Execution Chart

Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.

Trace from the execution

Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533100625.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533100625
=====================================================================

--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 452K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.8K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 59K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 57K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.6K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 27K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.1K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 11K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 120K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.1K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 47K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 35K May 29 14:32 model.pnml

--------------------
content from stdout:

=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)

The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR

echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-11

=== Now, execution of the tool begins

BK_START 1749187122857

Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLCardinality
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPs-PT-002B
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLCardinality PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 05:18:43] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLCardinality, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 05:18:43] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 54 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Transformed 139 places.
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Transformed 129 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 139 places and 129 transitions and 354 arcs in 137 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLCardinality.xml in 13 ms.
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
Support contains 57 out of 139 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 139/139 places, 129/129 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 134 transition count 124
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 134 transition count 124
Applied a total of 10 rules in 20 ms. Remains 134 /139 variables (removed 5) and now considering 124/129 (removed 5) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 124 rows 134 cols
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 10 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 212 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 104 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 355 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 123 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:18:44] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 59 ms of which 9 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 51 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 197 ms of which 169 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 51 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 42 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 45 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 38 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 20/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 5/48 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 43 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 10/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 1/59 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 5/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 3/69 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/71 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 2/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (OVERLAPS) 124/258 variables, 134/207 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 4/211 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/213 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/215 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 45 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/216 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 37 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 18 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/218 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 19 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 1/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 20 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/219 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:18:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 21 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 1/220 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 48 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 22 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 23 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 24 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 0/221 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 258/258 variables, and 221 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 18366 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/133 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/134 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 62/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 39 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 5/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 124/258 variables, 134/224 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 123/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 5/352 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 6/358 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 50 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 7/365 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/367 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 1/368 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/370 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/372 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 2/374 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 258/258 variables, and 374 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved in 30018 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 123/123 constraints, Known Traps: 92/92 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 48433ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 123 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 48444ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 134/139 places, 124/129 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 48836 ms. Remains : 134/139 places, 124/129 transitions.
Support contains 57 out of 134 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 28 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Initial state reduction rules for CTL removed 1 formulas.
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-11 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
Support contains 43 out of 134 places (down from 57) after GAL structural reductions.
RANDOM walk for 40000 steps (97 resets) in 766 ms. (52 steps per ms) remains 2/35 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40004 steps (21 resets) in 184 ms. (216 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
BEST_FIRST walk for 40002 steps (20 resets) in 81 ms. (487 steps per ms) remains 2/2 properties
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
All remaining problems are real, not stopping.
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/7 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 2 unsolved
Problem AtomicPropp5 is UNSAT
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 80/87 variables, 17/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/87 variables, 0/17 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 47/134 variables, 6/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/134 variables, 0/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 124/258 variables, 134/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/258 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/258 variables, 0/157 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 258/258 variables, and 157 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved in 72 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 134/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 5.0 s and query timeout 500.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/4 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 53/57 variables, 9/9 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 1 solved, 1 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Problem AtomicPropp8 is UNSAT
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 57/258 variables, and 10 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved in 56 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 9/23 constraints, State Equation: 0/134 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 0/2 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 131ms problems are : Problem set: 2 solved, 0 unsolved
Skipping Parikh replay, no witness traces provided.
Successfully simplified 2 atomic propositions for a total of 13 simplifications.
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-01 FALSE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-05 TRUE TECHNIQUES TOPOLOGICAL INITIAL_STATE
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
Computed a total of 28 stabilizing places and 28 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Discarding 5 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 5 rule applications. Total rules 5 place count 129 transition count 119
Iterating global reduction 0 with 5 rules applied. Total rules applied 10 place count 129 transition count 119
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 11 place count 128 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 128 transition count 118
Applied a total of 12 rules in 13 ms. Remains 128 /134 variables (removed 6) and now considering 118/124 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 128 cols
