Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533400785.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533400785
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 516K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 63K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.0K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 58K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.6K May 29 14:33 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.0K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 30K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 14K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 158K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 8.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 71K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:33 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:33 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:33 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749294848113

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPt-PT-001B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 49 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Transformed 81 places.
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Transformed 74 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 81 places and 74 transitions and 184 arcs in 139 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 57 out of 81 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 81/81 places, 74/74 transitions.
Discarding 2 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 2 rule applications. Total rules 2 place count 79 transition count 72
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 79 transition count 72
Applied a total of 4 rules in 16 ms. Remains 79 /81 variables (removed 2) and now considering 72/74 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 72 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 6 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 177 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 299 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 71 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:09] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 61 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 11/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 3/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 72/151 variables, 79/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 151/151 variables, and 105 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 2703 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/78 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/79 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 14/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 72/151 variables, 79/105 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 71/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 7/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 4/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/151 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/151 variables, 0/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 151/151 variables, and 187 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved in 4949 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 71/71 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 7678ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 71 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7690ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/81 places, 72/74 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 8021 ms. Remains : 79/81 places, 72/74 transitions.
Support contains 57 out of 79 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:17] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-07 11:14:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 23 ms
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-07 11:14:17] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:17] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (8 resets) in 835 ms. (47 steps per ms) remains 1/59 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (8 resets) in 148 ms. (268 steps per ms) remains 1/1 properties
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/2 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 42/44 variables, 8/8 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 84 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp38 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 44/151 variables, and 9 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 142 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 8/12 constraints, State Equation: 0/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 147ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 14 simplifications.
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-12 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 72 transitions.
Support contains 53 out of 79 places (down from 57) after GAL structural reductions.
Computed a total of 19 stabilizing places and 19 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 78 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 61 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 60 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 59 transition count 51
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 59 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 54 transition count 46
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 47 transition count 39
Iterating global reduction 4 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 47 transition count 39
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 63 place count 47 transition count 36
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 69 place count 44 transition count 36
Performed 14 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 14
Deduced a syphon composed of 14 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 28 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 30 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 29 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 28 transition count 21
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 5 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 28 transition count 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 5 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 27 transition count 20
Applied a total of 101 rules in 29 ms. Remains 27 /79 variables (removed 52) and now considering 20/72 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 27 cols
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned [5]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 53 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/79 places, 20/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 9 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 25 transition count 19
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 25 /26 variables (removed 1) and now considering 19/20 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 25 cols
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 27 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 36 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 25/79 places, 19/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 191 ms. Remains : 25/79 places, 19/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1770992616967791654.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3527202182471154972.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1770992616967791654.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3527202182471154972.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5760,0.0154,3740,2,48,5,1229,6,0,122,1425,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(((p26==0)||(p74==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U ((p26==0)||(p74==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.018735,3996,1,0,7,1229,14,1,548,1425,5
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 69 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 69 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 68 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 68 transition count 61
Applied a total of 22 rules in 6 ms. Remains 68 /79 variables (removed 11) and now considering 61/72 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 60 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 104 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 167 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 65 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1829 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 60/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2800 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 4641ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4642ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/79 places, 61/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4754 ms. Remains : 68/79 places, 61/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:23] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2257603594181478013.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14122975021235067460.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2257603594181478013.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14122975021235067460.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77085e+06,0.187,12416,2,1032,5,30101,6,0,335,54832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(((p4==0)||(p64==1))) + AF((((!(E(((p55==0)||(p0==1)) U (p5!=0))) * (p26==1)) * AX(((p3==0)&&(p54==1)))) + AX((p27==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(EG(((p4==0)||(p64==1))))),!((((!(E(((p55==0)||(p0==1)) U (p5!=0))) * (p26==1)) * !(EX(!(((p3==0)...203
