About the Execution of ITS-Tools for ShieldPPPs-PT-002A
Execution Summary | |||||
Max Memory Used (MB) |
Time wait (ms) | CPU Usage (ms) | I/O Wait (ms) | Computed Result | Execution Status |
0.000 | 3600000.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | TT??TTFFTFTTFFFF | normal |
Execution Chart
Sorry, for this execution, no execution chart could be reported.
Trace from the execution
Formatting '/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.r198-tall-174894533100618.qcow2', fmt=qcow2 size=4294967296 backing_file=/data/fkordon/mcc2025-input.qcow2 backing_fmt=qcow2 cluster_size=65536 lazy_refcounts=off refcount_bits=16
Waiting for the VM to be ready (probing ssh)
...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
=====================================================================
Generated by BenchKit 2-5832
Executing tool itstools
Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability
Time confinement is 3600 seconds
Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes
Number of cores is 4
Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533100618
=====================================================================
--------------------
preparation of the directory to be used:
/home/mcc/execution
total 568K
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.9K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 77K May 29 14:47 CTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5.7K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 54K May 29 14:47 CTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 4.2K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesDefinition.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6.5K May 29 14:32 GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.5K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 25K May 29 14:47 LTLCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 2.2K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 19K May 29 14:47 LTLFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 16K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 188K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityCardinality.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 9.5K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 85K May 29 14:47 ReachabilityFireability.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 1.6K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.txt
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 3.7K May 29 14:47 UpperBounds.xml
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 equiv_col
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 5 May 29 14:32 instance
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 6 May 29 14:32 iscolored
-rw-r--r-- 1 mcc users 18K May 29 14:32 model.pnml
--------------------
content from stdout:
=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)
The expected result is a vector of booleans
BOOL_VECTOR
echo here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-14
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-15
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-00
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-01
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-02
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-03
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-04
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-05
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-06
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-07
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-08
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-09
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-10
FORMULA_NAME ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-11
=== Now, execution of the tool begins
BK_START 1749185189993
Invoking MCC driver with
BK_TOOL=itstools
BK_EXAMINATION=CTLFireability
BK_BIN_PATH=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT=3600
BK_INPUT=ShieldPPPs-PT-002A
BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT=16384
Not applying reductions.
Model is PT
CTLFireability PT
Running Version 202505121319
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Running its-tools with arguments : [-pnfolder, /home/mcc/execution, -examination, CTLFireability, -its, -ltsmin, -greatspnpath, /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/, -order, META, -manyOrder, -smt, -timeout, 3600]
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Parsing pnml file : /home/mcc/execution/model.pnml
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Load time of PNML (sax parser for PT used): 47 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Transformed 65 places.
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Transformed 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Found NUPN structural information;
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Parsed PT model containing 65 places and 55 transitions and 206 arcs in 132 ms.
Parsed 16 properties from file /home/mcc/execution/CTLFireability.xml in 13 ms.
Support contains 59 out of 65 places. Attempting structural reductions.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 6 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 11 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 178 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 100 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 306 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:46:31] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 46 ms of which 7 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:32] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1780 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5217 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 7036ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 7054ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 7384 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Support contains 59 out of 65 places after structural reductions.
[2025-06-06 04:46:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 25 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
Reduction of identical properties reduced properties to check from 57 to 54
RANDOM walk for 26021 steps (142 resets) in 586 ms. (44 steps per ms) remains 0/54 properties
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
Computed a total of 1 stabilizing places and 1 stable transitions
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 54
Applied a total of 2 rules in 16 ms. Remains 64 /65 variables (removed 1) and now considering 54/55 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 88 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 133 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:46:39] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 37 ms of which 6 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1345 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 53/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 3872 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 5261ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5264ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5419 ms. Remains : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:46:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:46:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13906382140733567583.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:46:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9272330842395644316.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13906382140733567583.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9272330842395644316.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.54958e+09,4.48141,141964,2,3985,5,494765,6,0,312,1.02807e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG((((p21==0)||(p37==0))||((p53==0)||(p28==0)))) + A(EG(E(((p39==1)&&(p60==1)) U (p63==1))) U ((((p15==1)&&(p57==1))||(((p42==1)&&(p5...250
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG((((p21==0)||(p37==0))||((p53==0)||(p28==0)))) + !((E(!(((((p15==1)&&(p57==1))||(((p42==1)&&(p54==...584
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t23, t25, t27...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 15 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:14] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:47:14] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph17247161807346666537.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph17247161807346666537.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph17247161807346666537.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph17247161807346666537.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph17247161807346666537.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:47:15] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:47:15] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:47:15] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:47:15] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 36 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:15] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:47:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7705666506332474517.gal : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:15] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15708844183656869350.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7705666506332474517.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15708844183656869350.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.54958e+09,2.00303,55028,562,31,83782,226,146,163924,31,1081,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG((((i1.u8.p21==0)||(i5.u13.p37==0))||((i5.u19.p53==0)||(i3.u10.p28==0)))) + A(EG(E(((i7.u14.p39==1)&&(i7.u21.p60==1)) U (i4.u22.p63...373
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG((((i1.u8.p21==0)||(i5.u13.p37==0))||((i5.u19.p53==0)||(i3.u10.p28==0)))) + !((E(!(((((i2.u6.p15==...857
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t52, i1.t42, i1.t41, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t50, i2.t48, i2.u11.t7, i2.u...422
