Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533100626.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533100626
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749187241166

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPs-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 58 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Transformed 139 places.
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Transformed 129 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 139 places and 129 transitions and 354 arcs in 147 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 12 ms.
Support contains 100 out of 139 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 139/139 places, 129/129 transitions.
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 1 place count 138 transition count 128
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 138 transition count 128
Applied a total of 2 rules in 20 ms. Remains 138 /139 variables (removed 1) and now considering 128/129 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 128 rows 138 cols
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 12 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 236 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:20:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:43] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 245 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 513 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 127 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:20:43] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 61 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 54 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 56 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 20/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 17/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 11/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 3/75 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 5/80 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 7/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 128/266 variables, 138/225 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 3/228 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/229 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/231 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 3/234 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/235 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 1/236 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 44 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 65 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 9/245 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 6/251 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 6/257 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 34 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/259 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 53 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/266 variables, 0/260 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 266/266 variables, and 260 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved in 23265 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 127/127 constraints, Known Traps: 97/97 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/137 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/138 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 97/120 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 46 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 9/129 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 10/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 46 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 6/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 40 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 6/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 2/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/138 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 128/266 variables, 138/293 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 127/420 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 56 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 9/429 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 3/432 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/433 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 2/435 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/266 variables, 1/436 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 266/266 variables, and 437 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 138/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 127/127 constraints, Known Traps: 147/147 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 53366ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 127 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 53375ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 138/139 places, 128/129 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 53923 ms. Remains : 138/139 places, 128/129 transitions.
Support contains 100 out of 138 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 05:21:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 31 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (93 resets) in 1063 ms. (37 steps per ms) remains 3/90 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40001 steps (26 resets) in 118 ms. (336 steps per ms) remains 3/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (21 resets) in 90 ms. (439 steps per ms) remains 2/3 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (24 resets) in 62 ms. (634 steps per ms) remains 1/2 properties
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 1 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp27 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 42/266 variables, and 4 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved in 26 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 4/23 constraints, State Equation: 0/138 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 31ms problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 1 atomic propositions for a total of 16 simplifications.
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
Computed a total of 31 stabilizing places and 31 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 128 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 128 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 127 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 127 transition count 117
Applied a total of 22 rules in 16 ms. Remains 127 /138 variables (removed 11) and now considering 117/128 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 127 cols
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 5 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 72 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 164 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 238 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 17/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 52 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 117/244 variables, 127/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 12248 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 43/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 3/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 117/244 variables, 127/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 116/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/319 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 69 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/330 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/244 variables, and 332 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 42280ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42282ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/138 places, 117/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42537 ms. Remains : 127/138 places, 117/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:20] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:22:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:20] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15719911685476769600.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:20] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5767430448507094199.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15719911685476769600.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5767430448507094199.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 12 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6925362207412838613.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6925362207412838613.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6925362207412838613.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6925362207412838613.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6925362207412838613.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 40 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6109809907153751249.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:50] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10637264808760231773.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6109809907153751249.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10637264808760231773.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.09109e+12,4.96697,133296,2002,67,232092,545,366,447272,53,4085,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((i0.u2.p6==0) * A(!((((i6.i1.u30.p82==1)&&(i6.i1.u42.p117==1))||(i5.u24.p67==1))) U (i1.i0.u3.p8==1))) * (EX(!(A((i3.i1.u17.p42==1) ...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((i0.u2.p6==0) * !((E(!((i1.i0.u3.p8==1)) U (!(!((((i6.i1.u30.p82==1)&&(i6.i1.u42.p117==1))||(i5.u24...404
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t44, t47, t50, t71, t74, t77, i0.u1.t81, i1.i1.u6.t80, i2.u13.t73, i3.i0.u10.t76, i3.i1.u16.t...685
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 137 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 125 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 124 transition count 114
