262 variables, 138/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/262 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 262/262 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 4912 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 12/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:24:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 124/262 variables, 138/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 123/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 9/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 8/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/318 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 45 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 8/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 1/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 16 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/262 variables, 2/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Error getting values : (error "Error writing to Z3 solver: java.io.IOException: Stream closed")
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 262/262 variables, and 331 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 37/37 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 34931ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 34932ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/157 places, 124/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 35079 ms. Remains : 138/157 places, 124/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality13852920684225931725.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15983870056612012739.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13852920684225931725.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15983870056612012739.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27214e+13,3.19653,107780,2,6636,5,332283,6,0,678,709928,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG((AF(AG(((p48==0)||(p84==1)))) * (p73==0))) * E(EF(!(EG((p80==1)))) U ((p138==0)||(p122==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(Init) * EG((!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p48==0)||(p84==1)))))))) * (p73==0)))),E(TRUE U !(EG((p80==1))))) *...189
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t13, t18, t22, t24, t28, t32, t36, t38, t39, t41, t42, t44, t45, t47, t48, t50, t51, t55,...347
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12319292009166950875.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12319292009166950875.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12319292009166950875.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12319292009166950875.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12319292009166950875.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15707844099371745507.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:25:59] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2254287927755857607.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15707844099371745507.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2254287927755857607.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.27214e+13,0.319577,17252,621,59,27503,571,370,45318,65,1441,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG((AF(AG(((i3.u13.p48==0)||(i0.u28.p84==1)))) * (i7.u24.p73==0))) * E(EF(!(EG((i7.u24.p80==1)))) U ((i13.u44.p138==0)||(i11.u37.p122...163
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((EY(Init) * EG((!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i3.u13.p48==0)||(i0.u28.p84==1)))))))) * (i7.u24.p73==0)))),E(TRUE ...233
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t48, t89, t92, t116, t121, i1.u1.t99, i1.u9.t94, i2.i1.u11.t91, i3.t82, i3.u15.t86, i4.t...533
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 19 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 19 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 138 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 138 transition count 124
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 137 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 137 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 136 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 136 transition count 122
Applied a total of 42 rules in 4 ms. Remains 136 /157 variables (removed 21) and now considering 122/143 (removed 21) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 122 rows 136 cols
[2025-06-07 11:26:29] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 56 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:26:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:29] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 132 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 121 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:26:29] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 15/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 122/258 variables, 136/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 3/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 258/258 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 10099 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/136 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 122/258 variables, 136/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 121/299 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 8/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 58 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/308 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 6/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 0/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 258/258 variables, and 314 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved in 15832 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 136/136 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 121/121 constraints, Known Traps: 28/28 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 25941ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 121 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 25941ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 136/157 places, 122/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 26078 ms. Remains : 136/157 places, 122/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:26:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 122 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:26:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6260844533608840244.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:26:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality12233347371321402045.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6260844533608840244.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality12233347371321402045.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76329e+13,2.06293,74280,2,4916,5,227464,6,0,668,481004,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(AG(EX(TRUE))) U (!(AF(EG(((p35==0)&&((p113==0)||(p4==1)))))) * (EG(AX(((p72==0)||(p34==1)))) + !((EG(AG((p75==1))) * AF((p107==0))))...158
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EG(!(EG(((p35==0)&&((p113==0)||(p4==1)))))))) * (EG(!(EX(!(((p72==0)||(p34==1)))))) + !((E...573
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t13, t18, t22, t27, t31, t36, t37, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t53, t54, t58, t60,...331
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2983272383229584438.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2983272383229584438.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2983272383229584438.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2983272383229584438.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2983272383229584438.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 19 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17704469909906088317.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3118971381650939306.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17704469909906088317.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3118971381650939306.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.76329e+13,0.135036,9660,534,49,12148,335,354,18384,61,700,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(EG(AG(EX(TRUE))) U (!(AF(EG(((i1.i1.u12.p35==0)&&((i12.u34.p113==0)||(i0.u1.p4==1)))))) * (EG(AX(((i7.u24.p72==0)||(i1.i1.u11.p34==1)))...214