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 65 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:19:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 49 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 19/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 2/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/47 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 118/246 variables, 128/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 4/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/181 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/182 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 21 places in 40 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/183 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/184 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 1/185 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/186 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 186 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 11605 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 32/32 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 32/55 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/58 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/61 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 2/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 1/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 3/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/67 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 118/246 variables, 128/195 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 117/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:48] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 16/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 47 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:19:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 14/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/345 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/346 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/347 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 347 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30012 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 74/74 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 5/5 constraints]
After SMT, in 41628ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41629ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/134 places, 118/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41783 ms. Remains : 128/134 places, 118/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:15] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15111279089092802979.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3181096223153907624.ctl : 2 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15111279089092802979.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3181096223153907624.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.34829e+12,25.1829,698568,2,33352,5,2.14422e+06,6,0,632,4.84819e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 11 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13301308167253212770.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13301308167253212770.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13301308167253212770.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13301308167253212770.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13301308167253212770.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 42 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 7 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10930156424431348379.gal : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:20:45] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3135730107242898282.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10930156424431348379.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3135730107242898282.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.34829e+12,3.26466,90376,1835,67,144290,516,371,303248,53,3431,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(((i0.u1.p2==0)&&(i10.u46.p132==1)))) * ((EX(EF((((i10.u45.p129==0)&&(i8.i1.u40.p112==1))||(i5.i0.u27.p77==1)))) + AX((i6.u34.p94==...241
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(((i0.u1.p2==0)&&(i10.u46.p132==1))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((Init * !((EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(...352
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t45, t48, t51, t72, t75, t78, i0.u1.t82, i1.i1.u5.t81, i2.i0.u9.t77, i2.i1.u22.t58, i2.i1.u23...676
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 125 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 124 transition count 114
Applied a total of 20 rules in 19 ms. Remains 124 /134 variables (removed 10) and now considering 114/124 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 124 cols
[2025-06-06 05:21:15] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:15] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 52 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:21:15] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:16] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 92 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 145 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 113 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:21:16] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 10 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 11509 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 29/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 32 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 113/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:29] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 51 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41535ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41537ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/134 places, 114/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41701 ms. Remains : 124/134 places, 114/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:57] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:57] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality2164487114856768281.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:21:57] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3372481007677769858.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality2164487114856768281.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3372481007677769858.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,23.4102,616380,2,30408,5,1.915e+06,6,0,612,4.27745e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph18441403095260352727.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph18441403095260352727.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph18441403095260352727.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph18441403095260352727.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph18441403095260352727.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10517398596969033243.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:27] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3810381548630451472.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10517398596969033243.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3810381548630451472.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,3.28343,90416,1682,42,141799,258,319,309642,42,1391,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EX(AX(EG((i8.i0.u32.p87==0))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(EY(Init) * !(EX(!(EG((i8.i0.u32.p87==0))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t44, t47, t68, t71, t74, i0.u1.t78, i1.i1.u6.t77, i2.i0.u7.t76, i2.i1.u16.t65, i2.i1.u17...658
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 133 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 29 place count 119 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 2 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 118 transition count 108
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 118 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 3 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 54 place count 103 transition count 93
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 103 transition count 93
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 3 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 60 place count 103 transition count 90
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 66 place count 100 transition count 90
Performed 29 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 29
Deduced a syphon composed of 29 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 29 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 58 rules applied. Total rules applied 124 place count 71 transition count 61
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 3 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 125 place count 70 transition count 60
Applied a total of 125 rules in 28 ms. Remains 70 /134 variables (removed 64) and now considering 60/124 (removed 64) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 60 rows 70 cols