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-06 04:47:45] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 2 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 58 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:47:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:45] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 121 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:47:45] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:45] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:46] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1425 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5195 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6630ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6631ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6755 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:47:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:51] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:47:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:51] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability446693781074116783.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:47:51] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10074646549592058771.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability446693781074116783.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10074646549592058771.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.886929,35296,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((AF(((p18==0)||(p27==0))) + AG(AX(((p8==1)&&(p28==1))))) + ((p18==1)&&(p27==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((!(EG(!(((p18==0)||(p27==0))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((p8==1)&&(p28==1))))))))) + ((p1...183
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:48:21] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:21] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:48:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 13 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph16212624741828544909.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph16212624741828544909.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph16212624741828544909.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph16212624741828544909.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph16212624741828544909.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:48:22] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:48:22] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:48:22] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:22] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:22] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 4 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:48:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability16946892027988278529.gal : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:22] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10498679097170949135.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability16946892027988278529.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10498679097170949135.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,2.00136,56820,645,31,83580,163,176,199186,31,945,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((AF(((i2.u7.p18==0)||(i2.u10.p27==0))) + AG(AX(((i2.u3.p8==1)&&(i2.u10.p28==1))))) + ((i2.u7.p18==1)&&(i2.u10.p27==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((!(EG(!(((i2.u7.p18==0)||(i2.u10.p27==0))))) + !(E(TRUE U !(!(EX(!(((i2.u3.p8==1)&&(i2....222
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,10.3042,226164,1,0,363761,178,793,739590,125,945,258374
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-01 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 57 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:48:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:32] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 70 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 130 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:32] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1509 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5177 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6694ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6694ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6826 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 10 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17665764023516504914.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11827188141710117282.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17665764023516504914.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11827188141710117282.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.798581,35260,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(((AG((((((p2==0)||(p10==0))||((p47==0)||(p62==0)))&&(p11==1))&&(p23==1))) + AG(((E(((p49==1)&&(p60==1)) U (p28==1)) * E(((p47==1)&&(p6...244
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !((((((p2==0)||(p10==0))||((p47==0)||(p62==0)))&&(p11==1))&&(p23==1))))))] != F...394
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
(forward)formula 0,0,9.80972,306608,1,0,435,1.75215e+06,145,204,2127,2.41236e+06,420
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-02 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:48:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 101 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:50] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1420 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5157 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6587ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6587ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6693 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3908662966048710621.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11232179888850520163.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3908662966048710621.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11232179888850520163.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.819204,35384,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AX((((AF((p28==1)) + ((p18==1)&&(p27==1))) + (((p39==1)&&(p60==1))||(((p48==1)&&(p50==1))&&((p37==1)&&(p54==1))))) + (((p8==1)&&(p29==1))...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG((((EY(Init) * !((((p8==1)&&(p29==1))&&((p47==1)&&(p64==1))))) * !((((p39==1)&&(p60==1))||(((p48==1)&&(p50=...234
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 52/0/3
(forward)formula 0,0,3.45995,106012,1,0,73,473689,26,10,1718,568969,67
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-03 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 1 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 50 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:48:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:59] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 61 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:48:59] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:48:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:00] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1371 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5202 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6579ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6580ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6693 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:06] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:06] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11547936521990017810.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:06] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability4160094724393365695.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11547936521990017810.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability4160094724393365695.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.778479,35272,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(((p18==1)&&(p27==1))) U AF(AX(((((p37==1)&&(p53==1))||(p59==1)) * EF((p21==1)))))) + AG(A(AX(((!((p35==1)&&(p56==1)))&&(((p11==1)&&(...252
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(!(((p18==1)&&(p27==1))) U !(EG(!(!(EX(!(((((p37==1)&&(p53==1))||(p59==1)) * E(TRUE U ...922
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph13344972636243812542.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph13344972636243812542.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph13344972636243812542.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph13344972636243812542.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph13344972636243812542.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6748568004411652500.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:49:36] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7268721650241978411.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6748568004411652500.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7268721650241978411.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.17995,42352,672,31,60001,260,171,167407,31,1500,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (E(!(((i3.u7.p18==1)&&(i3.u10.p27==1))) U AF(AX(((((i6.u13.p37==1)&&(i6.u19.p53==1))||(i5.i0.u21.p59==1)) * EF((i1.u8.p21==1)))))) + AG(A...372
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(!(((i3.u7.p18==1)&&(i3.u10.p27==1))) U !(EG(!(!(EX(!(((((i6.u13.p37==1)&&(i6.u19.p53=...1271
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t54, i2.t53, i2.u11.t7, i2.u...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:50:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:50:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:06] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 65 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 116 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:50:06] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:06] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 23 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:07] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 32 ms of which 3 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1447 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5193 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6656ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6656ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6778 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:13] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:13] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 6 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability3409034801269004924.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:13] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability5763742883376682085.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability3409034801269004924.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability5763742883376682085.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.725662,35300,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(A((!(((p39==1)&&(p60==1))) + (!(((p4==1)&&(p25==1))) * EX((p0==1)))) U ((E((p31==1) U ((p36==1)&&(p55==1))) * EF((p0==1))) * AF(((p4...223
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!((E(!(((E((p31==1) U ((p36==1)&&(p55==1))) * E(TRUE U (p0==1))) * !(EG(!(((p42==1)&&(p54==1)))))...492