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!((!(!(EG(!(EG(((i1.i1.u12.p35==0)&&((i12.u34.p113==0)||(i0.u1.p4==1)))))))) * (EG(!(EX(!(((i7.u2...741
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t43, t87, t90, t114, i0.u1.t97, i1.i1.u11.t89, i2.t93, i2.i0.u6.t96, i2.i1.u7.t95, i3.u9...500
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 37 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 37 transitions
Performed 37 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 37
Iterating post reduction 0 with 37 rules applied. Total rules applied 37 place count 156 transition count 105
Reduce places removed 37 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 39 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 119 transition count 103
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 118 transition count 103
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 77 place count 118 transition count 94
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 95 place count 109 transition count 94
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 107 place count 97 transition count 82
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 97 transition count 82
Performed 6 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 6 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 119 place count 97 transition count 76
Deduced a syphon composed of 6 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 131 place count 91 transition count 76
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 189 place count 62 transition count 47
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 191 place count 60 transition count 45
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 59 transition count 45
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 192 place count 59 transition count 43
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 196 place count 57 transition count 43
Applied a total of 196 rules in 20 ms. Remains 57 /157 variables (removed 100) and now considering 43/143 (removed 100) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 43 rows 57 cols
[2025-06-07 11:27:55] [INFO ] Computed 22 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned [35, 39]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 48 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 55/157 places, 43/143 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 53 transition count 41
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 53 /55 variables (removed 2) and now considering 41/43 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 41 rows 53 cols
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 20 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 81 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 53/157 places, 41/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 153 ms. Remains : 53/157 places, 41/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 41 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9264653846894209524.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14005015792325861366.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9264653846894209524.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14005015792325861366.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.4152e+07,0.088945,8224,2,109,5,19215,6,0,255,29592,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(((p134==0)||(p91==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,((p134==0)||(p91==1)))] != FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 37/0/4
(forward)formula 0,1,0.124724,8352,1,0,9,19215,19,3,1227,29592,8
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 20 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 20 rule applications. Total rules 20 place count 137 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 137 transition count 123
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 41 place count 136 transition count 122
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 42 place count 136 transition count 122
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 43 place count 135 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 44 place count 135 transition count 121
Applied a total of 44 rules in 4 ms. Remains 135 /157 variables (removed 22) and now considering 121/143 (removed 22) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 135 cols
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 137 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:27:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 12/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 121/256 variables, 135/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:27:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/256 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 36 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 13 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 3/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/256 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/256 variables, 2/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/256 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 256/256 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 13188 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/135 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 15/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 121/256 variables, 135/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 120/294 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 7/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 3/304 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 2/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 6/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/256 variables, 0/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 256/256 variables, and 317 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 135/135 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 10/10 constraints]
After SMT, in 43211ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 43211ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 135/157 places, 121/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43352 ms. Remains : 135/157 places, 121/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:28:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:28:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9893800733378543715.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:28:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7064169618133455002.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9893800733378543715.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7064169618133455002.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5451e+13,1.44388,55444,2,4099,5,173270,6,0,663,348353,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX(AX(EG((p24==0)))) + AG(((p96==0)||(p29==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!(EG((p24==0)))))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p96==0)||(p29==1))))))] ...164
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t13, t18, t22, t27, t31, t36, t37, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t53, t57, t62, t66,...327
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11935496086847472670.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11935496086847472670.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11935496086847472670.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11935496086847472670.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11935496086847472670.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Removed a total of 23 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3025465082310543950.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14586317795191279541.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3025465082310543950.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14586317795191279541.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.5451e+13,0.150385,11400,479,29,16780,303,326,23114,45,643,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((AX(AX(EG((i2.u9.p24==0)))) + AG(((i10.u31.p96==0)||(i2.u9.p29==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(!(EX(!(EG((i2.u9.p24==0)))))))))] != FALSE + [(EY(Init) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i10.u31.p96==0)||(...184