Performed 11 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 11 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 124 transition count 103
Deduced a syphon composed of 11 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 11 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 22 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 113 transition count 103
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 100 transition count 90
Iterating global reduction 3 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 100 transition count 90
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 74 place count 100 transition count 86
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 82 place count 96 transition count 86
Performed 19 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 19
Deduced a syphon composed of 19 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 19 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 38 rules applied. Total rules applied 120 place count 77 transition count 67
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 122 place count 75 transition count 65
Applied a total of 122 rules in 30 ms. Remains 75 /138 variables (removed 63) and now considering 65/128 (removed 63) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 65 rows 75 cols
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 63 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/75 variables, 20/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 9/32 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 2/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 65/140 variables, 75/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 140/140 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 3090 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 13/13 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 3/3 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/7 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/75 variables, 20/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 9/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/75 variables, 0/36 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 65/140 variables, 75/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 63/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 2/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 2/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/140 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/140 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 140/140 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved in 6445 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 75/75 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 63/63 constraints, Known Traps: 15/15 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 9545ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 63 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9545ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 75/138 places, 65/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9695 ms. Remains : 75/138 places, 65/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 65 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13202167043671432289.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14587804074851970931.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13202167043671432289.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14587804074851970931.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.93428e+09,1.30942,50516,2,7649,5,164742,6,0,366,306576,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((((p20==1)&&(p22==1)) + (!((((A(((p86==1)&&(p111==1)) U (p124==1)) * (p21==1)) * ((p57==1)&&(p101==1))) * (p103==1))) * !(AF(((p39==1)...261
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((p20==1)&&(p22==1)) + (!((((!((E(!((p124==1)) U (!(((p86==1)&&(p111==1))) * !((p124==1)))) + EG(!...372
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t20, t31, t35, t46...305
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9279903401679551640.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9279903401679551640.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9279903401679551640.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9279903401679551640.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9279903401679551640.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 34 labels/synchronizations in 5 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability688034850784935561.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3586841837081566736.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability688034850784935561.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3586841837081566736.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.93428e+09,0.786983,30256,882,54,46940,152,234,87312,52,954,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(((((i0.i1.u4.p20==1)&&(i0.i1.u4.p22==1)) + (!((((A(((i5.u16.p86==1)&&(i6.u24.p111==1)) U (i5.u26.p124==1)) * (i0.i1.u3.p21==1)) * ((i3....389
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,((((i0.i1.u4.p20==1)&&(i0.i1.u4.p22==1)) + (!((((!((E(!((i5.u26.p124==1)) U (!(((i5.u16.p86==1)&&(i6...514
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t18, t32, t35, t44, t46, t56, t59, t62, i0.i1.u4.t31, i1.u9.t2, i1.u9.t3, i1.u9.t4, i...427
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 13 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 13 transitions
Performed 13 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 13
Iterating post reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 13 place count 137 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 13 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 124 transition count 112
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 122 transition count 112
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 122 transition count 102
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 50 place count 112 transition count 102
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 61 place count 101 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 3 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 101 transition count 91
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 72 place count 101 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 98 transition count 88
Performed 23 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 23
Deduced a syphon composed of 23 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 23 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 46 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 75 transition count 65
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 126 place count 73 transition count 63
Applied a total of 126 rules in 28 ms. Remains 73 /138 variables (removed 65) and now considering 63/128 (removed 65) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 63 rows 73 cols
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 103 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 61 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/73 variables, 18/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 7 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 3 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 11/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/34 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 63/136 variables, 73/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 136/136 variables, and 108 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 1918 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 12/12 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 5/5 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 8/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/71 variables, 0/13 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/73 variables, 18/31 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 4/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/73 variables, 0/35 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 63/136 variables, 73/108 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 61/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 3/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 2 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 4/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 1/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/136 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/136 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 136/136 variables, and 178 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved in 7736 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 73/73 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 61/61 constraints, Known Traps: 17/17 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 9659ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 61 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9660ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 73/138 places, 63/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9796 ms. Remains : 73/138 places, 63/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:24:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:40] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 63 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:24:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:40] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7250579474144229419.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:40] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2235764424919037787.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7250579474144229419.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2235764424919037787.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.45555e+09,1.25982,50232,2,6427,5,155190,6,0,356,319040,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((!(E((p62!=1) U EG((p77==1)))) * ((p19==0)||(p43==0))) + (EG((((p101==0)||(p103==0))||(p25==0))) * EF(((((p37==0)||(p8==0))&&(p10==0)...171