[2025-06-06 05:22:57] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 42 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:22:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:57] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 96 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:57] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 58 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:22:57] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/70 variables, 12/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 8 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 60/130 variables, 70/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 130/130 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 1208 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 11/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/68 variables, 0/11 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/70 variables, 12/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 1/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/70 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 60/130 variables, 70/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 58/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:22:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 12 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/130 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/130 variables, 0/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 130/130 variables, and 154 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved in 4038 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 70/70 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 58/58 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 5250ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 58 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5252ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 70/134 places, 60/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5380 ms. Remains : 70/134 places, 60/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:03] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 60 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:03] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9089447397551001551.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:03] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6658043691880766116.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9089447397551001551.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6658043691880766116.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.08532e+09,1.98126,67048,2,4060,5,206600,6,0,342,465219,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((AG((EF(((p120==0)||(p129==1))) * (p56==0))) * ((EF(((p136==0)||(p128==1))) + (p65==0)) + (p50==0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U ((p120==0)||(p129==1))) * (p56==0))))) * ((E(TRUE U ((p136==0)||...202
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t18, t19, t21...305
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph465414019586975727.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph465414019586975727.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph465414019586975727.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph465414019586975727.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph465414019586975727.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Removed a total of 13 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 20 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4327079704968684462.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:33] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14877576467370225196.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4327079704968684462.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14877576467370225196.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.08532e+09,1.9094,57324,925,61,86780,132,190,240010,56,1075,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF((AG((EF(((i6.u21.p120==0)||(i7.u23.p129==1))) * (i2.u10.p56==0))) * ((EF(((i7.u23.p136==0)||(i7.u23.p128==1))) + (i3.u11.p65==0)) +...174
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!((!(E(TRUE U !((E(TRUE U ((i6.u21.p120==0)||(i7.u23.p129==1))) * (i2.u10.p56==0))))) * ((...250
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t11, t12, t54, i1.t32, i1.t31, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t33, i2.u10.t5, i2.u10.t6, ...446
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 126 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 126 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 125 transition count 115
Applied a total of 18 rules in 11 ms. Remains 125 /134 variables (removed 9) and now considering 115/124 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 125 cols
[2025-06-06 05:24:03] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:24:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:03] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 128 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 114 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:24:03] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 50 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 14/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/41 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 115/240 variables, 125/166 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/177 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 177 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 8524 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 27/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 115/240 variables, 125/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 114/289 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 12/301 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/303 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/305 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:18] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/310 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/311 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/316 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
SMT process timed out in 38544ms, After SMT, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 38545ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/134 places, 115/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 38685 ms. Remains : 125/134 places, 115/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:42] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3017963617088073780.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:24:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6435358350561037759.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3017963617088073780.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6435358350561037759.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.78149e+12,26.6763,701500,2,32638,5,2.14671e+06,6,0,617,4.86915e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1221406753105547083.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1221406753105547083.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1221406753105547083.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1221406753105547083.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1221406753105547083.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7006136382744465995.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:12] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10403980029730569779.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7006136382744465995.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10403980029730569779.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.78149e+12,3.60417,105836,2096,50,177649,350,351,328442,45,2348,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(((i3.i0.u10.p26==0) + EX((i6.i0.u31.p86==0))) U EF(!(((i4.i1.u20.p54==0)||(i7.i1.u39.p112==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(E(TRUE U !(((i4.i1.u20.p54==0)||(i7.i1.u39.p112==1)))))))) * !(E(!(E(TRUE U !(((i4.i1.u20.p54==...308
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t45, t48, t69, t72, i0.t75, i0.i0.u5.t78, i0.i1.u6.t77, i1.u1.t79, i2.u22.t55, i2.u23.t1...648
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 14 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 14 transitions
Performed 14 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 14
Iterating post reduction 0 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 14 place count 133 transition count 109
Reduce places removed 14 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 14 rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 119 transition count 109
Performed 10 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 10 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 28 place count 119 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 10 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 10 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 20 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 101 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 101 transition count 91
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 101 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 98 transition count 88
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 68 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 66 transition count 56
Applied a total of 132 rules in 23 ms. Remains 66 /134 variables (removed 68) and now considering 56/124 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 40 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 52 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 93 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/66 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/122 variables, 66/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 3/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/94 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 94 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1252 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 5/5 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/66 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/28 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 1/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/29 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 56/122 variables, 66/95 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 52/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 147 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1020 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 6/6 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 2279ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 2279ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/134 places, 56/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 2401 ms. Remains : 66/134 places, 56/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality14167388897179081582.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:25:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality640794036333759632.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14167388897179081582.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality640794036333759632.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,3.62903e+09,0.906533,37708,2,3495,5,108535,6,0,323,250243,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF((EF((p112==1)) * EG(((p117==0)&&(p54==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!((E(TRUE U (p112==1)) * EG(((p117==0)&&(p54==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t41, t42, t43...295
(forward)formula 0,0,22.5456,726772,1,0,585,3.87959e+06,137,214,2080,6.33297e+06,644
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !