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t47, Intersection ...239
(forward)formula 0,0,13.7083,458260,1,0,1277,2.23843e+06,158,741,1851,3.92454e+06,1352
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 19 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 19 transitions
Performed 19 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 19
Iterating post reduction 0 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 19 place count 78 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 21 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 59 transition count 50
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 58 transition count 50
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 41 place count 58 transition count 45
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 51 place count 53 transition count 45
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 58 place count 46 transition count 38
Iterating global reduction 3 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 46 transition count 38
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 65 place count 46 transition count 35
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 71 place count 43 transition count 35
Performed 13 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 13
Deduced a syphon composed of 13 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 26 rules applied. Total rules applied 97 place count 30 transition count 22
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 98 place count 29 transition count 21
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 28 transition count 21
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 99 place count 28 transition count 20
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 101 place count 27 transition count 20
Applied a total of 101 rules in 18 ms. Remains 27 /79 variables (removed 52) and now considering 20/72 (removed 52) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 20 rows 27 cols
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned [5]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 37 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 26/79 places, 20/72 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 25 transition count 19
Applied a total of 2 rules in 2 ms. Remains 25 /26 variables (removed 1) and now considering 19/20 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 19 rows 25 cols
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Computed 10 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 30 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 37 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 68 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 25/79 places, 19/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 2 iterations and 126 ms. Remains : 25/79 places, 19/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 19 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14235839140527337710.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality1262555335956362385.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14235839140527337710.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1262555335956362385.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5184,0.016689,4112,2,49,5,1384,6,0,122,1857,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF((p25==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U (p25==1)))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is exact ! Faster fixpoint algorithm enabled.
(forward)formula 0,1,0.061042,6672,1,0,52,15007,20,74,586,23216,81
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 73 transition count 66
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 73 transition count 66
Applied a total of 12 rules in 10 ms. Remains 73 /79 variables (removed 6) and now considering 66/72 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 66 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 33 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 79 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 65 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 66/139 variables, 73/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/99 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 139/139 variables, and 99 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 2305 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/72 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/73 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 13/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 66/139 variables, 73/98 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 65/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 3/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 4/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 3/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/139 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/139 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 139/139 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved in 9696 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 65/65 constraints, Known Traps: 20/20 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 12010ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 65 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 12010ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/79 places, 66/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 12099 ms. Remains : 73/79 places, 66/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 66 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:14:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8114751599133941796.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:14:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3709523541010540710.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8114751599133941796.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3709523541010540710.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.03648e+07,0.916554,39436,2,2502,5,112621,6,0,360,243388,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (A(!(EX(EG(((p25==0)&&(p56==1))))) U ((A((p62!=1) U AG((p19==1))) * !(AG(((p77==0)||(p25==1))))) + (p62==1))) + AF(((AX(((p35==0)&&(p71==...321
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(!((E(!(((!((E(!(!(E(TRUE U !((p19==1))))) U (!((p62!=1)) * !(!(E(TRUE U !((p19==1))))))) + EG(!(...855
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t7, t11, t13, t16, t17, t21, t22, t23, t24, t28, t32, t33, t35, t38, t39, t42, t44, t45, ...278
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,21.4902,669980,1,0,1747,3.50438e+06,199,962,2230,5.28379e+06,1931
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 17 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 17 transitions
Performed 17 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 17
Iterating post reduction 0 with 17 rules applied. Total rules applied 17 place count 78 transition count 54
Reduce places removed 17 places and 0 transitions.
Ensure Unique test removed 1 transitions
Reduce isomorphic transitions removed 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 1 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 1 transitions
Performed 1 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 19 rules applied. Total rules applied 36 place count 61 transition count 52
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 38 place count 60 transition count 51
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 59 transition count 51
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 39 place count 59 transition count 46
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 49 place count 54 transition count 46
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 4 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 55 place count 48 transition count 40
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 48 transition count 40
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 4 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 61 place count 48 transition count 37
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 67 place count 45 transition count 37
Performed 11 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 11
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 89 place count 34 transition count 26
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 4 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 90 place count 33 transition count 25
Applied a total of 90 rules in 11 ms. Remains 33 /79 variables (removed 46) and now considering 25/72 (removed 47) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 25 rows 33 cols
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 35 ms returned [20]
Discarding 1 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 36 ms to find 1 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 32/79 places, 25/72 transitions.