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E((p62!=1) U EG((p77==1)))) * ((p19==0)||(p43==0))) + (EG((((p101==0)||(p103==0))||(p25==0))) *...222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t23, t26, t42, t4...316
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph227214914230067424.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph227214914230067424.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph227214914230067424.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph227214914230067424.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph227214914230067424.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 15 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 18 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17646936039375872957.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15362581270436538499.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17646936039375872957.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15362581270436538499.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.45555e+09,1.39203,53212,951,30,94827,187,225,166180,35,884,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(((!(E((i5.u16.p62!=1) U EG((i6.u17.p77==1)))) * ((i1.u4.p19==0)||(i2.u11.p43==0))) + (EG((((i8.i1.u23.p101==0)||(i7.u24.p103==0))||(i4...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(((!(E((i5.u16.p62!=1) U EG((i6.u17.p77==1)))) * ((i1.u4.p19==0)||(i2.u11.p43==0))) + (EG((((i8.i1.u...298
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t9, t10, t30, t42, t45, t46, t51, t55, t56, i1.u3.t23, i2.u11.t3, i2.u11.t4, i2.u12.t26, ...456
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 128 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 128 transition count 118
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 21 place count 127 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 127 transition count 117
Applied a total of 22 rules in 9 ms. Remains 127 /138 variables (removed 11) and now considering 117/128 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 127 cols
[2025-06-06 05:25:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:25:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 91 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 151 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:25:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 57 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 17/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 4/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 3/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 117/244 variables, 127/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 6/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 194 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 11664 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 43/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 3/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 10/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 13/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 117/244 variables, 127/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 116/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 13/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/355 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/360 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/244 variables, and 360 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30014 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 41685ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41687ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/138 places, 117/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41847 ms. Remains : 127/138 places, 117/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:26:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:22] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:26:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13587436933801276629.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17104794923142221482.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13587436933801276629.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17104794923142221482.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.77118e+12,26.8975,727052,2,39095,5,2.21869e+06,6,0,627,5.05701e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph11669249547681853836.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph11669249547681853836.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph11669249547681853836.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph11669249547681853836.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph11669249547681853836.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability9949172606220113339.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:52] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9499365951797344225.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability9949172606220113339.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9499365951797344225.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.77118e+12,3.67602,98516,2080,49,150370,431,371,347288,49,2975,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((((EX((i5.i1.u43.p119==0)) * EF((((i1.i0.u19.p47==0)&&(i2.i1.u18.p45==0))&&(i7.i1.u39.p109==0)))) * (((i2.i0.u7.p16==0)||(i1.i0.u19.p4...270
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((((EX((i5.i1.u43.p119==0)) * E(TRUE U (((i1.i0.u19.p47==0)&&(i2.i1.u18.p45==0))&&(i7.i1.u39.p109==0...321
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t46, t49, t71, t74, t77, i0.u1.t81, i1.i0.u19.t65, i1.i0.u19.t66, i1.i1.u6.t80, i2.i0.u7.t79,...705
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 125 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 124 transition count 114
Applied a total of 28 rules in 10 ms. Remains 124 /138 variables (removed 14) and now considering 114/128 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 124 cols
[2025-06-06 05:27:22] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:22] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 80 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 113 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:27:22] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 11815 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 29/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 113/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 55 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 30009 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41841ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41841ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/138 places, 114/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41985 ms. Remains : 124/138 places, 114/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2108354291325629412.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12175623258758142402.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2108354291325629412.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12175623258758142402.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,22.7192,616324,2,30408,5,1.915e+06,6,0,612,4.27745e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((p85==1)) + AG(EX(EF((((p8==1)||((p27==1)&&(p29==1))) * AX(((p15==1)&&(p50==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((p85==1)))))),TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U (((p8==1)||((p27==1)&&(p29==1))) * !(EX(!(((p1...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t27, t32, ...344
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph888920554347707467.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph888920554347707467.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph888920554347707467.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph888920554347707467.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph888920554347707467.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12168073990857399776.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4628969563439679523.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12168073990857399776.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4628969563439679523.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,3.53512,94840,1590,45,150428,376,339,312948,42,2264,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AG((i6.i0.u31.p85==1)) + AG(EX(EF((((i1.u3.p8==1)||((i3.i0.u10.p27==1)&&(i3.i0.u11.p29==1))) * AX(((i1.u5.p15==1)&&(i1.u18.p50==1)))))))...156
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU((Init * !(!(E(TRUE U !((i6.i0.u31.p85==1)))))),TRUE) * !(EX(E(TRUE U (((i1.u3.p8==1)||((i3.i0.u10.p27==1)...237
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t44, t47, t68, t71, t74, i0.u1.t78, i1.u5.t77, i2.i0.u6.t76, i2.i1.u15.t65, i2.i1.u16.t3...654
(forward)formula 0,0,8.05694,150776,1,0,252786,549,1958,540759,202,2912,384721
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-04 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 125 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 124 transition count 114
Applied a total of 28 rules in 5 ms. Remains 124 /138 variables (removed 14) and now considering 114/128 (removed 14) transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:28:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:28:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 96 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 168 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 113 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:28:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 35 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 11732 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 29/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 113/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 2/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41757ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41757ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/138 places, 114/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41931 ms. Remains : 124/138 places, 114/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:29:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:24] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:29:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:24] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1744579605475717262.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:24] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15063170068776462093.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1744579605475717262.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15063170068776462093.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,22.8281,616352,2,30408,5,1.915e+06,6,0,612,4.27745e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(EX((p78==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(EX((p78==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t27, t32, ...344