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph10854885034955996422.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph10854885034955996422.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph10854885034955996422.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph10854885034955996422.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph10854885034955996422.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 3 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17702861611057303734.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:50:43] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability2327707279261571432.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17702861611057303734.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability2327707279261571432.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.44538,48752,636,31,70985,146,173,185523,31,645,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EX(A((!(((i5.i1.u14.p39==1)&&(i5.i1.u21.p60==1))) + (!(((i2.u1.p4==1)&&(i2.u9.p25==1))) * EX((i3.u0.p0==1)))) U ((E((i0.u11.p31==1) U (...332
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!((E(!(((E((i0.u11.p31==1) U ((i4.u13.p36==1)&&(i6.i0.u20.p55==1))) * E(TRUE U (i3.u0.p0==1))) * ...689
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t54, i0.t53, i0.u11.t7, i0.u11.t8, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1....443
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 64 transition count 54
Applied a total of 2 rules in 8 ms. Remains 64 /65 variables (removed 1) and now considering 54/55 (removed 1) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 54 rows 64 cols
[2025-06-06 04:51:13] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:51:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:13] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 77 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:13] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 1 ms returned []
Running 53 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:51:13] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:13] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 44 ms of which 16 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 118/118 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 1243 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/64 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 54/118 variables, 64/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 53/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 1/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/118 variables, 0/205 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 118/118 variables, and 205 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved in 3830 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 64/64 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 64/64 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 53/53 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 1/1 constraints]
After SMT, in 5085ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 53 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5086ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 5250 ms. Remains : 64/65 places, 54/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:51:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 8 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:18] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 54 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:51:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:18] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11340285082705485051.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:18] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7305880711289704389.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11340285082705485051.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7305880711289704389.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.54958e+09,4.22922,141984,2,3985,5,494765,6,0,312,1.02807e+06,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(E(!((E(((p37==1)&&(p54==1)) U ((p44==1)&&(p63==1))) + ((p43==1)&&(p45==1)))) U EF(!(AF(((p13==1)&&(p33==1))))))) U EG(A((p51==1) U !(...183
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p13==1)&&(p32==1))))))) U (!((p51==1)) * !(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((p13==1)&...719
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t23, t25, t27...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph3561788253143927697.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph3561788253143927697.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph3561788253143927697.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph3561788253143927697.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph3561788253143927697.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2888465690554980652.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:51:48] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16302618834330572560.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2888465690554980652.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16302618834330572560.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.54958e+09,0.893084,32636,598,31,48003,100,149,114267,31,447,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: A(!(E(!((E(((i6.u13.p37==1)&&(i6.u19.p54==1)) U ((i4.u16.p44==1)&&(i4.u22.p63==1))) + ((i6.u15.p43==1)&&(i4.u16.p45==1)))) U EF(!(AF(((i2...258
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u5.p13==1)&&(i2.u11.p32==1))))))) U (!((i6.u19.p51==1)) * !(!(!(E...912
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t52, i1.t42, i1.t41, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t50, i2.t48, i2.u11.t7, i2.u...422
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-06 04:52:18] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 4 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 45 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:52:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:18] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 124 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:52:18] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 27 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:19] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 21 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1401 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5111 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6527ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6528ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6656 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:52:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:25] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:52:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability4396885802607776956.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7523174240147449298.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability4396885802607776956.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7523174240147449298.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.755012,35280,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX((!((!(A(((p13==1)&&(p32==1)) U ((p13==1)&&(p33==1)))) * (((p22==1)||((p13==1)&&(p33==1)))||(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))||(p53==1))))) * AF(...370
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(EX(!((!((!(!((E(!(((p13==1)&&(p33==1))) U (!(((p13==1)&&(p32==1))) * !(((p13==1)&&(p3...1141
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph9790281993299048654.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph9790281993299048654.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph9790281993299048654.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph9790281993299048654.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph9790281993299048654.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability5288462404035823097.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:52:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8731313403531655473.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability5288462404035823097.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8731313403531655473.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.83495,55156,677,30,81061,139,179,192230,31,603,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX((!((!(A(((i3.u5.p13==1)&&(i3.u11.p32==1)) U ((i3.u5.p13==1)&&(i3.u11.p33==1)))) * (((i0.u8.p22==1)||((i3.u5.p13==1)&&(i3.u11.p33==1)...546
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(EX(!((!((!(!((E(!(((i3.u5.p13==1)&&(i3.u11.p33==1))) U (!(((i3.u5.p13==1)&&(i3.u11.p3...1597
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t45, i0.t44, i0.u8.t3, i0.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 2 rules in 11 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-06 04:53:25] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 53 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:53:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:25] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 58 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 141 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:25] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 51 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:25] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 748 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 0/0 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 63/63 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 23/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 51/200 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 31 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:26] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 15 places in 22 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:27] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 29 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/203 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 203 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved in 12397 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 51/51 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 13182ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 51 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 13182ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 13340 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:38] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:38] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11152967208740189173.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:38] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability18417740723994878516.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11152967208740189173.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability18417740723994878516.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...285
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.54958e+09,0.452239,25248,2,2376,5,73446,6,0,308,157572,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AF(AG((p51==1)))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,!(!(E(TRUE U !((p51==1))))))] = FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t23, t25, t27...300