Performed 2 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 0 with 2 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 0 place count 32 transition count 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 30 transition count 23
Applied a total of 4 rules in 4 ms. Remains 30 /32 variables (removed 2) and now considering 23/25 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 23 rows 30 cols
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Computed 11 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 37 ms returned [7, 11]
Discarding 2 places :
Implicit Place search using SMT only with invariants took 39 ms to find 2 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 2 : 28/79 places, 23/72 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 26 transition count 21
Applied a total of 4 rules in 2 ms. Remains 26 /28 variables (removed 2) and now considering 21/23 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 21 rows 26 cols
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Computed 9 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 28 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 30 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 59 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 3 : 26/79 places, 21/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 3 iterations and 151 ms. Remains : 26/79 places, 21/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 21 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality5538947768590867100.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10315296390314762974.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5538947768590867100.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10315296390314762974.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4993,0.017191,4532,2,79,5,3189,6,0,127,4264,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((((p75==0)&&(p50==1))||((p13==0)&&(p48==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((((p75==0)&&(p50==1))||((p13==0)&&(p48==1))))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t6, t10, t12, t16, t19, Intersection with reachable at each step enabled. (destroyed/rev...187
(forward)formula 0,0,0.037781,5172,1,0,62,6184,68,29,783,8224,62
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-06 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 64
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 70 transition count 63
Applied a total of 18 rules in 14 ms. Remains 70 /79 variables (removed 9) and now considering 63/72 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 32 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 63/133 variables, 70/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 133/133 variables, and 89 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 1624 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 7/7 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 7/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/19 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 63/133 variables, 70/89 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 62/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 4/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 3/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 3/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 133/133 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 5918 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 7557ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7558ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/79 places, 63/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7650 ms. Remains : 70/79 places, 63/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:19] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17240682437986503443.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality2171580194178725826.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17240682437986503443.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2171580194178725826.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.90295e+06,0.246903,15784,2,1395,5,41641,6,0,345,76630,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(EF(AX((((p17==0)&&(p50==0))&&((p73==0)&&(p31==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,E(TRUE U !(EX(!((((p17==0)&&(p50==0))&&((p73==0)&&(p31==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t11, t12, t16, t20, t25, t29, t30, t31, t35, t36, t39, t41, t42, t44, t45, t47, t48,...259
(forward)formula 0,1,6.61415,237216,1,0,275,1.1658e+06,152,116,2050,1.47835e+06,296
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 69 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 69 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 68 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 68 transition count 61
Applied a total of 22 rules in 8 ms. Remains 68 /79 variables (removed 11) and now considering 61/72 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-07 11:15:25] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:15:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 90 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1444 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 60/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 17 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2725 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 4173ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4174ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/79 places, 61/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4273 ms. Remains : 68/79 places, 61/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:29] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality1030028119577740845.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14269195080276773921.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality1030028119577740845.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14269195080276773921.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77085e+06,0.184177,12432,2,1032,5,30101,6,0,335,54832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AX((p34==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(EX(!((p34==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t47, Intersection ...239
(forward)formula 0,0,4.0668,159676,1,0,543,686353,145,317,1837,1.23953e+06,428
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 69 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 69 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 68 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 68 transition count 61
Applied a total of 22 rules in 9 ms. Remains 68 /79 variables (removed 11) and now considering 61/72 (removed 11) transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 29 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 74 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1482 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 60/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2715 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 4202ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4202ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/79 places, 61/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4287 ms. Remains : 68/79 places, 61/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3996397414541528601.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3788170222911081278.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3996397414541528601.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3788170222911081278.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77085e+06,0.173252,12416,2,1032,5,30101,6,0,335,54832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EX(E(((((!((p11==0)||(p42==1)))||(p51==0))||((p0==1)||(p35==0)))||(p9==1)) U (AG((p22==1)) * ((p79==0)||(p12==1))))) * (p6==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((EX(E(((((!((p11==0)||(p42==1)))||(p51==0))||((p0==1)||(p35==0)))||(p9==1)) U (!(E(TRUE U !((p22==1...207