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18403903952818184297.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18403903952818184297.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18403903952818184297.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18403903952818184297.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18403903952818184297.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17942936487607600392.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:54] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13450049156367510021.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17942936487607600392.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13450049156367510021.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,2.43021,77456,1788,44,131472,332,353,256592,42,1961,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(EG(EX((i5.i2.u28.p78==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EG(EX((i5.i2.u28.p78==0)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t44, t68, t71, t74, i0.i1.u6.t77, i1.i0.u7.t76, i1.i1.u16.t65, i1.i1.u17.t3, i1.i1.u17.t...649
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 127 transition count 117
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 23 place count 126 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 24 place count 126 transition count 116
Applied a total of 24 rules in 3 ms. Remains 126 /138 variables (removed 12) and now considering 116/128 (removed 12) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 116 rows 126 cols
[2025-06-06 05:30:24] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:30:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:24] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 115 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:30:24] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 17/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 2/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 49 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 5/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 5/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 3/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 2/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 116/242 variables, 126/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 6/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 3/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/194 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 2/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 0/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 242/242 variables, and 196 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 11373 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 43/43 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/126 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 43/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 6/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/72 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 116/242 variables, 126/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 115/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 9/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 6/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 54 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 4/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 4/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/242 variables, 0/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/242 variables, 1/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 242/242 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 126/126 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 115/115 constraints, Known Traps: 70/70 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 4/4 constraints]
After SMT, in 41406ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 115 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41407ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 126/138 places, 116/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41541 ms. Remains : 126/138 places, 116/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 116 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1701510657249983118.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18005918763867519944.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1701510657249983118.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18005918763867519944.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph6396031893770607481.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph6396031893770607481.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph6396031893770607481.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph6396031893770607481.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph6396031893770607481.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability278993996435439160.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6879678175476688496.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability278993996435439160.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6879678175476688496.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.7079e+12,5.38943,137780,2264,54,217567,352,360,447939,54,2017,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((EG(AF(!(E((i1.i1.u19.p47==1) U (i9.i1.u43.p118==1))))) + AF((i5.u24.p67==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((EY(Init) * !(EG(!(EG(!(!(E((i1.i1.u19.p47==1) U (i9.i1.u43.p118==1))))))))),!((i5.u24.p67==1)))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t45, t48, t70, t73, t76, i0.u1.t80, i1.i1.u6.t79, i1.i1.u19.t64, i1.i1.u19.t65, i2.u13.t...685
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 137 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 121 transition count 111
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 121 transition count 101
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 111 transition count 101
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 65 place count 98 transition count 88
Iterating global reduction 2 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 98 transition count 88
Performed 4 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 4 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 78 place count 98 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 4 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 4 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 94 transition count 84
Performed 27 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 27
Deduced a syphon composed of 27 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 27 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 54 rules applied. Total rules applied 140 place count 67 transition count 57
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 142 place count 65 transition count 55
Applied a total of 142 rules in 20 ms. Remains 65 /138 variables (removed 73) and now considering 55/128 (removed 73) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-06 05:32:06] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:32:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 92 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:06] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 2 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:32:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 1/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 20 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 1/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 91 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1722 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 22/22 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 2/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 1/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 52/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/143 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/144 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 144 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1374 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 3101ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 3102ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 65/138 places, 55/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 3223 ms. Remains : 65/138 places, 55/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:09] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:09] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability274700575810849284.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:09] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8488150873213264576.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability274700575810849284.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8488150873213264576.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.60464e+09,1.06152,40268,2,3804,5,129000,6,0,318,253771,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EG(((EF(((p28==1)&&(p69==1))) * (p25==1)) * (p14==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(((E(TRUE U ((p28==1)&&(p69==1))) * (p25==1)) * (p14==1)))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t39, t40, t41...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,0,27.0036,833596,1,0,705,4.34564e+06,143,365,2128,7.28817e+06,703