(forward)formula 0,0,1.38291,54024,1,0,201,245002,132,62,2016,336163,175
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-08 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Performed 2 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 2
Deduced a syphon composed of 2 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 2 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 4 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 63 transition count 53
Applied a total of 4 rules in 10 ms. Remains 63 /65 variables (removed 2) and now considering 53/55 (removed 2) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 53 rows 63 cols
[2025-06-06 04:53:40] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 1 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:53:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:40] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 55 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 114 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:40] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 52 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:40] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:40] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 9 places in 28 ms of which 0 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 8 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 1/151 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:41] [INFO ] Deduced a trap along path composed of 16 places in 30 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 1/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 11 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/152 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 116/116 variables, and 152 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 1985 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/63 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/86 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 1/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/63 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 53/116 variables, 63/150 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 52/202 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 2/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/116 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
At refinement iteration 10 (OVERLAPS) 0/116 variables, 0/204 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 116/116 variables, and 204 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved in 2380 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 63/63 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 63/63 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 52/52 constraints, Known Traps: 1/1 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 2/2 constraints]
After SMT, in 4383ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 52 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 4383ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 4512 ms. Remains : 63/65 places, 53/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:44] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 53 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:44] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability2331136551788484628.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:44] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10586099259749976248.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability2331136551788484628.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10586099259749976248.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,4.12554,138660,2,3831,5,484736,6,0,307,999390,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(AG(((p35==1)&&(p56==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p35==1)&&(p56==1))))))] != FALSE
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t20, t22, t28, t30, t33, t35...295
(forward)formula 0,0,4.4754,138660,1,0,145,484736,128,56,1992,999390,116
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-09 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 63 transition count 53
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 62 transition count 52
Applied a total of 4 rules in 6 ms. Remains 62 /65 variables (removed 3) and now considering 52/55 (removed 3) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 52 rows 62 cols
[2025-06-06 04:53:49] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 61 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:53:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:49] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 59 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 147 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:49] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:49] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/114 variables, 62/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 38 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:49] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 32 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1129 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/114 variables, 62/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 50/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 4757 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5892ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5894ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/65 places, 52/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6052 ms. Remains : 62/65 places, 52/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:55] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:53:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:55] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability7225615801884882936.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:53:55] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability16345330225313741365.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability7225615801884882936.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability16345330225313741365.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,0.735161,34616,2,3380,5,111389,6,0,303,210064,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(((p8==1)&&(p28==1))) + AG(AF((p32==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((p8==1)&&(p28==1))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(!(EG(!((p...179
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t20, t22, t28, t30, t33, t35...295
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph2276271920223219372.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph2276271920223219372.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph2276271920223219372.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph2276271920223219372.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph2276271920223219372.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 0 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability54161974413618662.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:54:25] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability8656565815782970774.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability54161974413618662.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability8656565815782970774.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...260
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,1.01038,37176,594,29,56449,75,129,128683,33,327,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((AG(((i2.u3.p8==1)&&(i2.u10.p28==1))) + AG(AF((i3.u11.p32==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u3.p8==1)&&(i2.u10.p28==1))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE ...199
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t51, i1.t39, i1.t38, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t34, i2.t32, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...410
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Reduce places removed 1 places and 1 transitions.
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 1 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 2 place count 63 transition count 53
Performed 1 Post agglomeration using F-continuation condition.Transition count delta: 1
Deduced a syphon composed of 1 places in 0 ms
Reduce places removed 1 places and 0 transitions.
Iterating global reduction 0 with 2 rules applied. Total rules applied 4 place count 62 transition count 52
Applied a total of 4 rules in 11 ms. Remains 62 /65 variables (removed 3) and now considering 52/55 (removed 3) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 43 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:54:55] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 57 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 100 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Starting Z3 with timeout 200.0 s and query timeout 20000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:54:55] [INFO ] Redundant transitions in 0 ms returned []
Running 50 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:54:55] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (OVERLAPS) 52/114 variables, 62/147 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:54:55] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 10 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/148 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:54:56] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 17 places in 33 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 1/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 114/114 variables, and 149 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 1089 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 62/62 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 23/85 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 2/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/62 variables, 0/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (OVERLAPS) 52/114 variables, 62/149 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 50/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/114 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (OVERLAPS) 0/114 variables, 0/199 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 114/114 variables, and 199 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved in 4830 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 62/62 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 62/62 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 50/50 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 5924ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 50 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 5926ms
Starting structural reductions in SI_CTL mode, iteration 1 : 62/65 places, 52/55 transitions.