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t47, Intersection ...239
(forward)formula 0,0,0.698986,31300,1,0,188,110695,154,73,1975,165938,196
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 70 transition count 63
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 70 transition count 63
Applied a total of 18 rules in 6 ms. Remains 70 /79 variables (removed 9) and now considering 63/72 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 36 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 62 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 63/133 variables, 70/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 133/133 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 1546 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/69 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/70 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 63/133 variables, 70/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 62/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 6/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 5/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 2/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/133 variables, 0/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 133/133 variables, and 163 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved in 5747 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 7/7 constraints]
After SMT, in 7299ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 62 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7299ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/79 places, 63/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7409 ms. Remains : 70/79 places, 63/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:46] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2099254372852384965.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality616636813309743342.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2099254372852384965.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality616636813309743342.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.37453e+06,0.230032,14760,2,1303,5,37221,6,0,345,71253,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(AG((AX(((p21==0)||(p31==1))) * ((p45==1)||(p40==0))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(!(E(TRUE U !((!(EX(!(((p21==0)||(p31==1))))) * ((p45==1)||(p40==0))))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t32, t36, t39, t41, t42, t44, t45, t47, t48, t49, t51, Intersec...244
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,5.02049,165628,1,0,311,872807,161,163,2040,952454,349
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 69 transition count 62
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 69 transition count 62
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 68 transition count 61
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 68 transition count 61
Applied a total of 22 rules in 7 ms. Remains 68 /79 variables (removed 11) and now considering 61/72 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 61 rows 68 cols
[2025-06-07 11:15:51] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:15:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 53 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 95 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 60 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 129/129 variables, and 86 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 1432 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/67 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/68 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 6/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/18 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 61/129 variables, 68/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 60/146 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 3/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/129 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 129/129 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved in 2759 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 68/68 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 60/60 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 4195ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 60 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4195ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 68/79 places, 61/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4297 ms. Remains : 68/79 places, 61/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 61 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality17225425204966424518.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4519829486160777180.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17225425204966424518.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4519829486160777180.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.77085e+06,0.178833,12424,2,1032,5,30101,6,0,335,54832,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((p13==0)&&(p20==1))) + E(EF(EX(((p20==0)||(p63==1)))) U EG(AX(!(((p7==0)||(p35==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((Init * !(E(E(TRUE U EX(((p20==0)||(p63==1)))) U EG(!(EX(!(!(((p7==0)||(p35==1)))))))))),!(((p13==0)&&(p20...171
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t19, t24, t28, t33, t34, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t47, Intersection ...239
Using saturation style SCC detection
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 57/0/4
(forward)formula 0,0,0.941672,40300,1,0,212,148335,164,88,2080,230536,228
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 74 transition count 67
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 74 transition count 67
Applied a total of 10 rules in 4 ms. Remains 74 /79 variables (removed 5) and now considering 67/72 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 67 rows 74 cols
[2025-06-07 11:15:56] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:15:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:56] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 82 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:15:56] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 1/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 67/141 variables, 74/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 20 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 1/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:15:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 141/141 variables, and 97 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 2953 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/74 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 9/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/74 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 67/141 variables, 74/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 66/161 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 7/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/141 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/141 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 141/141 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 3734 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 74/74 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 19/19 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 6693ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6693ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 74/79 places, 67/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6779 ms. Remains : 74/79 places, 67/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 67 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9319671644412870363.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10830680380783101246.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9319671644412870363.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10830680380783101246.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.78944e+06,0.296169,18164,2,1734,5,49682,6,0,365,92645,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((E(((E((((p16==0)||(p20==1))||(p7==1)) U (p73==1)) * EX(((p69==0)||(p25==1)))) * ((((p40==0)||(p80==0))||(p56==1))&&(!((p19==0)||(p22=...246