***************************************

Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Discarding 6 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 6 rule applications. Total rules 6 place count 128 transition count 118
Iterating global reduction 0 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 12 place count 128 transition count 118
Applied a total of 12 rules in 11 ms. Remains 128 /134 variables (removed 6) and now considering 118/124 (removed 6) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 118 rows 128 cols
[2025-06-06 05:26:07] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:26:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:07] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 74 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 119 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 117 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:26:07] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 17/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 118/246 variables, 128/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 43 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/172 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/174 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 3/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/178 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 41 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 1/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:17] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 1/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/246 variables, 0/180 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 246/246 variables, and 180 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 12034 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 27/27 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/127 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/128 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 27/50 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 10/60 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 37 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 4/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/128 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 118/246 variables, 128/192 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 117/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 50 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 11/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/321 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 45 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 1/324 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 29 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 12/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/340 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 53 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/342 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 6/348 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
At refinement iteration 17 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/246 variables, 2/350 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 246/246 variables, and 350 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved in 30017 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 128/128 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 117/117 constraints, Known Traps: 80/80 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 42058ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 117 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 42058ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 128/134 places, 118/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 42189 ms. Remains : 128/134 places, 118/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:26:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:49] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 118 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:26:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8847211583576742917.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:26:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality3025786872240240013.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8847211583576742917.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3025786872240240013.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.4365e+12,28.0363,758312,2,54995,5,2.3142e+06,6,0,632,5.32768e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4106238914017733881.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4106238914017733881.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4106238914017733881.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4106238914017733881.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4106238914017733881.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality7730173048061143782.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:19] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17199141312530817644.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7730173048061143782.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17199141312530817644.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,5.4365e+12,3.47181,93336,2434,52,149001,436,353,316683,53,2481,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(((E((i6.i1.u41.p105==0) U (A((i5.i0.u42.p116!=1) U AX((i7.u38.p103==0))) + EF((i3.i0.u14.p36==1)))) + !(A(EG((i8.i0.u30.p83==1)) U (i9...227
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(EG(!(E((i8.i1.u44.p122==0) U (i8.i1.u44.p123==1)))))) * !(!(!((E(!((i9.u47.p132==1)) U (...441
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t44, t47, t50, t71, t74, t77, i0.u1.t81, i1.u5.t80, i2.i0.u6.t79, i2.i1.u19.t62, i2.i1.u20.t6...692
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 125 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 124 transition count 114
Applied a total of 20 rules in 3 ms. Remains 124 /134 variables (removed 10) and now considering 114/124 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 124 cols
[2025-06-06 05:27:49] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 54 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:27:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 73 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 129 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 113 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:27:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 30 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 31 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:27:58] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 11511 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 29/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 113/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:04] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:08] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 2/325 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 30013 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41536ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41537ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/134 places, 114/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41669 ms. Remains : 124/134 places, 114/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:28:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:31] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:28:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:31] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality16867606098244835855.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:28:31] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13269764203310646463.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16867606098244835855.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13269764203310646463.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,23.3114,615604,2,30408,5,1.915e+06,6,0,612,4.27745e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10627098391225610329.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10627098391225610329.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10627098391225610329.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10627098391225610329.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10627098391225610329.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15330766519354552959.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality4981146004824337456.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15330766519354552959.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4981146004824337456.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,6.31634,156644,1874,42,255919,325,349,499547,42,1917,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(EF(AX(((i5.i1.u43.p126==1)&&((i1.i1.u19.p51==0)||(i3.i1.u24.p69==1))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(EX(!(((i5.i1.u43.p126==1)&&((i1.i1.u19.p51==0)||(i3.i1.u24.p69==1)))))))))] = F...159
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t44, t47, t68, t71, t74, i0.i1.u5.t77, i1.i0.u12.t70, i1.i1.u19.t59, i1.i1.u20.t6, i1.i1...630
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 126 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 126 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 125 transition count 115
Applied a total of 18 rules in 9 ms. Remains 125 /134 variables (removed 9) and now considering 115/124 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 125 cols
[2025-06-06 05:29:31] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 48 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:29:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 72 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 122 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 114 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:29:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 35 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 30 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 34 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 34 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 19/42 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 26 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 27 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 37 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 9/51 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 20 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 44 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 6/57 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 32 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 36 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 7/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 41 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/66 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 115/240 variables, 125/191 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:36] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/196 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:37] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/198 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:38] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 24 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 34 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:39] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/201 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 201 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 10046 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 50/73 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 25 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 4/77 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/79 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 41 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/81 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 115/240 variables, 125/206 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 114/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 51 ms of which 8 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:43] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/322 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 47 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 41 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:47] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 5/328 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 42 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/333 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 3/336 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:29:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 15 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 16 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/338 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 338 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 30019 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 73/73 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 40072ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 40072ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/134 places, 115/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 40203 ms. Remains : 125/134 places, 115/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:30:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:30:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:11] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality795397645488599581.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6817725571266017973.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality795397645488599581.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6817725571266017973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...282