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2025-07 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 10 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 10 rule applications. Total rules 10 place count 128 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 128 transition count 118
Applied a total of 20 rules in 6 ms. Remains 128 /138 variables (removed 10) and now considering 118/128 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 128 cols
[2025-06-06 05:32:36] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:32:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:32:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 20/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 7/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 118/246 variables, 128/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 7/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 15 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 4/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 9232 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 40/40 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 40/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 4/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 118/246 variables, 128/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 117/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 20/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/335 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/343 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 349 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 39253ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 39253ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/138 places, 118/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 39397 ms. Remains : 128/138 places, 118/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:33:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:16] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:33:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12102587741380402740.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6888308669838489197.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12102587741380402740.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6888308669838489197.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17067517551021891556.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17067517551021891556.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17067517551021891556.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17067517551021891556.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17067517551021891556.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17851456321222496752.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:46] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13741224556700287127.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17851456321222496752.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13741224556700287127.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.86357e+12,3.27703,92000,2762,60,150783,485,349,322504,49,4021,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EG(!(A(((!(((i3.i0.u10.p27==1)&&(i3.i0.u11.p29==1))) * AG((i5.i1.u41.p115==1))) + !((((i1.i1.u5.p15==1)&&(i1.i1.u18.p50==1))&&(i8.u40.p1...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(FwdU((Init * EG(!(!((E(!((E((i1.i0.u4.p11==1) U (i5.i0.u26.p75==1)) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i9.u36.p100==1)&&(i7.i...681
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t44, t47, t50, t71, t74, t77, i0.u1.t81, i1.i1.u5.t80, i2.i0.u12.t73, i2.i1.u22.t57, i2.i1.u2...710
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 12 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 12 transitions
Performed 12 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 12
Iterating post reduction 0 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 137 transition count 115
Reduce places removed 12 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 25 place count 125 transition count 114
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 124 transition count 114
Performed 7 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 7 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 124 transition count 107
Deduced a syphon composed of 7 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 7 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 40 place count 117 transition count 107
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 48 place count 109 transition count 99
Iterating global reduction 3 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 109 transition count 99
Performed 1 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 1 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 56 place count 109 transition count 98
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 58 place count 108 transition count 98
Performed 28 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 28
Deduced a syphon composed of 28 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 28 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 56 rules applied. Total rules applied 114 place count 80 transition count 70
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 115 place count 79 transition count 69
Applied a total of 115 rules in 21 ms. Remains 79 /138 variables (removed 59) and now considering 69/128 (removed 59) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 69 rows 79 cols
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 38 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 54 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 66 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 3/79 variables, 13/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 16 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 5/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 69/148 variables, 79/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/107 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 2/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/109 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 1/110 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 14 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/111 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 1/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/113 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 148/148 variables, and 113 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 4112 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 10/10 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 10/10 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 4/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/76 variables, 0/14 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 3/79 variables, 13/27 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 6/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/79 variables, 0/33 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 69/148 variables, 79/112 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 66/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 3/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/188 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 1/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 2/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/148 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/148 variables, 0/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 148/148 variables, and 192 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved in 27696 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 79/79 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 66/66 constraints, Known Traps: 21/21 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 31812ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 66 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 31813ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 79/138 places, 69/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 31932 ms. Remains : 79/138 places, 69/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 69 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12364244606322141775.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14358373693611555229.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12364244606322141775.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14358373693611555229.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.3992e+10,2.53019,84676,2,13691,5,270424,6,0,387,586494,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((!(E(AF((((p95==1)&&(p136==1))||((p82==1)&&(p117==1)))) U ((A((p119==1) U ((p21==1)&&(p57==1))) + (p45==1)) + ((p56==1)||(p70==1))))) ...247
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(!(EG(!((((p95==1)&&(p136==1))||((p82==1)&&(p117==1)))))) U ((!((E(!(((p21==1)&&(p57==1))) U (!...379
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t21, t22...330
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18141468893191738536.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18141468893191738536.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18141468893191738536.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18141468893191738536.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18141468893191738536.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 12 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8043091425097300298.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability1766176606490758054.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8043091425097300298.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability1766176606490758054.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.3992e+10,1.3423,47716,1437,33,81835,129,242,157346,46,395,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((!(E(AF((((i7.u19.p95==1)&&(i9.u29.p136==1))||((i8.u15.p82==1)&&(i8.u24.p117==1)))) U ((A((i6.u26.p119==1) U ((i1.i0.u4.p21==1)&&(i4.u...371
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((!(E(!(EG(!((((i7.u19.p95==1)&&(i9.u29.p136==1))||((i8.u15.p82==1)&&(i8.u24.p117==1)))))) U ((!((E(...535