Finished structural reductions in SI_CTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6048 ms. Remains : 62/65 places, 52/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:01] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 52 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:01] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability17256398986913681890.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:01] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability301068158606225197.ctl : 1 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability17256398986913681890.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability301068158606225197.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.15977e+09,0.971971,34504,2,3380,5,111389,6,0,303,210064,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: AG(AF(((p43==1)&&(p45==1))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),!(((p43==1)&&(p45==1))))] = FALSE
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 47/0/5
(forward)formula 0,0,25.9641,889944,1,0,54,2.32263e+06,20,2,1538,8.23608e+06,54
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-11 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 2 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
// Phase 1: matrix 55 rows 65 cols
[2025-06-06 04:55:27] [INFO ] Computed 23 invariants in 0 ms
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:55:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:27] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 106 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:55:27] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 30 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:28] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1490 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5021 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6531ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6531ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6640 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:34] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:34] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6342052491757328357.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:55:34] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability9959333301466080788.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6342052491757328357.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability9959333301466080788.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...283
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.686702,35184,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((p1==0)||(p26==0))&&(p53==0))) + ((AG((((p49==1)&&(p58==1))&&((p6==1)&&(p23==1)))) * AX((p58==1))) * !(A(((p39==1)&&(p59==1)) U ...180
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((p1==0)||(p26==0))&&(p53==0)))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((...459
Hit Full ! (commute/partial/dont) 45/10/10
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph4691610370297496169.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph4691610370297496169.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph4691610370297496169.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph4691610370297496169.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph4691610370297496169.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability1796249078840771558.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:04] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability10929714614567472798.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability1796249078840771558.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability10929714614567472798.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...263
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.20725,44152,713,31,72348,145,184,148827,31,630,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF((EG((((i0.u0.p1==0)||(i0.u10.p26==0))&&(i4.u19.p53==0))) + ((AG((((i5.i0.u18.p49==1)&&(i5.i1.u21.p58==1))&&((i2.u2.p6==1)&&(i2.u8.p23=...279
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(((i0.u0.p1==0)||(i0.u10.p26==0))&&(i4.u19.p53==0)))] != FALSE + ([(FwdU((FwdU(Init,TRUE)...634
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,28.6746,565352,1,0,888505,170,627,1.28278e+06,111,630,631212
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-12 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 49 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:56:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:33] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 56 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 120 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:33] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:33] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 24 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:34] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 18 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1454 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5097 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6557ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6557ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6682 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:39] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:39] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability8970685388531667921.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:39] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability17826546423542616321.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability8970685388531667921.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability17826546423542616321.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.691183,35288,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EF(EG((AF(((p31==0)||(p63==0))) + AX((((p52==1)||(p28==1))||(((p5==1)&&(p24==1))&&((p20==1)&&(p41==1))))))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(FwdU(Init,TRUE),(!(EG(!(((p31==0)||(p63==0))))) + !(EX(!((((p52==1)||(p28==1))||(((p5==1)&&(p24==1))&&((p2...188
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
(forward)formula 0,1,11.5487,416728,1,0,470,2.52231e+06,137,170,2181,2.99396e+06,503
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2023-13 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
ITS tools runner thread asked to quit. Dying gracefully.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 3 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 41 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:56:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:51] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 107 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:51] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 25 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:52] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 26 ms of which 1 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1488 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5139 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6631ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6631ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6742 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:58] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:56:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:58] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6003802717790992464.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:56:58] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability15857248990531342973.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6003802717790992464.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability15857248990531342973.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.730116,35292,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AX(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))) * AF((p46==0))) * (!(E(AG(((p18==1)&&(p27==1))) U EF(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))))) * ((((p15==1)&&(p57==1))||((p...374
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(((!(EX(!(((p12==1)&&(p14==1))))) * !(EG(!((p46==0))))) * (!(E(!(E(TRUE U !(((p18==1)&&(...752
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 7 ms
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph12792519147448931506.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph12792519147448931506.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph12792519147448931506.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph12792519147448931506.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph12792519147448931506.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13976971069826296904.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:57:28] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability11931720961601551128.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13976971069826296904.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability11931720961601551128.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.69767,53872,679,31,78587,255,179,195388,31,1491,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: (AF(((AX(((i1.u4.p12==1)&&(i0.u5.p14==1))) * AF((i5.i1.u17.p46==0))) * (!(E(AG(((i3.u7.p18==1)&&(i3.u10.p27==1))) U EF(((i1.u4.p12==1)&&(...551
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((FwdU((Init * !(!(EG(!(((!(EX(!(((i1.u4.p12==1)&&(i0.u5.p14==1))))) * !(EG(!((i5.i1.u17.p46==0))))) * (!(E(!(E...1051
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i0.t54, i0.t53, i0.u11.t7, i0.u11.t8, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1....443
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
Starting structural reductions in LTL mode, iteration 0 : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
Applied a total of 0 rules in 4 ms. Remains 65 /65 variables (removed 0) and now considering 55/55 (removed 0) transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:57:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:57:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants in 39 ms returned []
[2025-06-06 04:57:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 160.0 s and query timeout 16000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:57:58] [INFO ] Implicit Places using invariants and state equation in 50 ms returned []
Implicit Place search using SMT with State Equation took 112 ms to find 0 implicit places.