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1775e+12,23.4564,620028,2,30997,5,1.92434e+06,6,0,617,4.31601e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph7129884808523277925.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph7129884808523277925.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph7129884808523277925.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph7129884808523277925.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph7129884808523277925.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality15744818509298226307.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:30:41] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality13532277617639159757.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality15744818509298226307.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality13532277617639159757.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.1775e+12,6.33435,153040,1984,35,242347,268,352,459455,42,1491,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF((i4.u23.p71==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!((i4.u23.p71==1)))] = FALSE
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 8 place count 126 transition count 116
Iterating global reduction 0 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 16 place count 126 transition count 116
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 17 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 125 transition count 115
Applied a total of 18 rules in 3 ms. Remains 125 /134 variables (removed 9) and now considering 115/124 (removed 9) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 115 rows 125 cols
[2025-06-06 05:31:11] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:31:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:11] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 69 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 127 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 114 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:31:11] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 46 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 47 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 43 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 14/37 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 43 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 36 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 6/43 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:14] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 2/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/45 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 115/240 variables, 125/170 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:15] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 29 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:16] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 21 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/240 variables, 0/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 240/240 variables, and 173 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 6710 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 23/23 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/125 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 23/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/125 variables, 0/46 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 115/240 variables, 125/171 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 114/285 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 46 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 11/296 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:20] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 44 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:21] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 11/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:22] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 27 places in 47 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:23] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/313 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:24] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:25] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 36 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/317 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 40 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 36 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 48 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 40 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 6/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 37 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 4/327 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 28 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/329 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 2/331 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:42] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 25 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/240 variables, 1/332 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 240/240 variables, and 332 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved in 30011 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 125/125 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 114/114 constraints, Known Traps: 67/67 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 36729ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 114 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 36729ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 125/134 places, 115/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 36859 ms. Remains : 125/134 places, 115/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:48] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 115 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality4326204061723216112.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:31:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14430260241622480321.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality4326204061723216112.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14430260241622480321.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.70127e+12,23.83,629008,2,31014,5,1.95612e+06,6,0,617,4.37602e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17221787244619312468.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17221787244619312468.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17221787244619312468.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17221787244619312468.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17221787244619312468.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality10274783974137840394.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality10354745220982967156.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10274783974137840394.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality10354745220982967156.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.70127e+12,4.37332,119924,2165,43,203903,322,379,357288,50,1863,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(A(AF((EX((i10.u46.p132==0)) + !(EX((i6.u34.p94==0))))) U AG(AX((i5.i0.u27.p76!=0)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(EY(FwdU((FwdU(EY(Init),!(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!((i5.i0.u27.p76!=0))))))))) * !(!(EG(!((EX((i10.u46.p132==0)) + !...299
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t42, t45, t69, t72, t75, i0.i1.u6.t78, i1.i0.u10.t74, i1.i1.u16.t66, i1.i1.u17.t3, i1.i1.u17....651
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Discarding 9 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 9 rule applications. Total rules 9 place count 125 transition count 115
Iterating global reduction 0 with 9 rules applied. Total rules applied 18 place count 125 transition count 115
Discarding 1 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 0 with 1 rule applications. Total rules 19 place count 124 transition count 114
Iterating global reduction 0 with 1 rules applied. Total rules applied 20 place count 124 transition count 114
Applied a total of 20 rules in 13 ms. Remains 124 /134 variables (removed 10) and now considering 114/124 (removed 10) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 114 rows 124 cols
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 3 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 75 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 113 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:32:48] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 42 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 45 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 38 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 38 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 21 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 48 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 33 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 39 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 16/39 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 46 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 1/40 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 19 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:51] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 35 places in 41 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 4/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/44 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/168 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/169 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 41 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 33 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:53] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 4/173 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 5 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:54] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 3 places in 26 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/175 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 1/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/176 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 42 ms of which 5 