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t2, t48, t54, t57, t59, t60, t64, t68, i0.u11.t26, i1.t53, i1.i0.t0, i1.i1.u9.t3, i1.i1.u9.t4...493
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 125 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 124 transition count 114
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /138 variables (removed 14) and now considering 114/128 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 124 cols
[2025-06-06 05:35:48] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 59 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:35:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 134 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 113 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:35:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:35:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 11715 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 29/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 113/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 56 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 2/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41733ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41733ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/138 places, 114/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41871 ms. Remains : 124/138 places, 114/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8310968481040313978.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:36:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18250978837450180901.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8310968481040313978.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18250978837450180901.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,22.9644,615836,2,30408,5,1.915e+06,6,0,612,4.27745e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph14830308656022269702.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph14830308656022269702.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph14830308656022269702.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph14830308656022269702.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph14830308656022269702.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12788843896370945221.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability12724868920844483118.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12788843896370945221.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability12724868920844483118.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,2.88914,81632,1915,35,135545,269,330,258209,42,1462,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG(AF(((i1.i1.u17.p45==1) * EX(((i8.i0.u33.p93==1)&&(i8.i1.u38.p108==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EG(!(((i1.i1.u17.p45==1) * EX(((i8.i0.u33.p93==1)&&(i8.i1.u38.p108==1))))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t44, t47, t68, t71, i0.u1.t78, i1.i0.u9.t73, i1.i1.u15.t65, i1.i1.u16.t3, i1.i1.u16.t4, ...633
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 11 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 11 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 127 transition count 117
Iterating global reduction 0 with 11 rules applied. Total rules applied 22 place count 127 transition count 117
Applied a total of 22 rules in 2 ms. Remains 127 /138 variables (removed 11) and now considering 117/128 (removed 11) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 117 rows 127 cols
[2025-06-06 05:37:30] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 47 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:37:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 76 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 125 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 116 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:37:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 20/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 117/244 variables, 127/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 2/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/244 variables, 0/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 244/244 variables, and 191 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 10524 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 39/39 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/126 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/127 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 39/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 9/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 117/244 variables, 127/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 116/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 54 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 5/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 4/337 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 3/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/341 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:37:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 1/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 2/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/244 variables, 0/344 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 244/244 variables, and 344 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved in 30021 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 127/127 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 116/116 constraints, Known Traps: 76/76 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 40554ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 116 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40554ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 127/138 places, 117/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40681 ms. Remains : 127/138 places, 117/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:38:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 117 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:38:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:38:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1424770520210745294.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:38:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6753534820979557160.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1424770520210745294.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6753534820979557160.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16350467265965910547.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16350467265965910547.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16350467265965910547.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16350467265965910547.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16350467265965910547.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability15741549653930742725.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:38:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10485542410941324079.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability15741549653930742725.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10485542410941324079.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.80271e+12,1.53514,55344,3428,58,96404,244,333,181206,49,1313,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AF((EG(((i9.i0.u35.p93==1)&&(i9.i1.u42.p111==1))) * (((i5.i0.u9.p21==0)||(i5.i1.u22.p58==0))||(((i2.i1.u24.p64==1)&&(i2.i0.u12.p27==...404
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((EG(((i9.i0.u35.p93==1)&&(i9.i1.u42.p111==1))) * (((i5.i0.u9.p21==0)||(i5.i1.u22.p5...566
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t43, t46, t49, t70, t73, t76, i0.u1.t80, i1.u16.t67, i1.u17.t3, i1.u17.t4, i1.u17.t5, i1.u17....700
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 13 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 13 rule applications. Total rules 13 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 13 rules applied. Total rules applied 26 place count 125 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 27 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 124 transition count 114
Applied a total of 28 rules in 2 ms. Remains 124 /138 variables (removed 14) and now considering 114/128 (removed 14) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 124 cols
[2025-06-06 05:39:11] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 64 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:39:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 78 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 143 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 113 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:39:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 11598 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 29/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 113/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 2/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 30010 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41612ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41612ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/138 places, 114/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41757 ms. Remains : 124/138 places, 114/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:39:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:53] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:39:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:53] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1201063379811158262.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:39:53] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability292916562107343265.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1201063379811158262.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability292916562107343265.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,23.1327,615356,2,30408,5,1.915e+06,6,0,612,4.27745e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph114915450799971009.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph114915450799971009.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph114915450799971009.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph114915450799971009.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph114915450799971009.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4950414876431447235.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:23] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability3619401714334502003.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4950414876431447235.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability3619401714334502003.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,4.46083,114916,1615,42,177918,326,357,383826,42,1943,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(EX(((i4.i1.u29.p81==1) + !(E(!(((i4.i1.u29.p80==1)&&(i5.i1.u46.p130==1))) U ((i7.i0.u32.p86==1)&&(i7.i1.u39.p110==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(EX(((i4.i1.u29.p81==1) + !(E(!(((i4.i1.u29.p80==1)&&(i5.i1.u46.p130==1))) U ((i7.i0.u32.p86==1)&&(i...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t44, t47, t68, t71, t74, i0.i0.u1.t78, i0.i2.u6.t77, i1.i0.u7.t76, i1.i1.u16.t65, i1.i1....661