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t40, t46, t86, t89, t92, t113, t118, i0.i1.u6.t95, i1.u7.t94, i2.u9.t91, i3.u11.t88, i4.t79, ...481
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 17 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 17 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 140 transition count 126
Iterating global reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 34 place count 140 transition count 126
Applied a total of 34 rules in 6 ms. Remains 140 /157 variables (removed 17) and now considering 126/143 (removed 17) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 126 rows 140 cols
[2025-06-07 11:29:39] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:29:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 125 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:29:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/266 variables, 140/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 183 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 6347 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 18/18 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/140 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 18/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 126/266 variables, 140/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 125/306 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 10/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 3/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 3/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 3/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 333 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved in 30016 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 140/140 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 125/125 constraints, Known Traps: 34/34 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 11/11 constraints]
After SMT, in 36369ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 125 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36370ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 140/157 places, 126/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36498 ms. Remains : 140/157 places, 126/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:30:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 126 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:30:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16635267190769517909.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality15730799424314930763.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16635267190769517909.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15730799424314930763.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.23204e+13,2.67242,95820,2,5465,5,293828,6,0,688,626169,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(((((p37==0)&&(p118==1)) * AX((p114==1))) + AF((((p16==0)||(p20==1))&&((p157==0)||(p89==1)))))) * A(!(((!(((p50==0)||(p141==1))) + ...278
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(Init) * EG(((((p37==0)&&(p118==1)) * !(EX(!((p114==1))))) + !(EG(!((((p16==0)||(p20==1))&&((p157==0)||(p8...543
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t14, t16, t19, t23, t28, t32, t36, t40, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t51, t52, t56, t60, t65,...350
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2847911763017135169.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2847911763017135169.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2847911763017135169.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2847911763017135169.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2847911763017135169.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 17 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5847987073529246397.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:30:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3416704084809162567.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5847987073529246397.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3416704084809162567.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.23204e+13,0.299944,16252,509,29,25063,288,332,43275,49,593,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX((EG(((((i4.u13.p37==0)&&(i12.u40.p118==1)) * AX((i12.u39.p114==1))) + AF((((i2.u7.p16==0)||(i2.u7.p20==1))&&((i15.u49.p157==0)||(i11.i...415
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((EY(Init) * EG(((((i4.u13.p37==0)&&(i12.u40.p118==1)) * !(EX(!((i12.u39.p114==1))))) + !(EG(!((((i2.u7.p16==0...770
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t46, t49, t91, t97, t118, t123, i0.i0.u1.t101, i1.t94, i1.i0.u6.t100, i1.i1.u9.t96, i2.u...540
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 7
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 8
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 9
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 10
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 11
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 12
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 13
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 14
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 15
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Discarding 18 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 18 rule applications. Total rules 18 place count 139 transition count 125
Iterating global reduction 0 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 139 transition count 125
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 37 place count 138 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 138 transition count 124
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 39 place count 137 transition count 123
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 137 transition count 123
Applied a total of 40 rules in 10 ms. Remains 137 /157 variables (removed 20) and now considering 123/143 (removed 20) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 123 rows 137 cols
[2025-06-07 11:31:16] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 46 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:31:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 84 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 122 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:31:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 14/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 123/260 variables, 137/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 2/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 4/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/260 variables, 0/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 260/260 variables, and 181 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 7965 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/137 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 15/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/38 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 123/260 variables, 137/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 122/297 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 10/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 5/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 6/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 4/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 14 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 3/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/260 variables, 0/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 260/260 variables, and 328 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 137/137 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 122/122 constraints, Known Traps: 33/33 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 13/13 constraints]