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:32:57] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 3/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 15 (OVERLAPS) 0/238 variables, 0/179 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 238/238 variables, and 179 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 11316 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 29/29 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/123 variables, 0/0 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (OVERLAPS) 1/124 variables, 23/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 29/52 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 37 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 36 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 28 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 24 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 26 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 35 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 29 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 34 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 30 places in 29 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 31 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:01] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 26 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 13/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/124 variables, 0/65 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 114/238 variables, 124/189 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 113/302 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 9 places in 43 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 14 places in 42 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 13 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:02] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 20 places in 39 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/307 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:03] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/309 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 49 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:05] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 15 places in 39 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/312 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 50 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 25 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 2/314 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:09] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 23 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 1/315 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:10] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 44 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 40 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 19 places in 45 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:11] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 22 places in 46 ms of which 4 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:12] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 31 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 5/320 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 3/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
At refinement iteration 14 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/238 variables, 0/323 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 24 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 34 places in 38 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
Solver is answering 'unknown', stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 238/238 variables, and 325 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved in 30015 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 124/124 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 113/113 constraints, Known Traps: 62/62 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 3/3 constraints]
After SMT, in 41337ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 113 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 41337ms
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 1 : 124/134 places, 114/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 41480 ms. Remains : 124/134 places, 114/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:30] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 114 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:30] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality18210970268039216066.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:33:30] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality5759976408502371209.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality18210970268039216066.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality5759976408502371209.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,23.4839,616388,2,30408,5,1.915e+06,6,0,612,4.27745e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph1879310401192454465.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph1879310401192454465.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph1879310401192454465.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph1879310401192454465.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph1879310401192454465.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality3436569480852062097.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:00] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality6824382266038543813.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality3436569480852062097.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6824382266038543813.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,4.17748e+12,3.35151,97748,1858,44,159448,277,345,326473,42,1539,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX(AF(!(E((i5.u30.p84==1) U (AF((i6.i0.u35.p93==1)) + EG((i2.i1.u25.p69==1)))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(EY(Init),!(!(E((i5.u30.p84==1) U (!(EG(!((i6.i0.u35.p93==1)))) + EG((i2.i1.u25.p69==1)))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t41, t44, t68, t71, t74, i0.u1.t78, i1.i1.u6.t77, i2.i0.u10.t73, i2.i1.u23.t54, i2.i1.u24.t9,...643
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 134/134 places, 124/124 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Drop transitions (Trivial Post-Agglo cleanup.) removed 15 transitions
Trivial Post-agglo rules discarded 15 transitions
Performed 15 trivial Post agglomeration. Transition count delta: 15
Iterating post reduction 0 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 15 place count 133 transition count 108
Reduce places removed 15 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating post reduction 1 with 15 rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 118 transition count 108
Performed 9 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 9 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 30 place count 118 transition count 99
Deduced a syphon composed of 9 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 9 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 18 rules applied. Total rules applied 48 place count 109 transition count 99
Discarding 8 places :
Symmetric choice reduction at 2 with 8 rule applications. Total rules 56 place count 101 transition count 91
Iterating global reduction 2 with 8 rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 101 transition count 91
Performed 3 Pre agglomeration using Quasi-Persistent + Divergent Free condition..
Pre-agglomeration after 2 with 3 Pre rules applied. Total rules applied 64 place count 101 transition count 88
Deduced a syphon composed of 3 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 3 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 6 rules applied. Total rules applied 70 place count 98 transition count 88
Performed 30 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 30
Deduced a syphon composed of 30 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 30 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 60 rules applied. Total rules applied 130 place count 68 transition count 58
Reduce places removed 2 places and 2 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 2 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 132 place count 66 transition count 56
Applied a total of 132 rules in 25 ms. Remains 66 /134 variables (removed 68) and now considering 56/124 (removed 68) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 56 rows 66 cols
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 34 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 49 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 85 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 2/66 variables, 2/23 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:30] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 6 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 2/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/25 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/122 variables, 66/91 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:31] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 5 places in 33 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 122/122 variables, and 92 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1223 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 3/3 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 21/21 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 3/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/24 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 2/66 variables, 2/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/66 variables, 0/26 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 56/122 variables, 66/92 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 53/145 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 4 places in 22 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 10 places in 18 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 31 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 18 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 3/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 16 places in 34 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:35] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 35 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 11 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 2/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 12 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 13 (OVERLAPS) 0/122 variables, 0/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 122/122 variables, and 153 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 7885 ms.
Refiners :[Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 66/66 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 9/9 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 9110ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 9111ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 66/134 places, 56/124 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 9226 ms. Remains : 66/134 places, 56/124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 56 transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8970618139012142872.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality7787789957001302144.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8970618139012142872.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality7787789957001302144.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,2.08995e+09,1.29799,51288,2,3353,5,163333,6,0,322,336221,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG(E(((p55==0)||(p21==1)) U ((p117==0)||(p127==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),E(((p55==0)||(p21==1)) U ((p117==0)||(p127==1))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t18, t39, t40, t41...300
(forward)formula 0,1,2.96245,87464,1,0,312,443334,138,117,2013,647354,283
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002B-CTLCardinality-2023-15 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !