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 131 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 131 transition count 121
Applied a total of 14 rules in 6 ms. Remains 131 /138 variables (removed 7) and now considering 121/128 (removed 7) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 121 rows 131 cols
[2025-06-06 05:40:53] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:40:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:53] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 81 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 136 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 120 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:40:53] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/131 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 20/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 52 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 60 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 10/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 1/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/56 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 121/252 variables, 131/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 3/190 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 1/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 1/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 1/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/193 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/252 variables, 4/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 1/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/252 variables, 0/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 252/252 variables, and 198 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 12944 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 131/131 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 42/42 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/131 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 42/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 1/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/131 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 121/252 variables, 131/197 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 120/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 53 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 4/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 3/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 4/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 52 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 14/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 54 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 5/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 2/349 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 39 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 4/353 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 48 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/252 variables, 1/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 252/252 variables, and 354 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 131/131 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 120/120 constraints, Known Traps: 78/78 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 42963ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 120 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42964ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 131/138 places, 121/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 43107 ms. Remains : 131/138 places, 121/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:36] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 121 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13280851848604990255.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:41:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7088632292763756226.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13280851848604990255.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7088632292763756226.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7558489307083760203.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7558489307083760203.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7558489307083760203.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7558489307083760203.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7558489307083760203.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability14541628752244719816.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8743506365462758530.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability14541628752244719816.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8743506365462758530.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,6.23111e+12,4.76157,127940,2787,61,207651,412,362,374042,57,2407,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((A((A(EX((i8.i1.u40.p113==1)) U (((i3.i0.u12.p26==1)&&(i3.i1.u17.p41==1))&&(i8.i1.u40.p113==1))) + EG((i10.u48.p132==1))) U (i2.u24.p...576
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!((i2.u24.p64==1))))) * !(E(!((i2.u24.p64==1)) U (!((!((E(!((((i3.i0.u12.p26==1)&&(i...1565
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t47, t50, t53, t74, t77, t80, i0.i1.u6.t83, i1.u7.t82, i2.u23.t60, i2.u24.t10, i2.u24.t11, i2...724
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 16 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 16 transitions
Performed 16 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 16
Iterating post reduction 0 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 137 transition count 111
Reduce places removed 16 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 16 rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 121 transition count 111
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 32 place count 121 transition count 101
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 52 place count 111 transition count 101
Discarding 12 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 12 rule applications. Total rules 64 place count 99 transition count 89
Iterating global reduction 2 with 12 rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 99 transition count 89
Performed 5 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 5 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 76 place count 99 transition count 84
Deduced a syphon composed of 5 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 5 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 10 rules applied. Total rules applied 86 place count 94 transition count 84
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 144 place count 65 transition count 55
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 146 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 146 rules in 19 ms. Remains 63 /138 variables (removed 75) and now considering 53/128 (removed 75) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-06 05:42:36] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:42:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:36] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 51 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:36] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 51 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:42:36] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 88 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 716 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 51/139 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/140 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/141 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/142 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 142 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 1856 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2574ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2575ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/138 places, 53/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2692 ms. Remains : 63/138 places, 53/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7170138373399521498.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4517797808604710341.prop : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-reach-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality7170138373399521498.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-reachable-file' '/tmp/ReachabilityCardinality4517797808604710341.prop' '--nowitness' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
RANDOM walk for 357 steps (1 resets) in 10 ms. (32 steps per ms) remains 0/1 properties
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLFireability-2023-14 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL RANDOM_WALK

ITS runner timed out or was interrupted.
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 138/138 places, 128/128 transitions.