Running 54 sub problems to find dead transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:57:58] [INFO ] Invariant cache hit.
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/153 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 37 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 6 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/154 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 120.0 s and query timeout 12000.0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:57:59] [INFO ] Deduced a trap composed of 11 places in 28 ms of which 2 ms to minimize.
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 1/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Real declared 120/120 variables, and 155 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 1339 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
Escalating to Integer solving :Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Starting Z3 with timeout 30.0 s and query timeout 3000.0 ms
At refinement iteration 0 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 64/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 1 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/64 variables, 0/64 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 2 (OVERLAPS) 1/65 variables, 23/87 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 3 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 1/88 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 4 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 2/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 5 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/65 variables, 0/90 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 6 (OVERLAPS) 55/120 variables, 65/155 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 7 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 54/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 8 (INCLUDED_ONLY) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
At refinement iteration 9 (OVERLAPS) 0/120 variables, 0/209 constraints. Problems are: Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
No progress, stopping.
After SMT solving in domain Int declared 120/120 variables, and 209 constraints, problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved in 5006 ms.
Refiners :[Domain max(s): 65/65 constraints, Positive P Invariants (semi-flows): 23/23 constraints, State Equation: 65/65 constraints, PredecessorRefiner: 54/54 constraints, Known Traps: 2/2 constraints, Known Traps Along Path: 0/0 constraints]
After SMT, in 6394ms problems are : Problem set: 0 solved, 54 unsolved
Search for dead transitions found 0 dead transitions in 6394ms
Finished structural reductions in LTL mode , in 1 iterations and 6510 ms. Remains : 65/65 places, 55/55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:58:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:58:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:58:05] [INFO ] Input system was already deterministic with 55 transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:58:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:58:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 04:58:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability13651887949769307597.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:58:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability7969066905415392904.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability13651887949769307597.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability7969066905415392904.ctl' '--gen-order' 'FOLLOW'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...284
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.714994,35316,2,4966,5,115151,6,0,317,199556,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(EX(EF(!(((p44==1)&&(p63==1)))))) U ((AG((((p18==1)&&(p27==1))&&(!((p53==1)||(p58==1))))) * !(EX((((!((p15==1)&&(p57==1)))||((p42==1)...398
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,EG(EX(E(TRUE U !(((p44==1)&&(p63==1))))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((p18==1)&&(p27==1))&&(!((p53==1)||(p...1440
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, t7, t8, t9, t10, t11, t12, t13, t14, t15, t16, t17, t20, t26, t28...300
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph15760367911456401241.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph15760367911456401241.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph15760367911456401241.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph15760367911456401241.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph15760367911456401241.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 2 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability11562990437645986791.gal : 9 ms
[2025-06-06 04:58:35] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability14606019636801545501.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability11562990437645986791.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability14606019636801545501.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 1 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,2.02322,60788,669,31,90007,165,182,217020,31,975,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(EG(EX(EF(!(((i4.i1.u16.p44==1)&&(i4.i1.u22.p63==1)))))) U ((AG((((i2.u7.p18==1)&&(i2.u10.p27==1))&&(!((i5.u19.p53==1)||(i6.i0.u21.p58==...608
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(((FwdU(Init,EG(EX(E(TRUE U !(((i4.i1.u16.p44==1)&&(i4.i1.u22.p63==1))))))) * (!(E(TRUE U !((((i2.u7.p18==1)&&...2122
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t45, i1.t44, i1.u8.t3, i1.u8.t4, i2.t41, i2.t40, i2.u10.t5, i2.u...443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 2 ms
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 3 ms
Converted graph to binary with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/convert-linux64' '-i' '/tmp/graph204811237054137317.txt' '-o' '/tmp/graph204811237054137317.bin' '-w' '/tmp/graph204811237054137317.weights'
Built communities with : '/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.louvain.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/louvain-linux64' '/tmp/graph204811237054137317.bin' '-l' '-1' '-v' '-w' '/tmp/graph204811237054137317.weights' '-q' '0' '-e' '0.001'
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Removed a total of 12 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 30 labels/synchronizations in 9 ms.