After SMT, in 37987ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 122 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 37987ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 137/157 places, 123/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38128 ms. Remains : 137/157 places, 123/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:54] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 123 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16697705106252554281.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:31:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3791483974382609214.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16697705106252554281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3791483974382609214.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.99001e+13,2.27203,81704,2,5644,5,251052,6,0,673,530762,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E((EX(TRUE) + (p73==0)) U ((p76==1)||(p38==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,(EX(TRUE) + (p73==0))) * ((p76==1)||(p38==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t9, t13, t18, t22, t27, t31, t36, t37, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t53, t57, t59, t63,...342
(forward)formula 0,1,5.82027,154524,1,0,267,576878,264,126,3790,989439,256
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 157/157 places, 143/143 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 28 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 28 transitions
Performed 28 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 28
Iterating post reduction 0 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 156 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 6 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 6
Iterating post reduction 1 with 34 rules applied. Total rules applied 62 place count 128 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 6 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 122 transition count 107
Performed 8 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 8 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 122 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 8 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 8 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 85 place count 114 transition count 99
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 93 place count 106 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 106 transition count 91
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 106 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 107 place count 103 transition count 88
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 161 place count 76 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 162 place count 75 transition count 60
Applied a total of 162 rules in 22 ms. Remains 75 /157 variables (removed 82) and now considering 60/143 (removed 83) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 91 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 56 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 4/75 variables, 15/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 4 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 7/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 60/135 variables, 75/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 107 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 1465 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 3/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 4/75 variables, 15/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 4/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/30 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 60/135 variables, 75/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 56/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 164 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved in 2552 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 56/56 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 4023ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 56 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4024ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/157 places, 60/143 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4144 ms. Remains : 75/157 places, 60/143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5161502455150130442.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5003586903816791879.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5161502455150130442.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5003586903816791879.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.69867e+09,0.375412,20260,2,409,5,64338,6,0,361,114979,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG((A((((((p151==0)||(p120==1))||((p5==0)||(p144==1)))&&(p58==1))&&(p36==1)) U E(((p95==0)||(p132==1)) U ((p66==0)||(p34==1)))) + (!(A(((...206
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(!((E(!(E(((p95==0)||(p132==1)) U ((p66==0)||(p34==1)))) U (!((((((p151==0)||(p120==1))|...713
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t10, t34, t35, t36, t39, t45, t46, Intersection with reachable at each step ...211
Using saturation style SCC detection
Fast SCC detection found a local SCC at level 0
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 58/0/2
(forward)formula 0,0,8.36093,310428,1,0,576,1.586e+06,159,333,2249,2.652e+06,582
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph5237585090336897755.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph5237585090336897755.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph5237585090336897755.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph5237585090336897755.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph5237585090336897755.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality11311967614457867549.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:32:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1110147823806438468.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality11311967614457867549.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1110147823806438468.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.68527e+13,1.09753,45924,1433,50,86458,516,370,132681,58,1064,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((i5.u22.p67==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((i5.u22.p67==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t55, t58, t108, t111, t114, i0.i1.u6.t117, i1.u7.t116, i2.u11.t110, i3.t106, i3.t99, i3.u15.t...715
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7458341877527180517.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:34:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1407267083742170865.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7458341877527180517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1407267083742170865.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.68527e+13,16.4481,514616,5795,258,992857,617,239,3.55832e+06,107,4686,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((i0.i1.i0.u22.p67==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((i0.i1.i0.u22.p67==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u2.t118, i0.i1.u23.t65, i0.i1.u23.t66, i0.i1.u23.t70, i0.i1.u23.t72, i0.i1.u23.t73, i0.i1....1225
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 1
Fast SCC detection found an SCC at level 2
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-07 11:58:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 98 ms
[2025-06-07 11:58:50] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 143 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:58:50] [INFO ] Transformed 157 places.
[2025-06-07 11:58:50] [INFO ] Transformed 143 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-07 11:58:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16073187456883143076.gal : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:58:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17847324940015882384.ctl : 11 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16073187456883143076.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17847324940015882384.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...330
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 6 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.68527e+13,2.40212,76772,2,23957,5,246409,6,0,773,437049,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AF((p67==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(!((p67==1)))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t10, t11, t15, t17, t18, t22, t23, t27, t29, t30, t34, t38, t39, t43, t44, t48, t50, t51, t52...428

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533400801"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;