Discarding 7 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 7 rule applications. Total rules 7 place count 131 transition count 121
Iterating global reduction 0 with 7 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 131 transition count 121
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 15 place count 130 transition count 120
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 130 transition count 120
Applied a total of 16 rules in 3 ms. Remains 130 /138 variables (removed 8) and now considering 120/128 (removed 8) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 120 rows 130 cols
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 44 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 119 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:42:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 22 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 20/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 8/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 3/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/54 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 120/250 variables, 130/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/187 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 50 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:44] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 11/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/208 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 7/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/217 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 1/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/250 variables, 0/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 250/250 variables, and 220 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 17135 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 64/64 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/129 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/130 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 64/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 42 places in 38 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 6/93 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 35 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 44 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 3/96 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/97 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 120/250 variables, 130/227 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 119/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:42:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 8/354 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 5/359 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/362 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 3/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/250 variables, 2/369 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 250/250 variables, and 370 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 130/130 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 119/119 constraints, Known Traps: 98/98 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 47152ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 119 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 47154ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 130/138 places, 120/128 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 47275 ms. Remains : 130/138 places, 120/128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:26] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 120 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5520070724061021037.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16420142931479424005.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5520070724061021037.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16420142931479424005.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.30141e+12,28.6257,760264,2,48364,5,2.27526e+06,6,0,642,5.32539e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7526189726716829353.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7526189726716829353.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7526189726716829353.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7526189726716829353.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7526189726716829353.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12073165553287130225.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:43:56] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9670392839033060308.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12073165553287130225.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9670392839033060308.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.30141e+12,4.47817,126896,2661,51,207729,381,362,425217,50,1965,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AX(AF((((AF(((i2.i0.u8.p21==1)&&(i2.i1.u21.p57==1))) + E((i4.i1.u16.p46==1) U ((i3.u13.p30==1)&&(i9.i1.u43.p120==1)))) + ((i4.i1.u16.p46...845
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(EY(Init),!((((!(EG(!(((i2.i0.u8.p21==1)&&(i2.i1.u21.p57==1))))) + E((i4.i1.u16.p46==1) U ((i3.u13.p30==1)...3163
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t48, t51, t74, t77, t80, i0.u1.t84, i1.i1.u6.t83, i2.i0.u7.t82, i2.i1.u20.t64, i2.i1.u21...715
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1168021327194220161.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1168021327194220161.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1168021327194220161.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1168021327194220161.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1168021327194220161.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3637502225463242173.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:44:26] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6389315747528510621.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3637502225463242173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6389315747528510621.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.08668e+12,6.04632,163912,4343,67,275846,368,359,597516,49,1639,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((i2.u2.p6==0) * A(!((((i6.i1.u29.p82==1)&&(i6.i0.u42.p117==1))||(i5.u23.p67==1))) U (i3.u3.p8==1))) * (EX(!(A((i0.i1.u16.p42==1) U (...215
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((i2.u2.p6==0) * !((E(!((i3.u3.p8==1)) U (!(!((((i6.i1.u29.p82==1)&&(i6.i0.u42.p117==1))||(i5.u23.p6...380
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t51, t54, t57, t81, t84, t87, i0.i0.u9.t86, i0.i1.t78, i0.i1.u15.t80, i0.i1.u16.t3, i0.i1.u16...818
Using saturation style SCC detection
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability437474621963617812.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:51:10] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5987232881048433971.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability437474621963617812.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5987232881048433971.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...261
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.08668e+12,136.071,3395896,35606,303,6.33985e+06,1282,216,2.51093e+07,90,19121,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((((i0.i1.u54.p6==0) * A(!((((i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u31.p82==1)&&(i1.i0.i0.u42.p117==1))||(i0.i1.u23.p67==1))) U (i0.i1.i0.i0.u56.p8==1)...297
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(((i0.i1.u54.p6==0) * !((E(!((i0.i1.i0.i0.u56.p8==1)) U (!(!((((i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.i0.u31.p82==1)&&(i1...500
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u2.t91, i0.i1.u23.t11, i0.i1.u23.t12, i0.i1.u23.t13, i0.i1.u23.t14, i0.i1.u23.t65, i0.i1.u...1254
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 06:19:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 116 ms
[2025-06-06 06:19:29] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 128 transitions.
[2025-06-06 06:19:29] [INFO ] Transformed 138 places.
[2025-06-06 06:19:29] [INFO ] Transformed 128 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-06 06:19:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13607273884001406554.gal : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 06:19:29] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15306467648280322931.ctl : 9 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13607273884001406554.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15306467648280322931.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...330
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 13 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,9.08668e+12,33.6414,874836,2,183323,5,2.49435e+06,6,0,682,6.10764e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPs-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533100626"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPs-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPs-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLFireability.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;