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability6729262898702717813.gal : 0 ms
[2025-06-06 04:59:05] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability6934182179022887136.ctl : 15 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability6729262898702717813.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability6934182179022887136.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...262
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 8 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,1.2388,44272,677,31,63421,139,176,171886,31,612,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: EG((EG((((i2.u8.p21==0)||(i5.u13.p37==0))||((i5.u19.p53==0)||(i3.u10.p28==0)))) + A(EG(E(((i4.i0.u14.p39==1)&&(i4.i0.u21.p60==1)) U (i6.i...397
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [FwdG(Init,(EG((((i2.u8.p21==0)||(i5.u13.p37==0))||((i5.u19.p53==0)||(i3.u10.p28==0)))) + !((E(!(((((i1.u6.p15==...911
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t0, t1, t2, t9, t10, t39, i1.t54, i1.t53, i1.u11.t7, i1.u11.t8, i2.t45, i2.t44, i2.u8.t3, i2....443
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,121.939,2138756,1,0,2.44299e+06,219,1018,6.20138e+06,130,669,1952674
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-00 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: (E(!(((i3.u7.p18==1)&&(i3.u10.p27==1))) U AF(AX(((((i5.u13.p37==1)&&(i5.u19.p53==1))||(i4.i0.u21.p59==1)) * EF((i2.u8.p21==1)))))) + AG(A...372
=> equivalent forward existential formula: (([((FwdU(FwdU((Init * !(E(!(((i3.u7.p18==1)&&(i3.u10.p27==1))) U !(EG(!(!(EX(!(((((i5.u13.p37==1)&&(i5.u19.p53=...1271
(forward)formula 1,1,242.795,2200196,1,0,2.53419e+06,219,563,6.48011e+06,83,669,1624025
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-04 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: E(EX(A((!(((i4.i0.u14.p39==1)&&(i4.i0.u21.p60==1))) + (!(((i0.u1.p4==1)&&(i0.u9.p25==1))) * EX((i3.u0.p0==1)))) U ((E((i1.u11.p31==1) U (...332
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [(FwdU(Init,EX(!((E(!(((E((i1.u11.p31==1) U ((i5.u13.p36==1)&&(i6.i0.u20.p55==1))) * E(TRUE U (i3.u0.p0==1))) * ...689
(forward)formula 2,0,518.992,3763332,1,0,3.7394e+06,219,510,1.18572e+07,80,669,1752326
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-05 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
***************************************
original formula: A(!(E(!((E(((i5.u13.p37==1)&&(i5.u19.p54==1)) U ((i6.i1.u16.p44==1)&&(i6.i1.u22.p63==1))) + ((i5.u15.p43==1)&&(i6.i1.u16.p45==1)))) U EF(...267
=> equivalent forward existential formula: [((Init * !(EG(!(EG(!((E(!(!(!(E(TRUE U !(((i1.u5.p13==1)&&(i1.u11.p32==1))))))) U (!((i5.u19.p51==1)) * !(!(!(E...921
(forward)formula 3,1,519.029,3763332,1,0,3.7394e+06,219,542,1.18572e+07,81,669,1754280
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-06 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
Detected timeout of ITS tools.
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Applying decomposition
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 5 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Decomposing Gal with order
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Rewriting arrays to variables to allow decomposition.
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Removed a total of 18 redundant transitions.
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Flatten gal took : 4 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Fuse similar labels procedure discarded/fused a total of 24 labels/synchronizations in 1 ms.
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize gal into /tmp/CTLFireability12130231744224318841.gal : 1 ms
[2025-06-06 05:23:16] [INFO ] Time to serialize properties into /tmp/CTLFireability13568083875560074208.ctl : 0 ms
Invoking ITS tools like this :cd /home/mcc/execution;'/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64' '--gc-threshold' '2000000' '--quiet' '-i' '/tmp/CTLFireability12130231744224318841.gal' '-t' 'CGAL' '-ctl' '/tmp/CTLFireability13568083875560074208.ctl'
its-ctl command run as :
/home/mcc/BenchKit/itstools/itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.itstools.binaries_1.0.0.202505121319/bin/its-ctl-linux64 --gc-threshold 2000000 --quiet -...264
No direction supplied, using forward translation only.
Parsed 4 CTL formulae.
Model ,|S| ,Time ,Mem(kb) ,fin. SDD ,fin. DDD ,peak SDD ,peak DDD ,SDD Hom ,SDD cache peak ,DDD Hom ,DDD cachepeak ,SHom cache
reachable,1.93998e+09,0.903886,38388,658,28,65622,113,141,136625,29,261,0
Converting to forward existential form...Done !
original formula: E(AX((!((!(A(((i3.u8.p13==1)&&(u15.p32==1)) U ((i3.u8.p13==1)&&(u15.p33==1)))) * (((u12.p22==1)||((i3.u8.p13==1)&&(u15.p33==1)))||(((i3.u...498
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU((FwdU((FwdU(Init,!(EX(!((!((!(!((E(!(((i3.u8.p13==1)&&(u15.p33==1))) U (!(((i3.u8.p13==1)&&(u15.p32==1))...1479
Reverse transition relation is NOT exact ! Due to transitions t27, t28, t30, t36, t38, t40, t41, t44, t45, t51, t52, u12.t3, u12.t4, u14.t5, u14.t6, u15.t7...373
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
Using saturation style SCC detection
(forward)formula 0,1,1193.58,7676880,1,0,1.33061e+07,168,448,3.38437e+07,77,330,12334964
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-07 TRUE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is TRUE !