***************************************

ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3037107306807947554.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3037107306807947554.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3037107306807947554.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3037107306807947554.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3037107306807947554.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 0 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality6296260820825474723.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:34:42] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality16017105019146645535.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality6296260820825474723.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality16017105019146645535.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.95415e+12,6.95397,172772,3380,75,266553,599,362,634412,50,4162,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(((i0.u1.p2==0)&&(i9.u46.p132==1)))) * ((EX(EF((((i9.u45.p129==0)&&(i8.i1.u40.p112==1))||(i5.i0.u27.p77==1)))) + AX((i8.i0.u33.p94=...245
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(((i0.u1.p2==0)&&(i9.u46.p132==1))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((Init * !((EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!...356
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t49, t52, t55, t77, t80, i0.u1.t87, i1.t83, i1.i1.u5.t86, i1.i2.u6.t85, i2.i0.u9.t82, i2.i1.u...755
ITS-tools command line returned an error code 139
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality9387460630015979537.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 05:40:49] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality14725113084391971920.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality9387460630015979537.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality14725113084391971920.ctl'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.95415e+12,92.1796,2471944,26322,267,4.8021e+06,1202,216,1.75121e+07,92,14655,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(((i0.u2.p2==0)&&(i1.u44.p132==1)))) * ((EX(EF((((i1.u44.p129==0)&&(i1.i0.i0.i0.u41.p112==1))||(i1.i0.i0.i0.i0.u64.p77==1)))) + AX(...290
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(((i0.u2.p2==0)&&(i1.u44.p132==1))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((Init * !((EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!...401
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions i0.u2.t87, i0.i1.u23.t11, i0.i1.u23.t12, i0.i1.u23.t13, i0.i1.u23.t14, i0.i1.u23.t63, i0.i1.u...1131
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 06:06:10] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 76 ms
[2025-06-06 06:06:11] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 124 transitions.
[2025-06-06 06:06:11] [INFO ] Transformed 134 places.
[2025-06-06 06:06:11] [INFO ] Transformed 124 transitions.
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/pinvar' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Running greatSPN : cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn//bin/RGMEDD2' '/home/mcc/execution/gspn' '-META' '-varord-only'
Run of greatSPN captured in /home/mcc/execution/outPut.txt
Using order generated by GreatSPN with heuristic : META
[2025-06-06 06:06:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLCardinality8657551586709395102.gal : 13 ms
[2025-06-06 06:06:11] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLCardinality17138660811313987563.ctl : 3 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLCardinality8657551586709395102.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLCardinality17138660811313987563.ctl' '--load-order' '/home/mcc/execution/model.ord' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'

its-ctl command run as :

/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...329
Successfully loaded order from file /home/mcc/execution/model.ord
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 9 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,7.95415e+12,26.5344,690412,2,135206,5,1.86384e+06,6,0,662,5.14602e+06,0


Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (EF(EG(((p2==0)&&(p132==1)))) * ((EX(EF((((p129==0)&&(p112==1))||(p77==1)))) + AX((p94==0))) + (EG(AG(AF((p127==1)))) + EF(((p40==0)||(p4...165
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(Init * !(E(TRUE U EG(((p2==0)&&(p132==1))))))] = FALSE * [(EY(((Init * !((EG(!(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p127==1))))...276
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t18, t19, t20, t21, t22, t23, t24, t25, ...394

BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED

--------------------
content from stderr:

+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLCardinality = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLCardinality -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600

Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM

This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.

set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPs-PT-002B"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLCardinality"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"

# this is specific to your benchmark or test

export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"

# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi

# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002B, examination is CTLCardinality"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533100625"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"

tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPs-PT-002B.tgz
mv ShieldPPPs-PT-002B execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh

echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLCardinality" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLCardinality" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLCardinality.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '' CTLCardinality.xml | cut -d '>' -f 2 | cut -d '<' -f 1 | sort -u) ; do
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLCardinality" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLCardinality" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLCardinality"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;