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(E(((E((((p16==0)||(p20==1))||(p7==1)) U (p73==1)) * EX(((p69==0)||(p25==1)))) * ((((p40==0)||(p80==0...307
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t7, t11, t13, t17, t21, t27, t31, t33, t36, t40, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t51, t52, t53, t55,...254
(forward)formula 0,0,6.88134,245856,1,0,432,1.17343e+06,175,206,2085,1.92497e+06,446
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-13 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 64
Applied a total of 16 rules in 5 ms. Remains 71 /79 variables (removed 8) and now considering 64/72 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-07 11:16:10] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 31 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:16:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:10] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 46 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 78 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:16:10] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/20 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 2/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1807 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 63/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/159 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 15 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 5/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 7 places in 16 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 169 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 8726 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 14/14 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 9/9 constraints]
After SMT, in 10540ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 10541ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/79 places, 64/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 10626 ms. Remains : 71/79 places, 64/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:16:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:21] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:16:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4320394761779813684.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:21] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4031168539144875065.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4320394761779813684.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4031168539144875065.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,8.30025e+06,0.266546,17080,2,1433,5,45362,6,0,350,87132,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((E(((p40==1)&&((p32==0)||(p1==1))) U AG(((p43==0)||(p4==1)))) + AG(EX((p57==0)))) + (AX(((p66==0)&&(p42==1))) * ((p42==0)||((p0==0)&&...168
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !((E(((p40==1)&&((p32==0)||(p1==1))) U !(E(TRUE U !(((p43==0)||(p4==1)))))) + !(E(TRUE ...395
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t15, t20, t22, t25, t29, t33, t37, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48, t49, t50, t52, Int...249
(forward)formula 0,0,5.95157,210340,1,0,629,1.0768e+06,157,317,1962,1.36144e+06,653
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 79/79 places, 72/72 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 72 transition count 65
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 72 transition count 65
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 71 transition count 64
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 71 transition count 64
Applied a total of 16 rules in 4 ms. Remains 71 /79 variables (removed 8) and now considering 64/72 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 64 rows 71 cols
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Computed 12 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 45 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 86 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 135/135 variables, and 93 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 1672 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/71 variables, 12/12 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 10/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 64/135 variables, 71/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 63/156 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 2/158 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 4/162 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/163 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/164 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/165 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 2/167 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 1/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/135 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/135 variables, 0/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 135/135 variables, and 168 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 12254 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 12/12 constraints, State Equation: 71/71 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 16/16 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 6/6 constraints]
After SMT, in 13932ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13932ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 71/79 places, 64/72 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 14023 ms. Remains : 71/79 places, 64/72 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:41] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 64 transitions.
[2025-06-07 11:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality601714810323514837.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-07 11:16:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13339438771719222367.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality601714810323514837.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13339438771719222367.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.91069e+06,0.414534,21820,2,1488,5,59628,6,0,350,118604,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(((A(((p59==1)&&((p44==0)||(p4==1))) U E((p73==1) U (p74==1))) * AF((((p20==0)||(p44==1))||((p62==0)||(p1==1))))) * ((p0==0)||(p42==1...182
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([((FwdU(EY(Init),!(EG(!(EX((p64==1)))))) * !(((!((E(!(E((p73==1) U (p74==1))) U (!(((p59==1)&&((p44==0)||(p4==1...391
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t6, t10, t11, t12, t16, t21, t23, t26, t30, t34, t36, t37, t39, t40, t42, t43, t45, t46, t48,...264
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,24.3348,765128,1,0,1740,3.66042e+06,156,1100,1982,6.41639e+06,1604
FORMULA ShieldPPPt-PT-001B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-07 11:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-07 11:17:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Total runtime 176538 ms.

BK_STOP 1749295025926

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPt-PT-001B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPt-PT-001B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533400785"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPt-PT-001B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPt-PT-001B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;