***************************************
original formula: EF((AG(((i2.u5.p8==1)&&(u14.p28==1))) + AG(AF((u15.p32==1)))))
=> equivalent forward existential formula: ([(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !(((i2.u5.p8==1)&&(u14.p28==1))))))] != FALSE + [(FwdU(Init,TRUE) * !(E(TRUE U !...193
(forward)formula 1,0,1251.65,7790072,1,0,1.35775e+07,168,571,3.41248e+07,82,330,15500170
FORMULA ShieldPPPs-PT-002A-CTLFireability-2025-10 FALSE TECHNIQUES DECISION_DIAGRAMS TOPOLOGICAL USE_NUPN
Formula is FALSE !
BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED
--------------------
content from stderr:
+ export BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
+ BINDIR=/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//../
++ pwd
+ export MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ MODEL=/home/mcc/execution
+ [[ CTLFireability = StateSpace ]]
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//runeclipse.sh /home/mcc/execution CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
+ ulimit -s 65536
+ [[ -z '' ]]
+ export LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
+ LTSMIN_MEM_SIZE=8589934592
++ sed s/.jar//
++ perl -pe 's/.*\.//g'
++ ls /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/plugins/fr.lip6.move.gal.application.pnmcc_1.0.0.202505121319.jar
+ VERSION=202505121319
+ echo 'Running Version 202505121319'
+ /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//itstools/its-tools -pnfolder /home/mcc/execution -examination CTLFireability -its -ltsmin -greatspnpath /home/mcc/BenchKit/bin//../itstools/bin//..//greatspn/ -order META -manyOrder -smt -timeout 3600
Sequence of Actions to be Executed by the VM
This is useful if one wants to reexecute the tool in the VM from the submitted image disk.
set -x
# this is for BenchKit: configuration of major elements for the test
export BK_INPUT="ShieldPPPs-PT-002A"
export BK_EXAMINATION="CTLFireability"
export BK_TOOL="itstools"
export BK_RESULT_DIR="/tmp/BK_RESULTS/OUTPUTS"
export BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT="3600"
export BK_MEMORY_CONFINEMENT="16384"
export BK_BIN_PATH="/home/mcc/BenchKit/bin/"
# this is specific to your benchmark or test
export BIN_DIR="$HOME/BenchKit/bin"
# remove the execution directoty if it exists (to avoid increse of .vmdk images)
if [ -d execution ] ; then
rm -rf execution
fi
# this is for BenchKit: explicit launching of the test
echo "====================================================================="
echo " Generated by BenchKit 2-5832"
echo " Executing tool itstools"
echo " Input is ShieldPPPs-PT-002A, examination is CTLFireability"
echo " Time confinement is $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT seconds"
echo " Memory confinement is 16384 MBytes"
echo " Number of cores is 4"
echo " Run identifier is r198-tall-174894533100618"
echo "====================================================================="
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "preparation of the directory to be used:"
tar xzf /home/mcc/BenchKit/INPUTS/ShieldPPPs-PT-002A.tgz
mv ShieldPPPs-PT-002A execution
cd execution
if [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StateSpace" ]; then
rm -f GenericPropertiesVerdict.xml
fi
pwd
ls -lh
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stdout:"
echo
echo "=== Data for post analysis generated by BenchKit (invocation template)"
echo
if [ "CTLFireability" = "UpperBounds" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of positive values"
echo NUM_VECTOR
elif [ "CTLFireability" != "StateSpace" ] ; then
echo "The expected result is a vector of booleans"
echo BOOL_VECTOR
else
echo "no data necessary for post analysis"
fi
echo
if [ -f "CTLFireability.xml" ] ; then # for cunf (txt files deleted;-)
echo echo "here is the order used to build the result vector(from xml file)"
for x in $(grep '
echo "FORMULA_NAME $x"
done
elif [ "CTLFireability" = "ReachabilityDeadlock" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "QuasiLiveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "StableMarking" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "Liveness" ] || [ "CTLFireability" = "OneSafe" ] ; then
echo "FORMULA_NAME CTLFireability"
fi
echo
echo "=== Now, execution of the tool begins"
echo
echo -n "BK_START "
date -u +%s%3N
echo
timeout -s 9 $BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT bash -c "/home/mcc/BenchKit/BenchKit_head.sh 2> STDERR ; echo ; echo -n \"BK_STOP \" ; date -u +%s%3N"
if [ $? -eq 137 ] ; then
echo
echo "BK_TIME_CONFINEMENT_REACHED"
fi
echo
echo "--------------------"
echo "content from stderr:"
echo
cat STDERR ;